The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutONE LIBRARY PARK (220 E. OLIVE ST.) - PDP - 34-07 - CORRESPONDENCE - (4)Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 19 Created: 11/27/2007 [11/27/07] Master Plan flows for the 100-year storm running down Olive Street need to be included in the analysis to determine if the water surface elevation is less than the proposed opening of 80.00 into the underground parking garage. Number: 21 Created: 11/29/2007 [11129/07] If the storm sewer in the alley is to remain per all the City departments, concrete would be required as the pipe material. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: WaterMastewater Number: 15 Created: 11/27/2007 [11/27/07] The sewer shown in the intersection of Olive and Mathews is a storm sewer not sanitary as currently labeled. Number: 16 Created: 11/27/2007 [11/27/07] Add a note regarding abandonment of the existing water services (see redlines). Number: 17 Created: 11/27/2007 [11/27/07] Move 10-inch HDPE line in alley to provide minimum 8 feet of separation from sanitary sewer. Number: 18 Created: 11/27/2007 [11/27/07] Revise note on connection of fire line to 6-inch main in Olive (see redlines). Topic: zoning Number: 13 Created: 11 /26/2007 [11/26/07] A breakdown of number of bedrooms per unit is needed to determine minimum parking. These should be listed on the site plan. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Ted Shepard Chief Planner Page 4 Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Electric Utility Number: 1 Created: 11 /15/2007 [11/15/07] The developer will need to coordinate power requirements, locations, and electric development charges with Light & Power Engineering (221-6700). Will a fire sprinkler pump be installed? Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 22 Created: 11/30/2007 [11/30/07] ALL FIRE COMMENTS ARE IN ADDITION TO COMMENTS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT, FROM JUNE 2004. Number: 23 Created: 11 /30/2007 [11/30/07] STANDPIPES AND FIRE PUMP Buildings four or more stories in height are required to be equipped with firefighting standpipes in every stairwell. The standpipe system must be capable of supplying a minimum 100 psi to the top floor; an approved fire pump may be required to obtain this minimum pressure. IFC 905.3.1 Number: 24 Created: 11/30/2007 [11/30/07] STAIRWELL SIGNAGE Approved stairwell identification signs shall be posted at each floor level in all enclosed stairways in buildings four or more stories in height. 97UFC1210.4 and Appendix I-C Number: 25 Created: 11/30/2007 [11/30/07] FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: Fire department connections shall be installed remote from the buildings, and located on the street or fire lane side of buildings, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle access or as otherwise approved by the fire code official. If possible, a fire hydrant shall be located within 100 feet of the FDC. PFA Bureau Policy Number: 26 Created: 11/30/2007 [11/30/07] KNOX BOX REQUIRED Poudre Fire Authority requires a "Knox Box" to be mounted on the front of every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 97UFC 902.4; PFA BUREAU POLICY 88-20 Number: 27 Created: 11/30/2007 (11/30/07] AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS: Because this is a mixed -use building, the automatic fire sprinkler is required to meet NFPA 13 specifications (as opposed to NFPA 13R requirements for residential sprinkler systems). Page 3 encroachment permit. We're potentially open to the encroachment shown on the Matthews Street side, however we're concerned over the extent of the encroachment onto the public space on the Olive Street side. We're not inclined to introduce a meander in the sidewalk system along Olive Street and would rather just see the sidewalk maintain the consistent 10 foot separation from the curb and gutter. Why is the public space being encroached into? Interestingly, we note page 7 of the traffic impact study which shows perhaps an earlier iteration of the project and has the sidewalk along Olive Street maintain a consistent separation from the street. We would prefer this design over the present iteration and don't see a compelling reason to support the present design. Number: 5 Created: 11 /21 /2007 [11/21/07] Page 4 of Appendix A of the TIS shows an internal floor plan of the building. As a thought, it appears that the ramp and seat wall along the Olive Street side might be desired for ADA concerns? Could the ADA access based upon the internal floor plan be accomplished from the north entrance via a ramp out to Matthews Street? This would potentially address the encroachment concerns on the Olive Street side. Number: 6 Created: 11 /21 /2007 [11/21/07] The proposed trash enclosure off of the alley cannot have doors which swing out into the alley right-of-way. Either sliding doors or further insetting the trash enclosure would need to be accomplished. Number: 7 Created: 11 /21 /2007 [11/21/07] The location of the trash enclosure appears to have some sight distance concerns for the parking garage entrance. How will residents exit the parking garage with proper view of vehicles traversing the alley? Number: 9 Created: 11/21/2007 [11/21/07] The concept of the project being residential with the potential for mixed use may warrant further discussion on the applicability of TDR fees as the fees were collected based on the premise of it being solely residential and it does not address a potential commercial usage. Number: 10 Created: 11 /21 /2007 [11/21/07] During the modification approval process we received feedback from the utility providers that utility easements would be needed behind the right-of-way. A utility coordination meeting should perhaps be held in order to verify that utility servicing needs can be met and that additional area behind the right-of-way reserved for utility easements is not needed. Number: 12 Created: 11/21/2007 [11/21/07] Will there be a 2' minimum separation between the Matthews Street sidewalk and the structures leading to the stairs? A 2' separation is required per LCUASS criteria. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Sandy McFeron Date: 12/7/2007 V.F. Ripley Associates 401 West Mountain Avenue, Suite 201 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Staff has reviewed your submittal for ONE LIBRARY PARK (220 E. OLIVE ST. #27- 07A) PDP - TYPE II, and we offer the following comments: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 3 Created: 11 /21 /2007 [11/21/07] The 2' sawcut shown on the drawings is likely sufficient on Matthews Street though there are some general concerns on the cross slope on Olive Street such that we believe the pavement patching needs to be extended further into Olive Street to achieve a better cross slope. At the time of final plan submittal further design information will be needed to show what cross slopes and flowline grades are achieved with the new curb and gutter and patching. On Olive Street I'd like to see cross sections of the full road at 50 foot intervals in order to ascertain how the cross slopes will work. Number: 4 Created: 11 /21 /2007 [11/21/07] The construction drawings indicate a 10" storm drain line that appears to be a private line within both the public alley and Olive Street right-of-way. Similar to ID#2 this is an encroachment onto public right-of-way that we'd prefer to see be relocated outside of all public right-of-way. Number: 8 Created: 11 /21 /2007 [11/21/07] At the time of a final plan submittal, I'd like to see spot elevations along the Matthews and Olive flowlines for more detailed verification of how drainage in being conveyed around the development. Number: 11 Created: 11/21/2007 [11/21/07] The construction drawings list two. benchmarks which is required, however the bonnet bolt is not acceptable as a means for a benchmark and a benchmark from the City's Vertical Control should be used as the second benchmark. Topic: General Number: 2 Created: 11 /16/2007 [11/16/07] There's been some general discussion and concern regarding the use of the public space (right-of-way) for aspects the building. Fundamentally, the steps and railings along Matthews along with the planter and low seat wall along Olive are all obstructions of the right-of-way that would need to be approved via an Page 1