Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBELLA VIRA - FDP - 36-05A/B - CORRESPONDENCE - (8)Topic: Utility Plan - Utility Plan Center Number: 352 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] Driveway locations now shown but the sewer service is hard to read. Text is blurry for the individual services, perhaps the pen width is too large for that smW6f a font. Please see E6 for minimum font size as well. Topic: Utility Plan - Utility Plan East Number: 217 Created: 6/27/2007 [9/3/07] Now labeled as -such, however, no detail and sheet were referenced. Please provide. 16/27/071 The existing ADS pipe under Elizabeth must be removed entirely from the row. Right now the plans are showing it only removed from curb to curb. Department: Traffic Operations Topic: Trq is Number: 320 [8/21 /071 No final issues. Issue Contact: Ward Stanford Created: 8/21 /2007 Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 360 Created: 9/4/2007 [9/4/07) On Sheet 15, include diameter and thickness in the note on steel casing. Be sure and return all red -lined plans if/when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, Steve Olt City Planner cc: Susan Joy Dana Leavitt Roger Buffington John Minatta Planning & Zoning file #36-05B Page 9 Number: 348 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07[ Label easements as existing or proposed. This has been a repeat comment under other Topics so I've created a new comment for each sheet that this information needs to be clarified to make sure we get the sheets labeled correctly. Number: 349 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07[ Proposed grading is shown tying into lot lines. Are the lines contour lines as well? Just a question... Number: 350 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07[ Correct misspelling on Sheet 11. Topic: Utility Plan - General Number: 212 Created: 6/27/2007 [9/3/07[ [6/27/071 See redlines for other comments. Topic: Utility Plan - Plan & Profiles Number: 222 Created: 6/27/2007 [9/3/07] Please carry cross slopes out to at least one decimal place. [6/27/071 The city requires all CL stationing and where FL and CL stationing is used separately, you'll need to provide spots at all PCs and VCs on the plan view and label with the cross slope so that I can verify that the min/max cross slope requirement is being met. Topic: Utility Plan - Rough Grading Number: 343 Created: 9/3/2007 19/3/071 Provide reception numbers for easements dedicated by separate document. Number: 345 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07[ There is a new note number 6 shown. Please add verbiage something to the effect that the wall must be placed a minimum of 2' behind the sidewalk. Since this is quite a drop, you may want to consider installing handrails for liability reasons. Number: 353 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07[ The key map is still showing the wrong area shown on sheet 10. This was a redline comment from the last round and has not been corrected. Topic: Utility Plan - Utility Phasing Plan Number: 351 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07[ Please correct Phasing Lines, all sheets ... see previous comments under other topics and carry this comment through any sheet where phasing is shown. Page 8 Number: 306 Created: 6/29/2007 [9/3/07] Just keeping this comment alive until the rough/final grading sheet issue is resolved. [6/29/071 All grading shown outside the row must be shown on the Grading sheets. Topic: Utility Plan - Existing Conditions Number: 342 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] Label easements as existing or proposed to match the plat. Topic: Utility Plan - Final Grading Number: 136 Created: 2/ 13/2007 [9/3/07] Repeat. 16/27/07] Call out the detail and sheet # for all sidewalk chases, etc. [2/ 13/07] Call out the detail and sheet # for the modified curb cut and sidewalk chase. Number: 138 Created: 2/ 13/2007 [9/3/07] The wall section shown incorrectly labels the UE as a 15' setback. Please correct. [6/27/07] The landscape plan is showing this as a 6' tall stucco and brick wall. No portion of the footing my lie within the utility easement. Please provide a cut section of the wall showing the footing and the UE so that it is very clear to the subcontractors where the wall may be placed. [2/ 13/07] What is the dark line shown on the SW corner of Overland and West Elizabeth - a retaining wall or fence? Wasn't included in the legend... Number: 213 Created: 6/27/2007 [9/3/07] Still missing this information, see comments under Rough Grading. Also, new notes 10 and 11 on sheet 12 refer to rough grading sheets for final grading. We still need final grading. If the rough grading is the final grading, then please label this area as final on the rough grading sheets and show the approximate limits. [6/27/071 Sheet 13 - Missing portions of the design along Overland Trail and the bridge area. Unable to review the areas not shown. Number: 346 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] Proposed grading does not tie into existing grading. Please see redlines. Number: 347 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] Correct phase lines, all sheets, so that Phase One completes the curb returns into Phase Two. Page 7 Y Number: 288 Created: 6/29/2007 [9/4/07] Repeat comment. Coordinate with comment number 282. [6/29/071 Detail 3 - The detail shown here does not match Detail 4 this sheet or Typical Section, sheet S4. Correct and update. Horizontal bar missing. Topic: Utility Plan - Bridge Design, S4 Number: 290 Created: 6/29/2007 [9/4/07] Need to renumber notes that follow Note 3 which was removed. [6/29/071 General Note 3 - Remove. Not shown. Number: 296 Created: 6/29/2007 [9/4/07] Repeat comment. Plan still have Class B and Class D concrete called out. [6/29/071 Design Data - Change design data or add note that the concrete has to be 5,000 psi as it needs to be poured monolithically with the bottom slab of box culvert. Topic: Utility Plan - Cover Number: 201 Created: 6/27/2007 [9/3/07] The legend has been updated to include the existing and proposed easements; however, the line weights appear almost identical. Please use a grey line for existing and a darker line weight for proposed. It helps to verify the line type as well. [6/27/071 The legend is incomplete and need to label the "easement line" as "existing" or "proposed". Missing quite a few line weights, either here or on individual sheets. Can either update the cover legend or add the various line weights to each individual sheet as they apply. Number: 243 Created: 6/29/2007 [9/3/07] This has been done on the cover sheet of the utility plans but has not been carried through to the plat. The various plan sets need to be coordinated so that they all present the same information. Does WAPA want to sign off on the landscape plan as well? There are several improvements proposed within their easement. [6/29/07] Need to type the name out of the president of the ditch company OR add a line for him to print out his own name in addition to the signature line. Topic: Utility Plan - Cross Sections Number: 232 Created: 6/27/2007 [9/3/07] Need to show the electrical duct bank at station 9+00 and dim from the bottom of the box. [6/27/071 Please extend the grid to include the structures and pipes located beneath the street section. Page 6 AN 7 Topic: Utility Plan - Bridge Design, Calculation Number: 250 Created: 6/29/2007 [9/4/07] [6/29/071 Calculations show 10 kips and 20 kips wheel load. HS20-44 loading should be 8 kips and 32 kips. Topic: Utility Plan - Bridge Design, Letter Number: 249 Created: 6/29/2007 [9/4/07] Repeat comment. 16/29/07] Letter from EEC regarding the anticipated settlement of box culvert, should state design bearing pressure of 2,000 psf, not 1,000 psf. Update settlement if value changes due to bearing pressure change. Topic: Utility Plan - Bridge Design, S1 Number: 260 Created: 6/29/2007 [9/4/07] Repeat comment. Civil sheet 13 called out here for final contour. [6/29/071 Detail 1 - Note reference civil drawing for final contour. Final contour not found in civil drawing. Topic: Utility Plan - Bridge Design, S2 Number: 275 Created: 6/29/2007 [9/4/07] New detail does not seem to work. Is the dowel bar your load transfer mechanism? Explain new detail. [6/29/07] Detail 1 - If the detail still applies to this box, the detail called for drilling 2 rows of holes all round at every 6" spacing, in addition to 1 row of holes all round at every 24"for the dowel bar. Is this correct? Topic: Utility Plan - Bridge Design, SS Number: 282 Created: 6/29/2007 [9/4/07] Repeat comment. Horizontal bar at mid -wall still not called out. Coordinate with comment number 288. [6/29/07] Detail 4 - There is a label calling out for horizontal reinforcing through pilaster. What is the size and spacing of the horizontal bar. Update label. This detail does not match Detail 3 this sheet and Typical Section sheet S4. Number: 284 Created: 6/29/2007 [9/4/07] Repeat comment. Need concrete design calculations that show the b 1 & b2 bar ® 6" spacing still works for the reduced "d" dimension in concrete design. [6/29/071 Detail 5 - If this detail is an option, need design calculation for the thinner slab thickness of 10" less 3" reinforcing bar cover. No plywood allow, use sand. Page 5 l .. 4. Delineate block boundaries with heavier line weights. Illustrate blocks or remove blocks all together. Number: 202 Created: 6/27/2007 [9/3/07) Please remove all revisions in the title block before printing the mylars. The plat will not be accepted with this information shown. [6/27/071 Remove all revisions from the title block. Number: 337 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07) See comment 243. Number: 341 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07) See redlines. Topic: Site plan Number: 329 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07) Remove the word "Final" from the title and title block. This is just the process you were going through. Number: 330 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07) Scannability still continues to be a problem with the plan set. Please see Appendix E6 for all scanning requirements and bring the plans up to standard. Mylars can not be signed until this is done. Suggest changing the scale on the vicinity map to 1 "=1000' and reduce the area shown so that all text is legible. See LCUASS for vicinity map requirements. Number: 331 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07) Details 2 and 3 on Sheet 2 are not typical... there are lots fronting Vertical Curb. Need to provide another typical section for those. Number: 332 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07) . Remove the landscaping from the site plan. Number: 333 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07) Label all easements as existing or proposed (needs to match the plat and utility plans). Provide reception numbers for the easements recorded by separate document. Number: 334 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07) Phase lines need to match the utility plans. Number: 335 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07) Sheet 4 calls out conflicting row dimensions on W. Elizabeth Street. Page 4 Number: 322 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] Remove the word "Final" from the cover sheet title block as well as the comma, "details and notes". Remove the word "Final" from the title block on sheets 2-5. Remove the word "Enlargements" from sheet 3's title, use "Details". Number: 323 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] Label all easements as "existing" or "proposed" to match the plat and utility plan. Please fill in all reception numbers for the easements' dedicated by separate document. Number: 324 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] Change the phase lines to match the utility plan's phasing to the PCs of the driveways and Overland Trail connection. Number: 325 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] Need to show the UE in detail 14, sheet 3, if this section is being used along the row, close to the UE. Need to refer to this detail and sheet number within the plan set where ever it's used. Number: 326 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] The typical parkway landscape detail #6 does not apply along the north side of Elizabeth Street where it fronts the CSU property. Please note this somehow or provide a separate section for that area. Number: 327 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] Please note that driveways may not be placed over the individual water services to the lots. Number: 328 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] Can't tell which line is the water line and which line is the sewer line for lots 1-6 along Elizabeth. Number: 336 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] See comment 243. Topic: Plat Number: 196 Created: 6/26/2007 [9/4/07] [6/26/07] From Technical Services: 1. Boundary and legal close. 2. Many missing bearings, distances, see red -lines. Several dimension problems. 3. Show WAPA easement. Page 3 !A .. Topic: Utility Plan Set Number: 355 Created: 9/4/2007 ]9/4/07] Signature Block on Sheets 15-18 still need to be revised from Natural Resources to Environmental Planner. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 236 Created: 6/28/2007 [9/3/07] Carrying this comment through until the estimate has been received and the DA completed. [6/28/071 The project has gone from a single phase to a two phase development since the last submittal. The Overland 'Nail and bridge improvements are now being completed in the last phase. As previously discussed, the city will require an estimate for those improvements for our review and approval. Once the final cost has been approved by the City, it shall be included in the Development Agreement and a portion collected over each phase with each building permit to assure that these improvements are made in the future. Number: 240 Created: 6/29/2007 [9/3/07] 16/29/071 The site, landscape, utility and plat plans need to go through each comment under the different sections so that all comments and plan sets can be properly coordinated. Some comments made under the Utility Plan section, for instance, will affect the site and landscape plans as well. Number: 358 Created: 9/4/2007 [9/4/07] All plan sets: The Vicinity Map covers too large an area making the text too small to read or scan. Suggest going to a 1"=1000' scale and reducing the area shown. Number: 359 Created: 9/4/2007 [9/4/07] All plan sets: See red -lines for other minor comments. Topic: Landscape plan Number: 235 Created: 6/28/2007 [9/3/07] Need WAPA signature on the Landscape Plan still. [6/28/071 Need to show, dimension and label the WAPA easement on all plan sets (site, landscape, utility and plat). WAPA will need to sign off on the plan sets if any improvements are proposed within their easement. Number: 321 Created: 9/3/2007 [9/3/07] Scannability continues to be a problem with the plan set. Please refer to Appendix E6 for all scanning requirements and bring the set into conformance. Page 2 F" STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins John Minatta Date: 9/ 11 /2007 c/o Jim Sell Design - Matt Blakely 153 West Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for BELI.A VIRA - FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: General Number: 197 Created: 6/26/2007 [9/4/07] Provide revised Trail Easement Agreement for review. Will not hold up project. 16/26/071 Trail Easement Agreement, page 2, section 4.3 - add "using native grass species" to the first sentence after OFP shall reseed the vegetation. Number: 354 Created: 9/4/2007 [9/4/07] Details on barrier fencing still have to include how fencing will be installed adjacent to wildlife corridors on Site Plan and Utilities Plans. Original comment by Doug Moore. Number: 356 Created: 9/4/2007 [9/4/07] [9/4/07) Carry until DA is completed. Will not hold up project. (6/26/07] Will be addressed when development agreement is prepared. [2/9/07) 112/30/051 Original comment by Doug Moore. Prairie Dogs - Standard language will be added to the development agreement for this project to ensure that construction activities including grading will not be allowed to occur on the development site if prairie dogs relocate to or inhabitant the site either prior to or during construction. At any time construction activities occur with prairies on site construction activities will be stopped until the situation is corrected. If relocation of prairie dogs on to the construction site becomes an issue the Natural Resources Department may require the developer to install a temporary barrier fencing to try to limit the animals ability to move on to the site. 3.4.1(F), 3.4.1(N)(6) Topic: Grading plans Number: 357 Created: 9/4/2007 [9/4/07] Proposed grading extends beyond the LOD on Sheet 13. Adjust LOD so that grading lies within the LOD. Page I