The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About617 WOOD ST. (MORIE AT CAPITOL HILL) - PDP - 22-06 - CORRESPONDENCE - (8). 4 - [10/3/06] The applicant has indicated that the standard 8 foot utility easement behind the alley ROW may not be needed by the public utility companies however, an 8 foot utility easement is being shown on the plans and no variance request has been submitted by the engineer. Until a formal variance request has been submitted and approved by the utility providers, the City will require that an 8 foot wide utility easement dedication be submitted with a $250 transportation development review fee. If a variance request is submitted and approved, the utility easement should be removed from the plans. [8/15/06] Alley standards require that an 8 foot wide utility easement be dedicated behind the alley right-of-way. This proposed easement shall be shown and labeled on the Site Plan Topic: Utility Plans Number: 14 Created: 8/15/2006 [10/25/06] There are still some inconsistencies with property boundary line types. This may be corrected at the final compliance stage. [10/3/06] The lot lines are now being shown but the line types are very inconsistent or do not correspond to the legend. Please revise line types accodingly, see redlines for clarification. [8/15/061 Please show the existing lot line between lots 4 and 5 on all sheets in the Utility Plan set. Clearly label property lines and existing right-of-way limits. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Yours Truly, Steve Olt City Planner Page 3 Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 26 Created: 8/25/2006 [10/25/06] Credit may also be used for easement review fees. [8/25/06] It appears that an overpayment of $460 was made on Transportation Development Review Fee (TDRF). The City will issue a credit toward the final compliance plan review such that the final plan review fee will only be $540 rather than $1000. Number: 37 Created: 8/31/2006 [10/25/06] Penalty street cut fees will apply to this project for Wood Street. [10/3/06] Same comment relating to street cuts on Wood Street for water service connections. [8/31/06] Pavement management comment - Wood Street was paved in 2003. Penalties will apply to any street cuts made on Wood street - triple street cut fees. Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 67 Created: 10/25/2006 [10/25/06] A drainage easement is required for the detention ponds and associated drainage structures connected to them. Please submit a drainage deed of dedication and legal description for review with a City review fee of $250.00. Number: 68 Created: 10/25/2006 [10/25/06] The detention pond to the south shall outlet to the gutter on Wood street via a sidewalk chase and concrete channel through the parkway. Show this on the plan and provide construction details. Number: 69 Created: 10/25/2006 [10/25/06] Please show the low flow concrete channel on the grading plan. A detail is provided. Number: 70 Created: 10/25/2006 [10/25/06] There are two 5 foot utility easements being labeled on the far north and south boundaries of the project. If these easements are for any public utilities, they must be recorded by separate document. Please submit deeds of dedication and legal descriptions for these proposed easements. The review fee is $250 per document. Number: 71 Created: 10/25/2006 [10/25/06) Provide cross sections for B-B and C-C as shown on the redlines, Grading & Drainage Plan. Number: 72 Created: 10/25/2006 [10/25/06] Please add a standard City signature approval block to sheet DT1 - Detail sheet Number: 73 Created: 10/25/2006 [10/25/06] Add street names to sheet UT1. Topic: Site Plan Number: 8 Created: 8/15/2006 [10/25/06] No easement document has been submitted. All easement documents and review fees shall be submitted for at least one review prior to final plan approval. Page 2 l STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins CRAIG MCKEE SEE ABOVE Date: 10/31 /2006 Staff has reviewed your submittal for 617 WOOD ST. - PDP - TYPE II, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 66 Created: 10/19/2006 [10/19/06] On the Landscape Plan, please add the required note about landscaping being installed, or the installation being secured ... before certificates of occupancy can be issued. Please see the red -lined Landscape Plan. Topic: Site Plan Number: 60 Created: 10/19/2006 [10/19/06] On the Site Plan cover sheet, under LAND USE STATISTICS, the one line item dealing with "total land area and location and amount of open space included" refers to residential, business, commercial, and industrial areas. This would seem to be incorrect in that there does not appear to be any business, commercial, and industrial areas in this project. Number: 61 Created: 10/19/2006 [10/19/06] The 2 monument signs (at street front and alley) shown on the Site & Landscape Plans should be removed from the plans. Signs are reviewed and approved separate from the Project Development Plan review through the Zoning Department, based on the Sign Code. The Planning & Zoning Board does not have authority over the signs. Number: 62 Created: 10/19/2006 [10/19/06] On the Site Plan please show the 9' dimension for the garage door setback from the porch front on Unit B, being the subject of your request for modification of standard set forth in Section 4.7(F)(1 )@. Also, in your Modification of Standards Request, please add "for Unit B" at the end of the sentence that requests a 9' setback instead of 10'. Number: 63 Created: 10/19/2006 [10/19/06] More just a curious question ... What happens in the "area wells" for each unit? Number: 64 Created: 10/19/2006 [10/19/06] The gates to the driveways for Units C & D, backing to the alley, are being shown to either move to the comers of the walls or another gate is being proposed. Which is correct? If there is a gate in the corners of these small courtyards will there be walkways provided from the gates to the alley? Number: 65 Created: 10/19/2006 [10/19/06] The Site Plan shows 3 "150' Fire Hose" lines from Wood Street to points back on the property. Will the gates on the north and south property lines (2 each) remain unlocked so that firemen can get through the gates, with their hoses, without delay? Page 1