Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHIDDEN POND ESTATES - PDP - 11-07 - REPORTS - TRAFFIC STUDYi Multi.modal Transportation Level of Service Manual IAS standards for Development Review - Bicycle Figure 7, Bicycle LOS Worksheet level of service -connectivity mnwrnan actual proposed base connectivity- C C 1:C specific connections to priority sites; description of applicable destination area within '1,320' including address destination area classification (see text) City of Port Collins Transportation Master Plan p. 20 i ( , Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual L.OS standards for Development Review - Pecicslrim, P. 18 Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification; 01T64C (enter as many as apply) ❑© Ia io description of applicable destination area within 1,3201 including address A IG r3$oe laaob To `MG W&S-r © P 6IteetKv "�->Qu Bsr�A Pr,wtgrz-PAci:�Aet Avmc) VRU S destination area classification (see text) �G51DGu rtA� l�us>!etAc. level of service (minimum based n: project location classification) ILIh'111LY •.1Ii.11111�' 61(!P, cl1,8l \!..till IIIIm i fl .ecwlty em.411" n,i,timlan - C C C C C actual /� A n 1 �01MIMI �01010_I[i�p� ,ninimum actual proposed I il imam actual proposed City of fort Collins Transportation Master Plan ,ninimum actual proposed I il imam actual proposed City of fort Collins Transportation Master Plan SCALE: 1"=1000' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA Iq APPENDIX F w 3: Site Access & Ziegler Road Short Total PM 4/27/2007 'e- t 1 P ` 1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y tT+ tt Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 3 2 1130 6 3 680 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly flow rate (vph) 4 2 1329 7 4 800 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (f /s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1740 668 1336 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1333 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 407 vCu, unblocked vol 1740 668 1336 IC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 IC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 IF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 97 99 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 126 401 512 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 6 886 450 4 400 400 Volume Left 4 0 0 4 0 0 Volume Right 2 0 7 0 0 0 cSH 173 1700 1700 512 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.52 0.26 0.01 0.24 0.24 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 1 0 0 Control Delay (s) 26.5 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 .0.0 Lane LOS D B Approach Delay (s) 26.5 0.0 0.1 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Synchro 6 Light Report Page 1 1-7 3: Site Access & Ziegler Road Short Total AM < 4-- 4/27/2007 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y tT+ Tt Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 5 3 575 1 1 940 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly flow rate (vph) 6 4 676 1 1 1106 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1232 339 678 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 677 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 555 vCu, unblocked vol 1232 339 678 IC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 97 99 .100 cM capacity (veh/h) 227 657 910 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 9 451 227 1 553 553 Volume Left 6 0 0 1 0 0 Volume Right 4 0 1 0 0 0 cSH 301 1700 1700 910 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.27 0.13 0.00 0.33 0.33 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 17.4 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C A Approach Delay (s) 17.4 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Synchro 6 Light Report Page 1 APPENDIX E 3: Site Access & Ziegler Road Short Bkgrd PM 4/27/2007 t P ` 1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ►rt t'r. tT Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 0 1 . 1130 1 1 680 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 1 1329 1 1 800 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1732 665 1331 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1330 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 402 vCu, unblocked vol 1732 665 1331 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 GM capacity (veh/h) 127 402 515 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 1 886 444 1 400 400 Volume Left 0 0 0 1 0 0 Volume Right 1 0 1 0 0 0 cSH 402 1700 1700 515 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.52 0.26 0.00 0.24 0.24 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 14.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 14.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Synchro 6 Light Report Page 1 T.. 3: Site Access & Ziegler Road Short Bkgrd AM 4/27/2007 < < t /P. �1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y TT4 Vi tT Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 1 1 575 1 1 940 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 1 676 1 1 1106 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL Median storage veh) . 0 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1232 339 678 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 677 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 555 vCu, unblocked vol 1232 339 678 IC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 IC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 IF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 227 657 910 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 2 451 227 1. 553 553 Volume Left 1 0 0 1 0 0 Volume Right 1 0 1 0 0 0 cSH 337 1700 1700 910 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.27 0.13 0.00 0.33 0.33 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 15.7 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C A Approach Delay (s) 15.7 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Synchro 6 Light Report Page 1 APPENDIX D IN Table 4-3 Fort Collins (City Limits) Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) Land Use (from structure plan) Other corridors within: Intersection type Commercial Mixed use Low density mixed use All other corridors districts residential areas Signalized intersections D E' D D (overall) Any Leg E E D E Any Movement E E D E Stop sign control N/A F" F" E (arterial/collector or local — any approach leg Stop sign control N/A C C C ( col lector/loca I —any approach leg) mitigating measures required " considered normal in an urban environment UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Average Total Dclay sccivcll < 10 aF > 10 and<15> 15 and < 25 > 25 and < 35> 35 and < 50> 50 ?0 5- Paddington & Ziegler Road Recent PM 4/26/2007 '� t t �► 1 Movement Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Stop . Stop Free Free 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 0 35 9 0 11 83 780 20 3 437 19 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.86 0.86 0.86 2 0 41 11 0 13 92 867 22 3 508 22 None None 1579 1588 508 1607 1588 867 530 889 1579 1588 508 1607 1588 867 530 889 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 97 100 93 85 . 100 96 91 100 79 98 565 73 98 352 1037 762 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 44 24 92 867 22 3 508 22 Volume Left 2 11 92 0 0 3 0 0 Volume Right 41 13 0 0 22 0 0 22 cSH 424 129 1037 1700 1700 762 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.18 0.09 0.51 0.01 0.00 0.30 0.01 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 16 7 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 14.5 39.0 8.8 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B E A A Approach Delay (s) 14.5 39.0 0.8 0.1 Approach LOS B E Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Light Report Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Page 1 5: Paddington & Ziegler Road, Recent AM 4/26/2007 * Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 40 + + + 14 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 1 0 87 13 2 17 47 583 10 1 618 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85. 0.85 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 0 102 15 2 20 55 678 12 1 719 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1529 1520 719 .1610 1509 678 720 690 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1529 1520 719 1610 1509 678 720 690 tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 100 76 75 98 96 94 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 86 111 429 61 113 452 882 905 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SIB 1 SB 2 SIB 3 Volume Total 104 38 55 678 12 1 719 1 Volume Left 1 15 55 0 0 1 0 0 Volume Right 102 20 0 0 12 0 0 1 cSH 410 119 882 1700 1700 905 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.25 0.32 0.06 0.40 0.01 0.00 0.42 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 25 31 5 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 16.7 48.6 9.4 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C E A A Approach Delay (s) 16.7 48.6 0.7 0.0 Approach LOS C E Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.5 , Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Light Report. Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Page 1 k� .APPENDIX C DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 970 669.2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 4.25.07 Observer: Carl Day: Wednesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right tum Intersection: Ziegler/Paddington-Grand Teton S = straight I = laft him Time Begins Northbound: Ziegler Southbound: Ziegler Total north/south Eastbound: Paddington Westbound: Grand Teton Total easttwest Total All L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S I R Total 7:15 13 111 1 '125 0 148 1 149 ` `. 274 0 0 18 _ "" 18 3 1 5 9 27 301 7:30 6 163 1 n ,> 0 162 0 1':162 -'.:. 332 1 0 32 33 1 0 4 5 38 370 7:45 16 164 6 :186 0 181 0 181 , 367 0 0 20 20 `.. . 4 0 6 10 30 397 8:00 12 145 2 `159 1 127 0 128. ,, 287 0 0 17 17 ... 5 1 2 8 25 312 8:15 7 94 1 102 0 147 1 0 147 _ .. 249 0 0 18 18. - 6 0 0 6 24 273 8:30 5 102 3 110' ':; 1 128 1 130 . '`- 240 0 0 14 14 " ,' 3 0 2 5 19 259 7:15.8:15 147 : 583 1 710 1 640 1:.1 • .618. '1 ' 620 1 1260 1 1 1 0 1,87 88 13 1 117.-1 32 1 120 1380 PHF 1 0.86 0.86 1 0.67 1 1 0.8 4:15 13 1115 4 •132 "" 0 115 1 4 °,119:``. 251 0 1 1 1 5 6 .' 3 0 1 1 4 10 261 4:30 17 1150 2 169 - 0 96 1 5 `-101 170 0 1 1 5 6 4 0 3 7 13 283 4:45 20 1185 6 -211 0 108 3 i 111 ;: `?: 322 0 0 9 9 :.. 5 0 3 8 17 339 5:00 22 162 2 86 1 125 8 134 ' - 320 1 0 13 14 2 0 3 5 19 339 5:15 24 209 7 240 1 103 6 110 ;': 350 0 0 4 4 1 0 3 4 8 358 5:30 17 224 5 ' 246 ;'- 1 101 2 104 `" 350 1 0 9 0 2 3 13 363 4:45.5:45 1 83 . 780' 1, 26:883 3 ` 437:.19; 459 1342 2 - .0..; .35 1 37 9. 0 11 . 20 57 1399 PHF 1 0.9 1 0.86 1 0.66 0.63 APPENDIX B r- TABLE 2 Trip Generation 210 Single Family 13 DU 9.57 125 0.191 2 10.% 7 0.64 8 0.37 5 SO TI 0.4J �JZ 0 A4 C,e A ►j D �u-ra .-j 0- � (Z. C) c) 00 r & TO/F R d -M org M Loft ....... ov ........... M ..... ........... I 3 aleaa( lrode/ olv T '1 2 4 — Attachments Attachment A Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions Project Information Project Name H fvDCN 'W' EST-rcr -S Project Location UA 5 r op p K P TIS Assumptions Type of Study Full: '0O In f(� D Study Area Boundaries North: Avesss South: rQc G6�� East: t�G 4-- West: r L — Study Years ShortRange: e-pd / Long Range: 2020�/A Future Traffic Growth Rate 3� j�,oqWA �& V t GAGS Study Intersections 1. All ac. 2.. 3,. 4.. Time Period for Study AM: 7:0 Sat Noon: ,00 Trip Generation Rates (Z Trip Adjustment Factors Passby:aptivearket: Overall Trip Distribution SEE ATTACHED SKETCH Mode Split Assumptions NSA Committed Roadway Improvements Other Traffic Studies PeoNi +6MQG; \/( LA&(;3: Areas Requiring Special Study Date: A Pp-1 L� 2 ?1 Zt]D-7 Traffic Engineer: Local Entity Engi Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted October 1, 2002 Page 4-35 Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins 7 4— APPENDIX A xess � - Denotes Lane n d SHORT RANGE (2009) GEOMETRY Figure 8 A& N 0) N N 0 00 0 rn 3/2 + x—5/3 fr Site Access o co Cl) I r Lo F + AM/PM SHORT RANGE (2009) TOTAL Figure 7 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC A Site Access AM/PM N SITE GENERATED Figure 6 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC TABLE 3 Short Range (2009) Background Peak Hour Operation V Own Ziegler/Site Access WB LT/RT C B (stop sign) SB LT A B TABLE 4 Short Range (2009) Total Peak Hour Operation 477 Anterse Ziegler/Site Access WB LT/RT C D (stop sign) SB LT A B Site Access - a--- AM/PM po SHORT RANGE (2009) BACKGROUND Figure 5 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC L N 0 0 IT Site Access A& N TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 4 SCALE: 1 "=200' SITE PLAN I& N Figure 3 TABLE I Current (2004) Peak Hour Operation .. ......... -_A" " — ­­ �1. � EB LT/TIRT c B Ziegler/Grand Teton -Paddington WB LT/TIRT E E (stop sign) NB LT A A SB LT A A TABLE 2 Trip Generation t 210 Single Farnily 13 DU '957 125 0.19 2 0.56 7 0.64 8 0.37 5 Paddington N T AM/PM Grand Teton N RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 SCALE: V=2000' SITE LOCATION Figure 1 Worksheet, the level of service is acceptable. Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there are no destination areas within 1320 feet of the Hidden Pond Estates site. The bicycle LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix F. The bicycle connectivity is at level of service C. This area of Fort Collins is not served by transit. It is concluded that, with full development of the Hidden Pond Estates, the future level of service at the Ziegler/Site Access intersection will be acceptable. The recommended geometry is shown in Figure 8.. The level of service for pedestrian a_nd hicycle modes will be acceptable. The trip distribution for this site is shown in Figure 4. The trip distribution was determined using the existing traffic counts, knowledge of the existing and planned street system, development trends, and engineering judgment. Figure 5 shows the site generated traffic assignment of the Hidden Pond Estates. Figure 6 shows the short range (2009) background peak hour traffic at the Ziegler/Site Access intersection. Background traffic volume forecasts for the short range (2009) future were obtained by reviewing traffic studies for other developments in this area and reviewing historic counts in the area. It was determined that peak. hour through traffic along Ziegler Road would increase at a rate of 3. percent per year. In addition to this, site generated .traffic from the proposed Front Range Village was included in the traffic forecast. Table 3 shows the short range (2009) background peak hour operation at the Ziegler/Site Access intersection. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix D. The Ziegler/Site Access intersection will operate acceptably with existing control. Figure 7 shows the short range (2009) total peak hour traffic at the Ziegler/Site Access intersection. Table 4 shows the short range (2009) total peak hour operation at the Ziegler/Site Access intersection. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix E. The Ziegler/Site Access intersection will operate acceptably during the peak hours. Figure 8 shows the short range (2009) geometry at the Ziegler/site Access intersection. Since Ziegler Road is designated as a four -lane arterial street north of Harmony Road, it was assumed that the cross section would, at a minimum, be striped as such by the short range future year (2009). This is especially true when Front Range Village is built, which is expected by fall 2008. The distance between the Ziegler/Grand Teton -Paddington intersection and the Ziegler/Site Access intersection is approximately 450 feet, on - centers. The available distance between these intersections is enough to store the forecasted left -turning vehicles in both directions. It is recommended that the center median area of Ziegler Road be striped as a continuous two-way left -turn lane. The Hidden Pond Estates site is in an area within which the City requires pedestrian and bicycle level of service evaluations. The paved driveway will be able to accommodate bicyclists, if there are any. The site plan shows a path on the south side of the driveway that can be used by pedestrians to get to Ziegler Road. Appendix F shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Hidden Pond Estates. site. There will be two pedestrian destinations within a quarter mile of the Hidden Pond Estates ,site. These are 1) the residential neighborhood west (adjacent) of the site and 2). the Hewlett-Packard/Avago Campus south of the site. There is a small residential neighborhood to the east of the Hidden Pond Estates. However, this neighborhood is physically separated from the site by a substantial elevation difference and the Fossil Creek Reservoir Ditch. A pedestrian connection is not practical. This site is in an area termed "other." The minimum level of service for "other" is C for all measured categories. As indicated on the Pedestrian LOS DELICH ASSOCIATES Traffic & Transportation Engineering 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, Colorado 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 �71 TO: Wendi Beld, Hidden Pond Estates Qp RE(;/, Mike Oberlander, Interwest Consulting Group J.�O,pT� City of Fort Collins vlip �'Er'•:S'R` FROM: Matt Delich DATE: April 30, 2007 SUBJECT: Hidden Pond Estates transportation analyses (File: 0734ME01) This memorandum addresses the transportation impacts of the proposed Hidden Pond Estates. The Hidden Pond Estates is proposed to be located east of Ziegler Road and north of the Hewlett-Packard/Avago Campus in Fort Collins. The site location is shown in Figure 1. The Hidden Pond Estates will consist of 13 single family dwelling units. There is an existing single family dwelling unit on the site. The scope of this study was discussed with the Fort Collins Traffic Operations Engineer. A brief memorandum was requested. The Base Assumptions form is provided in Appendix A. There are sidewalks along developed parcels of land within 0.25 miles of the site. There are bike lanes on Ziegler Road. Figure 2 shows recent peak hour counts at the Ziegler/Grand Teton -Paddington intersection. The count data was obtained in April 2007. Raw traffic data is provided in Appendix B. Table 1 shows the current peak hour operation of the Ziegler/Grand Teton -Paddington intersection. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. It is important to note that the Ziegler/Grand Teton -Paddington intersection was not requested nor required to be analyzed in this traffic analysis.. It is included for informational purposes only, since it is the intersection nearest to the site access. A description of level of service for unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix C. The Ziegler/Grand Teton -Paddington intersection operates acceptably during the peak hours. Figure 3 shows the site plan for the Hidden Pond Estates. The Hidden Pond Estates is proposed as 13 single family dwelling units. There is an existing single family dwelling unit on the site. Access to the site will be via a driveway from Ziegler Road. Trip Generation, 7th Edition, ITE was used as the reference document in calculating the trip generation. Table 2 shows the trip generation for the Hidden Pond Estates.