HomeMy WebLinkAboutBELLA VIRA - PDP - 36-05A - CORRESPONDENCE - (9)If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this
project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341.
Yours Truly,
/*Kar
Steve Olt
City Planner
cc: Dan DeLaughter
John Minatta
Lockwood Architects
Current Planning File #36-05A
Page 11
Number: 46 Created: 1 / 10/2006
[ 1 / 10/061 A utility coordination meeting is required for the multi -family portion of
the site. This is required to ensure the buildings can be served while meeting all
spacing requirements. Also, the scale makes it difficult to determine if all criteria
is being met within this area.
Number: 47 Created: 1 / 10/2006
[1 / 10/061 The water services for the single family lots should be located along the
center of each lot and not on one side as shown on the utility plans. Conflicts with
gas or sewer would probably arise with these services along the edges. The lots are
wide enough that this should not create a problem. The sewer service should be a
minimum of 10 feet consistently to one side of the water service.
Number: 48 Created: 1 / 10/2006
[ 1 / 10/06[ Please label curb stops and meter pits for the multi -family water
services. The meter pits need to have 4 feet of clearance to any structure.
Number: 49 Created: 1 / 10/2006
[1 / 10/061 Please label sewer service sizes for the multi -family buildings.
Number: 52 Created: 1 / 11 /2006
[ 1 / 11 /06[ Please reconfigure the water and sewer layout at Sunflower Drive and
Ratolina Court per redlined utility plan.
Number: 53 Created: 1 / 11 /2006
[1 / 11 /06) Before a hearing items 45 and 46 need to be addressed. Other
comments are for final compliance.
Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes
Topic: Zoning
Number: 5 Created: 12/23/2005
112/23/051 Section 4.2(E)(2)(b) limits the maximum density in the RF cluster plan
to not more than 1 unit per gross acre. The gross area of the RF portion is a little
over 15 acres, meaning that the maximum number of dwelling units in the cluster
plan is limited to 15. They are proposing 20 dwelling units.
Department: City Forester Issue Contact: Tim Buchanan
Topic: Landscape Plan
(1 / 17/06) The standard plant notes need to be added to the Landscape Plan. A
copy of the notes to be added is attached to this comment letter.
This represents staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments at this
time. Additional comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming. Another round
of staff review is determined to be necessary. This proposal is subject to the 90-
day revision re -submittal requirement (from the date of this comment letter,
being January 17, 2006) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use
Code. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you re -submit. The number of
copies of each document to re -submit is shown on the attached Revisions Routing
Sheet.
Page 10
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill
Topic: General
Number: 56 Created: 1 / 13/2006
[1 / 13/061 Please install crossing ramps at both locations where the internal path
crosses Sunflower Drive.
Number: 57 Created: 1 / 13/2006
[ 1 / 13/06) Would it be possible to better align the pedestrian crossing of West
Elizabeth (west side of Overland) so that the crossing isn't skewed. I understand
that there are some utility conflicts but would like to see if we can fix this. Thanks.
Number: 58 Created: 1 / 13/2006
[ 1 / 13/06[ Path Configuration: Seems like the proposed "soft surface path" within
this development makes sense for some of this area, but not all of it. As we
discussed at Staff Review, the portion of the path west of Sunflower can remain
soft surface, but needs to be increased in width to 6'. All other portions of path
serve to provide pedestrian connectivity (they also directly impact PED LOS) and
should be increased to 6' in width as well as be constructed of concrete,. per
LCUASS. I'd also like to see the eastern most portion of this system (from E. Fiore
Ct. out to W. Elisabeth) be realigned slightly to the east in order to more closely
match the desire line of a bicyclist or pedestrian as they approach W. Elizabeth
and its intersection with Overland Trail. I have provided a redlined site plan to
current planning, as well as a copy for the applicant for further clarification. If
there are any questions please do no hesitate to call. Thanks.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater . Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 44 Created: 1 / 10/2006
[ 1 / 10/06) The City requires developments greater than 20 acres to use SW WM to
size the detention ponds on site. This site also needs to use the Extran component
of SWMM to size the ponds that are An ,series along the south. side of the.
development. Before a hearing, the detention ponds can either be designed with
the rational method plus an additional 25% of volume, or by using an Extran
analysis. An Extran analysis is required at final design either way.
Number: 50 Created: l / 10/2006
[ 1 / 10/061 There is another basin thatcontributes off: site flows through the site.
This basin is located directly west, ofthe off -site basins that are already identified . .
in the report. The flow is roughly .60 .cfs, and needs .to be routed :through. this site to.
the regional detention pond. The conveyance elements for all off --site and on -site
flows need to meet all city criteria.for.the.100-year: storm...A.meeting may, be
warranted to discuss this issue. _
Topic: Water/Wastewater
Number: 45 Created: l / 10/2006
[ 1 / 10/061 The tap to the existing 16-inch water main needs to be in a utility
easement as well as the new line entering the site. This may require an off -site
utility easement.
Page 9
Since the code language was adopted in 1997 projects developing and redeveloping
along the Pleasant Valley and Lake Canal have been required to preserve this
corridor, failure to maintain this buffer standards by this protect could hamper the
conservation efforts already put in place provided by earlier projects.
Please refer to the requires of the establishment of Buffer Zones and the
performance standards under section 3.4.1 (E)`of the Fort Collins Land.Use Code,
along with development activities within the buffer zone section 3.4.1(E)(2), as well
as section 3.4.1(N ). Contact Doug Moore at (970) 224-6143 if there are any
questions related to this issue.
•• Reminder - The Land Use Code states that Stream corridors, lakes, reservoirs
and irrigation ditch buffer zones will be measured from the level of bank, full
discharge toward the boundary of such lot, tract or parcel of land.
Number: 40 Created: 12/30/2005
112/30/051 Limits of Development, LUC 3.4.1 (N) - Limits of development and
details explaining installation of barrier fencing will need to be show on plans
drawings related to the construction near the following natural habitats and
features:
• Wildlife movement corridor
• Existing cottonwood and peach -leaf willow trees
Number: 41 Created: 12/30/2005
[12/30/051 The portion of this project that lies within the R-F zone district will be
required to meet section 3.4.1 (I) Design and Aesthetics of the Fort Collins Land
Use Code. This may require the development of general architecture design
standards for lots within the zone district to.ensure that the standard will be met
as individual lots are sold and developed.
'• Harmony Ridge 2nd filing General Architect Standards are a good example to
refer to.
Number: 42 Created: 12/30/2005
[12/30/051 Prairie Dogs - Standard language will be added to the development
agreement for this project to ensure'thatcoristruction activities including grading
will not be allowed to occur on the development site if prairie dogs relocate to or
inhabitant the site either prior to or 'during construction. At any time construction
activities occur with prairies on site construction activities will be stopped until the
situation is corrected. If relocation of prairie dogs on to the construction site
becomes an issue the Natural Resources Department may require the developer to
install a temporary barrier fencing to try to limit the animals ability to move on to
the site. 3.4.1(F), 3.4.1(N)(6)
Number: 43 Created: 12/30/2005
[12/30/05] Wildlife Conflict - Section 3.4.1 (F)(3) will need to be met. One option
for a protection mechanism may be to provide future residences with a letter or
brochure detailing potential conflicts.
' Harmony Ridge 2nd Filing, Wildlife letter is a good example to refer to.
Page 8
Number: 25 Created: 12/29/2005
112/29/051 Check with Poudre Fire Authority on fire access issues. They may
have a problem with the private drive aisle width, since parking one side would
reduce the area for their trucks down to about 16'.
Number: 26 Created: 12/29/2005
[ 12/29/051 A variance request will:be needed to eliminate the 9' utility easement
on the north side of Elizabeth.
Number: 33 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/051 When 12 or more units are served by a driveway, our standards
(LCUASS 9.3.2C) require a minimum width of 28. This standard applies for the
proposed private drive. The width can be reduced when driveways are off of low
traffic volume streets. As long as average daily volume is <1000 vehicles, the width
of the drive can be 24'. However, any parking proposed will have to be in
bumpouts, and not in the 24' width.
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine
Topic: Landscape plan
Number: 1 Created: 12/22/2005
112/22/051 A landscape plan showing planned streetlights was mailed to Jim Sell
Design on 12-22-05. The lights will need to be shown on the landscape plan, and
street tree locations adjusted to provide 40 ft. clearance between streetlight
standards and trees (15 ft. if the tree is an ornamental).
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 2 Created: 12/22/2005
[ 12/22/051 Water services need to be moved away from the side lot lines to
provide space for electrical vaults, streetlights and electric services.
Number: 3 Created: 12/22/2005
[ 12/22/051 Locations of electric and gas meters on multi -family buildings will
need to be coordinated with Light & Power. and Excel prior to construction.
Electric and gas meters should be on opposite ends of each building.
Number: 4 Created: 12/22/2005
[12/22/051 Adjustment to the grade of the fiberglass electric vault on Overland
Trail will cost the developer several thousand dollars. Depending on the extent of
adjustment needed, the steel manhole is likely to be relatively less expensive.
Department: Natural Resources . Issue Contact: Doug Moore
Topic: General .
Number: 39 Created: 12/30/2005
[12/30/051 50' Wildlife Movement Corridor along Pleasant Valley & Lake Canal =
The Natural Resources Department doesn't not agree with the statement made in
the Ecological Characterization Study Report for. the. Overland Property, prepared
by Cedar Creek Associates dated August 15, 2005 that wildlife movement should
not apply to the Pleasant Valley and Lake Canal. Wildlife movement has been
found along the canal throughout the City. NRD will not support this project not
meeting this requirement.
Page 7
Topic: Site plan
Number: 34 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/05] Site plan shows a privacy fence located in the 15' utility easement.
This is not likely to be allowed- would need approval from all utilities.
Number: 35 Created: 12/29/2005
112/29/051 Site plan shows a 21' WAPA power line easement. This is not shown
on the plat, and should probably be vacated with the plat since the ROW will serve
the same purpose.
Number: 36 Created: 12/30/2005
[ 12/30/051 The phase line shown on the site plan/ tract line on the plat and plans
should be expanded to include all Phase 2 structures. We really need more detail in
general regarding the phasing (what is to be done with each phase- removal of
structures, grading, and construction should be addressed).
Number: 37 Created: 12/30/2005
[12/30/051 See redlines for additional revisions.
Topic: Streets
Number: 20 Created: 12/29/2005
[ 12/29/051 A third pedestrian access ramp is required at all T-intersections,
including where the private drive connects to Elizabeth. Access ramps are also
required every 300'. although ramps can be incorporated into driveways to meet
this requirement.
Number: 21 Created: _ 12/29/2005
[12/29/051 Flowline proffies will be needed in addition to centerline profiles for
final compliance. Also at final, we'll want to see station and approximate locations
of all utility crossings, and driveways.
Number: 22 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/051 Sheet 10: Please reference the design mentioned in Sunflower Dr.
note.
:...:
Number: 23 Created: .12/29/2005
[ 12/29/051 At final compliance, we'll need to'see street cross sections at 50'
Intervals
Number: 24 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/05] Under the standards at the time of this submittal, it is not permissible
to have a named private drive. The proposed layout would be ok for an unnamed
private drive, but to pursue a named one would either require a modification to the
Land Use Code, or pulling and resubmitting after the new private drive standards
are approved. With the latter option, all new Transportation Development Review
fees would apply.
Page 6
hearing. This also applies on the south side of the site, where it appears that you
plan to construct sidewalk along the FC- Loveland Water District's frontage.
Number: 12 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/051 All grading should tie into existing contours. Some contour lines
simply end without explanation.
Number: 13 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/051 It should be noted that the existing access out to Overland Trail will be
closed and replaced with curb and gutter with Phase 2 construction.
Number: 14 Created: 12/29/2005
[ 12/29/051 The grading and construction easement shown. in Tract B is probably
not necessary unless the intent is to sell off Tract B to another owner.
Number: 15 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/051 Flowline slopes shown in the E. Fiore Ct. cul-de-sac look flat.
Minimum is 1%. This is a final compliance issue.
Number: 16 Created: 12/29/2005
[ 12/29/05] Where slopes exceed 4:1 affecting public improvements, our standards
(LCUASS 7.7.2) require retaining walls. It's appears that these slopes are exceeded
near the storm drain pipes under Elizabeth.
Number: 17 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/051 Wherever you are showing curb cuts, there should also be a sidewalk
chase shown and labeled. Also, reference the appropriate details.
Number: 19 Created: 12/29/2005
[ 12/29/051 Please label and dimension all existing and proposed driveways,
sidewalks, and accesses.
Topic: Plat
Number: 6 Created: 12/29/2005
112/29/051 Tract D should be Drainage and Access Easement and Neighborhood
Park. Open space implies that it will be managed by the City Natural Resources
Department. Remove Open Space designationfrom,all other. Tracts as•well.
Number: 7 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/051 Remove centerlines on easements- they just clutter the drawing.
Number: 54 Created: 1 / 11 /2006
[ 1 / 11 /06] Technical Services Comments:
1. Boundary closes
2. Can't use East & West on Fiore Ct.
3. May be a more logical way to use the streets Elizabeth, Banyan, and Sunflower -
see Redlines. i,
4. Vira can not be used as a street or drive name since Vera is already in use.
Page 5
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Dan DeLaughter
Topic: Details
Number: 27 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/051 Provide spot elevations on south side of Overland Access. Also, provide
proposed elevations for new edge of pavement (Final compliance issue).
Number: 28 Created: 12/29/2005
[ 12/29/051 Please provide all necessary details from LCUASS. None of our
standard drawings are currently shown.
Number: 29 Created: 12/29/2005
[ 12/29/051 For vault detail, splash guard is only shown on one side. If not
proposed on the other side, change the note, and ensure that there is 1' clear flat
area behind the sidewalk.
Topic: General
Number: 8 Created: 12/29/2005
[ 12/29/051 The general notes are incomplete. Many are either missing entirely or
missing part of the note. I can e-mail you the full note set if you need it. Please
discuss any notes that you feel are not applicable on an individual basis with me.
Unless otherwise approved, they should be verbatim.
Number: 30 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/051 Scanability is an issue on many of the sheets. Some line types are too
light, some overlapping text problems. Please refer to redlines, Appendix E-6, and
talk with J.R. in our technical services department regarding how to clean up the
drawings.
Number: 31 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/051 Refer to redlines for additional minor comments.
Number: 32 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/05] Please provide a copy of the "Final Affidavit and Agreement" referenced
on the plat.
Number: 55 Created: 1 / 11 /2006
[ 1 / 11 /06] District Utilities signature block should be provided on all sheets.
Topic: Grading plans
Number: 9 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/051 Please provide key maps as you have for the other sheets.
Number: 10 Created: 12/29/2005
[12/29/05] For final, please provide more spot elevations in cul-de-sacs so we can
verify that cross slopes and flowline slopes are met.
Number: 11 Created: 12/29/2005
[ 12/29/051 Sheet 7: In several locations, you're showing offsite grading to tie in
your contours. Grading and/or construction easements would be required in these
locations with letters of intent from the affected property owners received prior to
Page 4
3.5.2(C) are not being met, Therefore, one or more modifications of
standards may be needed. The applicant would be responsible for
submitting any / all modification of standard request, with justification
based on criteria set forth in Section 2.8.2(H) of the LUC.
12. The Limits of Phase 2 Improvements on Sheet SP-3 of the Site Plan should
be revised to incorporate only the area in the development that includes
the building and area in that phase. This would be critical to the
Landscape Plan.
13. There should be a building envelope designation, possibly Building
Envelope 6, for the building in Phase 2 of development in the multi -family
portion.
14. In the single-family portion of the development, on Sheet SP-4 of the Site
Plan, the street name Sunflower Drive cannot be on the portion of street
that runs east - west. If a street changes direction this dramatically then
another street name must be proposed. Please contact J.R. Wilson in the
City's Technical Services Department for direction on how the street
naming could be accomplished. He can be reached at 221-6588 or 281
North College Avenue.
15. On Sheets SP-4 and SP-5 of the Site Plan, label the 5' wide detached
sidewalks (as typical).
Landscape Plan comments
16. Please see the red -lined Sheet Ll of 5 of the Landscape Plan for necessary
changes to the Landscape Assurances.
17. There are a total of 250 trees proposed in the single-family portion of the
development (Sheets IA and L5 of the Landscape Plan). Section 3.2.1(D)(3)
- Minimum Species Diversity of the LUC allows no more than 15% of any 1
species of tree on the site if there are more than 60 trees, in this case 37.
trees. There are 38 proposed Marshall Ash, 41 proposed Skymaster Oak,
and 53 proposed Shademaster Honeylocust. The Landscape Plan must be
revised to satisfy this requirement.
18. The City's LUC requires street trees spaces at 30' to 40' (averaged along
the entire front and sides of a block face) throughout the development. In
most cases there are street trees at 40' on -center but there are some large
gaps of 60' to 65' in some locations. Please make adjustments as necessary
to maintain the overall 30' to 40' spacing.
Building Elevations comments
19. Please show the building height, "general" building materials, and "general"
colors for the proposed patio homes on Sheet Al.
Page 3
b. All District facilities are to be potholed and shown in proffie at all
crossings.
c. The District requires vehicle access to and from their facilities.
d. Storm water erosion control across District's easement needs to
shown.
Please contact Terry, at 226-3104, ext. 104, if you have questions about his
comments.
5. Len Hilderbrand of %cel Energy indicated that this development will need to
extend the existing 4" gas main from approximately 400' south of the PV&L
Canal. This existing main is located along the west side of Overland Trail.
6. The City's Technical Services Department offered the following comments:
a. The outside boundary of the development closes.
b. The street name references to West & East Fiore Court cannot be
used.
c. Vira cannot be used as a street or drive name as Vera already is used.
These 2 names are too similar and could create confusion for the
Poudre Fire Authority and Police Services relating to emergency
response.
Site Plan comments
7. On the Cover Sheet for the Site Plan drawings, the Director of Planning will
sign the drawing once approved. The year in all the signature blocks must
be changed to 2006.
8. A 24' wide private drive is being proposed in the multi -family portion of the
development. Sheet SP-3 of 5 of the Site Plan drawings indicates on -street
parking on one side of the drive; however, a 20' wide emergency access fire
lane must be maintained, which would eliminate the on -street parking.
9. The naming of the proposed private drive in the multi -family portion of the
development will require a modification of a standard set forth in Section
3.6.2(L)(2)(a) of the Land Use Code (LUC).
10. If West Elizabeth Street is to be an arterial street then all residential
buildings must be set back from the street right-of-way (ROW) a minimum
distance of 30'. If it is less than an arterial street designation then the
proposed 15' in the multi -family portion of the development is sufficient.
11. Based on the layout of the multi -family portion of the development, along
with the proposed private drive, it appears that requirements for
Relationship of Dwellings to Streets and Parking set forth in Section
Page 2
aSTAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
Jim Sell Design Date: 01 / 17/2006
c/o Matt Blakely (for John Minatta)
153 West Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Staff has reviewed your submittal for BELLA VIRA PDP - TYPE 11, and we offer the
following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt
Topic: General
Number: 59 Created: 1 / 13/2006
(1 / 13/061 Additional planning comments, with red -lined plans, will be provided to
the applicant / developer no later than Wednesday, January 18th.
(1 / 17/06) Planning Comments:
1. Bonnie Ham of the U.S. Post Office indicated that centralized mail delivery
using a minimum of 5 centralized box units (CBU's, industry type III) is
required. Please revise the plan to show the required CBU locations as
approved by the U.S. Postal Service. In all cases the CBU's must be located
in the public right-of-way or a designated easement. Be advised that the
responsibility of purchase and maintaining the CBU's with the concrete
pads is that of the owner/developer/builder/HOA. Prior to occupancy within
the development approved mail receptacles must be in place. A Delivery
Agreement must be in place prior to any delivery of mail. Contact Bonnie
Ham, Growth Coordinator, U.S. Postal Service, 301 East Boardwalk Drive,
Fort Collins, CO., phone #970-225-4130, cell #970-214-3668, fax #970-225-
4139.
2. Dennis Greenwalt of Comcast Cable TV indicated that the S wide side and
rear lot utility easements are not adequate enough for placement and
maintenance of facilities. They will need to be at least 5' wide but Comcast
Cable would prefer 6' wide easements.
3. Alden Hill, representing the Pleasant Valley & Lake Canal Company,
indicated that the plans as submitted do not appear to affect the PV&L
ditch. They may, however, have additional comments if changes are to occur
to the plans or when they learn more about this project. Please contact Mr.
Hill, at 482-3683, if you have any questions about PV&L's review comments.
4. Terry Farrill of the Fort Collins -Loveland Water District and the South
Fort Collins Sanitation District offered the following comments:
a. The District does not allow trees, tree canopies, or landscaping within
the District's easement or within 10' of District facilities.
Page 1