The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHUMAN BEAN AT SPRING CREEK - FDP - 37-06/A - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)I If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, @Am&UkkV Shelby Sommer Associate City Planner Page 5 t Department: PFA Topic: Fire Number: 109 [3/20/07] No further comments or concerns. Department: Transportation Planning Topic: General Number: 107 [3/19/07] No comments or concerns. Issue Contact: Carle Dann Created: 3/20/2007 Issue Contact: David Averill Created: 3/19/2007 Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Floodp/ain Number: 110 Created: 3/20/2007 [3/20/07] 1. Please draw and label the floodplain line on the plat and landscaping plan. The Site Plan appears to have the floodplain line on it, but it is not labeled. Please label. Topic: Stormwater Number: 47 Created: 12/27/2006 [3/20/07] Please see redlined drainage plan for additional items to be included in the table. [1/23/07] Will be resolved at final. [12/27/06] Please include a basin and a water quality pond summary table on the Drainage Plan. Number: 111 Created: 3/20/2007 [3/20/071 Please label detention easement as drainage easement. Number: 112 Created: 3/20/2007 [3/20/07] Please include the erosion control escrow calculation in the report. Number: 113 Created: 3/20/2007 [3/20/07] Please add rip -rap and curb -cut details to the utility plans. Number: 114 Created: 3/20/2007 [3/20/07] Please see other minor comments on the redlined utility plans. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 35 Created: 12/26/2006 [3/19/07] [1/23/07] [12/26/06] Provide evidence of a recorded easement from the property to the north to this property for the offsite portion of the sewer service. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. Page 4 t Number: 115 Created: 3/21/2007 [3/21/07] Need to enter reception numbers on the plat for all off -site easements - access and utility prior to Plat approval and recordation. No easements have been submitted yet but we did receive the signed letter of intent. Please submit easement deeds of dedication (type I - admin. Approval). City review fee is $250 per document and we will collect a County recording fee prior to recordation based on the number of sheets in each document. Number: 116 Created: 3/21/2007 [3/21/07] Previous carry over comment. Please show all of the existing raised median on college and label as such with curb height and dimensions from westerly flow line on College on the Utility Plan drawings. Please show lane striping as well. Number: 117 Created: 3/21/2007 [3/21/07] Clearly label the limits of the drainage easement for the detention pond on the Utility Plan drawings. Number: 118 Created: 3/21/2007 [3/21/07] Please add a note on sheet 5 to the existing rip rap pad to the south. Protect in place, clean and repair as determined by the engineering inspector. Number: 119 Created: 3/21/2007 [3/21/07] Please add a typical detail to sheet 7 for the on -site curb and gutter, in- flow/out-flow. Number: 120 Created: 3/21/2007 [3/21/07] All engineering comments may be addressed with mylar submittal. Please return redlines with the mylars. Topic: Engineering - Technical services Number: 121 Created: 3/21/2007 [3/21/07] Monument cap stamping diagrams are reversed. Number: 122 Created: 3/21/2007 [3/21/07] Please remove PDP from the title on Utility plans and or Plat. I did not see this on my last submittal ? Just verify that none of the titles have PDP in them on the mylars. Number: 123 Created: 3/21/2007 [3/21/07] Please address all line over text scannability issues as shown on the Site Plan redlines. Submit one copy of the Landscape Plan to Tech. services for review before going to mylar. Thank you. Page 3 • Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 78 Created: 1 /3/2007 [3/16/07] Not addressed sufficiently. *If there is a question as to how much is enough, call Dana leavitt at 224-6143. [1/23/07] The planting plan shows a single row of plants along the majority of the landscape buffer. Additional plantings are needed to create a visual and physical buffer and establish a viable wildlife habitat in this area. [1/3/07] The proposed plant material along the south property line is not robust enough to provide an adequate buffer. Large openings in the buffer will occur where trees will be located. Additional plant materials in denser planting groups will provide the type of buffer described in your Request for Buffer Modification. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: Site Plan Number: 90 Created: 1 /23/2007 [2/26/07] Please add fence type and height to the site plan. Also please show the existing fence near the retaining wall if it will remain where it is. [1/23/07] Several of the written documents reference the existing 6 foot privacy fence along the eastern property line, but it is not shown on the site plan. Please revise. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: Site Plan Number: 98 Created: 1 /24/2007 [3/16/07] David Averill and I agree that the bike parking area has to be fully paved. [1/24/07] The bike parking is shown partially on the turf area. To minimize impacts to the turf provide paved surface for entire bike parking area. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 20 Created: 12/22/2006 [3/21/07] More detail needs to be shown to satisfy CDOT for an access permit. Clearly show the entire raised median fronting the site on College. Clearly label as a raised median with curb height. Provide dimensioning from westerly College curb line to median and show existing lane striping on the utility plans. This is the level of detail that should be sufficient to obtain an access permit from CDOT. I will be meeting with Glaria from CDOT on March 30. If you can get me a copy of the plans showing this information I will pass them along to her so she can include them with the package that you have already submitted to her. [1/23/07] Per telephone discussion, exiting improvements may be shown based on rough field measurments and known utility locations. An accurate surrey is not needed to satisfy this comment. [12/22/06] Please show and label any existing buildings or improvements within 50 feet of the site on all 3 sides. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins M. Torgerson Architects Troy Jones Fort Collins, CO 80524 Date: 03/23/2007 Staff has reviewed your submittal for HUMAN BEAN AT SPRING CREEK PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: Elevations Number: 83 Created: 1/3/2007 [3/16/07] ADAAG Section 7.2 states that the maximum height of a counter is 36 inches. Revise building elevations to meet standard. [1/23/07] Dimension counter height or add note that walk up window shall meet accessibility requirements. Will address at final. [1/3/07] Walk-up window will have to be accessible. Indicate on elevations with dimensioning which service window is accessible. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: General Number: 106 Created: 3/6/2007 [3/6/07] The following departments have no concerns with the final plans: Comcast, Post Office Number: 108 Created: 3/20/2007 [3/20/07] Will the new traffic rated vault be placed in the same location as the existing traffic control vault? Please show on site plan. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: General Number: 101 Created: 1 /25/2007 [3/16/07] Lighting fxture BB does not specify a back shield screen. Add to fixture, provide updated plan. [1/25/07] To meet the standards of Section 3.4.1(E)(1)D the lighting plan will need to address the amount of light spilling over along the bufferzone. Back shield screens have to be part of the pole mount fixtures.. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 105 Created: 3/2/2007 [3/2/07] Please add shrubs and/or trees to the five foot landscape setback area on the eastern edge of the site in combination with the proposed groundcover Page 1