Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSOLAR VILLAGE MAPLE - PDP - 23-07 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORTSolar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) November 8, 2007 Administrative Hearing Page 11 • Section 3.5.2(C)(1) Residential Building Standards, Relationship of Dwellings to Streets and Parking, Orientation to a Connecting Walkway where the applicant seeks a modification to the standard. C. The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable district standards of Section 4.16 of the Land Use Code, D—Downtown District, Civic Center Subdistrict. 5. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) and the associated request for modification of standards. 6. Attachments: Zoning exhibit Statement of Planning Objectives, dated July, 2007 Modification request letter dated November 5, 2007 Neighborhood Meeting Notes dated July 19, 2007 3-D renderings of proposed project Transportation Impact Study dated August, 2007 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment dated June 28,2006 Full sized plan set Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) November 8, 2007 Administrative Hearing Page 10 lines for mostly zero setbacks. Four outdoor seating areas and an entry plaza in front of a small, enclosed lobby create human scale, pedestrian interest, and contribute to the comfort and visual continuity of the site. There is no vehicle use between the building faces and the street. [Section 3.5.3(B)(2)] c) Variation in Massing: The street -fronting buildings have been designed with appropriate changes in volume and roofs as described above. There are numerous projecting and recessed elements. These changes are related to units, entrances and functions of the internal spaces. [Section 3.5.3(C)] d) Character and Image, Site Specific Design: The proposed project contributes to the uniqueness of the D--Downtown District, Civic Center Subdistrict. The street -fronting buildings are designed with appropriate and high -quality materials and detailing which will be a quality addition to this area. [Section 3.5.3(D)(1)] e) Fagade Treatment: All facades on the street -fronting buildings exceed the minimum wall articulations. Walls have clearly defined bays, changes in plane, materials and texture, and well articulated fenestration. All facades on the street -fronting buildings have materials and design characteristics consistent with those on the front elevations. Entrances are clearly identified with arches, awnings or canopies. [Section 3.5.1(D)(2),(3),(4) and (5)] fl Base and Top Treatments: The street fronting buildings have brick or split -face block bases and either a projecting metal cornice and flat roof or pitched roof tops. [Section 3.5.1 (D)(6)] 4. Findings of Fact / Conclusion: After reviewing the Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07), staff makes the following findings of fact and conclusions: A. The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable administrative standards contained within Article 2 of the Land Use Code. B. The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable General Development Standards contained in Article 3 of the Land Use Code, with one exception: Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) November 8, 2007 Administrative Hearing Page 9 character. The applicant has designed the north building to be compatible with the neighborhood by using light colored wood siding and shallow pitched roofs and pediments to reduce the bulk of the building. Staff has met with the designer to discuss possible alternatives to this plan but the applicant wishes to proceed with this design. No lights are proposed along the north property line to limit lighting impacts to the adjacent residence. [Section 3.5.1 (H)] h) Outdoor Storage Areas/Mechanical Equipment: The trash and recycling enclosure is located along the alley and accessible only from the alley. Outdoor Storage: All outdoor storage is adequately screened. Mechanical equipment will be rooftop mounted, including solar panels on the pitched roof surfaces facing south. All meters, vents and other equipment will be painted to match the surrounding building surfaces. 2) Residential Building Standards a) Relationship of Dwellings to Streets and Parking, Orientation to a Connecting Walkway. The north building, which contains garages with second -story studio apartments above, does not meet the connecting walkway standard for residential developments. The proposed walkway does not qualify as a major pedestrian spine. The applicant has submitted a request for modification of this standard, attached. Though staff is not completely in alignment with the modification as requested, staff cannot see a reasonably feasible alternative on this tight infill site. 3) Mixed -Use, Institutional and Commercial Buildings a) Relationship of Buildings to Streets, Walkways and Parking, Orientation to a Connecting Walkway. All mixed -use and commercial buildings have at least one entry that faces and opens onto the public sidewalk. b) Orientation to Build -to Lines for Streetfront Buildings: This project is a more urban development for this neighborhood. Build -to lines along Maple Street align with the build -to lines of the commercial neighbor to the east, but along Meldrum, build -to lines are closer to the street than the project's single-family residential neighbors to the north. The proposed sidewalks continue and enhance the existing sidewalk pattern. All proposed street -fronting buildings are sited at the property Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) November 8, 2007 Administrative Hearing Page 8 c) Privacy Considerations: The project is an infill development with existing residential to the north. The applicant has done their best to design a project that balances programmatic needs and desires on this site with a sensitivity to the neighbors. Windows are kept to a minimum on the north elevation of the project and fencing and vines are proposed to soften the project over time. [Section 3.5.1 (D)] d) Building Materials: The surrounding residential areas employ a variety of materials, mostly wood siding but also some brick and stucco. The proposed buildings are brick, split -face block, stucco and siding with spare detailing including metal sills, lintels, cornices and awnings. All windows are clear glass. Fenestration is detailed with mullions which break up the windows into human scaled sections. [Section 3.5.1 (E)] e) Building Color. The colors chosen for the project are within the realm of the colors of existing houses in the area. The colors are earthy and unify the project. [Section 3.5.1 (F)] t) Special Height Review: The pitched -roof street and alley fronting buildings are just over 40 feet to the ridge lines and therefore require special height review. The pitched -roof volumes contribute to the variety and residential scale of the buildings. These small triangle elements over 40 feet will not appreciably affect anyone's views of the foothills more than the buildings themselves do. The tallest structures are at the south end of the property where they are least likely to affect the neighboring property to the north. Still at the worst case scenario on December 21 st the entire property to the north will be nearly completely in shadow. The additional height of the pitched -roof elements will not impact privacy for neighbors since there is no habitable space or windows within the gables. The pitched roofs are proposed to break the mass of the large buildings up to fit into the scale of the area. [Section 3.5.1 (G)(1)] g) Land Use Transition: This PDP will be a substantial change from the existing pattern of development. The site is a relatively small infill site. The applicant has done his best to design the project to be compatible with adjacent properties through compliance with the standards set forth in the Building Standards Division of the Land Use Code regarding scale, form, materials, and colors. As mentioned above, the larger building masses are located on Maple and Meldrum Streets with the more commercial building facing City Hall and the more residential building with pitched roofs along Meldrum which is residential in Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) November 8, 2007 Administrative Hearing Page 7 h) Parking Stall Dimensions: All parking spaces are proposed to be standard size spaces. Staff will work with the applicant in Final Plan to fine-tune the parking dimension details. [Section 3.2.2 (K)] i) Site Lighting: All lighting fixtures and lighting levels meet City standards. All light fixtures feature full shielding and full cutoff and minimize glare. Cut sheets will be added to the photometric plans in Final Plan Review. [Section 3.2.4] j) Trash and Recycling Enclosures: The trash enclosures have been sized to accommodate trash and recyclables. The trash and recycling areas will be sufficiently screened from view. [Section 3.2.5] B. Building Standards [Division 3.5] 1) Building and Project Compatibility. The architecture of this project is compatible with the existing buildings to the extent possible and with the vision for the Civic Center subdistrict. This project sets a good standard of quality for redevelopment in the area. The mixed -use buildings fronting Maple and Meldrum Streets is articulated by variations in color and massing that are proportional to the massing and scale of nearby structures. a) Architectural Character: The architectural design proposed for this project consists of substantial brick or split -face block bases and stucco or brick fields topped with either post-modern metal cornices or pitched roofs. Roofs along Meldrum are pitched to break up the massing of the structure and echo the residential forms of this street. The buildings along Maple are more evocative of the Civic Center subdistrict that this elevation faces. [Section 3.5.1 (B)] b) Building Size, Height, Bulk, Mass, Scale: The proposed buildings are larger than surrounding existing buildings. The design incorporates good quality materials and building massing is articulated with roof forms, appropriately scaled building bays, and generous use of outdoor activity spaces including balconies, patios, courtyards and entry plazas. The applicant has minimized the bulk of the northern building by limiting its height to two stories, using a shallow pitched roof and parapet design and using varied width hardiboard siding for visual interest. Access stairs cut small voids in the overall mass of the building. [Section 3.5.1 (C)] Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) November 8, 2007 Administrative Hearing Page 6 separately. There is a detached sidewalk, diagonal on -street parking, a small internal off-street parking lot and convenient bike racks. The northern building which fronts on the parking lot is garages on the ground level and apartments above. The entries are linked to the pedestrian circulation system with a distinct pavement from the rest of the parking lot. Because of the garage doors it is not feasible to separate them entirely but this distinct paving within the parking area will distinguish the pedestrian zone from the vehicular zones in this very low volume parking area. [Section 3.2.2 (C)(1)(a) and (5)(b)] c) Curbcuts and Ramps: Adequate curbcuts and ramps are provided throughout the site. [Section 3.2.2 (C)(2)] d) Bicycle Facilities: The design includes convenient parking facilities for bicyclists associated with the commercial building. Staff will work with the applicant to fine-tune the details during Final Plan review. [Section 3.2.2 (C)(4)] e) Walkways, Directness and Continuity. Walkways through the site are ample and as direct as possible. All street fronting buildings are connected to the street sidewalk network. The northern building is connected to the sidewalk system on Maple through the parking lot, walkway and lobby. There are also sidewalk connections to Meldrum and the alley. [Section 3.2.2(C)(5)] f) Parking Lot Layout. The circulation routes, walkway system and parking bays throughout the site are clearly delineated and logical given the site constraints. [Section 3.2.2(E)] g) Required Number of Off-street Spaces for Type of Use: This project is within the Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay Zone. Therefore, no parking minimums apply to the residential portion of the project. The commercial parking is governed by maximums. There are 27 residential units proposed and 5366sf of commercial space. Thirty new diagonal, on -street parking spaces are provided on Maple and Meldrum Streets. Ten off-street surface parking spaces are provided, along with 9 garages and 4 carports for a total parking count of 53 spaces, two of which are handicap accessible spaces. There is at least one signed van -accessible space, according to Code. [Section 3.2.2 (K)(5)(d)] Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) November 8, 2007 Administrative Hearing Page 5 c) Landscape Area Treatment: All non -paved areas are proposed to be planted with appropriate plantings including turf and shrub or perennial planting beds and trees. Slopes are stabilized with retaining walls. Parkways are landscaped in accordance with the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS). Some foundation plantings are provided but this proposal is more urban in nature so a more urban landscaping design is used which meets the intent of this code standard. [Section 3.2.1(E)(2)] d) Parking Lot Interior Landscaping: The parking lot interior is quite tight on this urban infill site. 10 surface parking spaces are proposed on the south side of the parking lot. Garage spaces are proposed on the north. Four carports are proposed off the alley. A courtyard on the south of the parking contains a grove of trees that, with the building to the south, will shade the parking spaces. No landscape islands are required in this parking lot because there are fewer than 15 spaces proposed. The applicant proposes pervious pavement for the parking lot. [Sections 3.2.1(E)(4) and (5)] e) Tree Protection and Replacement: There are several existing trees on the site that the developer plans to preserve and protect through construction. If any significant trees need to be removed, appropriate mitigation will be required and provided during Final Plan review. Appropriate tree protection notes are on the plans. [Section 3.2.1(F) and (G)] f) Landscape Materials, Maintenance and Replacement: Appropriate notations will be placed on the plans to ensure compliance with these standards. [Section 3.2.1(1)] g) Utilities: The landscape plan does not show any conflicts with existing or proposed utilities. Details will be reviewed in Final Plan Review. [Section 3.2.1(K)] 2) Access, Circulation and Parking: a) Purpose: The proposed project is well -designed with regard to safety, efficiency, and convenience for vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians and transit as described in more detail in the sections that follow. b) Safety Considerations: The parking and circulation system proposed accommodates vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian travelers mostly Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) November 8, 2007 Administrative Hearing Page 4 Center: Materials proposed for the street -fronting elevations include brick, split -face block and stucco. [Section 4.16(D)(5)] D. Site Design Standards: 1) Parking Lots: All residential parking is proposed in a lot which is interior to the site. Commercial parking is proposed on -street in new diagonal parking spaces. [Section 4.16 (E)(1)(a)] 2) Outdoor cafes: Restaurants are a permitted use in this zone district. While the developer has not yet marketed the commercial units to potential buyers, outdoor seating is available at the Maple Street - fronting units should a restaurant opt to locate here. Through pedestrian access and access to shops and residences will not be blocked by seating areas. Sidewalks near seating areas are greater than 7 feet in width. [Section 4.16 (E)(1)(b)] 3. Compliance with applicable General Development Standards Applicable General Development Standards: A. Site Planning and Design Standards [Division 3.2] 1) Landscaping and Tree Protection: This project provides more than adequate tree stocking and landscaping to meet code standards. Details of the landscape plan will be reviewed in Final Plan Review. [Section 3.2.1] a) Street Trees: Several new canopy shade trees are proposed on the site in addition to some existing trees which will be preserved. New street trees are proposed on 40-foot centers. Approved street tree species will be used in the parkways. [Section 3.2.1(D)(2)] b) Landscape Standards: Buffering between Incompatible Uses and Activities: A six-foot fence and vines growing from planters in the ground on trellises along the north perimeter of the project are intended to subdue and soften the differences in architecture and bulk between this project and the existing residences to the north. Windows are limited to the second story of the northern building and no outdoor spaces are provided to preserve privacy to the best extent possible. [Section 3.2.1(E)] Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) November 8, 2007 Administrative Hearing Page 3 2. Compliance with Applicable D—Downtown District, Civic Center Subdistrict Standards A. Purpose: The purpose of the D—Downtown District, Civic Center Subdistrict is as follows: The Downtown District is intended to provide a concentration of retail, civic, office and cultural uses in addition to complementary uses such as hotels, entertainment and housing. It is divided into three (3) subdistricts as depicted on Figure 18. The development standards for the Downtown District are intended to encourage a mix of activity in the area while providing for quality development that maintains a sense of history, human scale and pedestrian -oriented character. The proposed project meets this purpose statement, although it represents a substantial change from the pattern of existing development. B. Permitted Land Use: 'Mixed -use dwelling units' is a permitted use in the D—Downtown District, Civic Center Subdistrict subject to a Type I — Administrative Hearing. [Section 4.16 (B)] C. Building Standards: 1) Setback from Streets: A landscaped setback is proposed on both the west and south frontage of this project. On the west, the sidewalk and landscape are consistent with the existing residential parkway and sidewalk to the north. On the south, the streetscape is more urban, with wide sidewalks and display windows. The buildings are set back consistent with the existing office building to the east. [Section 4.16(D)(1)] 2) Building Height: The tallest volume is less than 45 feet tall which complies with the height standards for this block as established by the Height Limits Map in Section 4.16(D)(2). 3) Building Character and Facades: There are no blank walls that span more than 50 feet. Storefronts have been integrally designed with the upper floors of the building in 20- to 40-foot bays along Maple and 20- foot bays along the more residential Meldrum. Outdoor Activity: The proposed buildings make ample use of balconies and patios and provide for a variety of outdoor activities. Windows: All ground -level windows are framed in brick or masonry and have mullions, sills, intels, awnings or transoms to frame them. Canyon Avenue and Civic Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) November 8, 2007 Administrative Hearing Page 2 COMMENTS 1. Background The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: D—Downtown (Existing single-family and multi -family residential) with NCB —Neighborhood Conservation, Buffer District (existing single-family residential) beyond; E: D—Downtown (Existing office, existing single-family residential and multi- family residential under construction beyond); S: D—Downtown (Existing City Hall offices and Washington Park with St. Joseph Parish beyond); and W: NCB —Neighborhood Conservation, Buffer District (Existing single-family residential) with NCM—Neighborhood Conservation, Medium Density District (Existing single-family residential) and one C—Commercial property (Existing auto body shop) beyond. The subject property was zoned D—Downtown, Civic Center Subdistrict in 1997 with the adoption of City Plan and the Land Use Code. Prior to that time, this area was zoned C—Commercial since at least 1976. The subject property currently contains the Hefner Dean print shop, warehouses and one residence with no historical significance. An optional neighborhood meeting was held on July 19, 2007 and was attended by approximately 6 residents and property owners. Notes from the meeting are attached. Staff has received one email about this proposal concerning the possibility of a neighbor acquiring the residence that will be moved from the site. Staff has not received any letters prior to the hearing. ITEM NO. lb MEETING DATE of ot STAFF_= Citv of Fort Collins HEARING OFFICER STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) APPLICANT: Justin Larson JCL Architecture, Inc. 401 S. Mason Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 OWNER: Alex Platt et al. Solar Village 2795 Pearl Street Boulder, CO 80302 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposal to redevelop the approximately .65-acre site at 302 N. Meldrum Street and 320 Maple Street, at the northeast corner of Meldrum and Maple Streets, into a mixed -use project. A total of 5366sf of commercial and 27 dwelling units are proposed in two three-story buildings and one two-story building. The property is zoned D—Downtown District —Civic Center Subdistrict. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Mixed -use dwellings are permitted in the D—Downtown District —Civic Center Subdistrict, subject to an Administrative Hearing. This Project Development Plan complies with the applicable requirements of the Land Use Code, including Administrative and General Development standards and the standards of the D— Downtown District —Civic Center Subdistrict, except where a modification has been requested. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Solar Village Maple Project Development Plan — Type I (# 23-07) and the associated request for modification of standards. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO.80522-0580 (970) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT