The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHARMONY TECH. PARK 3RD FILING, CUSTOM BLENDING - FDP - 01-08/A - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)FORT COLLINS•LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT GO \ SOUTH FORT COLLINS SANITATION DISTRICT April18,2008 Mr. Ted Shepard City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Harmony Technology Park 4a' Filing Custom Blending Dear Willkomm, The Fort Collins — Loveland Water District and the South Fort Collins Sanitation District have reviewed the above mentioned project and submit the following comments. There is a discrepancy in the water tap size between the drawings (2 inch) and the tap application (1'/2 inch). The parcel number needs to be provided on the tap application. Previously approved drawings indicate a 24 inch water line from Rock Creek to Precision Drive in Technology Parkway. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 226-3104, ext. 104, if you have any questions or require additional information. Respectfully, M�Zry W. Farrill, P.E. District Engineer xc: Mr. Michael D. DiTullio, District Manager Mr. Anthony Willkomm, Stantec Inc. 5150 Snead Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80525 Phone (970) 226-3104 Fax (970) 226-0186 2. On the Lighting Plan, be sure to include a quantity for the number of fixtures, not just the lamps per fixture. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely: P•-jc Ted Shepard Chief Planner Page 4 t Topic: Utility Plans Number: 50 Created: 5/7/2008 [5/7/08] Why is the storm drainage being discharged into the pond through a subdrain system and a level spreader? Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: WaterMastewater Number: 16 Created: 2/19/2008 [5/8/08] [2/19/08] Information pertaining to water service size is conflicting in various spots. Number: 53 Created: 5/8/2008 [518/08] Water main from Rock Creek to Precision to be 24". Number: 54 Created: 5/8/2008 [5/8/08] Add 24" butterfly valve at point of connection near Rock Creek. Number: 55 Created: 5/8/2008 [5/8/08] Use joint restraint for the water main lowerings rather than thrust and gravity blocks. Provide calculations on the required restrained lengths on each side of the lowerings and label clearly on the plans. Add a note (as outlined in the redlines) regarding MEGALUGS or pre -approved equal. Number: 56 Created: 5/8/2008 [5/8108] Label lengths of pipe between valves, fittings, etc, etc. Number: 57 Created: 5/8/2008 [5/8/08] Add butterfly valve, air release valve and tracer wire (2) details. Number: 58 Created: 5/8/2008 [5/8/08] See redlined plans for other comments. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: Zoning Number: 5 Created: 2/7/2008 [4/24/08] [2/7/08] Please show building envelope, footprint and dimensions on site plan. 4-24-08 Building dimensions are still not shown on the site plan Number: 7 Created: 2/8/2008 [4/24/08] [218/08] Add note to landscape notes regarding installation of landscaping prior to issuance of CO. 4-24-08 Landscape assurance note needs to include all landscaping, not just that in the drainage tract, but all landscaping on that site. Comments from Current Planning 1. Please consider adding a small cluster of evergreen trees south of the proposed tanks. Page 3 I Topic: General Number: 10 Created: 2/8/2008 [5/6/08] Carried over for reference. [2/8/08] The offsite pond (Pond B) shown on the northwest corner of Technology Parkway and Rock Creek Drive is considered development and as such the street frontages abutting Pond B needs to be obligated for. Sidewalk along Technology Parkway and Rock Creek Drive abutting Pond B would need to be escrowed for if not being built at this time. If a repay was filed with the City for the construction of Rock Creek Drive, the frontage abutting Pond B would also be required. Number: 11 Created: 2/8/2008 [5/6/08] Carried over for reference. [2/8/08] The offsite pond (Pond B) should have a 9 foot utility easement dedicated along Technology Parkway and Rock Creek Drive. Number: 44 Created: 5/2/2008 [5/2/08] Please note that the Engineering Development Review Manager has determined that there is $300 owed in TDR Fees from the PDP. Number: 49 Created: 5/7/2008 [5/7/08] As a heads -up, the additional width in Technology Parkway that encompasses the center turn lane which was previously a median, is not reimbursable from street oversizing. Topic: Plat Number: 37 Created: 2/20/2008 [5/7/08] Technical Services has the following revised comments: 1. Boundary and legal close but have minor differences. 2. Remove all references to Cambridge Avenue. [2/20/08] Technical Services has the following comments: 1. No north arrow and scale plat. 2. Plat closes, legal does not match plat at curve C7. Area is good. 3. Show how all the adjoining streets were dedicated. 4. Minor line over text issues. 5. Looks good as a preliminary plat. 6. Who owns and maintains Tract A? Number: 46 Created: 5/7/2008 [5/7/08] The "sight visibility easement' specified on the plat and other documents should be called out as a "sight distance easement' on the various documents. In addition, please provide our standard sight distance easement language on the plat. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Detention Pond Landscaping Number: 45 Created: 5/6/2008 [5/6/08] Thank you for providing adequate landscaping for the detention pond on Tract A. The lower portion of the pond is to be planted with a wetland seed mix, will there be sufficient water in this pond to sustain wetland vegetation? If not what would be done to address that. ` Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins BHA Design, Inc Date: 5/12/2008 1603 Oakridge Drive - Fort Collins, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for HARMONY TECH PARK, 3RD FILING, CUSTOM BLENDING PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Drawings Number: 15 Created: 2/19/2008 [5/6/08] Please remove the reference to "plus added median" below the typical cross section on Sheet C-003. Is the use of the broken yellow line for the inside of the reversible lane ideal given that there are no turning movements currently to necessitate entering the center lane? [2/19/08] With the median on Technology Parkway intended to have landscaping per C-003 then additional information at the time of final will be required, such as landscaping plan, subdrain systems, etc. Number: 32 Created: 2/20/2008 [5/6/08] The applicant's response is fine, though interestingly, I'm now realizing that west of Technology Parkway may not necessarily be a public street. Maybe a note on the construction plan should be provided indicating that Precision Drive may or may not develop as a public street west of Technology Parkway. Information shown for reference only. [2/20/08] For the future Precision Drive section please provide horizontal curve data. Number: 33 Created: 2/20/2008 [5/6/08] See response to #32. [2/20/08] For the future Precision Drive section, please clarify the profile view information, the lines aren't apparent as which might be proposed, existing, or other. Number: 47 Created: 5/7/2008 [5/7/08] Please update the details in LCUASS, many of the details are not the current version. Number: 48 Created: 5/7/2008 [5/7/08] The typical road sections sheet seems to have the Precision Drive cross section shown incorrectly at the future sidewalk would be in the 11' parkway delineation. Number: 51 Created: 5/7/2008 [5/7/08] Please add additional spot elevations at the PI per LCUASS 7-28. Number: 52 Created: 5/7/2008 [5/7/08] The use of a cross pan at the high point of a flowline (Tech Parkway and Precision) is odd and technically not to standard. Can itjust be eliminated? Perhaps in general it might be better not to build the curb return at the west leg of this intersection since it may not be a public street or a street for that matter with future development. Page 1