HomeMy WebLinkAboutMOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CHURCH - CTR - 31-07 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - CORRESPONDENCE-CONCEPTUAL REVIEWCONTACT INFORMATION:
Steve Schroyer
2303 Coal Creek Court
Fort Collins, Colorado 80528
481-5505
steves dmcwhinne,
schro. er8730 e,msn.com
r•
7. How is the level of service at Vine and Lemay and E. Lincoln and Lemay?
Would our new facility warrant an improvement of either of these?
8. Are there any reimbursements associated with any of the improved streets in the
surrounding area? Any foreseen in the near future?
9. Will we be permitted two access points onto Buckingham as shown?
10. Buckingham has a current flow line of 31 feet. What would the future cross-
section of Buckingham likely be? If larger, would we just be constructing our
half or the entire section? Is there an opportunity for reimbursements?
11. Will we be able to park on Buckingham?
Sanitary Sewer
1. Where is the nearest line that would have capacity to handle the proposed
improvements? What size is it?
2. Are there any reimbursements associated with this or these lines?
Water
1. Where is the nearest line that would have capacity to handle the proposed
improvements? What size is it? Pressure for fire?
2. Are there any reimbursements associated with this or these lines?
Storm Drainaee
1. We are aware of the high groundwater, undersized lines, flooding etc. that is
associated with this area of the City. It appears that water currently ponds into the
South East portion of our site then discharges into a swale on the Eastern side that
flows South and goes offsite. Will we be detaining on -site and releasing at
historic rates into this swale? If not?
2. Will there be any off -site drainage improvements required with the proposed
improvements?
3. Are there any reimbursements associated with any currently constructed drainage
improvements? Any foreseen in the near future?
Electric
1. Who is the provider?
2. Where is the nearest line that would have capacity to handle the proposed
improvements?
3. Are there any reimbursements associated with this or these lines?
Gas
1. Is Xcel the service provider?
Fire and Police Services
1. Do you see any red flags associated with the concept design?
2. What size of line and tap do you foresee to serve the building?
NUSCELLEANOUS
1. What are we forgetting? Red Flags?
.,
October 4, 2004
Mountain View Community Church
Conceptual Review
The City of Fort Collins
RE: New Church at the SW corner of Buckingham and Lemay
This Concept Plan Submittal is for a new Church Building and associated improvements
at the South West comer of Buckingham Street and North Lemay Avenue. Currently the
Church would plan to ultimately construct a 550 to 600 Seat Sanctuary, associated
classrooms and other necessary indoor and outdoor church facilities. The Church
structure will be approximately 15,000 to 25,000 sq. feet with a potential future building
up to 10,000 sq. feet.
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS:
Planning and Zoning
1. Places of Worship are permitted under Industrial Zoning. We would assume that
this would follow under the Admin. Review, Type 1 Zoning. Could we have a
simple explanation of this process and the estimated timeframes? Would this
require Planning Commission and City Council Approval?
2. Would we be able to process the PDP and the FDP concurrently?
3. When will character elevations be required? At PDP or FDP?
4. Will we be permitted signage at the North East and South East corners of our
property?
5. Since we are in Industrial Zoning will we be following the architectural
requirements Industrial Zoning or what other(s)?
Engineering — Transportation Services
1. Has a future alignment for North Lemay selected? Current thinking?
2. Will there be a "T" or a cul-de-sac constructed on the East side of our property?
3. Since we do not own the tract adjacent to Lemay (P.R.P.A. does), and generate
minimal traffic during peak hours.....Will we be forced to construct or pay our
share of the new North Lemay improvements? If we need to construct
improvements to Lemay, will we be doing the full section or just our local
portion?
4. How does staff feel about the access point on our Eastern boundary? Could this
be a 3/< movement or at least a right -in and out?
5. We believe that there is a requirement to have pedestrian connection to a currently
improved arterial ..... Is that true and where would our nearest pedestrian
connection to the nearest arterial be? Lincoln?
6. Will we be preparing a traffic memorandum or a full TIS?