Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIVER DISTRICT BLOCK ONE MIXED-USE (ENCOMPASS) - FDP - FDP130015 - CORRESPONDENCE - (8)05/10/2013: The r arking Garage Exhibit on the Site Plan is diffe,ent from the floor plan of the Garage level. These will need to be revised to match. BHA- Acknowledged. Department: GIS (this comment added by Jerod Huwa of BHA, per staff review meeting) Contact: Todd Reidenbach, 970-416-2483 Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/13/2013 05/13/2013: Projects with three or more tenant units require the Unit Level Addressing form to be completed and submitted to the GIS Department once plans have met final approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City. This can occur anytime during construction, but before any utilities are set within the structure to ensure the meter banks match the official addressing for the structure. The Unit Level Addressing form can be obtained by contacting the GIS office at gis[7a gcgov.com or 970416- 2483. Addressing will be determined by the GIS Department AU — Noted, addressing will be completed prior to utilities being set within the structure. Department: Traffic Operate..., Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanford(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: I'm unable to find previous resolution to this PDP comment. Please address or refresh any past conversation on the issue. 10/04/2012: Plantings near the driveway seem acceptable except have concerns with one tree, the Skyline Honeylocust. The following description From the US Forest Service Fact Sheet ST-282 is of concern: "Trunk/bark/branches: droop as the tree grows, and will require pruning for vehicular or pedestrian clearance beneath the canopy;". It looks close enough to be a possible sight distance issue as well as possibly being a problem for the nearby sidewalk. I'm unable to attain Tim Buchanan's or Ralph Zentz's input on the choice and location at this time (both are out) but would like their input before finding comfort in the choice. 08/08/2012. Please provide names of plantings near the Linden access so we can verify plant type will not cause sight distance issues on the sidewalk or on Linden St./2013: BHA- From 01/18/13 Comment Responses for Hearing: BHA Response: Per discussions with Forestry and Traffic Operation, Honeylocust is acceptable. From 09/18/13 PDP Resubmittal: BHA Response: Acknowledged — short plants have been chosen to allow good site visibility. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington(afcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Label valve , fittings, etc. at the fire line connection. NE Response: Drawing has been revised accordingly. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Schedule meeting to review the water service connections and to look at an option for the meter pits. NE Response: As discussed with Roger Buffington on Tuesday 6/11113 the meter pits as previously designed will remain unchanged. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Provide design calcs on the width & thickness of the insulation above the sewer service. Add a detail to provide direction on the placement of the insulation and include a note listing the specifications for the insulation (must be suitable for underground applications). NE Response: Design calculations were provided to Roger for reviewlapproval. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/10/2013 05/10/2013: A note on the site plan needs to be included that states the compact spaces will be reserved for employees and residents and designated by a sign. The sign detail that was submitted in the PDP phase should be included, I did not see it in the FDP submittal. BHA- Acknowledged Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/10/2013 05/28/2013: BANN STABILIZATION: Please increase the text size for the section line elevations on sheets 6 & 7. See redlines. Flywater Response: Drawings have been revised accordingly. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: BANK STABILIZATION: There is cut off text on sheet 9. See redlines. Flywater Response: Drawing has been revised accordingly Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 1 & 2. See redlines. BHA- Acknowledged. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please change "men" to "persons" in the Statement Of Ownership And Subdivision. NE Response: Plat has been revised accordingly. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Is the Lienholder still pending? NE Response: New ownership/lien holder information will be provided once sale of property is complete. Per discussion with Jeff this will be addressed prior to filing the plat. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please correct the spelling of "Aztlan". See redlines. NE Response: Plat was revised accordingly. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: What is the dash -dot -dot -dash line shown along the river? See redlines. NE Response: Dashed line has been deleted. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: There is a line over text issue. See redlines. NE Response: Plat was revised accordingly. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please adjust the leader near the south end of the property for the FEMA Floodway Boundary. See redlines. NE Response: Plat was revised accordingly. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please provide the reception numbers for the off -site easements by separate document prior to filing the Plat. NE Response: Once off -site easements are recorded the reception number will be added to the plat. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please change the legal description to match the legal description shown on the Subdivision Plat. BHA- Acknowledged. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet 2. See redlines. BHA- Acknowledged Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please rotate the circled text 180 degrees, to make it plan readable. See redlines. BHA- Acknowledged structures, must nu, oe conducted during flood season which is Mpril 15-end of September. This will be a condition of the floodplain use permit and will also be included in the development agreement. NE Response: Noted. Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: OS-1 flows for the 100-year storm need to pass through the proposed swale and inlet, not just the 2-year flows. NE Response: Drainage report and drawings have been revised accordingly. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please see other minor comments on the redlined plans and report. NE Response: All minor comments have been addressed. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountyCa?fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013, There are line over text issues on several sheets. See redlines. AU — Line over tex has been corrected. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Are the Floor Plan sheets to scale? Please add the scale or N.T.S. to the sheets. AU — Scale has been noted on plans and elevations. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please correct the title of sheet C301 in the index on sheet C000. See redlines. NE Response: Drawing has been revised accordingly. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013. Please correct the sheet numbering in the index on sheet C000 for the NE Response: Sheet index has been revised accordingly. construction details. See redlines. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: There is a line over text issue on sheet C300. See redlines. NE Response: Drawing has been revised accordingly. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please mask all circled text on sheets C301 & C500. See redlines. NE Response: Drawings have been revised accordingly. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: BANK STABILIZATION: Please change all linework & text on sheets 1 & 9 to solid. See redlines. Flywater Response: Drawings have been revised accordingly. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: BANK STABILIZATION: There are line over text issues on sheets 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9. See redlines. Flywater Response: Drawings have been revised accordingly. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 necessarily seeing ,re easement from Ranch -Way needing to bu do easement dedicated to the City, however we should review a draft of the easement language. At the staff review meeting it was brought up that an easement was provided from Ranch -Way prior to hearing. I was recalling that it was a letter of intent to grant an easement, but not an actual easement. I'm unable to locate the document. Can a copy of the document be provided for verification if an actual easement or intent to grant an easement was completed? NE Response: Rich Shannon provided Marc Virata with a letter from Ranch -Way granting access for domestic water line construction and this letter was accepted by Marc on Friday 617/13. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: The construction plans show the dedication of a drainage and access easement dedicated along the eastern boundary of the site that incorporates the pedestrian path that traverses the eastern boundary and connects to the path built on City property. The plat and site plan has this area indicated as a drainage easement only and not also an access easement. The status on whether this area should be in an access easement should be confirmed and coordinated. It would seem to make sense that this area has the access easement designation since it connects to a pedestrian path on City property. NE/BHA Response: Plat and site plan have been revised to reflect easement call out as "drainage and access". Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: I'm understanding from Emma McArdle with Transfort that the bus stop, trash receptacle, and bike racks are considered City/Transfort appurtenances, but will be installed and maintained by the Developer. We may want to place language in the development agreement for future reference on how the installation and ongoing maintenance of the City/Transfort appurtenances will be that of the Developer. Final confirmation of this would be from Emma. BHA- Per coordination with Bill Whirty, trash receptacle will be emptied by F.C. Parks Department. Developer is aware that Transfort will not be maintaining the bench/bike racks at the bus stop. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970.224-6143, lex(7fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Buffer zone areas and the standard comment (please refer to Section 3.4.1 of the Land Use Code for allowable uses within the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone) need to be added to the Utility Plans. NE Response: Notes have been added to utility plans. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Otherwise, all of my plan -related comments were addressed at PDP. When the DA is drafted, I will include language on the escrow required for the buffer zone landscaping and the need for a weed management plan. BHA- Acknowledged Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wlamargue(oDfcgov.com Topic: Floodplain Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Repeat Comment 1. Per our conversation during the field meeting on May 9th, construction timing and methods in the river must be addressed. Construction in the river, including the placement of diversion 05/31 /2013: It wouia be helpful to have all sheets numbered in acquence even though they are provided by different sources. BHA- Acknowledged. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata(cDfcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Please provide drive approach detail 706. The site plan shows the sidewalk across the driveway to be colored concrete. The specifications of this should be also shown on the construction plan set. NE Response: Detail 706 has been added. A note was added to Horizontal Control Plan referencing construction drawings by BHA, sheets L101-L104, where the colored concrete specifications have been included. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Indicate that the pavement detail on the details sheet is for private areas only. NE Response: Note has been added to pavement detail that specifies "private areas only". Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Please provide additional information (such as cross sections) for Linden Street to show how cross slopes will be for the widening of the inset parking and how cross slopes be into existing. NE Response: Cross sections were provided to Marc Virata for review/approval. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Is the "River District Block One Mixed Use Bank Stabilization" plan set intended to be part of the construction plan set and signed by the City, or is it intended to be its own set? It would seem to make sense to combine this into the construction plan set. NE Response: FlyWater Bank Stabilization drawings will be added to Northern Engineering construction drawings as discussed with city staff on Wednesday 5/29/13. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: The Engineering Construction Inspection Manager, in reviewing the amount, location, and spacing of the street cuts to Linden Street as a new street, is requiring that Linden Street be milled and overlaid full width from patch to patch (and would waive the pavement impact fee that would be levied). NE Response: Drawings have been revised to reflect mill/overlay for full width of Linden Street. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: The location of the grease trap appears to have been moved from under the patio (where an easement for the encroachment is ongoing) to further out into the right-of-way. Concerns weren't previously raised about the location of the grease trap since it would be located where an easement is intended to be granted. The grease trap should be placed back in its previous location under the patio. (Note that the "Garage Level" of the building floor plans shows the grease trap within the patio area.) NE Response: Drawings have been revised to reflect the location of the proposed grease interceptor being under the proposed front patio as desired by the c ity. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: In addition to the easements on City property/right-of-way, we'll need to be sure that an easement from Ranch -Way Inc is provided prior to approval of the plans. I'm not Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview May 31, 1 r,tj fE L� RE: River District Block One Mixed Use -Encompass, FDP130015, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepard()fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/31/2013 05/31/2013: Please add the following note to both the Site Plan and Lighting Plan El02: "Parking lot light fixtures will be programmed to turnoff at 10:00 p.m." BHA & SRB- Per coordination with Ted Shepard, "Parking lot light fixtures will be programmed to reduce illumination by one-half starting at 10:00 PM" has been added to plans. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/31/2013 05/31/2013: On Site Plan sheet 2 of 2, where labeling the trash enclosure, please revise to read "trash and recycling enclosure." BHA- Acknowledged Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/31/2013 05/31/2013: There are six sheets depicting the floor plans. These sheets will not be needed in the mylar set. AU — Plans have not been included with this submittal Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/31/2013 05/31/2013. Because the site does not align with north -south, east -west grid, the labels on the architectural elevations should be revised so that the North elevation is labeled as Northeast, the west elevation - Northwest, etc. AU — Naming has been changed. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/31/2013 05/31/2013: On the Perspective sheet, the East elevation label should be the Northwest and P_EC61 vE R the West elevation label should be the Southeast. AU —naming has been changed. pex3iEGTivE Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/31/2013 S hnT C). A A OMAvo *4�4 r*At.