Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3425 S. SHIELDS ST. MIXED-USE - PDP - 28-07 - CORRESPONDENCE -No Text if Anne Aspen - RE: 3425 S. Shields Page 1 From: Anne Aspen To: c.matkins@comcast.net; joannafrye@vfavfr.com Date: 10/18/2007 5:00:05 PM Subject: RE: 3425 S. Shields Hi Chris and Joanna, This looks fine and will not need a modification for hearing. Hopefully in final plan review, we can work together to get a true bioswale in there. Joanna, if you can get me two sets of site, landscape and elevations tomorrow, I should be all set to get everything to the hearing officer. Thanks for your diligence on this work, Anne >>> "Joanna Frye" <joannafrye@vfavfr.com> 10/18/2007 4:50 PM >>> Anne, Attached is the revised Site Plan PDF with the bioswale added to it as mentioned below. Please review and let me know if this will work. I can drop plans by your office tomorrow that reflect both this change as well as the replacement of ornamental trees for the evergreen trees along the north property line. Please let Chris or I know if you have any questions. Thanks, VF Ripley Associates 401 W. Mountain, Suite 201 Ft. Collins, CO 80521 (970)224-5828 (970)224-1662fax a oanna(dWavfr.com -----Original Message ----- From: c.matkins(a)comcast. net rmailto:c.matkins(ocomcast. netl Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:14 PM To: Anne Aspen; Joanna Frye Cc: Linda Ripley; Dana Leavitt Subject: Re: 3425 S. Shields Anne, Thank you for exploring these options with your peers, we very much appreciate your suggestions and the combined expertise from City staff. Similar in layout to the bioswale, we are interested in pursuing an island (with curbs) that is designed in a north -south orientation. This will allow us to include the residential/commercial screening we are trying to achieve, while increasing the open area available to the tree roots. As you pointed out, this layout will result in losing a couple of feet of the commercial front walkway. However, in this approach we would not be incorporating any east -west island ... this is to preserve our parking capacity. Will this scenario still require a modification to the 15-parking spot requirement? If so, we would ask for consideration to be given to our efforts to preserve the existing pine tree near the commercial building as an approach that exceeds the benefit of any ea s-west island. If we need to install east -west islands, then we'll likely have to regain these two spots by removing the existing pine tree we have worked diligently to save.