The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCHASE BANK @ RIGDEN FARM - FDP - 26-09/A - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)(4/12/2010) Emma McArdle RE: Chase Bjlk @ Rigden Farm Page 3 Gina Gina B. Graves, P.E. Project Engineer CLC Associates. Inc. 303.770.5600 Phone 303.915.8072 Mobile Celebrating 25 Years of Full Service Design Planning, Entitlements, Architecture, Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Land Surveying Denver I Phoenix I Salt Lake City I Spokane This e-mail is for the intended recipient only and may contain business confidential information. Use of or reliance upon this e-mail other than by the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail is the property of the author, furnished without guarantee or warranty, express or implied. Please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer and any network if you receive this in error. Please consider the environment before printing this email. (4/12/2010) Emma McArdle - RE: Chasqftnk @ Rigden Farm Page 21 To: Gina Graves Cc: Kris Saline Subject: Re: Chase Bank @ Rigden Farm Hi Gina! The draft of the DA was sent out several weeks ago and last I heard they were going to sign it and send it back along with some sort of agreement that specifies how the ownership is held? I'm not sure really what it is until I see it. Apparently our attorney was contacted by one of the other attorneys, something was discussed and agreed upon but I have yet to see anything sent back. I have your mylars sitting on my desk pending the receipt of the above so things seem to be in a holding pattern. I'm pretty sure that Chase does not have any outstanding fees related to the submittal but I will double check that with my supervisor in the morning to make sure. There will be DA recording fees and they know to return the check with the signed DA. It wouldn't hurt to confirm that with them if and when you speak to them next. :) There will be the DCP application to start the work but that starts a new process separate from the Final Plan Approvals. That's the one where they have to submit an application for the DCP with the cost estimate and schedule the meeting with me. They'll need the bond or letter of credit for the public improvements, inspection fees and the erosion control escrow. Once we have all that, we can issue the permit and they can start moving dirt. :) I'll keep you posted if I hear anything and please do the same for me if you can. I really appreciate it! :) Have a good evening and I'll write back tomorrow with confirmation of any outstanding payments due if any. Susan >>> "Gina Graves" <ginag ravesna cicassoc.com> 4/8/2010 11:53 AM >>> Good Afternoon Susan, Hope you are having a good week. I wanted to check on the Development Agreement for the Chase project. Has there been a decision regarding if one is needed, who will sign it and where it is now? I sent the Chase Utility Plans up with the Armstrong plans a couple weeks ago and was wondering on where they were in process? Let me know when you get those and I will call a courier to pick them up. The last question, can I get a list of any outstanding fees that Chase owes or will owe as we near the end of this process? Thank you for your time. I appreciate all your help! 12/2010) Emma McArdle - RE: Chase BlIll @ Rigden Farm • Pagel From: Susan Joy To: Gina Graves CC: Daniel Madruga; Emma McArdle; Heather A Beattie; Kris Saline; Michae... Date: 4/12/2010 10:06 AM Subject: RE: Chase Bank @ Rigden Farm Hi Gina, I am not sure where this is coming from because in my conference call with Paul Eckman (city attorney) we discussed why Chase needed it's own DA and agreed that we can not waive that requirement. I have never changed that requirement or wavered from it and have tried to make it as clear as possible. We only did a very, very simple DA for the overall project (Rigden 15th) where none of the erosion control or stormwater language was included. It is absolutely necessary that Chase has its own DA since they are adding impervious surface to the development. Paul said that the Armstrong folks were going to forward us some kind of document about the ownership of the property so that we did not have to change the plan sets (landscape, site and utility) or the DA but I have not received that either. Neither Paul nor I have seen the document so we have not been able to determine whether or not it will suffice. Bottom line, I need the DA back before we can close this project out. This project will also need its own DCP so it wouldn't hurt to get started on that application and estimate as well. There are on site utilities, trenching, etc that must be inspected by the City and Chase is responsible for repairing any broken curb, gutter and sidewalk that occurs before or during construction before they receive their Certificate of Occupancy. That is also addressed in the DA as well. Thank you, Susan >>> "Gina Graves" <ginagraves@cicassoc.com> 4/12/2010 9:54 AM >>> Good Morning Susan, I'm confused because I'm being told that the attorney's agreed that Chase does not have to have a DA because they will not be constructing any public improvements. The Chase attorney, Ms. Vanderhorst told me that during a conference call with Paul, City attorney, and yourself, that a DA would not be required for Chase and that all Chase would need is a building permit. In your email below you instruct that Chase will need a bond or letter of credit for public improvements. However, there are no public improvements in the construction plans or site plan. There will not be a cost estimate for public improvements either. If something has changed since this conference call that Ms. Vanderhorst is referring to, would you be so kind to outline those changes for me. Thank you, Gina -----Original Message ----- From: Susan Joy [ma iIto: sjoyaafcgov.coml Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:27 PM