HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL - PDP/FDP - 9-07/A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - DRAINAGE REPORTOACNS �q P
NIX NATURE AREA
r VOR NeRN
CATTAIL CHORUS
NATURE AREA
E. PIT�IN ST
PROSPECT RD
EDORA PARK
W
I,J
STUART ST 11 w
F/
IN
SHEET 1 OF ,
DATE: 4/16/07 1640 RIVERSIDE DRIVE % North Star
design, inc.
scA E: =,000' (RIVERSIDE STORAGE) 700 Automaton Drive, Unit I
Windsor, Colorado 80550
APPENDIX A
VICINITY MAP
_..............
6, CONCLUSIONS
6.1 Compliance with Standards
e in
liance
1 computations that have been the
completed within thisn al foort r Construcption Sites", the
Al p
"City of Fort Collins Erosion Control Reference Ma the
« Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual",
asnnoted in Sec ion 4
City of
Drainage Criteria Manual" except where variances are requested
of this report.
6.2 Drainage Concept
resented in this report and on the construction plans
The proposed drainage concepts p runoff
adequately provide for the collection and conveyanee de a ned runoff downstreamentron
area. Conveyance elements exist to adequately convey
groundwater is encountered, a Colorado Department of
If, at the time of construction,elt would be required.
ction Dewaterino
Health Construg
REFERENCES
1.
City of For
t Collins, "Storm Drainage Criteria Manual", (SDCM), dated March,
1986.
aa
ge and Flood Control District, "Urban Storm Drail
Urban Draina
Qe Criten,
2.
Manual", Volumes 1 and 2, dated March, 1969, and Volume 3 dated September
1992.
W
ention and and outlet
hidina the et
s project, iric 0
All drainage facilities proposed with ealand maintained by the prop
structure are private and wierty owner or Owner's
ll be own
Association.
5, EROSION CONTROL
5.1 General Concept
movement from the site and into adjacent
This
site lies within the Moderate Rainfall and Wind Erodibility Zone per the City of Fort
s The potential exists for silt streets, which could
Collins Zone Maps. o f mud onto existing
properties. Potential also exists for tracking required performance standard for the site is
then wash into existing storm systems. The
0 o construction and after paving, this figure has been exceeded with the use
79.9 /o. During
and as a sediment basin. The calculated
of silt fence and by using the detention p
ite, using the standard City
performance standard for the sof Fort Collins Effectiveness
Calculations, is 87.3%•
ount for the entire site is $6,675 (see Appendix D)•
The erosion control escrow am
5.2 Specific Details
' it the amount of silt leaving the site, several erosion control measures shall be
To limit
appropriate and the site
implemented during construction. Wattles will be used tracking
pad shalle installed at the
Q tracked onto the existing pavement.
boundaries shall have silt fence installed. A vehicle tracicrng p
site entrance in order to control the mud being
hall be kept In
grading, disturbed areas s
During overlot oroughened condition
pond will be used as asedim n
watered to reduce wind erosion. The proposed detention
basin during the construction process.
4
3.4 Hydraulic Criteria
Hydraulic elements have been designed per City of Fort Collins standards to adequately
convey the 100-year storm runoff from this site to the proposed detention pond. A
proposed outfall pipe and an existing drainage swale will convey the detained runoff from
the site to the downstream railroad crossing.
4. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN
4.1 General Concept
On -site runoff will be conveyed to the detention pond via surface flows in concrete pans
and curb and gutter. The detained runoff will discharge into the existing charnel located
at the northeast comer of the site. From there, runoff will be conveyed in the existing
swale downstream to an existing railroad crossing.
4.2 Specific Flow Routing
With this design, the site is modeled as a single basin. Drainage design for this site has
been designed to convey on -site runoff to the proposed detention pond with as little future
will be conveyed to the detention pond via
maintenance as possible. On -site runoff
surface flow in concrete pans and curb & gutter. The detention pond will release the
detained runoff from the site at the existing 2-year runoff rate. The developed 2-year
runoff rate for this site is 7.2 cfs; the developed 100-year runoff rate is 21.5 cfs.
Two variances are requested for this project. A variance is being requested to reduce the
minimum freeboard for the detention pond from 1.0' to 0.5'. A variance is also being
requested to allow the extended water quality volume to be included in the detention
volume storage for the 100-year storm.
4.3 Drainage Summary
This site has been designed to meet or exceed the "City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage
Design Criteria Manual" specifications except where variances are requested as noted in
Section 4.2 of this report. The proposed drainage design for t isstsit maintenhas
ee signed to
ijr
convey on -site runoff to the detention pond while minimiz�
3
to the north along the rear of the adjacent properties to an existing pipe under the railroad
tracks. The existing Swale across the adjacent properties concept determined Poris to to a historic
conveyance for this site. With the proposed existing
drainage
runoff will continue to be released into the existing Swale via a short outfall pipe.
3, DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA
3.1 Regulations
the
ainaae
This report was prepared to meet or exceed where City variances are rlequested aStorm s not d in
Design Criteria Manual" specifications except
Section 4.2 of this report. Where applicable, the criteria established in the "Urban Storm
Drainage Criteria Manual" (UDFCD), 2001, developed by the Denver Regional Council
of Governments, has been used.
3.2 Development Criteria Reference and Constraints
requireme
ts
The runoff from this site has been routed to conform torr to the
detention of
extended
Fort Collins Stormwater Department. Both storm
water quality detention are required for this site and are being provided by the proposed
on -site detention pond. The release rate from the site will be equal to the existing 2-year
runoff.
3.3 Hydrologic Criteria
aced for the 2-year minor and 100-year major storm
Runoff computations were prepared the
frequencies utilizing the rational method. Aeprtl o. StandardlFolrm8 (SF associated8) provides h me
basins are included in Appendix B of this report.
of concentration calculations for all sub -basins.
Detention volume was calculated using the runoff rate for the 2-yer sections of asphalt pavinand
rainfall
event
gravel.
existing site conditions, which includes existing s
The FAA method for detention pond sizing was utilized to determine the required
volume. Water quality
volume was calculated using the method recommended in the
"Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual'. Refer to the detention calculations included in
Appendix C of this report.
2
1, GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
1.1 Location
Range 68 West of the Sixth Principal
This site is located on the east side of Riverside Drive an rth of East Prospect Road in the
T Township 7 North, R Ma in
Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Colorado. See the Vicinity P
Meridian, in the City of Fort Collins, Larimer County,
Appendix A of this report. existing
existing storage units, on the east by
This project is bounded on the north by Riverside Drive, and on the south by
Union Pacific Railroad tracks, on the west by
existing Rivendell School.
1.2 Description of Property
e is
ly
The entire project consists of approximately 2.2 acres. e hs totthe northeatst with slopes
with areas of existing asphalt and gravel. Existing slop
ranging
from approximately L5% to 3%. The site currently drains into an existing Swale
located at the northeast corner of the site. five self -storage
Proposed development on -site will arng drainage patterns will not
include two office buildings,
buildings, and associated drives, parking, walks. Exist
i
be significantly altered with this development.
2 DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB -BASINS
2.1 Major Basin Description got
ro osed development lies within the Spring Creek Drainage Basin.
Thep p p
quality detention are required in this basin. T
Spring stormwater detention and extended water q
City requirement for stormwater detention in the Sp gsingle-staf
� ear runoff.
Creek basin is a
detention with a 100-year release rate equal to the existino --Y
2.2 Sub -basin Description
Runoff from this site currently flows to an existing Swale located in the northeast cor
of the site. From there, the runoff is conveyed in a proposed pipe and the existing sv
1
l0 TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................
....................................................
LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
1 GENERAL.......................
1.1 Location ...........................
of Property .............................
:.. 1.2 Description
AGE BASINS AND SUB -BASINS ..............................1
DRAIN...............2
2.1 Major Basin Description ..............................................
2.2 Sub -Basin Description
DESIGN CRITERIA....................................................2
3 DRAINAGE .....................
Criteria Reference and Constraints ............................................••••
3.1 Regulations ..................
3
3 2 Development
Hydrologic Criteria...............................................................................................
3.3
3.4 Hydraulic Criteria ......................
DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN
4
General Concept......................................................................................................
4
4.1......................................................................
. g ...........:.............................................._
4.2 Specific Flow Routing
4.3 Drainage Summary ...............................................
6
EROSION CONTROL ...............................•
...6
5 .....................
5.1 General Concept ..........................
5.2 Specific Details ...................................................
with Standards....................................................................................7
CONCLUSIONS
6'
6.1 Compliance ..........................................
fiance
6.2 Drainage Concept ................................
............................
.8
....................................
7. REFERENCES ........................
P,ppENDICES
A Vicinity Map
Computations
B Hydrologic Comp
Pond Sizing Calculations
C Detention
Erosion Control Calculations
D
E Figures and Tables
Excerpts from Previous Reports
F
iii
North Star
® design, inc.
May'), 2007
Glen Schlueter
City of Fort Collins Stormwater
700 Wood Street
Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
RE: Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report for 1640 Riverside Drive (Riverside
Storage)
Dear Glen,
I am pleased to submit for your review and approval, this Final Drainage and Erosion Control
Report for 1640 Riverside Drive. I certify that this report for the drainage design was prepared in
accordance with the criteria in the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Manual.
I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this submittal. Please call if you have any
questions.
o�`NQ „RECi
Sincerely,
O G P KRO0.
T�9
:¢ n:
0 Cr
31306 •4u
ii
-7r,r, A. o-n, ntinn nrive. Unit I Windsor, Colorado 80550
FINAL DRAINAGE AND EROSION
CONTROL REPORT
FOR
1640 RIVEDT o E E
(,,VERSE S
prepared for:
Wickham Gustafson Architects
1449 Riverside Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80524
prepared by:
North Star Design nit I
700 Automation Drive,
Windsor, Colorado680550
(970)
May 3, 2007
Job Number 264-02