HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY TECHNOLOGY PARK, 4TH FILING - PDP/FDP - 07-08/A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - TRAFFIC STUDY16: Harmony & HP West Access
Queues
Short Total PM
5/30/2008
Lane Group
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph)
18
2248
43
14
2309
198
1
65
93
80
v/c Ratio
0.10
0.92
0.04
0.15
0.70
0.79
0.01
0.31
0.44
0.42
Control Delay
45.9
25.6
4.9
57.2
19.2
67.3
47.0
15.7
47.9
18.4
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
45.9
25.6
4.9
57.2
19.2
67.3
47.0
15.7
47.9
18.4
Queue Length 50th (ft)
14
620
4
11
296
142
1
0
62
1
Queue Length 95th (ft)
33
#1146
21
32
#747
197
6
37
101
43
Internal Link Dist (ft)
1211
1298
466
608
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
310
2444
1139
310
3281
250
326
331
213
305
Starvation Cap Reduc to
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reducln
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.06
0.92
0.04
0.05
0.70
0.79
0.00
0.20
0.44
0.26
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Matthew J. Delich , P. E.
Synchro 6 Light Report
Page 1
13
16: Harmony & HP West Access Timing Report, Sorted By Phase
Short Total PM 5/30/2008
Phase Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Movement
WBL
EBT
NBL
SBTL
EBL
WBT
SBL
NBTL
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead
Lead
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C-Min
None
None
None
C-Min
None
None
Maximum Split (s)
25
58
15
22
25
58
12
25
Maximum Split (%) 20.8%
48.3%
12.5%
18.3%
20.8%
48.3%
10.0%
20.8%
Minimum Split (s)
8
23
8
22
8
23
8
22
Yellow Time (s)
3
5
3
4
3
5
3
4
All -Red Time (s)
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
Minimum Initial (s)
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Vehicle Extension (s)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Minimum Gap (s)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Time Before Reduce (s)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Time To Reduce (s)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Walk Time (s)
5
5
5
5
Flash Dont Walk (s)
11
11
11
11
Dual Entry
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Inhibit Max
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Start Time (s)
23
48
106
1
81
23
106
118
End Time (s)
48
106
1
23
106
81
118
23
Yield/Force Off (s)
44
99
117
17
102
74
114
17
Yield/Force Off 170(s)
44
88
117
6
102
63
114
6
Local Start Time (s)
95
0
58
73
33
95
58
70
Local Yield (s)
116
51
69
89
54
26
66
89
Local Yield 170(s)
116
40
69
78
54
15
66
78
Intersection Summa
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated -Coordinated
Natural Cycle 120
Offset: 48 (40%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Green
Splits and Phases: 16: Harmony & HP West Access
e1 a ;t e2 e3 > i 04
S
k' 2 t 06 r O5
Matthew J. Delich , P. E.
Synchro 6 Light Report
Page 3
17,
16: Harmony & HP West Access
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Total PM
5/30/2008
-♦
'-
1
t
r
Is.
1
-V
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
11
It
1
+0
1
?
it
1►
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
Total Lost time (s)
4.0
7.0
4.0
4.0
7.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.91
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Frt
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
0.85
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
Satd.Flow (prot)
1770
3539
1583
1770
5083
1770
1863
1583
1770,
1587
Fit Permitted
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.45
1.00
1.00
0.76
1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)
1770
3539
1583
1770
5083
847
1863
1583
1410
1587
Volume (vph)
16
2001
38
13
2142
6
168
1
55
79
1
67
Peak -hour factor, PHF
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.93
0.93
0.93
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
Adj. Flow (vph)
18
2248
43
14
2303
6
198
1
65
93
1
79
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
59
0
74
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
18
2248
36
14
2309
0
198
1
6
93
6
0
Turn Type
Prot
Perm
Prot
pm+pt
Perm pm+pt
Protected Phases
5
2
1
6
3
8
7
4
Permitted Phases
2
8
8
4
Actuated Green, G (s)
8.5
79.2
79.2
3.0
73.7
19.2
8.2
8.2
14.4
5.8
Effective Green, g (s)
8.5
79.2
82.2
3.0
73.7
21.2
10.2
10.2
16.4
7.8
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.07
0.66
0.68
0.02
0.61
0.18
0.08
0.08
0.14
0.06
Clearance Time (s)
4.0
7.0
7.0
4.0
7.0
4.0
6.0
6.0
4.0
6.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
125
2336
1084
44
3122
234
158
135
219
103
v/s Ratio Prot
0.01
c0.64
0.01
c0.45
c0.08
0.00
0.03
0.00
v/s Ratio Perm
0.02
c0.07
0.00
0.03
v/c Ratio
0.14
0.96
0.03
0.32
0.74
0.85
0.01
0.04
0.42
0.06
Uniform Delay, d1
52.3
19.0
6.1
57.5
16.4
46.3
50.3
50.4
47.2
52.7
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
0.5
11.7
0.1
4.1
1.6
23.5
0.0
0.1
1.3
0.2
Delay (s)
52.9
30.7
6.1
61.6
18.0
69.8
50.3
50.5
48.5
52.9
Level of Service
D
C
A
E
B
E
D
D
D
D
Approach Delay (s)
30.4
18.2
65.0
50.6
Approach LOS
C
B
E
D
Intersection Summa
HCM Average Control Delay
27.3 HCM Level of Service C
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.99
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
80.5% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
Synchro 6 Light Report
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. . Page 2
16: Harmony & HP West Access Queues
Short Total AM 5/30/2008
---* --v 'r 4N t t �► 1
Lane Group
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph)
161
1608
202
66
1829
35
1
12
4
9
v/c Ratio
0.61
0.61
0.16
0.40
0.55
0.26
0.01
0.09
0.04
0.07
Control Delay
54.2
7.9
0.3
58.8
3.3
45.1
42.0
22.7
40.0
26.0
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
54.2
7.9
0.3
58.8
3.3
45.1
42.0
22.7
40.0
26.0
Queue Length 50th (ft)
107
124
0
45
14
21
1
0
2
1
Queue Length 95th (ft)
m124
m576
m1
m51
m289
44
5
16
11
15
Internal Link Dist (ft)
1211
1298
466
608
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
281
2622
1258
167
3305
135
335
295
112
297
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.57
0.61
0.16
0.40
0.55
0.26
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.03
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
Matthew J. Delich , P. E.
Synchro 6 Light Report
Page 1
�Q
16: Harmony & HP West Access
Short Total AM
Timing Report, Sorted By Phase
5/30/2008
Phase Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Movement
WBL
EBT
NBL
SBTL
EBL
WBT
SBL
NBTL
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C-Min
None
None
None
C-Min
None
None
Maximum Split (s)
10
60
8
22
17
53
8
22
Maximum Split (%)
10.0%
60.0%
8.0%
22.0%
17.0%
53.0%
8.0%
22.0%
Minimum Split (s)
8
23
8
22
8
23
8
22
Yellow Time (s)
3
5
3
4
3
5
3
4
All -Red Time (s)
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
Minimum Initial (s)
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Vehicle Extension (s)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Minimum Gap (s)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Time Before Reduce (s)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Time To Reduce (s)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Walk Time (s)
5
5
5
5
Flash Dont Walk (s)
11
11
11
11
Dual Entry
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Inhibit Max
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Start Time (s)
31
41
1
9
31
48
1
9
End Time (s)
41
1
9
31
48
1
9
31
Yield/Force Off (s)
37
94
5
25
44
94
5
25
Yield/Force Off 170(s)
37
83
5
14
44
83
5
14
Local Start Time (s)
83
93
53
61
83
0
53
61
Local Yield (s)
89
46
57
77
96
46
57
77
Local Yield 170(s)
89
35
57
66
96
35
57
66
Intersection Summa
Cycle Length 100
Control Type Actuated -Coordinated
Natural Cycle 90
Offset: 48 (48%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Green
ana enases: id: narmonv & me vvesc Access
Matthew J. Delich , P. E.
Synchro 6 Light Report
Page 3
6
16: Harmony & HP West Access
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Total AM
5/30/2008
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
11
r
1
ETA
1
+
r
t*
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
Total Lost time (s)
4.0
7.0
4.0
4.0
7.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.91
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Fit
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
0.87
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)
1770
3539
1583
1770
5077
1770
1863
1583
1770
1614
Fit Permitted
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.62
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Satd Flow (perm)
1770
3539
1583
1770
5077
1146
1863
1583
1863
1614
Volume (vph)
145
1447
182
60
1647
17
30
1
10
3
1
7
Peak -hour factor, PHF
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
Adj. Flow (vph)
161
1608
202
66
1810
19
35
1
12
4
1
8
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
0
64
0
1
0
0
0
11
0
8
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
161
1608
138
66
1828
0
35
1
1
4
1
0
Turn Type
Prot
Perm
Prot
pm+pt
Perm
pm+pt
Protected Phases
5
2
1
6
3
8
7
4
Permitted Phases
2
8
8
4
Actuated Green, G (s)
15.0
65.5
65.5
8.2
58.7
8.4
4.5
4.5
2.2
1.4
Effective Green, g (s)
15.0
65.5
68.5
8.2
58.7
10.4
6.5
6.5
4.2
3.4
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.15
0.66
0.68
0.08
0.59
0.10
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.03
Clearance Time (s)
4.0
7.0
7.0
4.0
7.0
4.0
6.0
6.0
4.0
6.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
266
2318
1084
145
2980
144
121
103
78
55
v/s Ratio Prot
c0.09
c0.45
0.04
0.36
c0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
v/s Ratio Perm
0.09
c0.02
0.00
0.00
v/c Ratio
0.61
0.69
0.13
0.46
0.61
0.24
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.02
Uniform Delay, d1
39.7
10.9
5.4
43.8
13.3
41.0
43.7
43.7
46.0
46.7
Progression Factor
1.21
0.71
0.08
1.33
0.25
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
2.9
1.3
0.2
1.1
0.5
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.2
Delay (s)
50.8
9.0
0.6
59.1
3.7
41.9
43.8
43.8
46.3
46.9
Level of Service
D
A
A
E
A
D
D
D
D
D
Approach Delay (s)
11.6
5.7
42.4
46.7
Approach LOS
B
A
D
D
Intersection Summa
HCM Average Control Delay
9.2 HCM Level of Service A
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.61
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
64.2°% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
Matthew J. Delich , P. E.
Synchro 6 Light Report
Page 2
TABLE 3
Short Range (2013) Total Peak Hour Operation
T
Harmony/Technology-HP West
Access
(signal)
EB LT
D
D
EBT
A
C
EB RT
A
A
EB APPROACH
B
C
WB LT
E
E
WB T/RT
A
B
WB APPROACH
A
B
NB LT
D
E
NB
D
D
NB RT
D
D
NB APPROACH
D
E
SB LT
D
D
SB T/RT
D
D
SB APPROACH
D
D
OVERALL
A
C
13
7
APPENDIX C
n
0
Q
w
do
Harmony
Cl)
0
0
c
fS
a�
F-
--a-- - Denotes Lane
SHORT RANGE (2013) GEOMETRY
14
A&
N
Figure 8
s
APPENDIX B
0
Number: 30 Created: 5/12/2008
(5/12/081 All crosswalks and stencils will be Thermoplastic or epoxy. Thermoplastic is
preferred and is to be laid at time of final lift of asphalt
Page 2
3
Citv of Fort Collins
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Department: Traffic Operations
Date: June 9, 2008
Project: HARMONY TECHNOLOGY PARK, 4TH FILING - TYPE I
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than
the staff review meeting:
April 30, 2008
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Ward Stanford
Topic: Traffic
Number: 24 Created: 5/12/2008
[5/12/08] Please revise the Short Range Geometry, Fig 8, to reflect the 6 lane roadway
cross section.
Number: 25 Created: 5/12/2008
[5/12108] Please review the east/west lefts at Tech parkway as protected only left turns.
East/west may be programmed that way due to sight distance issues of the median offset of
the left turn lanes and the spped of Harmony. ST Total only. Done via a memo is ok.
Number: 26 Created: 5/12/2008
[5/12/08] Please provide analysis and documentation of Northbound storage lane lengths
on Teck Prkwy.
Number: 27 Created: 5/12/2008
[5/12/08) The west bound exit onto Tech Prkwy is two lanes wide. Please reduce to a single
lane wide (no left turns out are permitted).
Number: 28 Created: 5/12/2008
15/12/08] The west bound exit should be moved south about half way as it is located closer
to Harmony and releasing traffic right at the point of the indicated turn bays.
Number: 29 Created: 5/12/2008
[5/12/08] The proposed ped crossing south of the Intel Drive needs to be located closer to
the driveway and to Timberwood. We prefer the crossing be at the intersection for ped
visibility and to be able to command their crosswalk.
Signature
Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other
Utility Redlinc Utility Landscape
Page 1
Z
APPENDIX A
on May 22, 2008, "double yellow" striping will be painted on
this driveway for 1-2 car lengths (20'-351) to distinguish the
inbound and outbound lanes.
28.This comment refers to the location of the access to/from
Technology Parkway. As discussed with Ward Stanford on May 22,
2008, this access is approximately equidistant between Harmony
Road and Timberwood Drive (on -centers). It is at the best
location for the site plan. This access is located at the end
of the northbound left -turn lane approaching Harmony Road.
Do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions or desire
additional information. It is my expectation that this memorandum is
sufficient for this project to move forward. A new ITIS will not be
necessary. Thank you.
DELICH ASSOCIATES Traffic & Transportation Engineering
2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, Colorado 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 71 r
iy1KS;*};ic`ZU161vy1
P�® zS
TO: Mark Melchi, MAV Development Co.
���a J.
Angie Milewski, BHA Design ,,+ O�:°��� �:!.`•.i ''
Ward Stanford, Fort Collins Traffic Engineer
FROM: Matt Delich
DATE: June 12, 2008
SUBJECT: The MAVD Office Building Intermediate Transportation Impact
Study - Response to staff comments (File: 0814ME01)
This memorandum responds to Fort Collins staff comments (May 12,
2008) related to the "The MAVD Office Building Intermediate
Transportation Impact Study," (ITIS) dated March 2008. Specifically,
it responds to numbered items 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28. A copy of the
staff comments is provided in Appendix A.
24.This comment refers to the short range (2013) geometry (Figure
8). At the request of Ward Stanford, the geometry at the
Harmony/Technology-HP West Access intersection was changed to
reflect a six -lane cross section of Harmony Road. A revised
Figure 8 is provided in Appendix B.
25.This comment refers to the short range (2013) operation at the
Harmony/Technology-HP West Access intersection. At the request
of Ward Stanford, the eastbound and westbound left turns were
analyzed as protected left turns. Appendix C contains revised
analysis worksheets and a revised Table 3 (Short Range (2013)
Total Peak Hour Operation).
26.Ward Stanford also requested analysis and documentation of the
required storage lane length of the northbound left -turn lane at
the Harmony/Technology-HP West Access intersection. The queuing
analysis worksheets are also provided in Appendix C. The 95
percentile queue length is 44 feet in the morning peak hour and
197 feet in the afternoon peak hour. According to Figure 8-2 in
the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards, the required
storage length is 50 feet in the morning peak hour and 200-260
feet (minimum -desirable) in the afternoon peak hour.
27.This comment refers to the west site access to/from Technology
Parkway. This access was shown to be two lanes wide, allowing
one lane in and one lane out. Since there will be a median in
Technology Parkway, this access will be limited to right-
in/right-out. It is not necessary to have a raised island
("pork chop") in this driveway. As discussed with Ward Stanford