HomeMy WebLinkAboutTESTA BEAUTY SALON, 1635 S. LEMAY AVE. - PDP - 12-07 - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES0
201-1 L-) LIZZ 1 S8.e 24x,6 be e/g r i
Testa Beauty Salon (1635 S. Lemay Avenue) PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
July 16, 2007
Page 4 of 4
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
A. The Testa Beauty Salon (1635 South Lemay Avenue) Project Development Plan
is subject to administrative review and the requirements of the Land Use Code
(LUC).
B. The Testa Beauty Salon (1635 South Lemay Avenue) Project Development Plan
satisfies the development standards of the NC zoning district.
C. The Testa Beauty Salon (1635 South Lemay Avenue) Project Development Plan
complies with all applicable General Development Standards contained in Article
3 of the Land Use Code except for standards found in Section 3.2.2 (K)(2)(a)
where a modification has been previously granted and Section 3.2.1 (E)(5) where
alternative compliance has been approved by the Hearing Officer.
D. The alternative Landscape Plan:
1. Accomplishes the purposes of the standard equally well than a compliant plan
since the parking areas are essentially two separate smaller parking areas
that are not required to include interior parking lot landscaping;
2. There is no negative impact to neighborhood continuity, connectivity and -
vehicular access, and the landscaped vegetative buffer from the adjacent
Spring Creek channel limits the ability to enlarge the parking areas to include
internal landscaping.
DECISION
The Testa Beauty Salon (1635 South Lemay Avenue) Project Development Plan, #12-
07, is hereby approved by the Hearing Officer subject to the following condition:
The Applicant shall amend the landscape plan for the planting strip in between the
parking area and Lemay Avenue with plant materials of a type, size and configuration to
achieve opacity in its winter seasonal condition within three years of parking area
construction.
Dated this 16th day of July 2007, per authority granted by Sections
1.4.9(E) and 2.1 of the Land Use Code.
Cameron Gloss
Planning & Zoning Director
Testa Beauty Salon (1635 S. Lemay Avenue) PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
July 16, 2007
Page 3 of 4
This property was annexed in July 1967 as part of the Second Spring Creek
Annexation.
The property was subdivided as part of the East Acres Subdivision in 1930.
A modification to exceed the maximum parking standard of Section 3.2.2
(K)(2)(a) that limits Personal and Business Service Shops to 4 parking spaces
per 1,000 square feet of floor area was granted on March 22, 2007.
2. Compliance with Article 4 and the NC Zone District Standards:
The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable requirements of
Article 4 and the NC zone district. The Staff Report summarizes the PDP's
compliance with these standards. In particular, the proposed beauty salon which
is classified as "personal service" is permitted within the NC zone district subject
to an administrative review. See Section 4.23(2) (c) of the LUC. The building is
also in conformance with Section 4.23(E), site planning standards relating to
building height, calling for buildings to be at least 20 feet in height, but no greater
than five stories.
There was no evidence introduced at the hearing to contradict the Staff Report;
therefore, the Hearing Officer finds that the PDP is in conformance with the
applicable requirements found in Article 4 of the Land Use Code.
3. Compliance with Article 3 of the Land Use Code — General Development
Standards
The Staff Report summarizes the PDP's compliance with the design standards of
Article 3 of the LUC except for Section 3.2.2 (K)(2)(a), the maximum number of
off-street parking spaces, where a modification has been previously granted, and
to Section 3.2.1 (E)(5), landscaping internal to a parking lot, where alternative
compliance is being granted under this Decision. The Hearing Officer finds that
the alternative plan supports purposes of the standard equally well than a
compliant plan since the parking areas are essentially two separate smaller
parking areas that are not required to include interior parking lot landscaping.
Further, the Spring Creek buffer area encumbering the south portion of the site
limits the ability to physically accommodate larger parking lots with compliant
landscaping.
There was no evidence submitted at the hearing to contradict the statements and
conclusion of the Staff Report concerning compliance or to otherwise refute
compliance with all remaining standards of Article 3.
Testa Beauty Salon (1635 S. Lemay Avenue) PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
July 16, 2007
Page 2 of 4
PUBLIC HEARING
The Hearing Officer, presiding pursuant to the Fort Collins Land Use Code, opened the
hearing at approximately 3:06 p.m. on July 16, 2007 in Conference Room A, 281 N.
College Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado.
HEARING TESTIMONY, WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OTHER EVIDENCE:
The Hearing Officer accepted during the hearing the following evidence: (1) Planning
Department Staff Report; (2) application, plans, maps and other supporting documents
submitted by the applicant and the applicant's representatives to the City of Fort Collins;
and (3) a tape recording of the public hearing. The LUC, the City's Comprehensive
Plan (City Plan), and the formally promulgated policies of the City are all considered
part of the evidence considered by the Hearing Officer.
The following is a list of those who attended the meeting:
From the City:
Steve Olt, City Planner
From the Applicant:
John Testa
From the Public:
None
Written Comments:
None
FACTS AND FINDINGS
1. Site Context/Background Information
N: NC- existing single-family residential
E: NC- existing shopping center, residential, Spring Creek
S: MMN- existing residential & commercial (chiropractic center)
W: LMN- Spring Creek & residential
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
TYPE I ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING DATE
PROJECT NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
HEARING OFFICER:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
July 16, 2007
Testa Beauty Salon (1635 South Lemay
Avenue) Project Development Plan
#12-07
John Testa
4221 Cobb Lake Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Dona Hahn
1142 Spanish Oak Court
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Cameron Gloss
Current Planning Director
The Applicant has submitted a request to convert a single family detached house to a
personal service shop (beauty salon) on a 0.38 acre property located on the west side
of South Lemay Avenue, between East Prospect Road and Spring Creek.
SUMMARY OF HEARING OFFICER DECISION: Conditional Approval
ZONING DISTRICT: NC — Neighborhood Commercial
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Evidence presented to the Hearing Officer established
no controversy or facts to refute that the hearing was
properly posted, legal notices mailed and notice
published.