Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout637 COWAN STREET - PDP/FDP - FDP130030 - CORRESPONDENCE -redlines. Response: King Surveyors, Inc. is preparing this sheet. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 12/03/2013 12/03/2013: Please remove the Planning Certificate from sheet 2. Response: King Surveyors, Inc. is preparing this sheet. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/13/2013 12/03/2013: Add a note to the site plan describing the planned use of the existing service and identifying which lot is utilizing each service. 08/13/2013: Can the sewer services be switched so that the west portion of the existing service is used by the proposed house and the existing house is using the new service to the alley? This would avoid having the sewers cross which could lead to confusion for future owners. Response: A note has been added to the utility plan. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/13/2013 12/03/2013: Meter pits for 3/4" meters are not traffic rated and, therefore, cannot be located in the driveway. We need to discuss options. O8/13/2013: Show the existing curb stop on the service to the house on the north lot. Install the water meter in a pit within 2 feet of the curb stop. Response: The existing curb stop has been added to the construction drawings. The existing curb stop is within the proposed driveway due to the separation required by the existing tree. The water service will be extended under the driveway and the water meter will be placed in the basement for Lot 1. Department: Zoning Contact: Peter Barnes, 970-416-2355, pbarnes@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/18/2013 11/18/2013: The building will need to comply with the standards in Section 4.8 of the Land Use Code. Sec. 4.8(F)(1) requires the front entrance include an architectural feature such as a front porch, portico or landing. This feature should be located within the buiding envelopes. If the envelopes shown don't account for this feature, then they will need to be revised. Also note that per Sec. 4.8(F)(1)(c), a garage needs to be recessed at least 10' behind the front setback of the building, so please take this into account when designing a house. 12/03/2013: This has been added, but "Jim Schmidt, this" needs to be added (where shown) to the Notarial Certificate. See redlines. 08/08/2013: If there is a Lienholder, or if it is not known whether there will be a Lienholder, please add a si nature block. This may be removed later if neccessary. Comment Originated: 08/08/2013 12/03/2013: Please add (where shown) "Jim Schmidt, this" to the Notarial Certificate. See redlines. 08/08/2013: Please add ", by Barry M. Schram" to the Notarial Certificate. See redlines. Comment Originated: 08/08/2013 12/03/2013: There are still issues. See redlines. 08/08/2013: There are line over text issues on the Plat. See redlines. Comment Originated: 08/08/2013 12/03/2013: This has been added, but please add spaces between "Page" & "48". See redlines. 08/08/2013: Please add street right of way dedication information for both Cowan & Laurel Streets. See redlines. Comment Originated: 08/08/2013 12/03/2013: This has not been done. 08/08/2013: Please show the right of way line on the opposite side of Cowan & Laurel Streets. See redlines. Comment Originated: 08/08/2013 12/03/2013: This has not been done. 08/08/2013: Please show the subdivision information for the blocks on the opposite side of Cowan & Laurel Streets. See redlines. Comment Originated: 12/03/2013 12/03/2013: Please add a space between 'Book 1" & "at" in the legal description. See redlines. Comment Originated: 12/03/2013 12/03/2013: If the west line of the Richard Taranow property is to be shown, the southwest comer of Block 186 should be moved west of this line. See redlines. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 12/03/2013 12/03/2013: Please change the title of sheet 1 to "Site & Utility Plan". See redlines. Response: King Surveyors, Inc. is preparing this sheet. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 12/03/2013 12/03/2013: The "Lots 1 & 2" is not necessary, since the whole subdivision is covered by the plan. See redlines. Response: King Surveyors, Inc. is preparing this sheet. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 12/03/2013 12/03/2013: Please change the index on sheet 1 to reflect the plan titles on each sheet. See elevations. 08/13/2013: Please provide a grading plan including spot elevations showing how the drainage will flow off the lot. A cross-section may be required for the side yard swales. Response: The grading plan has been revised. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/13/2013 12/03/2013: This still needs to be submitted. 08/13/2013: Please provide a drainage addendum describing the drainage design. Response: A drainage addendum has been prepared. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Originated: 08/08/2013 12/03/2013: There are still issues on sheets 1 & 2. See redlines. 08/08/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 1 & 2. See redlines. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 12/03/2013 12/03/2013: Please change the title in the titleblock to "Details" on sheets 5 & 6. See redlines. Response: The detail sheets have been revised. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 12/03/2013 12/03/2013: Please remove the Planning Certificate from sheets 5 & 6. Response: This has been removed. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 12/03/2013 12/03/2013: IMPREVIOUS SITE PLAN: The "Lots 1 & 2" is not necessary, since the whole subdivision is covered by the plan. See redlines. Response: CCG has assumed that this sheet has been replaced by the Drainage Addendum document. Topic: Landsca a Plans Comment Originated: 08/08/2013 12/03/2013: Please remove the Planning Certificate from both plans. 08/08/2013: No comments. Topic: Plat Comment Originated: 08/08/2013 12/03/2013: These have not been corrected. 08/08/2013: Please change "Lot 186" to 'Block 186" in the Statement Of Ownership And Subdivision and in the notes thoughout the Plat. See redlines. Comment Originated: 08/08/2013 5 Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224-6152, dmartine@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/15/2013 11/15/2013: Doug Martine in Light & Power Engineering received a utility plan on approximately October 4, 2013. An email was subsequently sent to Anne Marks (for Barry Schram) indicating issues that became evident. There is an existing underground power line along the south side of the adjacent lot at 631 Cowan. The planned sewer line from the alley will need to maintain a minimum lateral separation from the power line at least equal to the lesser of 10 feet, or the depth of the sewer line. The same minimum clearance also applies to the sewer and electric services crossing lot 1 to lot 2. Also, the utility plan appears to show the electric service to lot 2 crossing under the S.W. corner of the existing house. This electric service must be a minimum of 3 feet from the building. Please contact Doug Martine at (970)224-6152 with any questions. Response: The proposed sanitary sewer service to the alley has been relocated to provide 6.5 feet separation with the electric utility. The. utility services that cross Lot 1 have been revised to provide as much separation as possible. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Don Kapperman, , Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/15/2013 08/14/2013: Developer to provide 1" conduit from house to comcast pedestal. (add note) Don Kapperman 970 567-0245 Response: This note has been added to the utility plan. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 08/14/2013: PREMISE IDENTIFICATION Comment Originated: 08/14/2013 New and existing buildings shall be plainly identified. Address numbers shall be visible from the street fronting the property, plainly visible, and posted with a minimum of six-inch numerals on a contrasting background. 2006 International Fire Code 505.1 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/13/2013 12/03/2013: Grading plan needs to be more clear and have more detail including F.F. 4 concerns if the City accepted these mylars with the note remaining. Response: This has been corrected. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013 12/04/2013: Evaluate if the street tree south of the drive way can be placed 8 feet from the driveway and at least 6 feet from the water service line to be to separation standards. Response: Coordinate with landscape architect. Topic: Landsca a Plans 12/04/2013: Comment Originated: 12/04/2013 Please add this landscape note if it does not already appear on the plans. • A permit must be obtained from the City forester before any trees or shrubs as noted on this plan are planted, pruned or removed on the public right-of-way. This includes zones between the sidewalk and curb, medians and other city property. This permit shall approve the location and species to be planted. Failure to obtain this permit may result in replacing or relocating trees and a hold on certificate of occupancy Comment Originated: 12/04/2013 12/04/2013: The note by that references the water line by the large ponderosa pine says it will be relocated. No excavation should occur for the relocation of this line as it goes right by the tree. Please confirm that there will be no excavation and if it is more accurate consider saying the water line will be abandoned. Department: Internal Services Contact: Todd Reidenbach, , Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/06/2013 08/06/2013: Building addresses will be assigned by the GIS Department after the plans have met final approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City. GIS Mapping Specialist teidenbach@fcgov.com 970 416-2483 3 Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/18/2013 11/18/2013: On Lot 1 the building envelope will need to be amended so it does not overlap the utility easement. Response: The building envelopes have been amended to reflect the actual footprints and there is no overlap with the utility easement(s). Comment Originated: 12/03/2013 12/03/2013: On the Plat City Clerk does not need a signature line. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Originated: 08/14/2013 12/04/2013: This comment did not appear to be addressed. 08/14/2013: The plat language (certificate of dedication, maintenance and repair) has been updated with newer language. I can email an electronic version of this language. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/14/2013 12/04/2013: The note on the site plan of "width to match existing sidewalk or 6' wide" leaves it open to interpretation. I would prefer to have it indicated as 5 foot attached sidewalk, which was the direction given to Loretta Mannix in coordination with Tim Buchanan. 08/14/2013: The minimum sidewalk width on a local street is 4.5 feet. The plans indicate 5 feet in width which is perfectly acceptable. Please note however that the construction of the additional .5 feet in width is not eligible for street oversizing reimbursement. Response: The proposed attached sidewalk width is 5 feet. The proposed detached sidewalk width is 5 feet. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: _ 12/04/2013: There still needs to be a little coordination between the different generated sheets in terms of showing information. Sidewalk connections from the units to the street sidewalk are not consistently shown on all sheets. 08/14/2013: Coordinate the sidewalk design between the plan sets (or plan set, if ultimately combined). The City would prefer to see a detached sidewalk for as much of the extent as possible, which can be 4.5 feet in width. Attached sidewalks would need to be closer to 6 feet. Response: The proposed attached sidewalk width is 5 feet per comment No. 8. The proposed detached sidewalk width is 5 feet. The attached sidewalk was required adjacent to the pine tree that will be protected in place. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013 12/04/2013: I'm assuming that the information referencing novapdf.com that appears under each detail on the detail sheet will be removed with the mylar version. I think there would be E City of F6rt Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview December 06, 2013 Barry Schram Lamar Valley Craftman 2620 Brush Creek Dr. Fort Collins, CO 80528 RE: 637 Cowan Street, FDP130030, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Noah Beals, at 970-416-2313 or nbeals@fcgov.com. Chris Messersmith M Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Originated: 08/07/2013 08/07/2013: Tree locations need to verify there is not a conflict with utilities. Show utilities on the landscape Ian. Comment Originated: 11/18/2013 11/18/2013: The existing tree labeled "E" can not be retained if it is in the building envelope and will need to be mitigated for. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/18/2013 11/18/2013: If a cover sheet is not provided the first sheet should include a table of content and a signature block for the planning director (the same block on the plat can be used for the siteplan). Response: King Surveyors, Inc, is preparing this sheet.