Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSOLAR VILLAGE MAPLE - PDP - 23-07 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)6. Please describe in drainage report how the no -rise issue is being addressed in the floodway. 7. Please use the 50% and 100% floodplain review checklists to see what is required on the plans and in the drainage report. Number: 48 Created: 8/17/2007 [8/17/07] The justification for no detention is incorrect. If the site exceeds 5000 square feet of additional impervious area then detention and water quality is required. A suggested route to decrease impervious area is to use pervious pavement material which will also be an effective water quality BMP. Topic: Grading Plan Number: 49 Created: 8/17/2007 [8/17/07] Please show slope in alley. Check alley flow capacity. Provide detail of channel under decking that outfalls into alley. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Landscape plan Number: 40 Created: 8/16/2007 [8/16/07] Show water/sewer lines on landscape plan and provide required landscape separation distances. Number: 36 Created: 8/16/2007 [8/16/07) Indicate size of new water services to be installed. Number: 37 Created: 8/16/2007 [8/16/07] Label intended use of water services (commercial vs residential). Number: 38 Created: 8/16/2007 [8/16/07] Show the proposed locations of the electric and cable TV lines which are noted to be re -located. Number: 39 Created: 8/16/2007 [8/16/07] Provide copy of the management organizations governing documents that outline maintenance responsibility for the common fire line. Number. 41 Created: 8/16/2007 [8/16/07] See plans for other minor comments. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6206. Si cerely, nne s n City Planner Page 6 Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Alan Rutz Topic: General Number: 44 Created: 8/17/2007 [8/17/07]Location of proposed sewer line will require relocating the existing electric system. An easement along the east edge of project may be required to relocate the electric line. Number: 45 Created: 8/17/2007 [8/17/07] Request a Utility coordination meeting to discuss relocating electric system and the location transformer, meters and interior utility lines. Number: 46 Created: 8/17/2007 [8/17/07] System modification charges will apply for rebuild of the electric system. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann Topic: Fire Number: 33 Created: 8/15/2007 [8/15/07] EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS: My only potential concern for the project is access to buildings on the northeast comer of the property (the garages/studios), based on UFC 902.2.1: "Fire access roads (fire lanes) shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the PFA's jurisdiction when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility." However, we also make the following provision concerning access: "If a fire lane cannot be provided, the building shall be fire sprinklered." Because these garages/studio units are equipped with automatic fire sprinklers and they are only two stories in height, they meet PFA's access requirements. Department: Stonmwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: F/oodp/ain Comments Number: 47 Created: 8/17/2007 [8/17/07] Solar Village Floodplain Comments 08-16-07 1. Plat — please correct the FIRM panel date to 12-19-06. 2. Site Plan — Please include floodplain and floodway lines 3. Drainage/Grading Plan — please either create a separate floodplain sheet or include all information on one plan: • floodplain and floodway lines • cross-section and BFE lines • lowest floor elevations • table with building #, BFE, Regulatory flood protection elevation, lowest floor elevation, lowest HVAC or mechanical elevation. • Notes from floodplain review checklist 4. If there is an elevator pit, please review the elevation of the pit relative to the floodplain elevations. Please call out how this is being protected. 5. Drainage Report — please correct the FEMA map panel # and date. Page 5 Number: 16 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Please provide sight distance information where the alley intersects with the private drive into the development. Mainly to the north. See redlines for clarification. Number: 17 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] No variance requests have been submitted with this review package. All variance requests must be submitted in writing, stamped by a licensed civil engineer and provide adequate justification for approval. Variance requests will be reviewed by appropriate staff for consideration in a timely manner. Number: 18 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Please remove the deck from the grading plan and show the proposed outfall concrete drainage channel between the buildings to the alley. Provide flowline elevations. Number: 20 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Construction details will be required at the final compliance review stage. Number: 22 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Use shading or another method to delineate the limits of the 100 year floodplain on the Grading Plan. Current hatching does not meet scanability requirements. Number: 24 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Clearly label any proposed carriage walks, planters, curbs etc... that are proposed within the ROW. Number: 31 Created: 8/14/2007 (8/14/07 Please provide cross sections at the SE and SW comers of the project. See granding plan redlines for locations. Number: 32 Created: 8/15/2007 [8/15/07] See redlines for additional minor comments related to labeling, dimensioning and drafting corrections. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Sheri Langenberger Topic: General Number: 1 Created: 8/3/2007 [8/3/07] TIS was not submitted - Per Ward Stanford it was allowed to be submitted with the 2nd submittal with the understanding that new and/or additional comments should be expected once the TIS is submitted and that the late submittal of the TIS may require additional submittals (rounds of review). Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Technical Services Number: 34 Created: 8/15/2007 [8/15/07] Plat - Notes 5,7,8 and 9 are not applicable to the Plat. Number: 35 Created: 8/15/2007 [8/15/07] Plat - no need for Block 1 designation. Page 4 Number: 4 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Please add the traffic engineer and geotechnical engineer information to the consultants on the Utility Plan cover sheet. Number: 5 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Clearly show and label all ROW dimensions from centerline on Maple and Meldrum. No utility easements have been shown or dedicated on the plat. Please submit a variance request to this standard and list the variance on note no. 48 in the General Notes section. Number: 6 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Clearly dimension and label new concrete sidewalks along Maple and Meldrum. Hatch fill with concrete pattern to clearly show sidewalk and parkway location. Clearly identify any proposed walls or curbs associated with the sidewalk on Maple. Note on the plan that no part of the buildings or building foundations may encroach into the City ROW. Number: 7 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07) Clearly show, dimension and label on the Utility Plan sheet all new and reconstructed curb and gutter to be installed on Maple and Meldrum. Show the approximate limits of street cuts needed for all work in the existing street (i.e. curb and gutter, driveways, utility service connections etc... ). Add the standard street cut note to the plans. Number: 8 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Please dimension a typical parking space. Refer to LCUASS table 19-7 for standard stall dimensions. If any additional diagonal street parking is desired adjacent to the alley intersection (area of new C&G), this new parking striping needs to be shown on the plan with dimensions. Number: 11 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] The alley intersection driveway will need to be reconstructed per LCUASS Drawing 803 provided. A few things to be noted regarding this standard intersection design: Pedestrian ramps are required on both sides of the driveway. No more than 0.5 cfs for the Design 2 year storm may drain over the sidewalk (alley flows and detention area flows combined). No part of the building structure may encroach into the ROW dedicated at the comer for sight distance. The driveway shall intersect Maple Street at 90 degrees with radius comers on both sides. Number: 13 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] There is an existing poor drainage condition in the alley pan on the east side that results in standing water. It appears to be caused by tree roots lifting the concrete. You may utilize the existing pan in your alley design however, you will need to reconstruct the pan and curb and gutter on the east side as needed to fix the problem. Please show the limits of reconstruction on the alley design plan and provide sufficient flow line elevation data to verify positive drainage is provided. Number: 15 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Parking off the alley is not clear. Striped, carports or garages ? Please label and dimension adequately to verify all set backs and sight distance standards are being met with this plan. Page 3 Topic: Cover Sheet Number: 21 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07) Please submit Lighting Plan with next submittal for timely review. Number: 23 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Add a north arrow. Minor comments on redlines. Topic: Proposed Site Plan Number: 25 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] The fonts sizes on this plan are too small for aging eyes to read! Please enlarge. Number: 26 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/071 Please dimension alley, drive aisles, setbacks, buildings, sidewalks and walkways. Number: 27 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Thank you very much for including information about the surrounding context. It is very helpful. You've offered so much that the site plan is smaller than it needs to be. Please see redlines for an idea of what should be shown on the site plan. Number: 28 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] See redlines for other minor comments. Topic. Landscape plan Number: 42 Created: 8/17/2007 [8/17/07] Tim Buchanan made comments on the landscape plan included with this packet. Please return redlines upon resubmittal. Topic: Elevations Number: 29 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] You are correct that in the Downtown Civic Center Subdistrict the maximum building height is 45 feet, however, there is a general standard that applies to buildings city- wide over 40 feet, which requires a special height review. The Review Standards are located in Section 3.5.1 (G). There are a few additional submittal items that are required too including a shadow study, a visual analysis and a written analysis. These must be reviewed prior to your administrative hearing. Number: 30 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] 1 have a number of concerns about the architectural detailing and materials on the elevations. Please see redlines. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 2 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] All of the plans should have identical titles and should match the title of the Plat (i.e. Solar Village Maple Subdivision) Number: 3 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] A second bench mark reference needs to be provided on the cover sheet per LCUASS Appendix E. Page 2 .� r AZ(ft a) 01 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Justin Larson Date: 8/20/2007 JCL Architecture, Inc. 401 S. Mason St. Fort Collins, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for SOLAR VILLAGE MAPLE PDP - TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Topic: General Number: 9 Issue Contact: Anne Aspen Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] The following departments or agencies have no concerns or issues with the proposed project: Park Planning, Environmental Planning, GIS, and Neighborhood Services. The Building Inspection Department has no problems, but has attached the applicable codes and standards that will apply to this project for your review. Rick Lee, Plans Analyst encourages you to schedule a required pre -submittal meeting to address code assumptions. You may schedule this meeting by calling (970) 221-6760. Number: 10 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Comcast comments that the plat map needs to show a 6' utility easement so Comcast can place their facilities in that easement to feed this project. li'M111 67TAi`a Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Xcel Energy comments as follows: +2-3 existing 5/8" PEI gas services will need to be cut off at the main located in Meldrum Street. Minimum asphalt cuts allowed are 3'x5'. +the project will need to have a new services tap at the main to serve buildings along Meldrum and Mason Streets. +the project may be required to extend a new main into the alley right-of-way to serve the back buildings. Number: 14 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] Water Conservation has provided you with a comment sheet which is attached to your comment letter. Number: 19 Created: 8/14/2007 [8/14/07] The Post Office comments that the developer is responsible for providing mailboxes for all potential tenants at an agreed upon location. Number: 43 Created: 8/17/2007 [8/17/07] At the staff review meeting, we agreed to meet separately once the landscape architect was on -board to talk about the landscape plan and the elevations and materials. Please let me know when you are ready and I will arrange a meeting between you all, Clark Mapes and me. Page 1