HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY TECH. PARK THIRD AMENDED ODP - 39-07 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYIV. CONCLUSIONS
This study assessed the impacts of the Harmony Tech Park ODP on
!I the long range (2030) street system in the vicinity of the proposed
development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded:
- The development of the Harmony Tech Park ODP is feasible from a
traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, the Harmony
Tech Park ODP will generate approximately 31,445 daily trip ends,
2978 morning peak hour trip ends, and 3524 afternoon peak hour
trip ends.
In the long range (2030) future, given development of the Harmony
Tech Park ODP and an increase in background traffic, all of the
key intersections are shown to operate acceptably with the
recommended geometry and control.
- Acceptable level of service is achieved for pedestrian, bicycle,
and transit modes based upon the measures in the multi -modal
transportation guidelines.
When specific development plans are submitted for all or a part
;I of the Harmony Tech Park, a detailed transportation impact study
will be required.
21
�.J
Transit Level of Service
Currently, Transfort serves this area of Fort Collins with Routes
i 16 and 17. Routes 16 and 17 run along Harmony Road and Ziegler Road
to the west of the Harmony Tech Park site. According to the Fort
'? Collins Transit System Plan, Harmony Road will be an enhanced transit
corridor with 10 minute service and Ziegler Road will have a feeder
route with 30 minute service. Transit level of service will be in the
B category.
Ul y
N
W
a a
r
Harmony
0 0 0
CD 6
N m c
~ _j U
JII�
Rock Creek
-as - -Denotes Lane
LONG RANGE (2030) GEOMETRY
19
Figure 8
Continued from previous page
TABLE 3
Long Range (2030) Total Peak Hour Operation
..w _i. e.;g I. sz
Rock Creek/Lady Moon
(all -way stop)
NB LT/T/RT
D
B
SB LT
B
B
SB T/RT
B
c
SB APPROACH
B
cEB
LT/T
D
c
EB RT
A
A
EB APPROACH
D
c
WB LT/T/RT
D
D
OVERALL
c
c
Rock Creek/Cinquefoil
(stop sign)
NB LT/T/RT
c
c
SB LT/TIRT
B
B
EB LT
A
A
WB LT
A
A
18
Continued from orevious naae
TABLE 3
Long Range (2030) Total Peak Hour Operation
"Of.
Harmony/Lady Moon
(signal)
EB LT
D
C
EB T
C
D
EB RT
D
C
EB APPROACH
C
D
WB LT
D
E
WB T
D
C
WB RT
B
B
WB APPROACH
D
C
NB LT
D
E
NB
C
D
NB RT
C
D
NB APPROACH
D
E
SB LT
C
C
SBT
C
D
SB RT
C
D
SB APPROACH
C
D
OVERALL
D
D
Harmony/Cinquefoil
(RT-in/RT-out)
NB RT
B
B
Ziegler/Rock Creek
(signal)
EB LT/T/RT
D
C
WB LT
D
D
WB T
C
C
WB RT
C
C
WB APPROACH
D
C
NB LT
A
C
NB
C
C
NB RT
B
C
NB APPROACH
B
C
SB LT
8
B
SBT
A
C
SB RT
A
A
SB APPROACH
A
B
OVERALL
C
C
Continued on next page
is
17
TABLE 3
Long Range (2030) Total Peak Hour Operation
0 x
Harmony/Ziegler
(signal)
EB LT
E
D
EB T
C
C
EB RT
B
C
EB APPROACH
C
C
WB LT
D
D
WB T
D
C
WB RT
E
C
WB APPROACH
D
C
NB LT
E
E
NB
D
D
NB RT
C
C
NB APPROACH
D
D
SB LT
E
E
SBT
C
D
SB RT
C
D
SB APPROACH
D
D
OVERALL
D
D
Harmony/Technology-HP West
Access
(signal)
EB LT
C
C
EBT
B
B
EB RT
B
A
EB APPROACH
B
B
WB LT
D
C
WB T/RT
8
B
WB APPROACH
B
B
NB LT
C
D
NB
C
D
NB RT
C
D
NB APPROACH
C
D
SB LT
C
D
SBT
C
D
SB RT
C
D
SB APPROACH
C
D
OVERALL
B
C
Continued on next page
16
Operation Analysis
Capacity analyses were performed at the key intersections. The
operations analyses were conducted for the long range future
reflecting a year 2030 condition with development of the Harmony Tech
Park ODP.
Using the traffic
intersections operate in
indicated in Table 3.
provided in Appendix C.
during the peak hours.
Geometry
volumes shown in Figure 7, the key
the long range (2030) total condition as
Calculation forms for these analyses are
The key intersections will operate acceptably
The long range (2030) approach geometry is shown in Figure 8.
The geometry at the key intersections in the long range future was
determined based upon achieving acceptable operation and meeting the
criteria in LCUASS.
Pedestrian Level of Service
Appendix D shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of
the Harmony Tech Park ODP. There will be six pedestrian destinations
within 1320 feet of the Harmony Tech Park ODP. These are: 1) the
residential/commercial area to the west of the site; 2) the future
commercial area to the northwest of the site; 3) the industrial campus
to the north of the site; 4) the future commercial/residential
development to the east of the site; 5) the residential area to the
southeast of the site; and 6) the institutional use to the southwest
of the site. This site is in an area type termed "other." Since this
is an MTIS and many of the streets will not exist for a number of
years, the "actual" level of service for each factor is not relevant.
The level of service determination assumes that future residential
developments will build their streets and adjacent streets in
accordance with Fort Collins Standards. This being the case,
pedestrian facilities will exist where they currently do not. This is
a reasonable assumption. If this does not occur or is not accepted by
the City, then acceptable pedestrian level of service cannot be
achieved. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix D.
The minimum level of service for "other" is C for all categories.
With the assumed future pedestrian facilities along future streets,
the pedestrian level of service will be acceptable.
Bicycle Level of Service
Appendix D shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of
the Harmony Tech Park ODP. Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS
criteria, there are three bicycle destinations within 1320 feet of the
Harmony Tech Park ODP. A bicycle LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix
D.
m
CD
a�
fV
Q
4
425/700
rryi $ S
J
MOM
80/1 90
2201120
1560/1585
o 0 as
295/185
m i�
N <
N
N
y
m
a
8
`
o
70/10
I� IN
r
r- o
�n M �11Oil 15
*)Im f 40/120
+ �,as/a35
65/15 Rock Creek
150140 y
60/75 o v co
0)A0
r- IT
2060P1540
A& N
N
W
a
oTZ
205/10
2080/1945
�J 355275 f 2640/2230
160/5 + 3 O� 1 2r Harmony
1545/2120 y o g
2351150 �_ N
n
N
C _—
O O
j
-p C_
� U
r- CD 0
80�0
&D rn _
'°
150160
185/195 y
40/90
n - CD
--w— AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
LONG RANGE (2030) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
t
p` 40/40
0
I� IZ-115/45
J i 5/10
2151140 --)� 1 f r
301115 O 2 LO
30/50 o Z o
Figure 7
I Li 14
2060P1540
A& N
N
W
a
oTZ
205/10
2080/1945
�J 355275 f 2640/2230
160/5 + 3 O� 1 2r Harmony
1545/2120 y o g
2351150 �_ N
n
N
C _—
O O
j
-p C_
� U
r- CD 0
80�0
&D rn _
'°
150160
185/195 y
40/90
n - CD
--w— AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
LONG RANGE (2030) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
t
p` 40/40
0
I� IZ-115/45
J i 5/10
2151140 --)� 1 f r
301115 O 2 LO
30/50 o Z o
Figure 7
I Li 14
r- CD 0
80�0
&D rn _
'°
150160
185/195 y
40/90
n - CD
--w— AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
LONG RANGE (2030) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
t
p` 40/40
0
I� IZ-115/45
J i 5/10
2151140 --)� 1 f r
301115 O 2 LO
30/50 o Z o
Figure 7
I Li 14
--w— AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
LONG RANGE (2030) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
t
p` 40/40
0
I� IZ-115/45
J i 5/10
2151140 --)� 1 f r
301115 O 2 LO
30/50 o Z o
Figure 7
I Li 14
rl
N
N
�
�
N
m
cc
m
W
rn
a
=
a
_
I �
N
pN_p
t0 N
r-181 /480
r 113J-11
89i279
�— 150/477
124/42
328/220
r 441/209
4441197
448/222
2521240 y
r 57/239 y
J� Harmony
102/46
nl n
252195 co224/111
m 231/169 ---
N
o T
N
R N
N
a)M
O
00
O
�
�
7
CC
O
cr
'i
I
�
O ^
LO
N
IT
a
'r cn v
37/37
a M
r) cv �
31/10
r 5J200 M
12
1r
125✓426
# +
I
38/67 J
72126
4/1 �
Rock Creek
112/51
f ( 213/137
[�40/37
100/29 —9--
rn
168/l53 —�
m N N 19/74 y
cD
12157
c0
Of
N O
.--
M
SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6
13
5%
NOM
o to
N
Rock Creek
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
N N 4
cc
rn
c
—
0
0
0
o
0
c
>'
v
c
m
�
U
Employment
H
Residential
12
20%
25%
Harmony
5%
10%
Figure 5
TABLE 2
Trip Generation
AM
Parcel C
Parcel E
Parcel G
Parcel H
Parcel I
Parcel J
Pared K
Parcel M
Pared N
Parcel 0
Parcel S
11
D
0
K_ , f-I 97909" OR
WILDWOOD
SUBDIVISION
(3.0 Gma De.;7 ,..
4.0 Net Dae4y) - -
Qa
OEE W 1tl
J Z
/IA J
W
N
f
�
EXISTING SIGNAUZED
INTERSECTION •�� �
E)OSr
Alf S TI NLLTURN5IGNM. L vi of Yutf��' �j, FULL TRN51GNAL
INTERSECTION
PROPOSED
OUT
D
h (q
•• HARMONYCORRIDOR'INTERSECTION
.,. ....
... - ,,,
HARMONY ROAD
W HARMONY CORRIDOR
W HARMONY CORRIDOR I V LANDSCAPE SETBACK
LANDSCAPE SETBACK n '
PRIMARY&SECONDARY USES NOT PART
S I 13.39 ACRES TOTAL
Imur.w 5.14 ACRES PRIMARY
PRIMARYBSECON ', a K�•� 8.25 ACRES SECONDARY
USES ....' • • _._.._•._.._v _....�
�.----"'�
•'
:L I
= _
m :
y
7
0
-•
21.5 ACRES TOTAL
0.35 FAR
.__.(./-i75,0D08.F.-GFA)
15.93 ACRES PRIMARY ''
! '
�'",o;`R1pN
I
w
°'. (�
n- 3
5.W ACRES SECONDA
I
.' !.� i
a
•
W�j
H
.
.o w a • ®
(+!- 328,000 S F:. GFA)_
r+vu
. i 1 . \ ; . �� Aar
w •
Zw
OJ
-_
.�
LL
INTEL
=
U)
b •
: ; •. ,_ - (COLLECTOR STREET)
Jv
•
K
• ,
I!I
(EXI I G)
z
• >
2r
b
00
3z.o ORES
U 0
•
p
_
Y a
PRIMARY & SECONDARY USES
Fw-"
• o
6 Ov
a
_...
C1w 19.7ACRESTOTAL
15.415ACRES PRIMARY
ACC
• PRIMARY USES
Zz
_
•�- PARCEL BOUN
20
=,.; 13.9ACRES
(- - 2W ACRES NON-RES SECON DARY
---
}
-_; +/-1810,5W S. F. GFA)
0.35 FAR
ib
a • a •
Q
'-" •
+!- 260,000 S.F. GFA
b' O • O
s •
• A
J
i "
_ ..
x+oPosEn FU
TURN
®
}' -- I i •
u •
• •
-
NOT A PART
-ODP BOUNDARY
�-L.
NTERSECTIONa
.,
'_ •
P
O
•
-
o • • • • '
PRIMARY &
oPa1 SPACE
PRIMARY USES
O
°'"
SECONDARY USES •
10AACRESTOTAL
54.1 ACRES
PRIMARY USES
2.06 ACRES PRIMARY
0.35 FAR
(+/-825.000 S.F. GFA)
•
® 11.7ACRES
0.35 FAR
8.34ACRESU A ONDARY
DU/AC
O
152,500 S.F. GFA)
+1
( 150 Units)
1 ®
SEUON ARY
• • • • ab
• • •- o b ®
a
i
1
PRIMARYUSES
• • • a
-------
.
A •
-- 14.15ACRES
®
40.55 ACRES
0.35 FAR
•
•
O 0 '-- -� p �;
L _._-____ _-
•..; , O- - -
I --� - ---0 -�-• --• -- --
18 DU/AC
--�+/- 250 Units)
607.000'.S.F.GFA) ® ( t
® J NE USES • ® fit" 1 SECONDARY USES
)sIOEr= I `I • 13.SACRC SECONDARY USE
® a 18 DU/AC 11.2ACRES DRARNAGE a
2.0 0TS • (+/- 240 Units) 18 DU/AC ��+
0.35 FAR • • �4, , (+1- 200 Units) AREA
I-30,SOO S. �(+I • � IAA O
2.84 ACRES
GFA) • O O • • O O 0 a 0 ® ® O O • a A • 00tt • • • • a w
-W OSED TURN ROCK CREEK DRIVE
INTERSECTION (COLLECTOR STREET)
I� EXISTING TREE, TYPICAL
FOSSIL RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL
' 1 PROPOSED\
FUTURE STRE
ILLOW BROOK"EcrroN
- i I SUBgMSION__-
RemIPDP
I 4`2 NNd Camp/.
5.4>
10
NOT A PART
`Ii
Q
o
N
r
0
A
�q
Q?'
In
U<i
Ww.
z
..
J
90 )
b
NOT A PART
A&
SCALE: 1 "=400'
PROPOSED
FUTURE STRI
01'r CONNECTION
Figure 4
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The Harmony Tech Park ODP is a mixed -use development, located
between Ziegler Road and County Road 7, and between Harmony Road and
Rock Creek Drive in Fort Collins. Figure 4 shows a site plan of the
( Harmony Tech Park ODP. The long range analysis (Year 2030) includes
development of the Harmony Tech Park ODP and an appropriate increase
in background traffic, due to normal growth and other potential
developments in the area.
Trip Generation
Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a
development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A
compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation,
7th Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by
the proposed/expected uses at this site. Table 2 shows the expected
trip .generation on a daily and peak hour basis. Portions of Parcels N
and O are constructed or are under construction. Internal trip capture
and passby traffic were applied using techniques contained in the Trip
Generation Handbook, 2°d Edition, ITE. Internal trip capture
calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix A.
Trip Distribution
Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for
the Harmony Tech Park ODP based upon the location of trip productions
i for these types of land uses and engineering judgment. Future year
data was obtained from the NFRRTP and other traffic studies. Figure 5
shows the trip distribution used for the Harmony Tech Park ODP.
Trip Assignment
Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are
expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are
the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 6 shows the
site generated peak hour traffic assignment with full development of
the Harmony Tech Park ODP.
Total Traffic
Figure 7 shows the total (site plus background) long range (2030)
peak hour traffic at the key intersections with development of the
Harmony Tech Park ODP. The street system in the long range (2030)
future will include the extension of Rock Creek Drive to CR7.
9
i
Continued from previous page
TABLE 1
Current Peak Hour Operation
.1-SWINW
Ziegler/Rock Creek
(signal)
EB LT/T/RT
D
D
\AfB LT
D
D
Vs/B T
D
D
WB RT
D
D
WB APPROACH
D
D
NB LT
A
A
NB
B
A,
NB RT
A
A
NB APPROACH
B
A
SB LT
A
A
SB T
B
A
SB RT
A
A
SB APPROACH
B
A
OVERALL
B
B
Rock Creek/Lady Moon
(all -way stop)
NB LT/T/RT
A
A
SB LT
A
A
SB T/RT
A
A
SB APPROACH
A
A
EB LT/T
A
A
EB RT
A
A
EB APPROACH
A
A
WB LT/TfLT
A
A
OVERALL
A
A
8
TABLE 1
Current Peak Hour Operation
Harmony/Ziegler
(signal)
EB LT
E
C
EB T
C
D
EB RT
B
B
EB APPROACH
C
D
WB LT
C
E
WB T
D
D
WB RT
F
E
WB APPROACH
D
D
NB LT
C
C
NB T/RT
D
D
NB APPROACH
D
D
SB LT
E
D
SB T/RT
C
C
SB APPROACH
D
D
OVERALL
D
D
Harmony/HP West Access
(stop sign)
SB LT
A
F
SB RT
C
D
SB APPROACH
C
D
EB LT
C
C
Harmony/Lady Moon
(signal)
EB LT
E
C
EBT
C
C
EB RT
B
C
EB APPROACH
C
C
WB LT
B
C
WB T
E
C
WB RT
B
A
WB APPROACH
D
C
NB LT
C
C
NB
C
C
NB RT
C
C
NB APPROACH
C
C
SB LT
C
D
SBT
C
C
SB RT
C
C
SB APPROACH.
C
D
OVERALL
D
C
Continued on next page
7
N
ow
d
m m
N
CO
CD342/441
CO N
f 1075fl402
511119
�
128/86
1078/l349 —�
109/72
m
04
�0404
10 n o 17/6
�— 146111895
84/14
1331/17T7
N
a—
55/55
v N n
— 23/13
J
i
/— 1015
5577/11�i
r Rock Creek
5119 —�
o
59/16
N m O1
coo m
v
►/ IM Till
*A
A&
N
N
N
f0
W
a
— 25111
'n Cl) CD
+ `
r 1447/1743
— 21 /51
xw
) f r
Harmony
1114/1738
m
121b7
N
� ° n
0
0
2
v
m
J
chi
39/15
cIo rn
f 65/31
1 �
— 3/0
35/6
=7
`*
BALANCED RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
6
Figure 3
N
rn
m
$ �q
N
348/440
f 1103/1383
44/134
128/86
1101/1282 y
m tO
92181
O
m
N to
o Q 54147
t° � f 23113
10/5
W10 f
51 /9 —� o
59/16
0
r� o 17/6
1323✓1357
84/14
1247/1456
Rock Creek
�— AM/PM
RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
5
N
N
�
N
;
w
W
0_
255/8
�1420/1748
21151
�
20018
/
Harmony
1087/1824
m _
12/39�
cl)
C
O
O
2
%.
f0
J
�i
— 39/15
31
3/0
�-3/0
3516
} .
34/46
22r27
"
n
N
Figure 2
Existing Traffic and Operation
Recent peak hour traffic counts at the key intersections are
shown in Figure 2. Raw traffic data is provided in Appendix A. The
traffic data for the Harmony/Ziegler and Harmony/Lady Moon
intersections was collected in March 2007. The traffic data for the
Ziegler/Rock Creek and Rock Creek/Lady Moon intersections was
collected in December 2006. The traffic data for the Harmony/HP West
Access intersection was collected in November 2007. Since the traffic
counts were performed on different days and at different times of the
year, traffic volumes were averaged and balanced between the key
intersections, as shown in Figure 3.
Existing Operation
The key intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in
the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the peak hour traffic shown
in Figure 3, the current peak hour operation is shown in Table 1.
Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. A description of level
of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000
Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor
Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are provided in Appendix B. The
key intersections operate acceptably during both the morning and
afternoon peak hours. This site is in a commercial corridor.
Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours
in commercial corridors is defined as level of service D or better,
overall. Any leg or movement can operate at level of service E. At
unsignalized intersections, acceptable operation is shown as not
applicable for arterial/local or arterial/collector intersections.
Pedestrian Facilities
There are pedestrian facilities adjacent to developed properties.
Sidewalks will be incorporated within and adjacent to this
development.
Bicycle Facilities
Bicycle lanes exist on Harmony Road, Ziegler Road, Rock Creek
Drive, and Lady Moon Drive. Bike lanes are not required on local or
connector streets.
Transit Facilities
Currently, Transfort serves this area of Fort Collins with Routes
16 and 17. Routes 16 and 17 run along Harmony Road and Ziegler Road
to the west of the Harmony Tech Park site.
9
SITE LOCATION
SCALE: 1 "=3000'
Figure 1
3
The location of
It is important that a
be presented.
Land Use
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
the Harmony Tech Park ODP is shown in Figure 1.
thorough understanding of the existing conditions
Land uses in the area are
industrial, institutional, or
residential uses to the south an
the site is flat (<2% grade) f
Industrial uses exist to the n
corner of the property (Intel).
of the site. The center of For
proposed Harmony Tech Park ODP.
Roads
primarily either vacant (agriculture),
residential. There are various
d west of the site. Land adjacent to
rom a traffic operations perspective.
orth (HP/Avago) and in the northwest
Fossil Ridge High School is southwest
t Collins lies to the northwest of the
The primary streets near the Harmony Tech Park site are Harmony
Road, Ziegler Road, Lady Moon Drive, and Rock Creek Drive.
Harmony Road is adjacent to the north side of the Harmony Tech
li Park ODP site. It is an east -west street designated as a six -lane
arterial street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it
has a four -lane cross section with appropriate auxiliary lanes. Some
I segments are being expanded to three lanes in each direction in
conjunction with the Front Range Village development. The existing
speed limit in this area is 50 mph.
Ziegler Road is classified as a four -lane arterial, north of Rock
Creek Drive and a two-lane arterial street, south of Rock Creek Drive
on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Ziegler Road has a
four -lane cross section with auxiliary lanes north of Harmony Road.
The Harmony/Ziegler intersection has signal control. The existing
speed limit in this area is 40 mph.
Lady Moon Drive is a north -south street designated as a collector
street south of Harmony Road on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan.
Currently, Lady Moon Drive has a two-lane cross section south of
Harmony Road. The north leg (of Lady Moon Drive) serves the Hewlett-
Packard campus. The Harmony/Lady Moon intersection has signal
control.
Rock Creek Drive is an east -west street designated as a collector
street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Rock Creek
Drive has a two-lane cross section east of Ziegler Road. The
Ziegler/Rock Creek intersection has signal control. The Rock
Creek/Lady Moon intersection has all -way stop sign control.
2
I. INTRODUCTION
'i This Master Transportation Impact Study (MTIS) addresses the
capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed
Harmony Tech Park ODP. The proposed Harmony Tech Park ODP is located
between Ziegler Road and County Road 7, and between Harmony Road and
Rock Creek Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado.
During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made
with the project planning consultant (BHA Design), the project
developers (MAV Development Company and Imago Enterprises), and the City
of Fort Collins staff. This study generally conforms to the format set
forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines as
contained in the "Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards" (LCUASS).
A scoping discussion was held with the Fort Collins Traffic Engineer.
The Base Assumptions form is provided in Appendix A. This MTIS includes
only a long range analysis, since overall development plan approval is
being sought. When specific preliminary development plans are submitted
for all or a part of this property, a detailed transportation impact
study will be required. The study involved the following steps:
- Collect physical, traffic, and development data;
j - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment;
Determine peak hour traffic volumes;
- Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key
intersections;
Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and
transit modes of transportation.
1
i
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
Page
1.
I
Site
Location ........................................
3
2.
Recent
Peak Hour Traffic .............................
5
j 3.
Balanced Recent Peak Hour Traffic ....................
6
4.
Site
Plan ............................................
10
5.
Trip
Distribution ....................................
12
6.
Site
Generated Peak Hour Traffic .....................
13
7.
Long
Range (2030) Total Peak Hour Traffic ............
14
8.
Long
Range (2030) Geometry ...........................
19
APPENDIX
A Base Assumptions Form/Traffic Counts
B Current Peak Hour Operation
C Long Range Total Peak Hour Operation
D Pedestrian/Bicycle Level of Service Worksheets
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. Introduction ......................................... 1
II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2
LandUse ............................................. 2
Roads................................................ . 2
Existing Traffic and Operation 4
Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 4
Bicycle Facilities ................................... 4
Transit Facilities ................................... 4
III. Proposed Development ................................. 9
Trip Generation ...................................... 9
Trip Distribution .................................... 9
Trip Assignment ...................................... 9
Total Traffic ........................................ 9
Operation Analysis ................................... 15
Geometry............................................. 15
Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 15
Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 15
Transit Level of Service ............................. 20
IV. Conclusions .......................................... 21
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 7
2. Trip Generation ...................................... 11
3. Long Range (2030) Total Peak Hour Operation .......... 16
HARMONY TECH PARK ODP
MASTER TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
DECEMBER 2007
Prepared for:
MAV Development Company
Market Place Building
303 Detroit Street, Suite 301
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
And
Imago Enterprises
140 Palmer Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Prepared by:
DELICH ASSOCIATES
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: 970-669-2061
FAX: 970-669-5034