Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout220 EDWARDS STREET - MODIFICATION OF STANDARD - 20-07 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)Number: 2 Created: 7/3/2007 [7/3/07) SITE PLAN: Need to see clear depiction of property lines, lot dimensions and proposed setbacks. Please label the streets as well as "North". Number: 3 Created: 7/3/2007 [7/3/07) SITE PLAN: What is the square footage of the lot? Number: 5 Created: 7/3/2007 [7/3/07) Site Plan: A rear setback of 6.5 ft is being shown yet the request is for 5' The structure can be moved closer to the street as only a 15' front s/b is required. Number: 6 Created: 7/3/2007 [7/3/07) Are you seeking "equal to or better than" in your modification request for the increased square footage? The lot is too small for two detached dwellings therefore requesting greater square footage for the second dwelling doesn't meet "equal to or better than". Number: 7 Created: 7/3/2007 [7/3/07) What is the square footage of the existing home? Does this request meet the lot -to -floor -area ratio requirement? This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments at this time. Additional comments may follow. Red -lined documentation from City departments is included with this comment letter. Another round of staff review really is necessary This proposal is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the date of this comment letter, being July 18, 2007) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be sure and return all red -lined documentation when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, Steve Olt City Planner cc: Planning & Zoning file #20-07 Page 3 Number: 14 Created: 7/ 18/2007 17/ 18/07) For consideration of the ultimate second dwelling unit on the property, please be aware of the requirements set forth in Section 4.8(D)(5) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and Section 4.8(F) Development Standards (containing Building Design, Bulk and Massing, and Carriage Houses and Habitable Accessory Buildings). Number: 15 Created: 7/ 18/2007 [7/ 18/07) Please see red -marked submittal information packet for Planning & Zoning comments. Number: 16 Created: 7/ 18/2007 [7/ 18/07) A re -submittal of the information, addressing the comments in this letter, and another 2 week round of staff review is necessary before an administrative public hearing can be scheduled. Department: Current Planning Topic: General Number: 4 [7/3/07) No comments Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Created: 7/3/2007 Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Janet McTague Topic: Fire Number: 9 Created: 7/ 10/2007 17/ 10/07) No comments on the modification of standards. We'll need to make sure that we coordinate services, including electric, to the new structure. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Alan Rutz Topic: Fire Number: 10 Created: 7/ 11 /2007 [7/ 11 /07) Locate existing underground electric service line and show on the site or utility plan. System modification and dwelling unit charges may also apply. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 8 Created: 7/ 10/2007 [7/ 10/07) PFA has no comments or concerns at this time. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: ZO T VG Number: 1 Created: 7/3/2007 [7/3/07) SITE PLAN: Two site plans are shown - it is not clear from your narrative which you are requesting - the attached structure or detached. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Rentfrow Design Date: 07/ 18/2007 c/o Jon Rentfrow / Troy Jennings a WOO 205 Allen Street Fort Collins, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for 220 EDWARDS STREET - MODIFICATIONS OF STANDARDS - TYPE 1, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: General Number: 11 Created: 7/ 18/2007 [7/ 18/07) Bonnie Ham of the U.S. Postal Service indicated that she sees no change in mail delivery for the property. Number: 12 Created: 7/ 18/2007 [7/ 18/07) Rick Lee of the Building Department indicated that the new residential structure will be constructed under the 2003 IRC. See attached notes and red marks on returned submittal information. Number: 13 Created: 7/ 18/2007 [7/ 18/07) Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner, comments are as follows: Historic Preservation is fully in support of the plans for 220 Edwards as submitted and supports the requests for modifications of Land Use Code Standards 4.8D1, 4.8E3, 3.2.2D3C, and 4.8D2. The existing house and garage at 220 Edwards Street is designated on the National Register of Historic Places, and the property is located within the Laurel School National Register District. Additionally, the buildings likely qualify for recognition as Fort Collins Landmarks. As such, it would be detrimental, both to the historic and architectural integrity of these buildings and to the significance of the National Register District itself, to require that the proposed new construction meet the existing standards. Staff supports this request for modification of the standards under 2.8.2(H)1 and 2.8.2(H)4. It is staffs position that the plans as submitted promote the general purpose of the standards far better than would a plan which complies with the standards. Staff further believes that the plans as submitted will not diverge from the standards of the LUC except in a nominal, inconsequential way. Page 1