Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFEEDER SUPPLY - PDP - PDP130012 - CORRESPONDENCE -Why are these labeled as 'compact'? The modification request includes reference to the compact stalls, but doesn't give specifics as to the percentage of stalls, or for that matter, it's not clear what the request is for since no Code section references are included. Also, the justification for the modification needs to more clearly explain how any of the modification standards in Sec. 2.8.2(H) are met. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 04/16/2013: Show parking stall dimensions of the surface spaces on site plan. Show drive aisle width of the parking aisles. Clearly label building footprint/envelope of the apartment building. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Parking stall striping carries across the access drive onto Linden. Please revise plan. Topic: Traffic Impact Study Comment Number: 2 04/30/2013: TIS is accepted. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffingtona().fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 04/29/2013: All water meters must be installed in meter pits in accordance with the Development Construction Standards. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 04/29/2013: A 1.5" water services is not adequate for 52 dwelling units. Provide water service/meter sizing calculations. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 04/29/2013: There are existing water mains in Linden and Willow that can provide service to the buildings. Eliminate the the water mains in the drive to the southwest of the buildings and between the buildings. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: Show curb stop and meter pit on the existing 3/4" water service. Department: Zoning Contact: Peter Barnes, 970.416-2355, pbarnes(cDfcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 04/16/2013: Show building height on building elevation drawings. Buildings over 40' in height require Building Height Review per Sec. 3.5.1(G). Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 04/16/2013: 6% of the interior of the surface parking lot needs to be in landscape islands per Sec. 3.2.1(E)(5). The modification request needs to include the Code section reference. Each island must have at least one deciduous tree. Trees need to be planted at 40' intervals in the perimeter landscape strips of the surface parking lot per Sec. 3.2.1(E)(4) Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 04/16/2013: The number of compact parking stalls can't exceed 40% of the total number of parking stalls in a long-term parking lot (employee, residential) per Sec. 3.2.2(L)(2). The number shown exceeds that. The plan labels 27 garage spaces as 'compact'. However, the dimensions of nine of them are indicated to be 9' x 19', which is the size for a standard stall. See redlines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 04/29/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7. See redlines. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 04/2912013: Please bring the text in the profiles in front of the gridlines on sheet 7. See redlines. Topic: General Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Does this property need to be replatted? Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 04/29/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet 1. See redlines. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 04/29/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet 1. There are lines generally following the southerly boundary, that could be removed if they are not lighting related. This would clean up the line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 04/29/2013: Please sharpen up the detail/data sheets on sheet 1. The text is hard to read. See redlines. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: What are the dots shown at the corners of the property? Please add the symbols & description to the legend. See redlines. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: How was the boundary of this property determined? Using the legal descriptions provided, there is curve data that is not included that is needed to lay out the boundary. From the limited research done, there appear to be errors in the legal descriptions. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970.221.6820, wstanford(a)fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: Please revise Signing and Striping Construction Notes to state the local entity Traffic Engineer at each occurance of the "local entity engineer". Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Will the existing diagonal parking on the west side of Linden be altered by the project's access drive? If yes, please provide a striping plan of the changes. Comment_Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please verify corner sight distances at Linden and Willow meet LCUASS requirements. Sprinkler protection shall be provided for exterior balconies, decKs, and ground floor patios of dwelling units where the building is of Type V construction. 2006 International Fire Code 903.3.1.2.1 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft and in a sensitive area, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted does not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue(a�fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: This development is required to meet the LID regulations which require 25% of private parking and drive aisles to be porous. Porous pavers are suggested for the private drive between the two buildings. This would allow for the removal of the small bio-swale. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: Please document the total amount of new impervious area for the site in the text of the report. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: The City has preferred details for water quality bio-swales. Please add these details to the utility plans. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: The City is determining if the new storm sewer should be upsized to the master plan design storm sewer. The City would contribute funds for the difference of the cost between the proposed storm sewer and the master plan storm sewer. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty(a)fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 04/29/2013: The text is hard to read. Please sharpen up the text & linework. See redlines. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 04/29/2013: Please sharpen up the Willow Street cross section on sheet 1. See redlines. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 04129/2013: Please add "preliminary" & "design" to the title of sheet 7 in the index on. sheet 1. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224-6152, dmartine(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/19/2013: The island showing the "proposed transformer' appears to be too small to fit a transformer. The minimum N-S dimension would need to be 8 feet. This island will need to be widened, or an alternate location for a transformer coordinated with Light & Power Engineering (970)221-6700. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/19/2013: The existing light south of the apartment building is the property of Fort Collins Light & Power. It can be removed by Light & Power on request. This light has underground power to it. Any overhead lines attached to the pole are telephone and/or CATV. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/1912013: The developer will need to coordinate power requirements, locations, and electric development charges with Light & Power Engineering. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/19/2013: The residential units must be individually metered, with the meters outdoors. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/19/2013: A landscape plan showing planned streetlights has been sent to the landscape architect. These planned lights will need to be shown on the landscape plan and street tree locations will need to be adjusted to provide a minimum of 40 feet between the light standards and trees (15 feet if the tree is an ornamental type). Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/19/2013: Light & Power Engineering will need a copy of the subdivision plat showing the perimeter and total area dimensions. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/19/2013: After the plan is final, an AutoCad drawing (version 2008) of the utility site plan will need to be sent to Terry Cox at TCOX@FCGOV.COM. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970.416.2869, llynxwiler(a)poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 01 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: PUBLIC -SAFETY RADIO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM New buildings or building additions that cause the building to be greater than 50,000 square feet will require a fire department, emergency communication system evaluation after the core/shell but prior to final build out. For the purposes of this section, fire walls shall not be used to define separate buildings. The proposed square footage of the apartment building appears to be in excess of 50,000 SF and as such, a BDA assessment will be required. Where adequate radio coverage cannot be established within a building, public -safety radio amplification systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with criteria established by the Poudre Fire Authority. Poudre Fire Authority Bureau Admin Policy #07-01 Comment Number: 02 04/30/2013: BALCONIES AND DECKS Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 Comment Number: 3 Gomment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Topics that still need to be discussed on the historic mill building include the proposed addition of windows on the 2nd story, and the proposed addition of the three season patio enclosure on the Willow elevation. Also needing review will be the new doors and window on the Willow Street elevation, and the proposed removal of the two rear historic additions. Additional discussion with Anne McCleave and City Historic Preservation staff will be ongoing. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The massing, set back, and height of the mill building addition appear to be appropriate, meeting the Secretary of the Interior Standards. Architectural detailing, including materials and stylistic elements, are not consistent with the era of the Old Town Historic District and the River District. The mill addition has a more Neo-Classical appearance, based upon its detailing, which should be changed to better reflect the Early 20th Century Commercial and Industrial architecture of the Historic District. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Staff will need elevations showing the apartment building in context with the Mill building. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: As currently proposed, staff has concerns about the height, setback and step -back of the apartment building relative to the Mill. Staff strongly recommends that the applicant take further advantage of the design and land planning expertise of the Landmark Preservation Commission through the Commission's Design Review Subcommittee and through Complimentary Reviews before the entire Commission. It is likely that other configurations for the apartment building could be developed that will address the concerns of height, set -back, etc., to create a better relationship between the two buildings. Comment Number: 7 05/01/2013: Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 As with the Mill addition, the apartment building feature Neo-Classical elements that are not typical for the District's 20th Century Commercial and Industrial architecture, and these should be removed. These include the quoining, the dentils, the ocular window and the pitched roof of the tower element. Again, staff strongly recommends the use of the Design Review Subcommittee to refine these elements. Comment Number: 8 05/01/2013: Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 The Mill building renovations, both interior and exterior, should qualify for the various financial incentives, including both 20% State and 20% Federal Tax Credits, and State Historic Fund grants. Once designated as a Fort Collins Landmark, the exterior work could also qualify for 0% -interest City Landmark Rehabilitation Loans. Direct label all the trees and shrubs on the plan as to species or cultivar to improve readability of the landscape plan. Some of the currently used symbols may not be shown in the plant key. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 05/02/2013: If it doesn't already occur on the plan documents then describe clearly on the landscape plan that tree grates shall be installed around all of the sidewalk trees meeting City requirements of the Engineering Department. Comment Number: 6 05/02/2013: Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 Review LUC 3.2.1 E 4 parking lot perimeter landscaping for required trees in these zones and incorporate trees as needed. Comment Number: 7 05/02/2013: Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 In landscape note 23 add the word significant to read..... Healthy mature significant trees Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 05/02/2013: Please add this landscape note: City street trees shall be maintained following City of Fort Collins Forestry Division practices or policies. Department: Historical Preservation Coritact: Karen McWilliams, 970.224.6078, kmcwilliams(a)fcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 Historic Preservation staff is pleased with the direction the plans are taking, and anticipate that this will become an award -winning project when fully developed. The applicant has made many improvements to the project, based upon comments he has received from complimentary reviews with city staff, History Colorado, and the Landmark Preservation Commission. The City and applicant have received a Historic Structure Assessment grant from History Colorado, which should help to resolve remaining questions about the treatment of the historic mill building and the appropriate characteristics of the proposed apartment building. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: As this property is designated on the National and State Registers as part of the Old Town National Register District, Land Use Code Section 3.4.7, Historic and Cultural Resources, will apply to the review of this project. Additionally, the Colorado Historical Society will be consulted with, to ensure that the building will still meet its criteria for continued designation on these registries, and that the proposed new construction will not adversely impact the District. For additional information on the Colorado Historical Society's process, please contact Anne McCleave at anne.mccleave@state.co.us, or the Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation, 1300 Broadway, Denver 80203, http:l/www.coloradohistory-oahp.orgfiindex.html. Willow/Linden intersection north. A copy of the concept plan is included with my redlines. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/22/2013 05/22/2013: No comments, as the site is more than 500' from a natural habitat or feature. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221.6361, tuchanan()fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 05/02/2013: Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 The existing Siberian elms have the following diameters that should be placed on the plan. Also please confirm the accuracy on the plan of the locations of the existing Siberian elms. Siberian elm that is the east most tree at the corner of building is 36 inch DBH Siberian elm just to the west of the above tree is 28 inch DBH Siberian elm that is furthest the west has two major stems that are 12 inch DBH and 14 inch DBH. Siberian elm that is furthest to the north is less than 11 inches DBH. All existing trees are Siberian Elm and were rated as being in poor condition and of volunteer origin. Siberian Elm are exempt from mitigation if they are less than 11 inches DBH, determined to be in poor condition, or of volunteer origin, such as those that have sprouted from seed along fence lines, near structures or in other unsuitable locations. 0 The statement from the applicant numbered 6.1, and at another place in the document, reflecting the on -site meeting with the City Forester, could be more accurately stated..... are in poor condition, less than the minimum mitigation size of 11 inches DBH, of wild origin and/or growing in unsuitable locations immediately adjacent to buildings or fences, and therefore no mitigation would be required for removal of same. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 05/02/2013: Please label the existing street trees along Linden to SAVE AND PROTECT. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 05/02/2013: Species selected for the sidewalk cut-outs should be changed to Skyline honeylocust. Please list their calipers at 2.5 inches to insure a large enough tree to allow for adequate initial function and survival as a sidewalk tree. Comment Number: 4 05/02/2013: Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-221-6501, tsiegmundta7.fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: The Willow St road section on the cover sheet is difficult to read. Please revise Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: On the Utility plans, the main entry doors to the apartments off of Willow St show the doors opening into the right-of-way but on the site plan the entry is recessed. Please revise on the utility plan sheets. Please note that doors cannot swing into public right-of-way. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: There is an existing light pole, decorative fencing, and a tree that are conflicting with the proposed 30ft access off of Linden St. Further coordination to relocate the conflicts will be needed with the costs associated paid for by the project. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: It is not clear if the easements needed for the project currently exist. Please provide documentation if easements do exist on the site. If not, access, utility, drainage and fire access easements will need to be dedicated by separate document. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: On the Grading plan (sheet 5) there is a reverse in the flowline grade design from the existing curb/gutter FL spot elevation to where the proposed FL ties into the inlet. On the preliminary Willow Street design (Sheet7) flowline grade shows positive drainage to the inlet. Please revise Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: It appears that there is more than 750 square ft of pavement draining out of the 30ft access drive/Fire lane to Linden St, across the public sidewalk. Please revise or provide additional spot elevations if the design is not intended to drain to the right-of-way. Not sure where the HP is along the drain pan. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: Further evaluation of the streetscape finishes along Willow St is needed to ensure that what is built with this project is consistent with the River District Plan and the completed streetscape finishes adjacent to the project. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: There is a repay amount of $29,172 due to the city for the completed developers local street portion costs for the Linden St improvements along the frontage of the property. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: For Final: More information on the design of the perforated storm drain is needed. It is possible that a clay wall will need to be included in the design for the drain behind the mill. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: For Final: 500ft of additional off -site design of Willow St will be needed for final submittal. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 . 04/30/2013: For Final: Design of the north flow line on Willow Stand cross -sections of the road every 50ft is needed for final submittal. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Preliminary layout of the Willow St cross section has been completed. for the City of Co F *t z4hns ' June 07, 2013 Jon Prouty 1001 E. Harmony Rd. #510 Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Feeder Supply, PDP130012, Round Number 1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax tcgov. com/developmentreview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Advance Planning Contact: Timothy Wilder, 970-221.6756, twilder fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/19/2013: The buildings overall appear to be fairly consistent with the River District character. In general historic River District architecture is characterized by simple brick patterns and limited detailing. There are a couple details on the elevations which need to be addressed to comply with 3.4.7 (F)(2): 1) A stone or brick base is needed on the Mill Building addition (grey brick/stucco building). 2) Buildings in the River District do not have trim and corner blocks. Please remove this detail from the mill building addition. 3) Consider replacing the half round window from the mill building addition. 4) Willow Street building: Remove quions (a Georgian architectural feature), which is also not found in River District, nor Fort Collins architecture. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970.221.6573, slangenberger(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The project owes an additional $801.13 for the PDP TDRF.