Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout412 E. PITKIN CHANGE OF USE - PDP - 21-06 - CORRESPONDENCE -[8/4/06] No comments. Department: Zoning Topic: General Number: 3 [7/19/06] no comments Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Created: 7/19/2006 Please revise your plans and make an appointment with Sandy Lindell at 221-6750 when you are ready to submit your PDP revisions. I have attached a revision routing sheet that indicates how many of each item to submit for further review. Please be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, 3t11A/9N4W4/'-- Shelby Sommer Associate City Planner Page 4 Number: 11 Created: 8/4/2006 [8/4/06] Add the following note to the Site Plan: Any damage sidewalk, curb & gutter existing or damaged during construction shall be replaced at the direction of the City Engineering Inspector prior to final acceptance by the City and issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Number: 12 Created: 8/4/2006 [8/4/06] The request for a modification to the Land Use Code Section 3.6.2-J(2) is supported by the Transportation Development Review staff. Number: 13 Created: 8/4/2006 [8/4/06] Add a Vicinity Map to the Site Plan showing the project location with respect to major arterial cross strets. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Electric Utility Number: 1 Created: 7/19/2006 [7/19/06] City ordinances require separate dwelling units to have separate electric meters. Therefore, the owner will need to modify the electric metering system to provide two meters (one for existing dwelling, and a second for the basement dwelling). Additional electric development charges as well as possible electric system modification charges will apply. Contact Light & Power engineering at 221- 6700. Department: Natural Resources Topic: General Number: 2 [7/19/06] No issues. Issue Contact: Doug Moore Created: 7/19/2006 Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann Topic: Fire Number: 19 Created: 8/8/2006 [8/8/06] Applicant needs to meet PFA requirements from conceptual review regarding addressing, water supply and egress windows (applicant acknowledged comments in response letter), in addition to Building Department requirements related to fire safety. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Fire Number: 20 Created: 8/9/2006 [8/9/06] No comments or concerns. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: General Number: 14 Created: 8/4/2006 Page 3 y Number: 22 Created: 8/10/2006 [8/10/06] JR Wilson (Technical Services): No concerns. Topic: Landscaping Number: 15 Created: 8/4/2006 [8/4/06] Please show any existing street trees in the parkway strip between the sidewalk and street. Topic: Lighting Number: 18 Created: 8/4/2006 [8/4/06] There seems to be a lot of motion sensor lighting that could potentially affect neighboring properties. Can they be positioned so that they do not spill over onto neighboring properties? Will they have an override switch to turn them off? Topic: Site Plan Number: 16 Created: 8/4/2006 [8/4/06] Please show proposed dimensions for new addition, porch, garage and concrete slab. Also, please include floor area calculations for what is existing and what is proposed. Per Division 4.7 (D)(1) Minimum lot area is 2 times the total floor area of the buildings, and per Division 4.7(D)(5) lots are subject to a minimum floor area ratio (FAR) of .33 on the rear 50 percent of the lot. Please confirm these calculations in your comment response letter or on the site plan. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: General Number: 7 Created: 8/4/2006 [8/4/06] Show any new proposed utility connections or relocations of existing services on the Site Plan — water, sewer, power etc... Number: 8 Created: 8/4/2006 [8/4/06] An 8 foot wide utility easement must be dedicated behind the alley right-of- way along the alley frontage of the property. This dedication can be recorded by separate instrument. The document shall contain a written legal description and exhibit map prepared by a CO licensed surveyor. A copy of the standard easement dedication language is included with the red -lines. Please show and label the 8 foot utility easement with a dashed line on the site Plan. A Transportation Development Review Fee of $250 must be submitted with the easement document. Number: 9 Created: 8/4/2006 [8/4/06] Please show surface drainage patterns around the new building additions and all new concrete and flagstone flatwork with arrows. All surface drainage shall be conveyed toward Pitkin or the alley without crossing adjoining property lines. Number: 10 Created: 8/4/2006 [8/4/06] Please label concrete patios as existing or proposed on the Site Plan showing surface drainage patterns with arrows. Page 2 r STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins PHILLIP SAND Date: 08/10/2006 STRAIGHTEDGE DRAFTING AND DESIGN 4115 TERRY LAKE ROAD FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for 412 E. PITKIN CHANGE OF USE PDP -TYPE II, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: Elevations Number: 17 Created: 8/4/2006 [8/4/06] It would be helpful if you could identify what is existing vs. what is proposed on the building elevations (see redlines). Topic: General Number: 4 Created: 7/21 /2006 [7/21/06] Don Kapperman (Comcast): No utility easement is shown in the alley. Please revise plans to show this easement, or dedicate a utility easement if none exists. Number: 5 Created: 7/28/2006 [7/28/06] Bonnie Ham (Post Office): Developer must provide adequate mail, receptacles on front of house. Number. 6 Created: 8/2/2006 [8/2/06] Rick Lee (Building Inspection): Please find attached the various codes that the Fort Collins Building Department will enforce: Be aware that multiple family dwellings have some special construction requirements. The most challenging is going to be the required one -hour floor / ceiling tenant separation. This may mean providing a new 5/8" gypsum board ceiling supported by hat channels throughout and surface mounted light fixtures. Another challenging component is that the interior air cannot be shared and that independent heat sources shall be provided. Number. 21 Created: 8/10/2006 [8/10/06] Karen McWilliams (Historic Preservation): This proposal went through the Demolition/Alteration Review process (required because the residence is 50+ years old). The property was determined to not qualify to be individually eligible for landmark designation, due to previous alterations to the building (notably the front porch). Because the building is not individually eligible, there is no additional historic preservation review - - the standards in LUC Section 3.4.7 (Historic and Cultural Resources) do not apply, nor would there be a hearing in front of the LPC. Page 1