Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSOUTH TRANSIT CENTER - PDP - 9-10 - CORRESPONDENCE -0 11 Department: Zoning Topic: zoning Number: 2 [5/7/10] The site plan is too cluttered. Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Created: 5/7/2010 Please remove the topo lines Number: 3 Created: 5/7/2010 [5/7/10] Need to show distance from building envelope to lot lines. A distance is shown to the north, south and west lot lines, but the distances shown aren't to the envelope line. Number: 4 [5/7/10] Need a trash enclosure detail. Created: 517/2010 Number: 5 Created: 5/7/2010 [5/7/10] 6 handicap parking stalls are shown, which is the minimum number required. Is that enough? Number: 6 Created: 5/7/2010 [5/7/10] The landscape legend needs to indicate the quantity of each tree, shrub, etc. Number: 7 Created: 5/7/2010 [5/7/10] Are the covered bike racks covered by something other than the overhead canopy? If so, need elevation drawings of structure. Number: 8 Created: 5/7/2010 [5/7/10] The main pedestrian connection/sidewalk in the south portion of the site is mainly at the west side of the lot. An additional connection should occur further east, near where the existing sidewalk along the access road curves west. Need to label the name of the access road on the various plans. Is it Fossil Blvd.? Number: 9 Created: 5/7/2010 [5/7/10] It's advisable to remove a few of the southernmost parking spaces in the east parking aisle in order to eliminate a possible vehicular conflict situation where cars wanting to enter the lot have to wait while cars backing out of the subject parking spaces maneuver out of the stall to exit. A situation where cars are having to wait will create a bottle neck, and even delay arriving buses. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Emma McArdle City Planner Page 13 l7J Number: 77 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] Please correct "Weld County" in the legal description, to "Larimer County". Number: 78 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] Please add "East Line of the NE 1/4 of Section 2-6-69 to the plat. See redlines. Number: 79 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] Please change "Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad" to "BNSF Railway", to match the legal description. Topic: Tree Mitigation Plan Number: 82 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] There are several line over text issues on the Tree Mitigation Plan. Topic: Utility Plan Number: 83 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] We were not routed a Utility Plan set. We will need to review them. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 88 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] The rainfall intensities used to calculate the quantity detention are not consistent with the City of Fort Collin's current rainfall criteria. Please revise the intensities. Number: 89 Created: 5/18/2010 (5/18/10] Due to the intensities being incorrect, the quantity detention required is more than the required detention stated in the drainage report. The design did provide 1 foot of freeboard with detention for the extra foot. This additional volume does make up for the extra volume required. One foot of freeboard is not needed below the pond spillway. The invert of the spillway can be set at 5008.1, which is the elevation where the volume equals 1.35 ac-ft. The 1-foot freeboard requirement is from the invert of the spillway to the top of the berm and the lowest opening of any structures. Number: 90 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] Please provide 10 feet separation from the storm sewers to any trees. Number: 91 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] Onsite drainage easements or alignments are needed for the limits of the detention pond and storm sewers. Number: 92 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] Offsite drainage easements are required for the portion of the detention pond offsite and for any portion of the outfall storm sewer that is on private property and not within an existing drainage easement. Where an offsite drainage easement is required, a letter of intent is all that is required before the public hearing. Number: 93 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] A detention pond depth gage is required for ponds deeper than 4 feet. Number: 94 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] Please provide more detail for the outfall. This includes property lines, topo, etc. Page 12 Number: 104 Created: 5/21 /2010 [5/21/10] When using attached walks, width needs to be 6' to include shy distance. Add sidewalks for pedestrian connection from SE of site. See redlines. Suggest adding a pedestrian crossing from pedestrians accessing site from south to connect to internal walkway. See redlines. Number: 105 Created: 5/21 /2010 [5/21/10] Please specify appropriate size of cobble along Mason Trail to ensure cobble does not spill out onto Mason Trail. Number: 106 Created: 5/21 /2010 [5/21/10] South "access control rail" on site plan should be pointing to railings. Number: 107 Created: 5/21 /2010 [5/21/10] Ensure a strong E/W pedestrian spine from property to east through site to transit center. See South College Corridor Plan for example illustration. Number: 108 Created: 5/21 /2010 [5/21/10] If possible, please show rumble strips and lighting for Mason Trail users on plans as work done by others to ensure this element is not lost. Number: 109 Created: 5/21 /2010 [5/21/10] "Colored concrete bike route" please add pedestrians to this label. Number: 110 Created: 5/21 /2010 [5/21/10] "Ramp" at south of site may be mislabeled. This may be a light rather than a ramp. Number: 111 Created: 5/21 /2010 [5/21/101 Per meeting 5/20/10 please stripe drive isle connector similar to property to the North to show visual cue that this is intended as a drive through connection. Number: 112 Created: 5/21 /2010 [5/21/10] Per meeting 5/20/10 please provide access easement along east property line for future connection from property to the east to the connector drive isle. Provide at least 3 potential access points. When this property develops and the exact location of these access points can be negotiated. Department: Technical Services Issue Contact: Jeff County Topic: Existing Conditions Plan Number: 80 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] There is incomplete text on the Existing Conditions Plan. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 81 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] There is incomplete text on sheet 1 of the Landscape Plans. Topic: Plat Number: 76 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] The boundary & legal close. Page 11 Tree Transplanting: Thirty four trees are shown to be transplanted. Those to be kept on site need to be identified. Others should be labeled for off site tree transplanting. A plant note should be added on tree transplanting: The City Forester will make a final determination of which of tree trees located in the groups are suitable for transplanting. Tree transplanting method and season shall be approved by the City Forester. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Electric Utility Number: 1 Created: 5/3/2010 [5/3/10] The location of electric facilities, including the electric transformer, coordinated with Light & Power Engineering. Also need a Commercial Service (C-1) form completed, and the name/address of who to invoice for the Light & Power development charges. Please contact Light & Power Engineering at (970)221-6700. Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Erica Saunders Topic: General Number: 95 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] On Existing Conditions Plan and Tree Mitigation. Plan identify the trees containing raptor nests. You will not be able to remove a tree with an "active nest." You will need to add a note identifying appropriate construction timing. Note that great horned owls typically nest earlier than other raptors. Number: 97 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] What are you going to do with the existing structures (house, deck, shed) on -site? Please consider deconstruction as a means to recycle construction materials and reduce the amount of debris being transported and dumped at the County landfill. Topic: Planning Objectives Number: 96 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] How are you addressing the recommendations in the Raptor Nest Survey? Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann Topic: Fire Number: 98 Created: 5/19/2010 Just a reminder to include the EAE when you show easements on future documents. Number: 99 Created: 5/19/2010 A 6-inch "water service" line is shown. Is that supposed to be the Fire Line? If so, please label as such; if not, please show location of the Fire Line. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Jennifer Petrik Topic: General Number: 103 Created: 5/21 /2010 [5/21/10] Show cross access point on plans to business to North. Build pedestrian connection to business to North. Example use, customers can drop off vehicle for service and take BRT north while vehicle is being serviced. Page 10 Department: Forestry Issue Contact: Tim Buchanan Topic: Utility Plan Number: 101 Created: 5/19/2010 [5/19/10] Species list: Don't use: Red Sunset Maple Autumn Blaze Maple Brandywine Crab Newport Plum Additional shade trees to use on this project: Bur Oak Chinkapin Oak Hackberry Catalpa Skymaster English Oak Additional ornamental trees to use on this project: Canyon Maple Adams Crabapple for Brandywine Thunderchild Crabapple for Newport Plum Hotwings Tatarian Maple for Tatarian Maple Japanese Tree Lilac The minimum species diversity of a maximum of 15% of any tree type needs to be applied for this project. Mitigation: 109 Mitigation trees have been identified. Note number 2 on sheet 1 of 2 states that only 64 trees are to be upsized for mitigation. Final plan needs to identify upsized trees. Tree Spacing: To get all the mitigation trees on this project and hopefully some of the trees that will be transplanted, close spacing appears to be necessary. Applicant should try to provide for these minimum spacing's between trees. To get all the mitigation trees on site that may not be possible. Shade trees 20 feet Conifers 12-15 feet Ornamental trees 12 feet Plant Notes: Plant note number 18 should delete the word street, which is the 11th word of the statement. All of the 7 tree protection statements under 3.2.1 G should be placed in the plant notes. Page 9 Number: 115 Created: 5/21/2010 [5/21/10] On the grading sheet, many spot elevations are needed. See the checklist (Appendix E-4) item II.D. for what spot elevations are needed. Also, please make the property lines much darker. The background line weight is also too light and will not scan properly. Number: 116 Created: 5/21/2010 [5/21/10] On most sheets the line weight needs some work. Please show whatever is proposed as a dark line weight and what is existing as a lighter line weight that what is proposed. The current existing conditions line weight is too light and will not meet the city's scanning criteria. Also, please show property lines etc as the darker weight. Number: 117 Created: 5/21/2010 [5/21/10] The stormline that is shown proposed to drain into the Red Tail Development needs more detail. Will the street need to be cut and patched? If so show the approx. limits of the cut. Also there are no grading lines (existing or proposed) shown for most of the lines path. Please show more detail about this connection and how exactly it will tie into what is existing. Number: 118 Created: 5/21/2010 [5/21/10] Is the curb and gutter along Fairway Ln. and Fossil Blvd. being reconstructed? If not, please do not show it in a proposed line weight. Number: 119 Created: 5/21/2010 [5/21/10] The utility sheet needs some work. Currently only a portion of the site is displayed on the sheet so I have not been able to review the entire sheet. Please show the whole site on the Utility sheet. See the Utility plan checklist for details on what is required on utility sheet. Number: 120 Created: 5/21/2010 [5/21/10] On all sheets in the Utility set, please show where existing Fossil Blvd ends and if any street cuts and/or patches are required for the new utilities. Number: 121 Created: 5/21/2010 [5/21/10] Please add the following street cut note to the Utility and Grading sheets: "Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with the City street repair standards." Number: 122 Created: 5/21/2010 [5/21/10] Please see redlines for additional comments/concerns. Number: 123 Created: 5/21/2010 [5/21/10] Overall, the Utility plan set needs some work. Please take another look at the Utility Plan checklist provided in Appendix E-4 of LCUASS to see what exactly is required. have tried to identify the majority of the big issues with this round, however the set needs some work before the next round. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Page 8 Number: 43 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Add the following note to the Grading and Drainage and Erosion Control plan sheets. 'The top of foundation elevations shown are the minimum elevations required for protection from the 100-year storm." Number: 44 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] The Utility sheet only shows the southern portion of the site. Please carefully review Section III. In the Utility Plan Checklist and provide all of the required information. Number: 45 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] As discussed at Conceptual Review, this property is subject to the South College Access plan which shows a access circulator through this site tying the existing public street (Fossil Blvd) to the property to the North where the access circulator then returns to College in the Ultimate Condition. This connection is not required to be a public street however the development of this site can not preclude the connection from happening in the future. Number: 84 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] On the Storm water plan please show the grading (existing and proposed), how the stormline is tying into the existing, any off -site easements that are needed, as well as, any street cuts/patches that are required. Currently, there is very little detail on the sheet. Number: 86 Created: 5/18/2010 (5/18/10] All of the sheets in the Utility Plan could use more off -site context and background information. It is very difficult to understand the surrounding conditions and how this design will tie in. Number: 100 Created: 5/19/2010 [5/19/10] The Access circulator through the site will need to be in an Access Easement. Please show this and any other easements on site such as the Emergency Access Easement on the Utility Sheet. Number: 102 Created: 5/20/2010 [5/20/10] After a Transportation Coordination meeting on 5-20, several conclusions have been made regarding the overall site layout and the location of the Access Circulator within the site. Staff is Okay with the Access Circulator going through the site, provided that some treatment of the through movement be done to show that it is a through movement and not only a drive isle. Also, provide access point(s) to the property to the East so that in the future when they develop they have access to the circulator. As the design is submitted with the next round of review, staff will review and comment. Number: 113 Created: 5/21 /2010 [5/21/10] Site details are needed for the utility plan set. Please see Appendix A in LCUASS for all of the applicable details. Number: 114 Created: 5/21 /2010 [5/21/10] For this site, would it be cleaner to do away with the general abbreviations sheet and simply call out what is needed on each sheet? It is a fairly straight forward plan and having to refer back to a master list that is much bigger than needed seems wasteful. Also, there is plenty of room on each page for a small legend. Page 7 L� Number: 15 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] The District allows DR 18, C900 PVC pipe. The "DI" call out on the water line is to be removed. Number: 16 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] The location and size of the domestic meter pit needs to be shown. Number: 17 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] The District does not allow trees, tree canopies or landscaping within the District's easement or within 10 feet of the District Facilities. Number: 18 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] The District's typical fire hydrant installation, gate valve installation, thrust blocks, and meter pit installation are to be included in the drawing set. The typicals may be obtained in CAD format by contacting Miss. Sue Vest at (970)226-3104, extension 107. Number: 19 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] The sanitary sewer line needs to be shown in profile. Number: 20 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] The District will require another round of review due to the nature and number of the above comments. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 226-3104, extension 104, if you have any questions or require additional information. Topic: Water Conservation Number: 87 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] Comments entered for Lauri D'Audney, Water Conservation Specialist. - Landscape Plan needs to show applicable hydrazones, - A water budget chart shall be included, which shall not exceed 15 gallons per square foot over the site. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Andrew Carney Topic: Utility Plan Number: 38 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Please add the City signature block to all sheets in the Utility Plan set. Number: 39 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Remove "PDP Submittal" from the title of the Utility Plan. Number: 40 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Please add the General Notes and the General Construction Notes to the Utility Set. (See Appendix E-1-FC/LAR and E-2 of LCUASS). Number: 41 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Please show more off -site context on all sheets. It is difficult to tell what the surrounding properties/areas are as existing. Number: 42 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Add finish grade elevations for streets, lots corners, and finish floors/top of foundation of buildings for all lots. (See II. D. in the LUCASS Utility Plan Checklist) Page 6 Number: 30 Created: 5/13/2010 (5/13/10] Easements should be shown on Site Plan. Number: 31 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] Approximately 150' of context should be shown, i.e. adjacent property lines, ROW. Number: 46 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Please add a date table showing when the plan was originally prepared and then include future revision dates. Number: 52 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Why not switch the sidewalk and planting areas on the central parking lot islands. This will help get more landscaping and decrease paved area. Number: 57 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] 1 recommend delineating the pedestrian walk ways through the drive aisle and parking lot by using a raised walk or special paving. (3.2.2(D)(2) and 3.2.2(E)(5). Number: 58 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Please show the 2' overhang for parking spaces as atypical. Number: 59 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Are there any Compact Parking spaces? These may account for 40% of your spaces and be 8' wide as opposed to 9,' they would need to be labeled. Topic: Water and Sanitation Number: 10 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] These comments entered for Fort Collins - Loveland Water District, representative Terry W Farrill, District Engineer. The proposed water line must be looped per previous discussions. The fire hydrant laterals and the fire line must be separated lines from the main. Number: 11 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] The District will require easements on the District's standard easement form, for all facilities that are not located with in the public ROW. The District requires minimum 30 foot and 20 foot wide easements for the sanitary sewer lines and water lines, respectively. Number: 12 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] The general notes shall include the following: -All water line construction shall conform to the Fort Collins - Loveland Water District Standards and Specifications current to the date of construction. - All sanitary sewer line construction shall conform to the South Fort Collins Sanitation District Standards and Specifications current to the date of construction. Number: 13 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] The District's signature block is required on the sheet G01. The signature block may be obtained in the CAD format by contacting Ms. Sue Vest at (970)226-3104, extension 107. Number: 14 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] The connection to the existing manhole is to be core drilled. Page 5 Topic: Plat Number: 66 Created: 5/17/2010 [5/17/10] Please finish the Plat, see submittal requirements: http://www.fcgov. com)currentplanning/pdf/pdp_subm ittal_req_10-09. pdf. This includes: -Name and addresses of owner, applicant, engineer and surveyor; - Show ROW dimensions, - Label Zoning on this and adjacent properties, - Names of adjacent Subdivisions, - Designation of any areas of floodplain, and - Show easements. Topic: Site Plan Number: 21 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/101 Site plans should be a quick easy way to see what the development plan is, this is way too busy, please take grading, existing landscaping, and drainage details off, this information is all shown on separate plans. Number: 22 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] This size development should be able to fit on a single sheet, I prefer one sheet to the two provided. Number: 23 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] North arrow and scale should be under the plan it refers to, right not it looks to be associated with the Vicinity Map. Number: 24 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] Vicinity map needs to be a line map and should show more context. Number: 25 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] "T" will not work for the trash enclosure, please show actual shape, dimensions, and details with elevations. Number: 26 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] Title should be City of Fort Collins South Transit Center, PDP (Project Development Plan). PDP is not necessary to spell out, unless you want to, it will be removed on the Final Plan anyway. Number: 27 Created: 5/13/2010 (5/13/10] 1 would prefer the use of fills for different paving, planting beds, landscaping, etc. rather than initials. I've provided an example plan. Number: 28 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] Existing vs. proposed should be different line weights, i.e. - Mason Trail. Number: 29 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] Is there a need for a Building Envelope? The building placement is proposed, I don't think it is necessary. The plan shows the Building Envelope and Overhead Canopy as the same line. Page 4 Number: 75 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] Please check the Plant List. Number: 85 Created: 5/18/2010 [5/18/10] Are you aware of the Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines for Stormwater and Detention Facilities? Please see this document regarding the design of the detention pond. It addresses: - varying slope, - plantings, - LA required construction plans, - etc. Topic: Lighting Plan Number: 61 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/101 Please tell the Light Loss Factor on the plans, without this the numbers mean nothing. Number: 62 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Not clear from the plan where the ELI lights are, the plan says to refer to the elevations, but I don't see them on the elevations either. Number: 63 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] The notes on the 2nd page confuse me, the Note Specific to Scheduled Luminaries says to refer to the notes, but the 2 notes below are discussing the ELls not EPS. Number: 64 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] 1 don't find anything saying the fixtures will be downward facing and have glare shields. The table says the ELI will be mounted on the surface, I need more information, please show locations on plan. Will all ELI be under the canopy? Please darken the line showing where the canopy ends. Number: 65 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Please darken site boundary, take indoor detail off, there is more site detail on this plan than on the site plan regarding paving, don't need it here. Topic: Modification Requests Number: 74 Created: 5/17/2010 [5/17/10] The Modification Requests must also address if the modification would be detrimental to the public good (end of 2.8.2(H) Step 8). Topic: Planning Objectives Number: 72 Created: 5/17/2010 [5/17/10] What will the conference room be used for in the facility? Who will run the coffee shop? City or private? What are the hours of the building? Who will use the offices? Number: 73 Created: 5/17/2010 [5/17110] What is the plan for complying with the Raptor Nest Survey recommendations? When will the "presence/absence survey" be done? Page 3 Number: 37 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] Please include a table with all trees types and species called out and number and percentage of total trees listed meeting LUC 3.2.1((D)(3) Minimum Species Diversity. Number: 47 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Following a Transportation Coordination meeting the week of May 3rd, it is Staffs consensus that they prefer the parking lot and drive aisle that was originally submitted on the. Conceptual Review Plans. This will be discussed in greater detail at our meeting, but the any changes that are made regarding the parking lot circulation will likely have an impact on the parking lot landscaping, therefore, my comments WILL change if the plan changes. Number: 48 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] 3.2.1(E)(4)(a) requires 1 tree per 40' linear feet along a side lot line. The side property line is 460', which requires 12 trees, only 10 are on the plan. Number: 49 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Parking lots with more than 100 spaces shall consist of at least 10% of interior landscaping, which is apx 5,428 s.f. for this proposal. The plan only has apx 2,614 s.f. of landscaping, please increase the interior landscaping to meet the standard. Number: 50 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] All landscape islands shall have a canopy shade tree. Code requires 1 canopy shade tree per 150 s.f. of interior parking lot landscaping. With the 10% requirement of 5,428 s.f. of interior landscaping the parking lot shall have a minimum of 36 shade trees. (3.2. 1 (E)(5)(b)) Number: 51 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Canopy Shade trees need at least 80 s.f. of ground area per tree, please make sure all landscape islands are at least 80 s.f. Number: 53 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Trees are required along parking lot walkways at 1 per 40'. (this applies along the west side of the parking lot) Number: 54 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] The LUC has many tree requirements, remember 1 tree can be counted for more than just one standard, so though it may sound like you need apx 60 trees in the parking lot alone, that is not necessarily true if you place trees in a way that they can meet more than one standard. ** Where conflicts arise regarding tree placement and lighting we can make exceptions. Number: 55 Created: 5/14/2010 [5114/10] Please add some landscaping around the trash enclosure. 3.2.1(E)(6) Number: 56 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] Check lights and placement of trees, many are too close. Number: 60 Created: 5/14/2010 [5/14/10] I'm concerned about the trees and plantings underneath the overhang. Tell me more about this. Page 2 F, ry Collins STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Jerod Hawa BHA Design, Inc. 1603 Oakridge Dr Fort Collins, CO 80524 Date: 5/25/2010 Staff has reviewed your submittal for SOUTH TRANSIT CENTER PDP- TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Emma McArdle Topic: Elevations Number: 67 Created: 5/17/2010 [5/17/10] 1 like the color plans for review, but I will need to make sure they are legible in black and white also, please submit black and white next time or include both. Also, black and white plans label the colors of each material. Number: 68 Created: 5/17/2010 [5/17/10] Please label the heights and dimensions of the elements on each facade. (see redlined plan for examples) Number: 69 Created: 5/17/2010 [5/17/10] Will there be any vents or equipment on the roof? Number: 70 Created: 5/17/2010 [5/17/10] There are several call outs (A-D and 8-17), please add description of what there are. Number: 71 Created: 5/17/2010 [5/17/10] Planters are shown on the site plan, please label these on the elevation sheet. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 32 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] 1 would really prefer this to all be on one sheet, I think it will still be legible. Number: 33 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] Bus examples can come.off Landscape Plan. Number: 34 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] Is there a canopy over all the plantings around the building? Please label if so. Will these trees and plantings survive under a canopy? Number: 35 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] Please provide a section view of the landscaping along the east property line. This landscape area should be at least 30" high to screen the parking lot. Number: 36 Created: 5/13/2010 [5/13/10] Existing vs. proposed should vary in line weights. Page t