HomeMy WebLinkAboutNATHAN'S SUBDIVISION, 637 COWAN STREET - PDP/FDP - FDP130030 - CORRESPONDENCE - (7)Comment Numbei. .5 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: Please add street right of way dedication information for both Cowan & Laurel Streets.
See redlines.
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: Please show the right of way line on the opposite side of Cowan & Laurel Streets. See
redlines.
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: Please show the subdivision information for the blocks on the opposite side of Cowan &
Laurel Streets. See redlines.
Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221.6854, rbuffington(a)fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/13/2013
08/13/2013: Can the sewer services be switched so that the west portion of the existing service is
used by the proposed house and the existing house is using the new service to the alley? This would
avoid having the sewers cross which could lead to confusion for future owners.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/13/2013
08/13/2013: Show the existing curb stop on the service to the house on the north lot. Install the water
meter in a pit within 2 feet of the curb stop.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/13/2013
08/13/2013: Show water and sewer service lines on the landscape plan and adjust plantings to meet
the required separation distances.
Page 6 of 6
Comment Number. . Comment Originated: 08/13/2013
08/13/2013: Pleae provide a drainage addendum describing the drainage design.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, icounty(cDfcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 1 & 2. See redlines.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: Please mask all text within hatched areas on sheet 1. See redlines.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: What is the "50.00' ROW" note for on sheet 2? See redlines.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: No comments.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: Please change "Men" to "Persons" in the Statement Of Ownership And Subdivision.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: The boundary & legal desdription close.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: Please change "Lot 186" to "Block 186" in the Statement Of Ownership And Subdivision
and in the notes thoughout the Plat. See redlines.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: If there is a Lienholder, or if it is not known whether there will be a Lienholder, please add
a signature block. This may be removed later if neccessary.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: Please add ", by Barry M. Schram" to the Notarial Certificate. See redlines.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: Is the Northwest corner of Section 13 being set? We're thinking this should read found.
See redlines.
Comment Number: 11
Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: Please change all references to Ron Perkins as the Surveyor, if
he is not signing this Plat
for King Surveyors.
Comment Number: 12
Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: There are line over text issues on the Plat. See redlines.
Comment Number: 13
Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: There are notes with cut off text on the Plat. See redlines.
Comment Number: 14
Comment Originated: 08/08/2013
08/08/2013: Please add all missing reception numbers, prior to filing mylars.
Page 5 of 6
Comment Numbek . J Comment Originated: 08/15/2013
08/1412013: Developer to provide 1" conduit from house to comcast pedestal.
Don Kapperman 970 567-0245
Contact: Megan Harrity, ,
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/12/2013
08/12/2013: Several places on the plat refer to part of Lot 186 and it should be part of Block 186. For
instance the first line of the statement of ownership and subdivision has Lot 186.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/12/2013
08/12/2013: Also, the spelling of the owners name is Berry instead of Barry.
Megan Harrity
Subdivision Dept County Assessor
970498-7065
mhardty@larimer.org
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970.416.2869, ilynxwiler(ftoudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08/14/2013: PREMISE IDENTIFICATION
New and existing buildings shall be plainly identified. Address numbers shall be visible from the street
fronting the property, plainly visible, and posted with a minimum of six-inch numerals on a contrasting
background.
2006 Intemational Fire Code 505.1
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970.218.2932, ischlam(a)fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 07/30/2013
07/30/2013: No Comment from Erosion Control. This site; disturbs less than 10,000 sq-ft, is not in a
sensitive area, and is not in a larger development under construction. Therefore, no submittal of
erosion control material is needed. However, the site still must still be swept and maintained to
prevent dirt and other pollutants from entering the storm sewer or else BMPs will be required of the
site. If you need clarification concerning this, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse
Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue()fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/13/2013
08/13/2013: Please provide a grading plan including spot elevations showing how the drainage will
flow off the lot. A cross-section may be required for the side yard swales.
Comment Number: 3 1 Comment Originated: 08/13/2013
O8/13/2013: Please see redlines for other comments.
Page 4 of 6
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/30/2013
07/30/2013: The project only paid $1,000 toward the Transportation Development Reveiw Fees. The
total cost of the fees is $2,000 ($500 x 2 (for each dwelling unit) + $1,000 final), therefore the project
owes an additional $1,000.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224.6143, lex(7u.fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/13/2013
08/13/2013: No comments.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221.6361, tbuchanan(a.fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08/14/2013: The Street tree should be 2 inch caliper.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/1412013
08/14/2013: The landscape plan shows the driveway of the north house bending around the large pine
identified to be preserved and protected. The utility and drianage plan does not show the driveway
where it is shown on the landscape plan. The utility plan shows the drive way where the tree is located.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08/14/2013: Providing a couple of more feet of separation between the pine and driveway could be
helpful. Is this feasible?
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Todd Reidenbach, ,
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/06/2013
08/06/2013: Building addresses will be assigned by the GIS Department after the plans have met final
approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City.
GIS Mapping Specialist teidenbach@fcgov.com 970 416-2483
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224.6152, dmart! ne(a.fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/25/2013
07/25/2013: The builder or developer will need to coordinate the electric development chages and
installation of the electric utility faciliteis with Light & Power Engineering at (970)221-6700.
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Don Kapperman, ,
Topic: General
Page 3 of 6
Comment Numbe,A Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08/14/2013: The 6 foot dimension of the parkway shown on the utility and drainage plan needs to
indicate where the 6 foot is measured from on the street side. If the 6 foot measurement is measured
from the back of curb, then the parkway width is sufficient.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08/14/2013: An offsite utility easement from the property owner to the north is indicated on the plans
and plat A letter of intent from that property indicating an agreement (in concept) to granting the
easement is required prior to the scheduling of a hearing for the project.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08/14/2013: The plat language (certificate of dedication, maintenance and repair) has been updated
with newer language. I can email an electronic version of this language.
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 08/1412013
08/14/2013: Is a drainage easement needed on the northeast comer of the property? I'm tracking the
verification on the recording of a drainage easement shown as approved in 2006. If recorded, it should
appear on the subdivision plat and documents, and if no longer needed, indicated as to be vacated
on the plat.
Comment Number: 8
Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08114/2013: The minimum sidewalk width on a local street is 4.5 feet. The plans indicate 5 feet in width
which is perfectly acceptable. Please note however that the construction of the additional .5 feet in
width is not eligible for street oversizing reimbursement.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08/14/2013: Please update the construction details from the Larimer County Urban Area Street
Standards to the latest (2007) version.
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08/14/2013: 1 had the chance to ask "up the line" about the concept of filing a utility and drainage plan
set with our traditional "Utility Plan" set and the set not being prepared and signed by a licensed
engineer. The feedback I received is that the City wouldn't want to file this set in with our Utility Plans
because it would not be a set of plans prepared and stamped by a licensed engineer. We haven�t
apparently done this before, and are leery of doing so. There would appear to be two options as
result of this, with either option being equally acceptable:
a. Have all the utility and drainage plan pages added to the site and landscape plan set that would
be filed as the planning documents. It may lend itself to needing to create a "cover sheet" that would
list the individual components of the site plan, landscape plan, utility and drainage sheets, etc.
b. Have an engineer sign and stamp the plan set (and add the City's Utility Plan Approval Block,
with additional other information needing to be added).
Comment Number: 11
Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08/14/2013: Coordinate the sidewalk design between the plan sets (or plan set, if ultimately
combined). The City would prefer to see a detached sidewalk for as much of the extent as possible,
which can be 4.5 feet in width. Attached sidewalks would need to be closer to 6 feet.
Comment Number: 12
Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08/14/2013: The City has Cowan Street identified for slurry seal this fall, tentatively scheduled for next
month. The timing of the City's work against the timing of the proposed street cuts should be closely
looked into. Street cuts into a reconditioned new street would require pavement impact penalty fees.
Please contact Tom Knostman at 679-7947 to further discuss and coordinate.
Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221.6573, slangenberger[7a.fcgov.com
Page 2 of 6
r
Community Development and
City of Neighborhood Services
Fort Collins 261 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 60522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/deve/opmentreview
August 16, 2013
Barry Schram
Lamar Valley Craftman
2620 Brush Creek Dr.
Fort Collins, CO 80528
RE: 637 Cowan Street, FDP130030, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of
the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual
commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Noah Beals, at 970-416-2313 or
nbeals@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Current Planning
Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416.2313, nbeals(fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/07/2013
08/07/2013: There was not a site plan included, this project will need a site plan. This can be
combined with the landscape plan.
The site plan should include building envelopes not building footprints.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/07/2013
08/07/2013: Landscape plan needs to identify the front property line.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/07/2013
08/07/2013: Tree locations need to verify there is not a conflict with utilities.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/07/2013
08/07/2013: Sidewalk locations are not matching from the different plan sets.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: MarcVirata, 970.221.6567, mviratana.fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08114/2013: The title of the project needs to be the same on all the plans.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/14/2013
08/14/2013: Was an accompanying site plan submitted?
Page 1 of 6