Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHASE BANK @ RIGDEN FARM - FDP - 26-09/A - CORRESPONDENCE -(4/12/2010) Emma McArdle - RE: Chas2&nk @ Rigden Farm AdIlk Page'4 Denver I Phoenix I Salt Lake City I Spokane This e-mail is for the intended recipient only and may contain business confidential information. Use of or reliance upon this e-mail other than by the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail is the property of the author, furnished without guarantee or warranty, express or implied. Please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer and any network if you receive this in error. Please consider the environment before printing this email. (4/12/2010) Emma McArdle - RE: Chase Bic @ Rigden Farm Amk Page 3 any outstanding payments due if any. Susan >>> "Gina Graves" <ginagraves(c)cicassoc.com> 4/8/2010 11:53 AM >>> Good Afternoon Susan, Hope you are having a good week. I wanted to check on the Development Agreement for the Chase project. Has there been a decision regarding if one is needed, who will sign it and where it is now? I sent the Chase Utility Plans up with the Armstrong plans a couple weeks ago and was wondering on where they were in process? Let me know when you get those and I will call a courier to pick them up. The last question, can I get a list of any outstanding fees that Chase owes or will owe as we near the end of this process? Thank you for your time. I appreciate all your help! Gina Gina B. Graves, P.E. Project Engineer CLC Associates, Inc. 303.770.5600 Phone 303.915.8072 Mobile Celebrating 25 Years of Full Service Design Planning, Entitlements, Architecture, Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Land Surveying (4/12/2010) Emma McArdle - RE: Chasg&nk @ Rigden Farm Page 2 I'm confused because I'm being told that the attorney's agreed that Chase does not have to have a DA because they will not be constructing any public improvements. The Chase attorney, Ms. Vanderhorst told me that during a conference call with Paul, City attorney, and yourself, that a DA would not be required for Chase and that all Chase would need is a building permit. In your email below you instruct that Chase will need a bond or letter of credit for public improvements. However, there are no public improvements in the construction plans or site plan. There will not be a cost estimate for public improvements either. If something has changed since this conference call that Ms. Vanderhorst is referring to, would you be so kind to outline those changes for me. Thank you, Gina -----Original Message ----- From: Susan Joy [mailto:sjoyCafcgov.com] Sent: Thursday, April 08. 2010 4:27 PM To: Gina Graves Cc: Kris Saline Subject: Re: Chase Bank @ Rigden Farm Hi Gina! The draft of the DA was sent out several weeks ago and last I heard they were going to sign it and send it back along with some sort of agreement that specifies how the ownership is held? I'm not sure really what it is until I see it. Apparently our attorney was contacted by one of the other attorneys, something was discussed and agreed upon but I have yet to see anything sent back. I have your mylars sitting on my desk pending the receipt of the above so things seem to be in a holding pattern. I'm pretty sure that Chase does not have any outstanding fees related to the submittal but I will double check that with my supervisor in the morning to make sure. There will be DA recording fees and they know to return the check with the signed DA. It wouldn't hurt to confirm that with them if and when you speak to them next. :) There will be the DCP application to start the work but that starts a new process separate from the Final Plan Approvals. That's the one where they have to submit an application for the DCP with the cost estimate and schedule the meeting with me. They'll need the bond or letter of credit for the public improvements, inspection fees and the erosion control escrow. Once we have all that, we can issue the permit and they can start moving dirt. :) I'll keep you posted if I hear anything and please do the same for me if you can. I really appreciate it! :) Have a good evening and I'll write back tomorrow with confirmation of (4/12/2010) Emma McArdle - RE: Chase @ Rigden Farm r - Page 1 From: Susan Joy To: Gina Graves CC: Daniel Madruga; Emma McArdle; Heather A Beattie; Kris Saline; Michae... Date: 4/12/2010 11:54 AM Subject: RE: Chase Bank @ Rigden Farm Gina, Please have your clients forward the signed development agreement and the legal document they were referring to. I can not release the utility plans until that is complete. Thank you, Susan >>> "Gina Graves" <ginagraves@cicassoc.com> 4/12/2010 10:59 AM >>> Susan, So the DA for Lot 1 will only be concerned with additional impervious surface and erosion control? There is one landscape drain and small pvc pipe (that outfalls to a trickle channel) but other than that the entire site will sheetflow and no storm facilities will be constructed. The ownership on the coversheet of the utility plans match the owner information on Armstrong's utility plans so that should not be an issue. Have you obtained all the City signatures for the mylars? I would think that we could get those back and make the required copies, re -stamp them and you could hold them until this DA issue is resolved. We did that with the Armstrong plans. Let me know when I can have a courier pick those up. Thanks, Gina -----Original Message ----- From: Susan Joy [ma iIto: sjoy(a fcgov.comj Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:26 AM To: Gina Graves Cc: Robert W. Frisch; Peter Shimkus; Daniel Madruga; Kris Saline; Emma McArdle; Paul Eckman; Heather A Beattie; Michael A Ganzle Subject: RE: Chase Bank @ Rigden Farm Gina, Perhaps the confusion is that Chase Bank themselves are not signing the DA. Only Armstrong. Our DA does not involve third party lease agreements. So, yes, in a way, it is correct that Chase does not need a DA BUT that does not mean that Owner/Armstrong does not need to complete one. Does that help? Susan >>> "Gina Graves" <ginagraves cicassoc.com> 4/12/2010 9:54 AM >>> Good Morning Susan,