Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL - PDP/FDP - 9-07/A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYChapter 41 — Attachments 16. Are bike lanes existing or proposed to be installed (to be striped with any required no parking signs installed) along major collector or arterial street(s) adjacent to this property (on both sides of the street)? Yes_ Now( NA_ 17. Is the property adjacent to a major collector or arterial street as shown on the City's 2020 transportation plan? YesXC No_ If the total trip new trips, (that is the difference between the daily trip ends calculation for any existing use and the total daily trip ends calculated for the proposed use), is less than 200 and if peak hour and/or daily traffic counts demonstrate that the existing traffic plus the site generated traffic volumes are within the limtix-.�tku-Lil_.Gr� : loud,, the applicant may request a waiver or the Traffic Impact Study submittal requirements by signing below. S 1,'lla 200�- Full TIS Required: Intermediate TIS Required: TIS Waived: M Date: Page 4-36 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1, 2007 Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins --- 4 — Attachments personal estimate, other: Attach documentation to support your data. H . Number of accesses existing onto the public street(s) from this property: 12. Number of pedestrians visiting the site each day: 13, Number of bicyclists visiting the site each day: 14. Do sidewalks exist along street(s) adjacent to the property? Yes_ No_ 15. Are bike lanes existing (striped) along major collector or arterial street(s) adjacent to this property (on both sides of the street)? Yes —No— NA_ 16. Is the property adjacent to a major collector or arterial street as shown on the City's transportation plan? Yes_ No- B. Proposed use: I . Description of proposed land use: 5E L F - STO RA67E 44 C t /- I ry 2. Proposed building area (square footage) for above use(s): (2) 30, 0 0 0 3. Anticipate number of employees on site each day: (3) N/A - 4. Daily Trip Ends for employees [multiply line (3) by the number 4]: (4) N�A 5. Anticipate number of customers on site each day: (5) ^' A 6. Daily trip ends for customers [multiply line (5) by the number 21: SE E ATTA1r7 -&b (6) N A -�IQ 9;k;�,J 7. Anticipate number of venders on site each day: (7) 8. Daily Trip Ends for venders [multiply line (7) by the number 21: (S) rJ pt 9. Total Daily Trip Ends [line (4) plus line (6) plus line (8)1: 10. Source of trip generation data (circle one): ITE business records, traffic engineer, personal estimate, other: Attach documentation to support your data. 11. Proposed number of accesses onto the public street(s) from this property (does NOT include any existing accesses proposed to remain for use): I 1 l . Number of existing accesses proposed to remain and be used: 1 13, Number of pedestrians visiting the site each day: 14. Number of bicyclists visiting the site each day: �- 15. Are sidewalks proposed to be installed (or exist in good condition) along the street(s) adjacent to the property? Yeses No_ Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1, 2007 Page 4-37 Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins I Chapter 4 — Attachments Attachment C Transportation Worksheet This form must be completed and submitted when requesting a waiver of the TIS submittal and compliance requirements. This form is not required with building permit applications for residential projects proposing twelve dwelling units or less and no substantial access changes on a collector or arterial roadway. Project Name: &45 I D I:—&&49eIA L Date: q eL'I'bo -� Property Legal Description (lot, block, subdivision) ll,gO 1Zvt:2SlDE AV(. NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: Developer: `JV Ti C.H By: MAF-P t)EQWoq -t-E Title: Address: y0o ti{R tit! ST. 5u TE C a i so e0550 Phone #: 9'�0. (o]EN • S2N3 Fax #: _y/� o. 1 y• 92yS Email: VwoiSy(GC� (���ti'?a �/1c°�. Covet Provide the following information for all non-residential projects: A. Existing use: I . Description of existing land use: (if none, proceed with Proposed Use) 4J6 AJ E 2. Existing building area (square footage) for above use(s): (2) 3. Number of employees on site each day: (3) 4. Daily trip ends for employees [mult. line (3) by the number 4]: (4) 5. Number of customers on site each day: (5) 6. Daily trip ends for customers [multiply line (5) by the number 2] (6) 7. Number of venders on site each day (include trash, ups, etc): (7) 8. Daily Trip Ends for venders [mult. line (7) by the number 21: (8) 9. Total Vehicular Daily Trip Ends [line (4) plus line (6) plus line (8)]: (9) 10. Source of trip generation data (circle one): ITE, business records, traffic engineer, Page 4-36 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1, 2007 Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins m as ari�.r w EXISTING BUILDING Two ee R. fGOIrRN! woo ea R. TorK ewe e' 9R'IO ea. R. p� rao�r woo en R. $ rmK -- �o. ] reoee;wnre¢ sariei i sw. G• eeao Barr. BLOB. V SNM Bari. naB. e eeeo aorr. III I �9 III r�+w•roe I I i SITE DATA: .� .leA an se:T:oN rm. rTa Bane aaTaN AIlA ram_ TIDe. . 2" la.W W m . 2" 2 dns.rS me S eem M ITDu einr. v.we e.Too rear nar. e••ms eaeo !ea]+ erne. P. me. Tine. r.me. eaeo aem reev nAu Tm. mOT/6T OlD6M1 ]{AW !D4 ror. erne, eocm !ar ureunu aum !au PAv w]sA rasa Mama rT:.e Ne. 1WOILIRQ! fWIY ] W VAN K.LmT YM ]e Tm. b '..ro. :!El:iiREli9i; a YO9 P r eew 9aR. k u ra em werroe �h �+�II n{�pgg�p PRELlrnr ARY $ITE PLAN o d HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Site Access & Riverside Avenue H:\E5802\Reports\Traffic\Synchro\PM.sy6 4/27/2007 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations V, tl. tt Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 10 8 620 3 3 630 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 12 9 729 4 4 741 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL Median storage veh) 0 vC, conflicting volume 1109 366 733 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 731 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 378 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 91 99 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 138 630 868 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 21 486 247 4 371 371 Volume Left 12 0 0 4 0 0 Volume Right 9 0 4 0 0 0 cSH 211 1700 1700 868 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.29 0.15 0.00 0.22 0.22 Queue Length (ft) 8 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 23.9 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C A Approach Delay (s) 23.9 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.5% ICU Level of Service A Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 1 DREXELBOUL-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Site Access & Riverside Avenue H:\E5802\Reports\Traffic\Synchro\am sy6 4/27/2007 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 'y +T+ t Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 2 2 496 10 8 504 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 2 2 584 12 9 593 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL Median storage veh) 0 vC, conflicting volume 905 298 595 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 589 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 315 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 100 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 186 699 977 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 5 389 206 9 296 296 Volume Left 2 0 0 9 0 0 Volume Right 2 0 12 0 0 0 cSH 294 1700 1700 977 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.23 0.12 0.01 0.17 0.17 Queue Length (ft) 1 0 0 1 0 0 Control Delay (s) 17.5 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C A Approach Delay (s) 17.5 0.0 0.1 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.5% ICU Level of Service A Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 1 DREXELBOUL-ST51 r-, DREXE4 BARRELL & CO -;Ills--r—_—__Engineers-Surveyors Phone 303-442-4338 Fax 303-4424373 PROJECT NAME: DATE: REVISED: riverside commercial 3-Apr-07 ITE Code I Units lice 710 general office building 12 kSF ,If storage tocRRy 151 mini -warehouse 24.4 kSF Average Trip Generation Rates Weekday Avg. AM PM Weekday I Trin% 1.55 1.49 11.01 I 132 0.15 0.26 2.5 61 Project Totall 193 l AM Peak -Hour Inbound Outbound ;Trips Trips %Trips Trips 88% 16 12% 2 59% 2 41% 2 1s I l 4 PROJECT NUMBER: M02 PREPARED BY: 1LS PM Peak -How Inbound Outbound %Trips Trips %Trips Trip 17% 3 83% 15 51% 3 49T 3 6 I l is Drexel, Banvil Do. 4/27/2007 H:1E5802VieponslTwf6cW_27_06mvisions4iverside trip gen2.xls Access Location: The proposed site access onto Riverside Avenue is located 700 feet north of Prospect Road. No other practical access locations are apparent for this property. Acceleration/Deceleration Lanes: No acceleration or deceleration lanes were deemed necessary as a result of this development. Sight Distance: No apparent issues with sight distance occur within 700 feet of the proposed site access. Pedestrian and Bike Facilities: There is currently an existing sidewalk adjacent to Riverside Avenue. As part of the proposed development, it is anticipated that the existing sidewalk will be removed and replaced. Riverside Avenue is designated bike route in the vicinity of the proposed development. However, no bicycle facilities currently exist in the vicinity of the site. Roadway Signing and Striping: The existing striping of Riverside Avenue demarks two through lanes in each direction with a painted center median. The median is striped as a continuous two-way left turn lane in the vicinity of the proposed development. Conclusion: Due to the relatively low volume of traffic anticipated to utilize this access, no off -site transportation improvements are recommended. Since there is an existing two-way left turn lane on Riverside, improvements to the southbound left turn movement are not necessary. Please call if you would like any additional information or have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Drexel, Barr i J nat an St art T rc Engineer Encl. Site plan Trip generation estimate Synchro analysis Attachment C Reviewed By: Kari McDowell, PE, PTOE Traffic Engineer Drexel, Barrell & Co. Engineers Surveyors TO: CITY OF FORT COLLINS TRAFFIC OPERATIONS CENTER PO Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 ATTN. ERIC BRACKE FROM: Jonathan Stewart DATE: April 27, 2007 RE: Traffic Impact Memorandum 1640 Riverside Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado Project Background: The proposed development is located within the City of Fort Collins, 700 feet north of Prospect Road along the east side of Riverside Avenue. The project is a single-phase self -storage facility development with an estimated buildout year of 2007. Riverside Avenue is a four -lane arterial at this location. The site is currently undeveloped. Proposed Land Use: The proposed development includes 24,400 square feet of self -storage warehousing and 12,000 square feet of office space. Per the 7th Edition, 2003, of Trip Generation Manual (ITE), published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, this classifies as land use code #151, "Mini -Warehouse" and land use #710, "General Office Building" Trip Generation: 1640 Riverside Avenue is anticipated to generate 193 average weekday trips estimated based upon trip generation rates contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The commercial development is expected to generate 18 inbound and 4 outbound trips in the morning peak hour. During the evening peak hour, the development is anticipated to generate 6 inbound trips and 18 outbound trips. Please refer to Table 1 — Estimated Project Generated Traffic, for the trip generation estimates. Peak Hour Driveway Level of Service: Full day counts were taken on Thursday, October 27, 2005. The counts were obtained from the City of Fort Collins website and were used to generate morning and evening driveway Level of Service for this development. The full day counts were 6,000 for the eastbound direction and 5,900 for the westbound direction. Two years of 2.5% growth were applied to the traffic figures. Ten percent of the resulting full day count was used for the afternoon peak hour, eight percent for the morning peak hour. Using the above information, HCM methodology and the Synchro Software package, the Level of Service for the driveway is estimated to be "C" following build out of the development. Refer to the documents following this report for the HCM analysis.