HomeMy WebLinkAboutMAGNOLIA WEST SUBDIVISION (621 W. MAGNOLIA) - FDP - 22-07/A - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)[1/15/08] Just a couple of places where line overtext remains. I highlighted them in
pink for you.
[12/11 /07] Correct all line over text prior to submitting mylars.
[8/31/07] Repeat comment. Just really needs to be done at Final though.
[7/27/07] Please correct all line over text conflicts for scannability. Refer to
LCUASS Appendix E requirements.
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this
project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Sincerely,
S4abqRQLJ'��
Shelby Sommer
Associate City Planner
Page 3
ir
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: Plat
Number: 90 Created: 1 /16/2008
[1/16/08] Will need another paper round of the plat before going to mylars since
there are so many repeat comments. Please call me if you have any questions or let
me know if you need me to email the plat language to you again. Thank you.
Number: 87 Created: 12/12/2007
[1/16/08] Repeat comments 1 and 4. Regarding number 4, if this easement was
dedicated to a private entity, you can either vacate by separate document or that
entity can sign the plat. If this easement was dedicated to the city, then the note "to
be vacated by this plat" is sufficient. You do not need the separate vacation note
because it doesn't serve any purpose.
[12/12/07] From Technical Services:
1. Boundary closes.
2. Can not have angle breaks in ROW, alley and Magnolia should be parallel.
3. Boundary on Site Plan does not match the plat.
4. Is the vacation note necessary? If this is an exclusive easement to be vacated by
a particular utility, then they would have to sign the plat OR you may vacate by
separate document and place the reception number on the plat. If this easement
was dedicated to the city, then it can be vacated by the plat without a vacation note.
Number: 25 Created: 7/27/2007
[1/15/08] Corrections still required to the Statement of Ownership and Subdivision.
Missing language in the Certificate of Dedication. Missing the Maintenance
Guarantee and the Repair Guarantee language. Remove the Notice as there are no
private drives or streets. Remove the vacation note, the note to vacate on the plat
itself is sufficient. Please email me at sjoy@fcgov.com for the correct plat language
if you do not have it.
[12/11/07] The plat language is still incorrect. Please email me at sjoy@fcgov.com
for the current word doc.
[8/31/07] The Certificate of Dedication is missing verbage. The Maintenance
Guarantee and the Repair Guarantee language are missing. The vacation note
refers to Lot 3... there are only Lots 1 and 2.
[7/27/07] Please add the standard Certificate of Dedication language to the Plat
which has been provided. See red -lines & Standard Plat Language.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 89 Created: 1 /15/2008
[1/15/08] The few remaining comments can be addressed and then straight to
mylar. Thank you.
Number: 14
Created: 7/27/2007
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
North Star Design, Inc.
6581 Rookery Rd
Fort Collins, CO 80528
Date: 01 /18/2008
Staff has reviewed your submittal for Magnolia West Subdivision (621 W. Magnolia)
PDP - Type I and Final Plans, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer
Topic: General
Number: 88 Created: 1 /14/2008
[1/14/08] All of my concerns have been addressed - thank you! I'm ready for mylars
once everything has been resolved with Engineering.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
Number: 10 Created: 7/27/2007
[1/15/08] Thank you for addressing this comment. Just in case the drive approach
needs to be rebuilt per the inspector in the field, please add drawing 803 to the detail
sheet. Correct the note on sheet 4 to read drawing 803 instead of detail 707 (and
remove 707). 1 was wrong below, I'm sorry for the confusion!!! Thanks!
[12/11/07] The hearing officer placed a condition of approval on this project that the
first 20' (measured from the back of the sidewalk) of the alley must be paved.
Engineering will accept a full depth patch in lieu of an alley design. Please note on
the utility plans this requirement and that all existing drainage patterns must be
maintained. If the paved area between the street and the sidewalk is in good shape
and does not need to be repaired or replaced then it can stay as is. If it does need
to be replaced, then it must be built to standard. meaning it must be constructed in
concrete per detail 707 (or if there is an existing crosspan, detail 708). Please note
on the utility plans to repair and/or replace as necessary in accordance with the
appropriate detail. The drainage will need to be verified to make sure that the alley
drains - a lot of times the sidewalk is too high and that section spanning the alley
needs to be lowered to get the alley to drain right.
[8/31/07] The modification for not improving the alley was not received with this
submittal. The modification will need to be either approved or denied prior to going
to hearing.
[7/27/07] City Code requires that the alley be improved with this development. No
modification request has been submitted for review. Applicant needs to submit a
request for modification with adequate justification. Please list this modification
request under Note 48 on sheet 2 of the Utility Plans.
Page 1