Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE - PDP - 18-09 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)2. The eight foot high fence can only be allowed if it complies with the building setbacks. As a residential use in the L-M-N zone, the building setbacks are 15-feet front, five -feet side, and eight -feet rear. Please draw setback line indicating the distance of the eight foot high fence from the front property line along Parker and the side property line along Whedbee. In order to illustrate compliance with this standard, the property line must be clearly delineated. Please label the property line on all sides. If these setbacks cannot be met, then a Modification of Standard must be requested. 3. The eight foot high fence along Parker Street needs to be softened with additional plant material. 4. The trash enclosure does not need to be eight feet in height. It can be reduced to five feet. 5. Please clearly label the fence along the south and east property lines as six-foot, solid wood. 6. See redlines for other minor comments. The P.D.P. is ready for the September 17, 2009 Planning and Zoning Board hearing. The P.D.P. includes two Modifications, and possibly a third if the eight -foot fence does not comply with the building setbacks. Each Modification should be individually addressed in a narrative that will be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board. The deadline for providing materials to the Board's packet is Wednesday, September 9, 2009. Please note: Packet materials are due Wednesday, September 2nd Full size prints, folded, are due Tuesday, September 8`h Digital images for P & Z Wednesday, September 9t' P & Z Worksession is on Friday, September 11`" Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincere) Ted Shepard Chief Planner Page 3 [5/8/09] Another round of review prior to hearing will be required if the modification to allow the existing gravel parking is not approved. If it IS approved, I can get by with an informal round of review if no other department is requiring a formal round. Number: 28 Created: 7/30/2009 [7/30/09] (FC) The existing retaining wall running along the southern property line in the SE comer of the property needs to be removed 2' behind the row. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 20 Created: 5/8/2009 [8/5/09] Thank you for your response to this comment and my other comments. Per our discussion today, panic hardware will be installed in courtyard gates to facilitate safe egress and also address security (entrance) concerns. ACCESS/MEANS OF EGRESS: Please contact me so we can coordinate your need for security, with emergency services' need for access. We can certainly make the two needs co -exist. Also, I need to know how exiting occurs through the courtyard. Is there an exit from the courtyard, directly to the exterior of the building? There does not appear to be on the site plan, but the actual building does appear to have direct access. Please contact me to discuss. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Matt Wempe Topic: General Number: 27 Created: 7/28/2009 [7/28/09] The landscape plans need to accurately reflect the widened sidewalk along Parker Street and other improvements shown on the utility plans. This includes saw -cutting the short concrete wall along the driveway on Whedbee Street where it encroaches onto the public right-of-way. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: zoning Number: 4 Created: 4/27/2009 [7/24/09] The lot doesn't have to be paved if a modification is granted. [4/27/09] The change of use requires the gravel parking lot to be brought into compliance with 3.2.2 and 3.2.1 of the LUC. This means it will have to be hard surfaced, interior parking lot landscaping, perimeter parking lot landscape (1 tree every 40'), etc. Number: 9 Created: 4/27/2009 [7/24/09] Response letter states that the dimensions are shown, but I don't see them. [4/27/09] Need to show parking stall dimensions of what I assume are parallel spaces along south lot line. They need to be a minimum of 8' x 23'. Show dimensions of drive -aisle widths (24' required at 90 degree stall, 20' at parallel stalls, and 24' behind the 2 stalls next to the southwest corner of the building). Comments from Current Planning: The new brick wall with the two -foot metal extension needs to be described as an eight -foot high fence. Please add a note that at eight feet, the fence will require a separate building permit and must be engineered and submitted with an engineer's stamp. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Date: 8/13/2009 Staff has reviewed your submittal for Crossroads Safehouse PDP Type II, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Topic: General Number: 15 Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Created: 5/6/2009 [8/4/09] A good contact in Utilities is Norm Weaver at 970-416-2312. He is very knowledgeable on the solar programs at the local and state level. [5/6/09] As you work through the renovation of the interior, consider the various programs and services for green building offered through the Utilities Department. The following link will provide you with information on specific programs: hftp://www.fcgov.com/greenbuilding/home/existing_programs.php. Also, Doug Swartz (221-6719) is a good contact person to talk to regarding energy efficiency solutions. Department: Engineering Topic: General Issue Contact: Susan Joy Number: 14 Created: 5/6/2009 [7/30/09] (FC) Please note — this comment is just be carried through for Final and the DA. [5/6/09] This development is responsible for constructing the sidewalk where none currently exists on this property; however, it was determined that in this case, it really wouldn't benefit the neighborhood by constructing it at this time. It has been agreed that this development will provide cash in lieu of the additional sidewalk to the west. An estimate for our review and approval is due in Final Compliance and that amount will be added to the development agreement and due prior to the issuance of the building permit. Number: 16 Created: 5/8/2009 [7/30/09] (FC item) Looks good! Just one thing though, for after the hearing and in Final Compliance, could you show 15' radii on the sidewalk tapers and we'll need to round out the sidewalk a little at the western driveway (but that's FC stuff). Add variance for the attached versus detached sidewalk to line 48 of the general notes as approved for Parker and Whedbee sidewalks. [5/8/09] It was determined that the existing 1' widening of the sidewalk along Parker would be removed and a 4' extension would be put in its place. The sidewalk would then taper to match the existing width at the corner and no widening of the existing sidewalk along Whedbee would be required. The existing timber retaining wall will be removed as well as the concrete wall extending into the row along the south side of the driveway. In addition, < minimum of 25' of the driveway from the bow will be paved or put in concrete to minimize drag -out over the sidewalk and street. Number: 17 Created: 5/8/2009 [7/30/09] (FC) The modification is going forward to the hearing with staff recommendation for approval. If this is denied for whatever reason, we can address the issue at Final. Page 1