Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHUMAN BEAN AT SPRING CREEK - PDP - 37-06 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: WaterMastewater Number: 30 Created: 12/26/2006 [1/23/07] Adjust location of water service to avoid conflict with benches. Would prefer to have curb stop/meter pit in landscaped area if practical. [12/26/06] Coordinate water service location with landscaping to provide minimum separation distances. Number: 32 Created: 12/26/2006 (1/23/07] [12/26/06] Show curb stop on water service. Number: 35 Created: 12/26/2006 [1/23/07] [12/26/06] Provide evidence of a recorded easement from the property to the north to this property for the offsite portion of the sewer service. Number: 92 Created: 1 /23/2007 [1/23/07] See redlined utility plans for other comments. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, &1bqkuwe- Shelby Sommer Associate City Planner Page 8 [1/24/07] No further comments or concerns at this time. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Floodplain Number: 43 Created: 12/27/2006 [1/23/07] Will be resolved at final. [12/27/06] 1. It appears a very small portion of the site is located in the Spring Creek 100-year floodplain. It is in the flood fringe, not the floodway. Please modify the report to reflect this. 2. The City floodplain map included in the report has now been officially adopted by FEMA, therefore there is a new map panel number. Please use FIRM Panel 08069C0987F, Community number 080102 in the report and include the attached copy of the new map. 3. From the plan it appears some landscaping will occur in the floodplain. This is allowed in the flood fringe. Please include a note in both the report and the Drainage and Erosion Control Plan: An approved Floodplain Use Permit is required prior to the start of any construction or site improvements in the floodplain. 4. Please draw and label the floodplain line on the plat, drainage plan and landscaping plan. We do not yet have the digital version of the new FEMA map, however, you can use the City floodplain line since the two should be one and the same. 5. Floodplain Admin. Contact: Susan Hayes, 416-2233. Topic: Stormwater Number: 44 Created: 12/27/2006 [1/23/07] This item needs to be resolved before a hearing with location of outfall identified and agreed upon by City Stromwater and Environmental Planner. [12/27/06] Since a new outlet pipe will be used, the outfall needs to meet current standards. This may include additional erosion protection and realignment of the outfall pipe to enter Spring Creek more in parallel with flows. Number: 45 Created: 12/27/2006 [1/23/07] Will be resolved at final. (12/27/06] Please revise water quality outlet structure detail to the current City standard. I can email an electronic copy to you. Number: 46 Created: 12/27/2006 [1/23/07] Will be resolved at final. [12/27/06] Please label storm sewer on the Drainage Plan including size, length, and type. Number: 47 Created: 12/27/2006 [1/23/07] Will be resolved at final. [12/27/06] Please include a basin and a water quality pond summary table on the Drainage Plan. Page 7 Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 15 Created: 12/22/2006 [1/23/07] CDOT access permit to be obtained after the plans have been approved and prior to issuance of a development construction permit. [12/22/06] A CDOT Access Permit will be required for this project. Per discussions with CDOT, a standard LCUASS driveway with radius curb on both sides will be required. Please clearly show both sides of proposed driveway curb cut and call out standard driveway with a detail added to the detail sheets. Any additional ROW or off -site easements must be dedicated if needed to construct the driveway to standard. Number: 19 Created: 12/22/2006 [1/23/07] It is still unclear on the plarls how much R.O.W. will be available after the proposed dedication. Please clearly show, label and dimension the new R.O.W. on College Avenue. Please show on the Plat and Utility Plan drawings. [12/22/06] Clearly show, label and dimension the limits of ROW for College Ave. on the Utility Plan sheet and Grading Plan sheet. Existing and proposed. Number: 20 Created: 12/22/2006 [1/23/07] Per telephone discussion, exiting improvements may be shown based on rough field measurements and known utility locations. An accurate survey is not needed to satisfy this comment. [12/22/06] Please show and label any existing buildings or improvements within 50 feet of the site on all 3 sides. Number: 21 Created: 12/22/2006 [1/23/07] In addition to showing off -site easements on the Utility Plans, these proposed offsite easements shall also be shown and labeled on the Plat. The recorded reception numbers for these off -site easements will need to be provided for reference on the final Plat prior to recording. [12/22/06] Please show and label any off -site easements needed by separate document on the Utility Plan and Grading Plan sheets. Number: 89 Created: 1 /23/2007 [1/23/07] All signed deeds of dedication or letters of intent must be submitted for off - site easements prior to scheduling a hearing for the project Topic: Engineering - Technical services Number: 91 Created: 1 /23/2007 [1/23/07] Legal matches, area closes good. Used wrong diagram at section corners. See redline comments. Department: PFA Topic: Fire Number: 97 Issue Contact: Carle Dann Created: 1 /24/2007 Page 6 Number: 58 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] Existing conditions are not shown on plan. Add information to plan. [1/3/07] Difficult to read site plan - not enough clarity between existing conditions and proposed improvements. Proposed improvements need to stand out from the existing conditions. Recommend using a grey scale line type for existing conditions. Number: 59 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] Comment that turning radii have been carefully calculated only pertains to the area immediately to the east of the drive trough lanes. The remainder of the curbline can be shifted to meet the 5 foot buffer requirement. [1/3/07] Insufficient buffer along east property line. Unless turning radius templates preclude using a consistent outer traffic flowline, the parking lot edge can be offset a minimum of 5 feet per Section 3.2.2(J) of the LUC. Number: 61 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] The depth of the parking bay is measured from the face of curb as you depict it, but the 19 foot depth extends beyond the face of the curb line at the open end of the parking bay. Will resolve at final. [1/3/07] The parking bay is dimensioned to 19 feet. Upon measuring the depth, it appears to be 18 feet. Resolve deficiency. Number: 64 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] Will be addressed at final. [1/3/07] With all parking stalls ending at the curb line, which has less than 2 feet of overhang, there is less than 12' of clear travel lane in the drive -through lane. This conflict has to be resolved. Number: 69 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] Will address at final. [1/3/07] Hand railing shown on island next to building should extend further to direct pedestrians to cross driving lanes at pedestrian crossing. Number: 98 Created: 1 /24/2007 [1/24/07] The bike parking is shown partially on the turf area. To minimize impacts to the turf provide paved surface for entire bike parking area. Number: 99 Created: 1 /25/2007 [1/25/07] There is an existing curb ramp into the Visionland building that extends into your parking lot. How is that going to be dealt with? Number: 100 Created: 1 /25/2007 [1/25/07] Accessible parking sign needs to identified as "van accessible". Will be addressed at final. Page 5 request #4) is not specific as to why you cannot satisfy the standard. Please clearly justify this modification request and show the dimentions of the proposed setback on the site plan. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: Modification of Standard Number: 55 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] The tree in question is on city property next to the storm drain line to be replaced. Part of the proposed on -site meeting will be to discuss the drainage outfall. Will be resolved at final. [1/3/07] Buffer Zone Standards 1.e response is in conflict with plans regarding the preservation of significant existing trees. Upon resolving grading, utility and landscape plan issues, this statement may need to be modified. If so, address. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: Site Plan Number: 49 Created: 12/28/2006 [1/19/07] Please address this issue at the Final Plan stage. [12/28/06] The vault on the western edge of the site is not a Light & Power transformer. Can this be rotated to gain clearance? Number: 86 Created: 1 /19/2007 [1/19/07] 1 believe there is a bus stop in front of this property. Please verify and label on the site plan. Also, your cover page indicates that only 2 bicycle parking spaces are provided, but on your site plan there appears to be 8 bicycle parking spaces. Please correct. Number: 88 Created: 1 /23/2007 [1/23/07] The handicap accessible parking space needs to be van -accessible (8 feet wide with 8 foot wide access aisle). Your site plan shows a regular handicap accessible space that is only 13 feet wide. Number: 90 Created: 1 /23/2007 [1/23/07] Several of the written documents reference the existing 6 foot privacy fence along the eastern property line, but it is not shown on the site plan. Please revise. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: Site Plan Number: 57 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] Site Plan calls out asphalt pavement and the utility plans call out concrete pavement. Will be resolved at final. [1/3/07] Show all existing surface conditions and label. Show existing trees with canopy/dripline. Include driveway access and plant material at the north property boundary adjacent to College Ave. Show and label proposed improvements, i.e. asphalt or concrete pavement, type of walks, island surface, curb cuts, etc. Page 4 Number: 78 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] The planting plan shows a single row of plants along the majority of the landscape buffer. Additional plantings are needed to create a visual and physical buffer and establish a viable wildlife habitat in this area. [1/3/07] The proposed plant material along the south property line is not robust enough to provide an adequate buffer. Large openings in the buffer will occur where trees will be located. Additional plant materials in denser planting groups will provide the type of buffer described in your Request for Buffer Modification. Number: 95 Created: 1 /23/2007 [1/23/07] The parking island is only as wide as two curb widths. The planting plan shows plant material in this very narrow area. There is not enough room to have a plant bed in this area. Number: 96 Created: 1 /23/2007 [1/23/07] The tree well shown on the Site Plan is next to the accessible ramp. A tree grate that meets ADA standards will need to be used to provide a solid surface so that disabled pedestrians can have a safe travel route from the curb cut to the sidewalk. Number: 102 Created: 1 /25/2007 [1/25/07] Plaza and existing tree are in conflict. The paving around the tree needs to be pulled back as it is too close to the tree. Tree protection standards 3.2.(G)1. A redesign of the plaza is required to protect the existing significant tree. Will be addressed at final. Number: 103 Created: 1 /25/2007 [1/25/07] The three shrubs on the south edge of the plaza are within the stated separation between utilities and plant material of 4 feet. Move shrubs to create required separation. Will be addressed at final. Number: 104 Created: 1 /25/2007 [1/25/07] Note #12 states that all trees shall be installed as shown on the landscape plan. Show planting details for trees and shrubs on Landscape Plan. Will be addressed at final. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: Modification of Standard Number: 9 Created: 12/20/2006 [1/19/07] The modification request to reduce the rear setback still cannot be supported by staff. Can you revise the plans to have at least a 5 foot setback on the north side of the east property line, and request a modification just for the area adjacent to the drive-thru lanes? [12/20/06] The justification for the modification of standard request to allow less than 5 feet of vehicular use area setback along the rear property line (Modification Page 3 Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: Exception Request Number: 87 Created: 1 /19/2007 [1/19/07] For the exception to the build -to line request you state that this proposal satisfies the standard better than a compliant plan. Staff cannot support that this alternative is better, but would support justification that this alternative complies with the standard equally as well as a compliant plan. Also, your justification for the exception includes a statement that you will post signs and provide pedestrian lighting. Please include this on the site plan or remove this from your justification statement. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: General Number: 53 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] While you show dimensioning on the Site Plan, the utility plans contain no geometric layout of parking areas is shown. Will this be part of the final package submitted by the civil engineer? If not, remove note. [1/3/07] General Note # 11, Cover Sheet refers to the Utility Plan for exact geometry of parking areas. Utility plans do not show any geometry or layout information. Provide complete layout information on Site Plan. Number: 101 Created: 1 /25/2007 [1/25/07] To meet the standards of Section 3.4.1(E)(1)© the lighting plan will need to address the amount of light spilling over along the buffer zone. Back shield screens have to be part of the pole mount fixtures. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 71 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/071 The existing and proposed conditions can be differentiated now. The proposed planting symbols do not stand out from the rest of the plan. Will address at final. [1/3/07] Clearly show difference between existing and proposed conditions. Plant symbols do not stand out. Existing conditions that will be removed do not need to be shown. Number: 74 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] Trees are identified. Tree protection standards - Section 3.2.1(G) are not included on the plan. Add to the plan. Will address at final. [1/3/07] Identify significant existing trees to remain and protect per Section 3.2.1(F&G) of the LUC. There are two trees along the College Ave. frontage to be considered, and one tree off -site on the slope of the Spring Creek embankment adjacent to the existing/proposed storm drain pipe to be addressed. Proposed grading impacts both street side trees. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins M. Torgerson Architects Date: 1/30/2007 Troy Jones Fort Collins, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for HUMAN BEAN AT SPRING CREEK PDP - TYPE 11, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: Elevations Number: 83 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] Dimension counter height or add note that walk up window shall meet accessibility requirements. Will address at final. [1/3/07] Walk-up window will have to be accessible. Indicate on elevations with dimensioning which service window is accessible. Number: 94 Created: 1 /23/2007 [1/23/07] Trash enclosure dimensions at 14'-3" on the Site Plan. The elevation shows the dimension to be 9'-4". Resolve conflicting information and revise plans accordingly. Will be addressed at final. Topic: Engineering Number: 84 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] The utility plan shows an existing evergreen plant symbol adjacent to the water line. The Site and Landscape Plan do not show this tree/shrub. Will address at final. [1/3/07] Clearly delineate the location of the existing water line along the front of the property in relation to the existing vegetation. Locate existing trees and shrubs accurately, including dripline of tree. Number: 85 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/23/07] A meeting is needed as suggested in the response to comments. The Utility Plan calls for a new 18" storm drain line in place of the existing one. Replacing the line will have impacts upon the tree next to the location of the existing line. This tree is on City property. Tim Buchanan will need to be party to the site visit. Will resolve at final. [1/3/07] The 18 inch storm pipe outfall -is that existing pipe to remain or new pipe. The existing tree next to the pipe may be impacted by the installation of a new pipe. Clarify outfall pipe and accurately show the type of tree and dripline so that it can be determined if this tree can be saved. If not, contact Tim Buchanan to discuss tree mitigation strategies. Section 3.2.1(F&G) have to'be considered and addressed in locating any need pipe. Coordinate with Landscape Plans in regard to preservation or removal of this and any other trees on -site. Page 1