HomeMy WebLinkAbout412 E. PITKIN CHANGE OF USE - PDP - 21-06 - CORRESPONDENCE -[8/4/06] No comments.
Department: Zoning
Topic: General
Number: 3
[7/19/06] no comments
Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols
Created: 7/19/2006
Please revise your plans and make an appointment with Sandy Lindell at 221-6750
when you are ready to submit your PDP revisions. I have attached a revision routing
sheet that indicates how many of each item to submit for further review. Please be
sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this
project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Sincerely,
3t11A/9N4W4/'--
Shelby Sommer
Associate City Planner
Page 4
Number: 11 Created: 8/4/2006
[8/4/06] Add the following note to the Site Plan: Any damage sidewalk, curb & gutter
existing or damaged during construction shall be replaced at the direction of the City
Engineering Inspector prior to final acceptance by the City and issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
Number: 12 Created: 8/4/2006
[8/4/06] The request for a modification to the Land Use Code Section 3.6.2-J(2) is
supported by the Transportation Development Review staff.
Number: 13 Created: 8/4/2006
[8/4/06] Add a Vicinity Map to the Site Plan showing the project location with respect
to major arterial cross strets.
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine
Topic: Electric Utility
Number: 1 Created: 7/19/2006
[7/19/06] City ordinances require separate dwelling units to have separate electric
meters. Therefore, the owner will need to modify the electric metering system to
provide two meters (one for existing dwelling, and a second for the basement
dwelling). Additional electric development charges as well as possible electric
system modification charges will apply. Contact Light & Power engineering at 221-
6700.
Department: Natural Resources
Topic: General
Number: 2
[7/19/06] No issues.
Issue Contact: Doug Moore
Created: 7/19/2006
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann
Topic: Fire
Number: 19 Created: 8/8/2006
[8/8/06] Applicant needs to meet PFA requirements from conceptual review
regarding addressing, water supply and egress windows (applicant acknowledged
comments in response letter), in addition to Building Department requirements
related to fire safety.
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill
Topic: Fire
Number: 20 Created: 8/9/2006
[8/9/06] No comments or concerns.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: General
Number: 14 Created: 8/4/2006
Page 3
y
Number: 22 Created: 8/10/2006
[8/10/06] JR Wilson (Technical Services): No concerns.
Topic: Landscaping
Number: 15 Created: 8/4/2006
[8/4/06] Please show any existing street trees in the parkway strip between the
sidewalk and street.
Topic: Lighting
Number: 18 Created: 8/4/2006
[8/4/06] There seems to be a lot of motion sensor lighting that could potentially
affect neighboring properties. Can they be positioned so that they do not spill over
onto neighboring properties? Will they have an override switch to turn them off?
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 16 Created: 8/4/2006
[8/4/06] Please show proposed dimensions for new addition, porch, garage and
concrete slab. Also, please include floor area calculations for what is existing and
what is proposed. Per Division 4.7 (D)(1) Minimum lot area is 2 times the total floor
area of the buildings, and per Division 4.7(D)(5) lots are subject to a minimum floor
area ratio (FAR) of .33 on the rear 50 percent of the lot. Please confirm these
calculations in your comment response letter or on the site plan.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland
Topic: General
Number: 7 Created: 8/4/2006
[8/4/06] Show any new proposed utility connections or relocations of existing
services on the Site Plan — water, sewer, power etc...
Number: 8 Created: 8/4/2006
[8/4/06] An 8 foot wide utility easement must be dedicated behind the alley right-of-
way along the alley frontage of the property. This dedication can be recorded by
separate instrument. The document shall contain a written legal description and
exhibit map prepared by a CO licensed surveyor. A copy of the standard easement
dedication language is included with the red -lines. Please show and label the 8 foot
utility easement with a dashed line on the site Plan. A Transportation Development
Review Fee of $250 must be submitted with the easement document.
Number: 9 Created: 8/4/2006
[8/4/06] Please show surface drainage patterns around the new building additions
and all new concrete and flagstone flatwork with arrows. All surface drainage shall
be conveyed toward Pitkin or the alley without crossing adjoining property lines.
Number: 10 Created: 8/4/2006
[8/4/06] Please label concrete patios as existing or proposed on the Site Plan
showing surface drainage patterns with arrows.
Page 2
r
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
PHILLIP SAND Date: 08/10/2006
STRAIGHTEDGE DRAFTING AND DESIGN
4115 TERRY LAKE ROAD
FORT COLLINS, CO 80524
Staff has reviewed your submittal for 412 E. PITKIN CHANGE OF USE PDP -TYPE
II, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer
Topic: Elevations
Number: 17 Created: 8/4/2006
[8/4/06] It would be helpful if you could identify what is existing vs. what is proposed
on the building elevations (see redlines).
Topic: General
Number: 4 Created: 7/21 /2006
[7/21/06] Don Kapperman (Comcast): No utility easement is shown in the alley.
Please revise plans to show this easement, or dedicate a utility easement if none
exists.
Number: 5 Created: 7/28/2006
[7/28/06] Bonnie Ham (Post Office): Developer must provide adequate mail,
receptacles on front of house.
Number. 6 Created: 8/2/2006
[8/2/06] Rick Lee (Building Inspection): Please find attached the various codes that
the Fort Collins Building Department will enforce: Be aware that multiple family
dwellings have some special construction requirements. The most challenging is
going to be the required one -hour floor / ceiling tenant separation. This may mean
providing a new 5/8" gypsum board ceiling supported by hat channels throughout
and surface mounted light fixtures. Another challenging component is that the
interior air cannot be shared and that independent heat sources shall be provided.
Number. 21 Created: 8/10/2006
[8/10/06] Karen McWilliams (Historic Preservation): This proposal went through the
Demolition/Alteration Review process (required because the residence is 50+ years
old). The property was determined to not qualify to be individually eligible for
landmark designation, due to previous alterations to the building (notably the front
porch). Because the building is not individually eligible, there is no additional historic
preservation review - - the standards in LUC Section 3.4.7 (Historic and Cultural
Resources) do not apply, nor would there be a hearing in front of the LPC.
Page 1