The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About132 W. WILLOX - PDP - 19-06 - CORRESPONDENCE - (7)11. Please call Marsha Hilmes-Robinson at 970-224-6036 with any questions about the floodplain regulations. 12. All forms and checklists are available on our website at hftp://fcgov.com/stormwater/forms.php Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Landscape plan Number: 42 Created: 8/1 /2006 [10/4/06] Show water/sewer services on landscape plan and adjust landscaping to provide required separation distances. [8/1/06] Provide 6 foot separation between trees and water/sewer service lines. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: Zoning Number: 5 Created: 7/20/2006 (9/27/06] [7/20/06] The placement of the building does not meet the build -to -line requirements. See section 3.5.3(B)(2). Number: 6 [9/27/06] Created: 7/20/2006 [7/20/06] Land Use Statistics table: Correct spelling: "WAREHOUSE" Number: 52 Created: 9/27/2006 [9/27/06] Plant types, counts are not called out on the actual landscape plan Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, StevCity Planner for Ted Shepard, Chief Planner cc: DMW Engineers Current Planning File #19-06 Page 5 Topic: Floodplain Administration Number: 37 Created: 8/1/2006 [10/3/06] Floodplain Comments 9-28-06 The Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation that is on Sheet 5 (Utility Plan) does not match the other plans. It should be 4985.6. 2. A new site plan was not included in this submittal. Please include a note on the site plan that the site is in the FEMA 100-year floodplain — REPEAT COMMENT. 3. Drainage Report, P.5 — The height of the floodproofing gate does not match with the plan elevation and the regulatory flood protection elevation. Please review and revise. Also, with the overhead doors, a series of gates may be needed with center posts. Please describe the general floodproofing plan relative to the new building design. [8/1 /06] 1. The BFE and Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation that are shown on the plans are incorrect. They need to be 1.1 feet higher than what is currently shown on the plans. Locating the parcel on the FEMA map is complicated because the FEMA map shows Willox Ct. in the wrong location. Please see attached GIS map with cross -sections and BFE lines. 2. The site is also in a City floodplain that has a higher BFE than FEMA. Because the City is working on the Dry Creek Flood Control Project that will eliminate or reduce the floodplain, the developer can apply for a waiver to the higher City BFE. However, the FEMA BFE and elevation requirements still apply. Please complete the waiver form that is available on our website and return with the next submittal. 3. Please show the FEMA cross-section line on the plans. 4. Please include a note on the plans that all HVAC will be elevated to or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. 5. Please include notes on the plans regarding floodproofing of the building. 6. Please review the attached 50% review checklist for all notes that are required on the plans. Please seethe 100% review checklist for all items that will be required on the final plans. The 100% checklist is available on our website. 7. Please include a note on the site plan that the site is in the FEMA 100-year floodplain. 8. A floodplain use permit and $25 fee is required for the building. A floodplain use permit and $25 fee is.required for the site work. 9. Please see minor comments in the drainage report. 10. If the project is constructed after the Dry Creek Diversion Project map revision is approved by FEMA (approx 2 years from this fall) the floodproofing will not be required. Please call to discuss the timing of the project versus the Dry Creek map revision. Page 4 Number:21 . Created:7/31/2006 (10/3/06] [mpv] The offsite design requirement has been waived per an email sent to the consulting engineer. [7/31/06] The offsite design requirement has not been waived and nothing has been shown yet. We will not hold this project from going to hearing, but be advised that prior to final approval, we will need to see preliminary design of centerline and flowline profiles, with existing and proposed grade and ground lines. The requirement is 1000' to the west and out to the College/Willox intersection to the east. Number: 24 Created: 7/31 /2006 (10/4/06] [mpv] In following up on this item, it appears the main concern is just ensuring that positive drainage is ensured on the north side of Willox out to the curb and gutter section. I don't believe the plans show enough grading information to demonstrate this, but it can be deferred until final plan review. [7/31/06] Pavement may need to be improved on the south edge of the site in order for Willox Ln to drain properly. I will follow up with Rick Richter on this issue. Number: 25 Created: 7/31 /2006 [10/4/06] [mpv] Carried over for reference pertaining to the DA. [7/31/06] Our development agreement will specify, and it should be noted on the utility plans, that no parking will be allowed on the street at such time as Willox Ct. is made into a parallel circulation route connecting out to College Ave. per the access control plan. This is standard, since parking is not allowed on a major collector. If you would like to maintain on - street parking in the long-term, additional ROW should be dedicated to reach the minor collector standard. Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: General Number: 51 Created: 9/26/2006 [9/26/06] No remaining issues. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 56 Created: 10/12/2006 [10/12/06] FIRE LANE: Please submit a preliminary plat that shows the dedicated Emergency Access Easement. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topic: Drainage Number: 55 Created: 10/6/2006 [10/6/06] Please wrap the sub -drain with Mirafi fabric or equivalent. Topic: Drainage Along Willox Number: 50 Created: 8/4/2006 [10/3/06] [8/4/06] Please provide a detail of how the'existing inlet in Willox will be adjusted to prevent ponding. Page 3 Planning a. Why are trees shown only behind the sidewalk? There should be street trees between the sidewalk and back of curb, as well. Topic: Landscape plan Number: 57 Created: 10/18/2006 [10/18/06] Tim Buchanan, the City's Forester, offered the following comments: a. All trees and shrubs need direct labeling as to type on the Landscape Plan. This more specific information is required on the Final Landscape Plan. b. Several landscape notes are needed, including this one: The soil in all landscape areas, including parkways and medians, shall be thoroughly loosened to a depth of not less than eight (8) inches and soil amendment shall be thoroughly incorporated into the soil of all landscape areas to a depth of at least three (3) cubic yards of soil amendment per one thousand (1,000) square feet of landscape area. Number: 60 Created: 10/18/2006 [10/18/06] The City's street tree requirement must be met in the parkways along Willox Lane and Willox Court. Please see the red -lined Landscape Plan for suggested locations. Topic: Site Plan Number: 59 Created: 10/18/2006 [10/18/06] It would be helpful if the proposed use was shown in the building footprint on the Site Plan, along with the square footage of the building. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 53 Created: 10/4/2006 [10/4/06] Please ensure with the final plan that proposed street patching information is shown. Number: 54 Created: 10/4/2006 [10/4/06] Please consider using a faded type of line weight for the existing utilities as it's difficult to interpret what utilities are new instead of existing. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Dan DeLaughter Topic: General Number: 20 Created: 7/31 /2006 [10/3/06] [mpv] The response letter indicated that a plat would be prepared and submitted with the Final Plan review for these dedications. As all plats require a type I or type II hearing, it would be more efficient for all parties if the project and associated plat go to hearing together. Alternatively, if the easements and right-of-way are dedicated by separate document, no hearing is required for these. Transportation Development Review Fees are applicable in either scenario. [7/31/06] 1 have not received any easement or ROW dedication documents. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Eastpoint Studio Date: 10/18/2006 c/o Don Brookshire 522 Kinnikinnik Court Severance, CO. 80546 Staff has reviewed your submittal for 132 WILLOX LANE, PDP - TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Ted Shepard Topic: General Number: 58 Created: 10/18/2006 [10/18/06] On the Site & Landscape Plan there is a rectangular area at the southwest corner of this site that is not labeled. What is this area? Number: 61 Created: 10/18/2006 [10/18/06] The following comments were expressed at the staff review meeting on October 4, 2006: Engineering a. The subdivision plat must be part of the Project Development Plan review process, not the Final Compliance phase of review. A subdivision plat cannot be approved administratively without a public hearing, and there is no public hearing for Final Compliance approval. b. Once a subdivision plat is submitted for review, and City staff given enough time to review the. plat, then this item is ready for public hearing. Stormwater a. A detail is needed for the inlet on Willox Lane. It is very shallow. b. The FEMA floodplain must be shown on the Site Plan. Water/Wastewater a. Please show utilities and services on the Landscape Plan. Light & Power a. A 10' wide utility easement is needed along the north property line. b. The switch must be relocated. Page 1