Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBELLA VIRA - FDP - 36-05A/B - CORRESPONDENCE - (7)i.Y•. r...R•33a I. k s Steve Olt-BellaVira,Final Plan-MinattaPro 1.RevisionsCommentLetter.doc Page 18 cc: Susan Joy John Minatta Planning & Zoning File #36-05B Page 18 Steve Olt - be-1 iamira,FlnalPlan-Minatta-Pro l.RevisionsCommentLetter.doc Page 17 Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: fire Number: 194 Created: 6 / 19 / 2007 [6/ 19/07] PFA has no additional comments or concerns. Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Eric Bracke Topic: Traffic Number: 195 Created: 6/ 19/2007 [6/ 19/07] Sheets 32/33 - The plans show a combination left/thru for WB traffic. Change to a Left and a combination thru/right. I don't need to see the plans again, please change on the mylars. The interim striping and final striping plans are fine. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 168 Created: 2/ 16/2007 [6/27/07] Casings required where access to water/sewer lines is obstructed by 24-inch and larger pipes or multiple parallel pipes. [2/ 16/07] Add steel casings on the water mains and sanitary sewers that cross below the dual storm culverts. Calculate length of casing by using a 1:1 slope from the outside of the storm culverts down to the elevation of the water/sewer mains. Specify the length, diameter and thickness of each casing. Number: 234 Created: 6 / 27/ 2007 [6/27/07] Add a cross section of the 16-inch water main with insulation which shows location of insulation with respect to water main and trench. A limited round of review (of paper copies) of these latest revisions is necessary to ensure that the utility plans, primarily, are ready to prepare and submit mylars. Please see the attached REVISION ROUTING SHEET. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yo rs Truly Steve Olt City Planner Page 17 Steve Olt - BellaVira,FinalPlan-MinattaPro y.Revision sCommentLetter.doc Page 16 14 . Number: 217 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 [6/27/07] The existing ADS pipe under Elizabeth must be removed entirely from the row. Right now the plans are showing it only removed from curb to curb. Topic: Utility Plan - Utility Plan West Number: 216 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 [6/27/07] Please show all driveway locations on all lots with less than 50' of frontage on all utility plan sheets where applicable. Remove the word "conceptual" from the driveway location note and correct note 7 to read: Driveways on individual lots may not be placed over water services. The driveway locations need to be shown on the site plan and the landscape plan along with the same note. Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: General Number: 40 Created: 12 / 30 / 2005 [6/26/071 LOD is shown on the plans. Details on barrier fencing as part of the construction process to protect wildlife movement corridors and the existing trees needs top be added to the Site Plan and the Utility Plans set of drawings. [2/9/07] [12/30/051 Limits of Development, LUC 3.4.1 (N) - Limits of development and details explaining installation of barrier fencing will need to be show on plans drawings related to the construction near the following natural habitats and features: • Wildlife movement corridor • Existing cottonwood and peach -leaf willow trees Number: 42 Created: 12 / 30 / 2005 [6/26/071 Will be addressed when development agreement is prepared. [2/9/07] [12/30/05] Prairie Dogs - Standard language will be added to the development agreement for this project to ensure that construction activities including grading will not be allowed to occur on the development site if prairie dogs relocate to or inhabitant the site either prior to or during construction. At any time construction activities occur with prairies on site construction activities will be stopped until the situation is corrected. If relocation of prairie dogs on to the construction site becomes an issue the Natural Resources Department may require the developer to install a temporary barrier fencing to try to limit the animals ability to move on to the site. 3.4.1(F), 3.4.1(N)(6) Page 16 `Steve Olt - BellaVira,FinalPlan-MinattaPrc y.RewsionsCommentLetter.doc Page 15 Number: 248 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Overland Trail - All patching from roughly 10+50 to 8+00 must go to the CL. Our patching requirements do not allow an irregular patch like the one proposed. This same comment is under the Cross Section section as well. Number: 304 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Overland Trail - Max grade break has been exceeded but could be easily solved with another grade break thrown in between the two. The CL profile is missing the existing grade - is it because it's the same as the proposed? Perhaps labeling it that way would make it more clear. Number: 305 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Station 4+00 is showing a taper in the pavement to meet existing dirt or pavement? But sheet 27 is not showing any taper at all. Which is correct? If the plan view on 27 is correct, then correct the cross section. If the cross section is correct, correct the plan view on 27 and how will the drainage be handled? What's currently shown won't work. Number: 308 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Please relabel Sheet 27 as "Ultimate (Phase 2) Overland Trail Plan and Profile". Topic: Utility Plan - Rough Grading Number: 135 Created: 2/ 13/2007 [6/29/07] Still missing some lot corners. [2/ 13/07] Please provide spot elevations for all lot corners and at the PC's of corner lots as well. Number: 209 Created: 6 / 27/ 2007 [6/27/07] The key maps aren't correct. The area blocked out is not what is actually shown on the sheet. Please correct all key maps, each sheet. Topic: Utility Plan - Signing and Striping Number: 156 Created: 2/ 15/2007 [6/27/071 Repeat. [2/ 15/07] Please route Traffic Engineering with the next round so that they can review this sheet. Topic: Utility Plan - Utility Phasing Plan Number: 215 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 [6/27/07] Please note to construct the waterline stub 10' back (or?) into Phase II. That way you won't have to tear any of your Phase I work up later to tie in. Topic: Utility Plan - Utility Plan East Page 15 (Steve Olt - BellaVira,FinalPlan-MinattaPrc y.RevisionscommentLetter.doc Page 14 [6/29/07] All transitions must occur at the PC of an intersection. [2/15/07] Please provide a transition detail for the VC to rollover curb. Number: 221 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/071 Please call out the cover depth to any pipe or structure that does not meet section 12.2.2. on all plan and profile sheets (street and utility). Will need to update the variance letter to list out all locations where this requirement is not being met as well. Number: 222 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/071 The city requires all CL stationing and where FL and CL stationing is used separately, you'll need to provide spots at all PCs and VCs on the plan view and label with the cross slope so that I can verify that the min/max cross slope requirement is being met. Number: 223 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/07] Grade breaks can not exceed those stated in 7.4.1.13.3. Number: 224 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/071 Label the station and elevation of the end of both FL's for the cul-de- sac so that I can make sure they match up. I redlined the first cul-de-sac to ask if two particular points were the same. Make sure the max grade break isn't being exceeded as well. Number: 225 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/07] Cross slopes of the cul-de-sac or any street can't exceed 2%min or 3% max. Number: 226 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/07] The wrong intersection detail sheet is being referred to on each plan and profile sheet. Number: 227 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/07] Please provide more overlap between matchlines. There are missing gaps in some cases. Number: 229 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/07] Overland Trail - Note 2 says that all curb returns are 20' unless otherwise noted. Please note both curb return radii on Overland because they are not 20'. Number: 230 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/07] Overland Trail - Missing information. Page 14 Steve Olt - BellaVira,FinalPlan-MinattaPrc y.RevisiorisCommentLetter.doc Page 13 Number: 212 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 [6/27/07] See redlines for other comments. Number: 228 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 [6/27/07] This is a repeat question from the previous redlines... but why is the curb and sidewalk jogging at the west end of Elizabeth? This needs to be corrected. *Update - per the last discussion, the applicant is proposing a change from VC to Rollover curb midblock. The city only allows a change in curb type at the intersections because of the additional cost and difficulty in maintaining the transition area, plus it causes the sidewalk to job like what's proposed. No variance can be granted because what you are proposing is not as good or better than the standard and it does cost the city additional time and money in maintaining this area. See 1.9.4 if you wish to pursue the variance. Topic: Utility Plan - General Notes Number: 203 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 [6/27/07] See redlines. Number: 299 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Line 48 of the General Notes requires a little more information. Need to site the section of the code that was varied as well as what the standard is and what the variance granted. Topic: Utility Plan - Intersection Details Number: 231 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 [6/27/071 See 7-27 and 7-28 for all required spot elevations that need to be called out. Need to show the transition length on all intersections. If the minimum transition length is not provided with the next submittal, then that will generate another comment so please be sure to meet the minimum. If the minimum has not been met with THIS submittal but I can't tell because it's not dimensioned, then correcting the situation will change the spot elevations and flowlines as well. More comments could follow based on the new information. This statement or disclaimer applies everywhere. If the information changes, then it's basically a new review and new comments can be generated. Topic: Utility Plan - Plan & Profiles Number: 151 Created: 2/ 15/2007 [6/27/07] Just carrying this item through until the variance is approved. [2/ 15/07] Minimum cover requirements are not being met. Please refer to 12.2.2 Number: 152 Page 13 Created: 2/ 15/2007 Steve Olt - BeIlaVIra,FinalPlan-MinattaPrc 'y.RevisionsCommentLetter.doc Page 12 [2/13/07] Call out the detail and sheet # for the modified curb cut and sidewalk chase. Number: 138 Created: 2/ 13/2007 [6/27/07] The landscape plan is showing this as a U tall stucco and brick wall. No portion of the footing my lie within the utility easement. Please provide a cut section of the wall showing the footing and the UE so that it is very clear to the subcontractors where the wall may be placed. [2/ 13/07] What is the dark line shown on the SW corner of Overland and West Elizabeth - a retaining wall or fence? Wasn't included in the legend... Number: 211 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/07] Refer to detail and sheet number where necessary. Provide a cross section of the trail, construction notes if any, materials, and refer to detail and sheet number if not placed on this sheet. Number: 213 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/07] Sheet 13 - Missing portions of the design along Overland Trail and the bridge area. Unable to review the areas not shown. Number: 300 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Missing lot corner spot elevations. Number: 301 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/071 Please dimension all sidewalks and trails. Label trail connections with type of material being used. Topic: Utility Plan - General Number: 207 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/071 There is a new landscape wall shown on the south side of Elizabeth that wasn't previously shown before. It appears that you are meeting the 2' minimum setback but wondered how you will be landscaping between the sidewalk and wall. If I might suggest widening out the sidewalk 2' to meet the wall, you won't have a maintenance issue. Figure 16-1 really restricts what you can put in there and just from a practical point of view, it's really hard to get anything to grow in there anyway. You could taper the sidewalk to meet the widened section with a 45 degree angle or curve it in a way that makes sense. Whatever you think is best and will be safe later. Number: 210 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/07] Remove revisions from the title block, each sheet. The plans haven't been approved yet, therefore there are no revisions. Page 12 Steve Olt - -Bel laVira,Final Plan-MinattaPrc y.RevisionsCommentLetter.doc Page 11 [6/29/07] All patching from roughly 10+50 to 8+00 must go to the CL. Our patching requirements do not allow an irregular patch like the one proposed. This same comment is made under the Plan and Profile section as well. Number: 306 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] All grading shown outside the row must be shown on the Grading sheets. Number: 307 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] The cross section at station 9+00 is incorrect. Topic: Utility Plan - Details Number: 214 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 [6/27/07] Missing sidewalk chase details. Topic: Utility Plan - Drainage and Erosion Control Number: 218 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 [6/27/07] Perhaps removing some of the layers will help with the scannability and legibility of the sheet. The way you submitted it last time was fine ... only information related to Drainage and Erosion Control is required on this sheet. Number: 219 Created: 6 / 27/ 2007 [6/27/07] Sidewalk Chase size is incorrectly called out. Need to refer to city detail and sheet #. Topic: Utility Plan - Existing Conditions Number: 204 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 [6/27/07] Remove Note 4 from all sheets. Our standard Note 5 prevails. Number: 205 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 (6/27/07] Correct (all sheets) Note 5 to read: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Number: 206 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 [6/27/07] Sheet 7 - Demo Note 4 states that you are to protect in place and to move or remove by utility. How can you do both at the same time? Either it is staying or you are moving or removing. Topic: Utility Plan - Final Grading Number: 136 Created: 2/ 13/2007 [6/27/07] Call out the detail and sheet # for all sidewalk chases, etc. Page 11 Steve Olt - BellaVira,FinalPlan-MinattaPrc y.Revision sCommentLetter.doc Page 10 dimension associate with ** Number: 296 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Design Data — Change design data or add note that the concrete has to be 5,000 psi as it needs to be poured monolithically with the bottom slab of box culvert. Topic: Utility Plan - Cover Number: 145 Created: 2/ 15/2007 [6/27/07] More corrections required since the index has changed since the last submittal. [2/ 15/07] Correct the index (see redlines) and add the box culvert design to this set and number as part of the set. Number: 200 Created: 6 / 27/ 2007 [6/27/071 Reference the soils report here (see redlines) or as line 49 in the General Notes, sheet 5. Number: 201 Created: 6 / 27 / 2007 [6/27/07] The legend is incomplete and need to label the "easement line" as "existing" or "proposed". Missing quite a few line weights either here or on individual sheets. Can either update the cover legend or add the various line weights to each individual sheet as they apply. Number: 243 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Need to type the name out of the president of the ditch company OR add a line for him to print out his own name in addition to the signature line. Topic: Utility Plan - Cross Sections Number: 154 Created: 2/ 15/2007 [6/29/071 Please dimension parkways and sidewalks. Please label existing sidewalks as "existing". Please call out the dimension from the top of pipe or structure to the subgrade where ever the minimum cover requirement is being met. [2/ 15/07] Missing information - please refer to LCUASS. Number: 232 Created: 6 / 27/ 2007 [6/27/071 Please extend the grid to include the structures and pipes located beneath the street section. Number: 233 Created: 6/27/2007 [6/27/07] Please dimension all sidewalks, parkways, etc. Number: 246 Page 10 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 jj-Steve- Olt - BellaVira,Final Plan-MinattaPrc 'y.RevisionsCommentLetter.doc Page 9 Update. Number: 286 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/071 Detail 1 - Update wingwall footing thickness dimension to l'-4" as shown on other sheet and design calculation. Need to address with note or new detail the 4" difference in thickness with the bottom slab thickness of the box. Update this detail base on how it was address. Number: 287 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 3 - Correct parapet wall height from 4'-71/2" to 4'-41/2", as the top slab thickness is 15". Number: 288 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 3 - The detail shown here does not match Detail 4 this sheet or Typical Section, sheet S4. Correct and update. Horizontal bar missing. Topic: Utility Plan - Bridge Design, S4 Number: 289 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] General Note 2 - Add "Top of footing shall be flush with top of box bottom slab" Number: 290 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 (6/29/07] General Note 3 - Remove. Not shown. Number: 291 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/071 General Note 5 - This minimum splice length table is different from sheet S2. Update. Number: 292 Created: 6/29/2007 [6/29/071 Design Table - Need to label "e" dimension. Number: 293 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Typical Section - Change the dimension 8" to 81/2". Number: 294 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Typical Section - Fill slope label and arrow did not point to anything. Number: 295 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Typical Section - Change footing thickness to 1'-4" as per design calculation and design table shown on this sheet. Remove all notes and Page 9 Steve Olt - BellaVira, Final Plan-M inattaPr( ty.RevisionsCommentLetter.doc Page 8 Number: 276 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 1 - Span in table need to be clarified and updated. Number: 277 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] General Note 1 - CDOT Class D (Box Culvert) called out is 4,500 psi. Design calculation show the box is design for 5,000 psi concrete. Update accordingly. Number: 278 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/071 General Note 10 - The minimum lap splice length shown here is different from those in Sheet S4. Show correct length in this table and that of Sheet S4. Number: 279 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Design Data - There is NO LRFD Strength Design Method in 16th edition of AASHTO. Update design data to what was actually used for design. Number: 280 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Design Data Unit Stresses - f c should be 5,000 psi as per design calculation. Number: 281 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Loading Data Live Load - There is no AASHTO HS 20-25 designation. Correct/Update. Topic: Utility Plan - Bridge Design, S3 Number: 282 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 (6/29/07] Detail 4 - There is a label calling out for horizontal reinforcing through pilaster. What is the size and spacing of the horizontal bar? Update label. This detail does not match Detail 3 this sheet and Typical Section sheet S4. Number: 283 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/071 Detail 4 - Update dimension. Overall width of parapet is V-4". 3/4" + 3" + 81/2" + 3" +3/4" and 33/4"+ 81/2"+ 33/4". Number: 284 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 5 - If this detail is an option, need design calculation for the thinner slab thickness of 10" less 3" reinforcing bar cover. No plywood allow, use sand. Number: 285 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 1 - Section 5 cut line is not shown at the right location. Page 8 Steve Olt - BellaVira,FinalPlan-MinattaPrc '.y.RevisionsCommentLetter.doc Page 7 Number: 266 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 5 - Call out box size as 14'-0" x 4'-0". All dimensions shown here are perpendicular dimension. If skewed span dimension are call out, it should be secondary. Skew span dimension should be 15'-6" as shown on sheet S1, not 18'-6". Correct dimension and table. Number: 267 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/071 Detail 4 - Z bar size need to be called out Number: 268 Created: 6/29/2007 [6/29/071 Detail 4 - Is dl bar perpendicular to tl, t2, bl, & b2? Or it is parallel to the C.L. of CBC? Number: 269 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 4 - Remove section B-B & C-C cut lines. No section shown. Number: 270 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/071 Detail 4 - Label called to add horizontal dowels per 3/S1. There is not dowel called out in 3/S1. Remove label and line. Number: 271 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 4 - Label pointing to transverse bar (tl, t2, bl, & b2) say to skew bars parallel to C.L. of ditch. This is not correct. These bar should be perpendicular to C.L. of ditch or parallel the headwall. Shows correct rebar orientation on plan respectively. Number: 272 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 4 - There is a label calling out "see plan". This is the reinforcing plan. Remove label. Number: 273 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 4 - Show correct wingwall orientation. Number: 274 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 1 - Note for this detail said that it only for joint perpendicular to the C.L. of box. This box is on a skew and the joint is NOT perpendicular to the C.L. of box, thus for this box, this detail does not apply. Need detail that applies to joint NOT perpendicular to C.L. of box. Number: 275 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 1 - If the detail still applies to this box, the detail called for drilling 2 rows of holes all round at every 6" spacing, in addition to 1 row of holes all round at every 24"for the dowel bar. Is this correct? Page 7 Steve Olt - bellaVira,FinalPlan-MinattaPrc y.RevisionsCommentLetter.doe Page 6' Number: 254 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Foundations Note 5 - Remove. Update note number that follows. Number: 255 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Submittals Note 1 - Remove. There is no Material section. Update note number that follows. Number: 256 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Quality Assurance Notes - Correct note numbering. Number: 257 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Special Inspection Notes - Correct note numbering. Number: 258 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 1 - Remove one of the call out "Align inside walls of new box with walls of existing box, typ." Number: 259 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 1 - Remove <1>, lower right hand corner. Note do not have a reference in detail 1. <1> was used in detail 3, same sheet. Number: 260 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 1 - Note reference civil drawing for final contour. Final contour not found in civil drawing. Number: 261 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 2 - Structural backfill dim. Should be 1'-6" min. Need to call out slope of backfill. Number: 262 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 2 - Skew length called out should be 15'-6" Number: 263 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 3 - Sidewalk should be 6" Topic: Utility Plan - Bridge Design, S2 Number: 264 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 5 - tl & bl bar need to be #7@6" per calculation submitted, not #4@6" Number: 265 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Detail 5 - dl bar size need to be called out. Page 6 Steve OR - BeIIaVIra,FlnalPlan-MinattaPr( ty.RevisionsCommentLetter.doc Page 5 [6/29/07] Please see comment 216. Topic: Utility Plan - 16" Waterline Number: 162 Created: 2/ 15/2007 [6/27/07] Just carrying this item through until the variance has been approved. [2/ 15/07] Minimum cover requirements are not being met. I will talk to Rick Richter in Pavement Management next week when he's back from vacation for some ideas. Topic: Utility Plan - Bridge Design Number: 160 Created: 2/ 15/2007 [6/29/07] Need to show and dimension the 10' sidewalk in the cross sections. [2/ 15/07] Eliminate the parkway and construct a 10' attached walk. Design the bridge in accordance with city standards. Please provide all structural calcs. More comments to follow when a specific, detailed design has been submitted. Number: 298 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Please note that all railings must be aluminum or galvanized steel. Shop drawings must be submitted to Engineering for the city's review and approval prior to ordering the materials. Topic: Utility Plan -Bridge Design, Calculation Number: 250 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/071 Calculations show 10 kips and 20 kips wheel load. HS20-44 loading should be 8 kips and 32 kips. Topic: Utility Plan - Bridge Design, Letter Number: 249 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Letter from EEC regarding the anticipated settlement of box culvert, should state design bearing pressure of 2,000 psf, not 1,000 psf. Update settlement if value changes due to bearing pressure change. Topic: Utility Plan - Bridge Design, Sl Number: 251 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Project Description Note - Change 4' x 15'-6" to 14'-0" x 4'-0". Number: 252 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] General Application Note 6 - Remove Number: 253 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Foundations Note 1(i) - Add "A copy of the letter of confirmation shall be submitted to the City." Page 5 Steve Olt - BellaVira,FinalPlan-MinattaPrr ty.RevisionsCommentLetter.doc Page 4 [6/29/071 Missing a layer? See redlines. Number: 244 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Remove all revisions from the title block. Number: 302 [6/29/07] Please see comment 216 Topic: Plat Number: 196 [6/26/07] From Technical Services: Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 Created: 6/26/2007 1. Boundary and legal close. 2. Many missing bearings, distances, see redlines. Several dimension problems. 3. Show WAPA easement. 4. Delineate block boundaries with heavier line weights. Illustrate blocks or remove blocks all together. Number: 202 Created: 6 / 27/ 2007 [6/27/07] Remove all revisions from the title block. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Dan DeLaughter Topic: Plat Number: 90 Created: 4/ 19/2006 [6/27/071 Tract C is now labeled as being owned and maintained by the city. If so, then the city will need to sign the plat as an owner as well. [2/ 13/07] Please place a signature line on the plat for any entity or persons having an easement dedicated to them. [4/ 19/06] The Ditch Company should sign all applicable plan sheets, as well as the plat. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Site Plan Number: 239 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Please label each landscape wall with either tow, bow or height. Number: 242 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Missing a layer? See redlines. Number: 245 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Remove all revisions from the title block. Number: 303 Page 4 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 1. Steve Olt- BellaVira,FinalPlan-MinattaPr, ty.RevisionsCommentLetter.doc Page 3 shall be included in the Development Agreement and a portion collected over each phase with each building permit to assure that these improvements are made in the future. Number: 237 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] The project ID sign (including any footer) can not be located with in the utility easement. Number: 240 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] The site, landscape, utility and plat plans need to go through each comment under the different sections so that all comments and plan sets can be properly coordinated. Some comments made under the Utility Plan section, for instance, will affect the site and landscape plans as well. Number: 297 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Section 3.8.11 of The Land Use Code requires fences to be articulated. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Dan DeLaughter Topic: General Number: 30 Created: 12 / 29 / 2005 [6/27/07) Repeat comment. The scanning issues will need to be resolved before the mylars can be signed. I highlighted a couple of the utility plan sheets to give you an idea of some of the problems. All line over text labeling needs to be corrected on all sheets. Please come in and see me or JR in Tech Services if you have any questions about E6. [2/ 13/07] The plan sets are still not meeting the requirements set forth in Appendix E6. In some cases, the font is too small to even read let alone review. Please bring the plans up to standard. More comments to follow once the labeling becomes legible. [4/6/06] [12/29/05] Scanability is an issue on many of the sheets. Some line types are too light, some overlapping text problems. Please refer to redlines, Appendix E-6, and talk with J.R. in our technical services department regarding how to clean up the drawings. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 208 Created: 6 / 27/ 2007 [6/27/07] See comment 207 under Utility Plan - Rough Grading. Number: 238 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 [6/29/07] Please label each landscape wall with either tow, bow or height. Number: 241 Page 3 Created: 6 / 29 / 2007 Steve Olt - BellaVira,Final Plan-MinattaPrr -ty.RevisionsCommentLetter.doc Page 2 Number: 317 Created: 7 / 2 / 2007 [7/2/07] The Pleasant Valley & Lake Canal concerns were apparently satisfied with the PDP review and they were not routed Final Plans. Number: 318 Created: 7 / 2 / 2007 [7/2/07] Planning has no further comments or red -lined plans. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: General Number: 115 Created: 2 / 9 / 2007 [6/26/07] Minor revisions to Architectural Standards on L1, see redline drawing. [2/9/07] Doug Moore's comments have been carried forward for Architectural Standards, adding the LOD around the buffer, inclusion of prairie dog protection measures during construction in the development agreement and wildlife letter for potential home owners. Number: 197 Created: 6/26/2007 [6/26/07] Trail Easement Agreement, page 2, section 4.3 - add "using native grass species" to the first sentence after OFP shall reseed the vegetation. Number: 198 Created: 6 / 26 / 2007 [6/26/07] Add open space to uses for Tract E. On Plat, note that Tract E is permanent open space. Topic: Utility Plan Set Number: 199 Created: 6 / 26 / 2007 [6/26/07] Change natural resources to Environmental Planner on the signature blocks. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 235 Created: 6 / 28 / 2007 [6/28/071 Need to show, dimension and label the WAPA easement on all plan sets (site, landscape, utility and plat). WAPA will need to sign off on the plan sets if any improvements are proposed within their easement. Number: 236 Created: 6 / 28 / 2007 [6/28/07] The project has gone from a single phase to a two phase development since the last submittal. The Overland Trail and bridge improvements are now being completed in the last phase. As previously discussed, the city will require an estimate for those improvements for our review and approval. Once the final cost has been approved by the City, it Page 2 Steve Olt - B_ellaVira,Fina1Plan-MinattaPr -ty.RevisionsCommentLetter.doc Page 1_' STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins John Minatta Date: 07/02/2007 c/o Jim Sell Design - Matt Blakely 153 West Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for BELLA VIRA - FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: General Number: 309 Created: 7/2/2007 [7/2/07] A REVISION COMMENT SHEET from Dana Leavitt, the Environmental Planner, is attached to this comment letter. Number: 310 Created: 7/2/2007 [7/2/07] A copy of the letter received from Terry Farrill of the Fort Collins - Loveland Water District and the South Fort Collins Sanitation District is attached to this comment letter. Number: 311 Created: 7/2/2007 [7/2/07] Carie Dann of the Poudre Fire Authority indicated that she has no problems with the Bella Vira re -submittal documentation. Number: 312 Created: 7/2/2007 [7/2/07] Don Kapperman of Comcast indicated that he has no problems with the Bella Vira re -submittal documentation. Number: 313 Created: 7/2/2007 [7/2/07] Excel Energy was routed Site Plan and Plat documents with the last re -submittal and they have not responded. Number: 314 Created: 7/2/2007 [7/2/07] Light & Power has no further comments or red -lined plans. Number: 315 Created: 7/2/2007 [7/2/07] No further comments have been provided by the Traffic Engineer. Number: 316 Created: 7/2/2007 [7/2/07] No further comments have been provided by Transportation Planning. Page 1 Steve Olt - Re: Bella Vira Review Page 2 Is it safe to assume that Xcel, Comcast and PV Lake and Canal have no issues or does the city contact them to confirm? Please contact me today to advise when all the comments and redlines will be made available. Thank You, John Mlnatta 690-2662 CC: Jon Sweet; Susan Joy; Wes Lamarque Steve Olt - Re: Bella Vira Review Page 1 V r _ From: Steve Olt To: John Minatta Date: 07/02/2007 9:55:32 AM Subject: Re: Bella Vira Review John, Attached is the complete City staff comment letter for the Bella Vira - Final Plans. I have no additional red - lined plans to forward to you at this time. Apparently Wes Lamarque of Stormwater will have comments and red -lined plans available by noon today. I will put the hard copy of this comment letter, with referenced attached comments and REVISION ROUTING SHEET, on the Development Review Center counter for you to pick up. Steve >>> "John Minatta" <johnminatta@comcast.net> 07/02/2007 8:37 AM >>> Steve, Documents available at 4:30pm Friday, 6/29 which I picked up Natural Resources - redline site plan, redline easement agreement - no (text) comments Engineering - redline utility/construction and plat, comments (text) included Water - redline utility/construction, comments (text) included Technical Services - redlines: Site, Plat and Landscape plans, revision sheet with (text) comments Light and Power - no redlines or comments PFA - no redlines or comments Traffic - no redlines or comments Transportation - no redlines or comments Planning - no redlines or comments Stormwater - Wes LaMarque informs me his redlines and comments will be available by noon on Monday 7/2 FCL Water District - I have received a comment letter in the mail from Terry Farrill