Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWATER'S EDGE @ RICHARD'S LAKE - PDP - 58-86J - CORRESPONDENCE - (10)fas I St��n�wri,i" -Cady P01 c�� �J. - musf Crave , y jrdvAX - ND II MAJ e(- Si ie. -114dd half I)o - Nat. ,eesavrM' - Of rained (ite& obey plg�,) pefire h6'}Y - "'IViekr lraln 4rm ofps . - �GUeq�%fi�'J of �-re �✓rl�� �'Pa i�Clv��d ��'� �� being used in lieu of using only CL stationing (as the code requires). Cross sections are still required every 50' for all Arterial and Collector streets and they need to contain all information required on the checklist or LCUASS. Spots for the locals are required in final compliance, cross sections for collectors and arterials are required before hearing. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Bruce Vogel Topic: Traffic Number: 103 Created: 6/23/2006 [6/23/06] No Comment Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Steve Olt City Planner + Ward - Tra{{t'.. eps -nlerd5 fo revjeuj Plu�ls in ad���,'a►7 fo TES CufiGf�J Ae -rrio. -Plahnmr ?: ID' sideWdJkllMiI Needs io revieto nea(-1- round Tc►� Serv;ces - rr&f -rgble -Who DalhS toha-� PFA - H'tz 41tf /A'PA�1 fin a l y si s r1W Poo/ - din° IA�ieS need m be Shod n ar, jxt- - Pwk n en cvI de -sets - M&di4nS hee6 ke eMery- mof acccss �ase��s I , Page 6 Number: 47 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Carrying this comment forward until the plans show the proposed striping tieing into the existing. [5/9/06] See 7.4.1.A.6 for transitions for roadway shifts and lane drops. Number: 81 Created: 5/11 /2006 [7/4/06] Final Compliance. The striping sheet should be separated from the horizontal control sheet for clarity but see Ward Stanford in Traffic to see what he prefers. [5/11/06] A striping sheet must be provided and approved before going to hearing. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 22 Created: 5/8/2006 [7/5/06] Thank you for submitting the checklist with this round. Just as a reminder, only highlighted items are required and reviewed before going to hearing. All unhighlighted items are required for Final Complaince and are not reviewed prior to that. [5/8/06] See Appendix E4 for all information that must be shown on the plans before going to hearing. Please complete the checklist and submit with the next round of review. Any information not shown on the plans required by the checklist will become a new comment that will need to be addressed before going to hearing. Number: 23 Created: 5/8/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Will need to show how the proposed striping lines up with the existing striping where tieing into existing streets. Will need to show how the proposed striping ties in across intersections (especially at Morning Star and Turnberry - there appears to be quite an offset). Because Lind 3 hasn't submitted yet, they will need to match and tie into whatever this development gets approved for so may want to consider this early in the design. Sheets C110 and 111 have some scanning and legibility issues - might want to break them out into separate striping and horizontal control sheets or decrease the scale a little. The HC sheet needs to dimension all driveways and taper lengths. [5/8/06] Horizontal Control Sheet - Please label and dimension all sidewalks, crosspans, parking stalls, drive aisles, easements, etc. Number: 26 Created: 5/8/2006 [7/4/06] Final Complaince - May want to visit with JR in Tech Services after the first final compliance submittal to get his input as early as possible. The set still has scanning problems but this does not need to be worked out prior to hearing (it's more of a FC issue). [5/8/06] Please see Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. May need to change the scale and break some sheets into more sheets so that they scan properly. Number: 29 Created: 5/8/2006 [7/4/06] Final Compliance, issue still remains open. [5/8/06] Sheet 13 shows an existing street stub or driveway on the north side of Brightwater just west of Longboat Way. This will need to be closed. Please provide a ped ramp as required for a T-Intersection. Number: 112 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Key Map needs to be updated to match current layout. Number: 113 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - There seems to be some confusion about the cross section requirement. The spots for FL and CL are only for Locals where CL and FL stationing is Page 5 [7/4/06] Final Compliance - You could move the sidewalk connection over and away from lot 332. This area would need to be vacated as row and depending on how the row is dispersed back to either this development or the property owner to the north, a portion of it could become part of the Tract and the space used more efficiently. This development will need to contact our Real Estate Services department as soon as possible to start the process of vacating the existing Barnswallow street stub row. [5/8/06] Richard's Lake subdivision stubbed out Bamswallow to your property line and this development is tying into it in such a way that the existing street stub is left going nowhere. This development will need to turn the intersection into a T-Intersection and remove the existing street stub or realign your streets so they tie in better. Number: 32 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Still not showing how the proposed is tieing into existing. Repeat comment. [5/9/06] Little to no information was provided for existing offsites within 150' of the project. The next submittal showing this information may trigger new comments and may require additional changes to the plan sets. Number: 33 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] [5/9/06] Morningstar is considered a collector unless this development goes through the formal process to have it downgraded. No crosspans are allowed in collectors so the one at Morningstar and Tumberry will have to come out (unless the road is formally downgraded of course). Number: 35 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Still missing Turnberry, both interim and ultimate. [5/9/06] No plan and profiles were given for any street in this submittal. Please see Appendix E4 for the minimum information required before going to hearing. Expect more comments to follow in the next round. Number: 43 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Typical cross section #8 and 9 does not meet standard (why the 10' sidewalk?) and does not tie into the existing street stub. Repeat - this development is responsible for the design of both the interim and ultimate for Turnberry plus 1000' of offsite preliminary design. See comment 44. [5/9/06] The typical street sections on the utility plan cover sheet are incorrect. Please see chapter 7 in LCUASS and redliens. Need an ultimate typical street section for Tumberry in addition to the two additional sections for Morningstar (if the median stays). Number: 44 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Tumberry is missing from the plan and profile sheets. The plans need to show where the existing row is and the taper length to match into existing on the north. Do you need to obtain more row in order to do this? Still need the left turn design at Douglas and Tumberry and the 1000' offsite prelim design. [5/9/06] This project is responsible for the design and construction of the interim along their Tumberry frontage plus a 1000' of preliminary design to the north and south. Some of the preliminary design may have been done by the Lind development and may be used to fulfill all or a portion of this requirement. This project is also responsible for the ultimate design along their frontage plus the 1000' offsite. Page 4 Topic: Overall Utility Plan Number: 114 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Hard to read, probably won't scan. Suggest breaking this out into more sheets for legibility. Topic: Plan and Profiles Number: 115 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Vertical curves must be designed in accordance with Figures 7-17 and 7-18. Checked sheet 29-31 once it became apparent you only checked the K values, I stopped. Please go through all the plan and profile sheets and make sure the profiles are meeting the minimum requirement in figures 7-17 and 7-18. Number: 116 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Provide a detail showing all the required dimensions in 7-24 for all street widenings on the appropriate plan and profile sheet. Topic: Plat Number: 63 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] [5/9/06] From Technical Services: Boundary and legal close but do not match. Several numbers do not match. Number: 64 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] [5/9/06] From Technical Services: Please show ties to oil radii. Locate easement. Number: 65 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] [5/9/06] From Technical Services: Does the City own Tract J? If so, it should be excepted out of ownership. Number: 66 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] [5/9/06] From Technical Services: Sub title needs to be fixed to include unplated area of Richards Lake and except out the City owned parcel. Number: 118 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Provide a tract table (who owns and maintains each tract). Number: 119 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Scanning requirements in Appendix E6 aren't being met. Topic: Street Design Number: 12 Created: 5/8/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - The proposed section west of Navigator does not tie into existing and does not meet standard. [5/8/06] Only one typical section is provided for Morningstar when there appears to be three according to the horizontal control sheet in the utility plans. What are the typical sections for the remaining two? Will need to see these before any approvals are given. Number: 17 Created: 5/8/2006 Page 3 C� C; Number: 109 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - The taper at Longboar and the alley is on the wrong side. It needs to be on the south side, not the north. Number: 110 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Shouldn't the ramp and the sidewalk line up at the south side of the MF/Parkside and Cruiser? Number: 111 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Please note on the Site and Utility Plans that driveway access will not be allowed for the "A" lots on Daysailor and Outrigger and that all garage/driveway access must occur off the alley or private drive. This note will also be made in the Development Agreement. Number: 117 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Driveways must be perpendicular to the road (plus or minus 10 degrees) for a minimum of 25'. Topic: Grading Number: 27 Created: 5/8/2006 [7/4/06] [5/8/06] Slopes can not exceed 4:1 and grades at the back of walk must be flat to nearly flat for a minimum of 2'. Some areas have extremely steep slopes shown (not labeled) and may require a retaining wall. Utilities are another concern (no structures are allowed in utility easements). All lots less than 50' will need to show the driveway and utility locations on the plan sets to make sure everything fits, including the street tree. A utility coordination has been set for 2pm next Wednesday, the 17th of May to work out all the issues. All items must be resolved and approved by the utilities prior to going to hearing. Number: 41 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Please show slope info. [5/9/06] Sidewalk grades are an issue. It appears that you are exceeding maximum slopes per ADA requirements. Please label all sidewalk slopes where appropriate. Number: 108 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Show existing grading for a minimum of 50'.and tie proposed into existing. Hard to tell if offsite grading is occuring due to the large property boundary line weight. Will need to see this to determine if offsite easements are required. Please reduce the line weight widths on the extra thick ones for legibility - all sheets. Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 55 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] Final Compliance - Just keeping this comment alive until these conditions are included in the DA. [5/9/06] Landscaping in the median will not be maintained by the city nor will any damage to the road caused by the irrigation system. All landscaping/road damage must be maintained by the development and the future HOA and language as such will be included in the Development Agreement. Landscape medians must include drainage facilities to handle sprinkler runoff and nuisance flows. Refer to Appendix C for all other requirements. Page 2 A ®rA��'' STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins VIGNETTE STUDIOS Date: 07/05/2006 144 N MASON ST #2 FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for WATERS EDGE AT RICHARD'S LAKE PDP - TYPE II, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 21 Created: 5/8/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Still not showing existing within 150' (see sheet 29 of the Utility Plans, for instance). It is still unclear how the proposed streets are lining up with existing streets and intersections. [5/8/06] All sheets, all plan sets, need to show all existing features within 150' of the project boundaries so we can see how you're tying in and that all separation distances, street alignments, etc, are being provided. Number: 42 Created: 5/9/2006 [7/4/06] Final Compliance. You may be able to do this with Real Estate Services in conjunction with the row being vacated under comment 17 and save the TDRF fees. Please discuss this with them to see if its an option. [5/9/06] Need to show the existing rights of way and what you are planning to have vacated. Will need legals and exhibits for each proposed vacation along with an $800 filing fee for each vacation. Larimer County Filing Fees also apply but those will be determined at a later time. Number:104 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Comment 100 by Ward Stanford in Traffic will require that this required left turn lane will have to be either designed and constructed with this development or just designed with an equivalent cash amount to construct it in the future in the form of a contribution in aid. I will bring the matter to Trans Coordination today if possible or next week at the latest. Will need a preliminary design/layout prior to going to hearing. Number: 105 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - The ramps at Jettyand Skiff are not correct. Please treat as a T- Intersection. Number: 106 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Please provide a section through the proposed retaining wall on the north side of lots 112 and 113 so that we can determine if offsite easements are required. Please indicate the property line on the section and consider the excavation requirements to install the wall. How tall will it be? Will need bottem and top of wall spots on the utility plans. Number: 107 Created: 7/4/2006 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Missing ramps at Fleet and Momingstar as well as a ped refuge area in the median. Page 1