Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWATER'S EDGE @ RICHARD'S LAKE - FDP - 58-86K - CORRESPONDENCE -THE WATER SUPPLY AND STORAGE COMPANY P.O. BOX 1584 2319 E. Mulberry Street FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-1584 September 21, 2007 IiEMI0PICO 9 k1rha:7:1r7 Steve Olt Project Planner City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Re: Waters Edge Mr. Olt: RECEIVED 7727 CURRENT PLANNING We received yesterday a copy of plans for Waters Edge, a proposed development near Richards Lake. Thank you for forwarding those plans and for keeping WSSC on the distribution list for future communication purposes as the review process moves forward on this project A brief review of the plans shows that the proposed project is located adjacent to Richards Lake and includes provisions for stormwater discharge into the lake. Water Supply & Storage Company is concerned about both, among other issues. We will need some time to have our engineers review the plans and comment. We anticipate that we will require a discharge agreement with the project owner/developer for the stormwater discharge, at a minimum. That agreement will likely include annual fees to WSSC and reimbursement of our out-of-pocket costs for legal and engineering services. We will also require easements and minimum setbacks along the shoreline from the crest elevation of the dam to ensure our ability to maintain and operate the reservoir in the future. Please ask the developer to contact us to set up a meeting to include our engineer and legal counsel. Sincerely, Dennis J. Harmon General Manager * Darwin Williams of the East Larimer County Water District indicated that red -line remarks were made on the Utility Plans and returned to the Developer's engineer. This represents staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments at this time. Additional comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming. Another round of staff review is determined to be necessary before the mylars will be requested. This proposal is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the date of this comment letter, being June 21, 2007) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you re -submit. The number of copies of each document to re -submit is shown on the attached REVISION ROUTING SHEET. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970)221-6341. Yours Truly, Qy v� Steve Olt City Planner cc: Susan Joy Stantec Consulting Skyland Meadows Developments Current Planning file #58-86K Page 16 Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 156 Created: 6/8/2007 (6/8/07) Please provide 10 foot of separation between all storm lines and proposed trees. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 149 Created: 6/4/2007 [6/4/07) Storm sewer C which is flows into the detention pond off of Morningstar Drive seems too close to the lot and the sidewalk. Storm line cannot be located on private lot. Storm line must be relocated into the street or lot has to be shifted. Line B should maintain a 10 foot clearance from the edge of the proposed pipe to the lot line. Storm Lines D, P, R and Q (between Lots 205 -206 and Lot 207, and Lots 214-242 and Lot 243, between 253 and 254 and between Lots 289 and 290) are shown to be located on private property. Please revise, lines should be within a tract owned by HOA, a minimum of 20 foot width is required. Please change note on storm line profiles to state that all storm lines to be inspected by City of Fort Collins. All storm lines in the right of way shall be owned and maintained by City of Fort Collins. A maintenance exhibit should be prepared that would clarify what lines are to be maintained by the City. The lines that the City would own and maintain should be discussed in a meeting prior to re -submittal. Call out location of S nN O 1 in storm sewer profile sheet. Note calls for trash racks to be placed at end all storm sewer FES's. This is not a recommended solution as a person can be trapped by these. Trash racks should only be placed at upstream ends of storm sewers. Please call for removal of sections of the existing pans in the detention pond so that vegetation cover can be achieved over the covered pans. Minimum depth of cover to the pan should be 1 foot to allow for placement of irrigation system and topsoil. Call out limits of development on grading plan at points of outfall into Richard's lake. Call out silt fence/and or construction fence around proposed limits of development. Call out for revegetation of the disturbed area on Water Supply and Storage property. A number of the street plan and profile sheets are mislabeled, please correct. Page 15 9 0 Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Hamden Topic: Ditch company signatures Number: 148 Created: 6/4/2007 [6/4/07] Please provide approval letter from the affected ditch companies for release into their facilities, being the Reservoir No. 8 Outlet Canal, owned by the Windsor Reservoir Company; and, Richard's Lake, owned by Water Supply and Storage. Topic: Drainage Plans Number: 157 Created: 6/8/2007 [6/8/07] Please provide drainage summary table, drainage basin delineations, detention summary table. Topic: Easements Number: 158 Created: 6/8/2007 [6/8/07] Please provide drainage easements for all outfall pipes into the Richards Lake property. Topic: Grading Number: 150 Created: 6/4/2007 [6/4/07] Flows from Lots 299 to 305 seem to be directed at existing lots within a previous filing. These should be collected in a swale and routed into the swale to the west. Alternatively, you need to show that post development flows directed at these properties are less than historical amounts. Plans show that upper portion on ponds 201 and 301will hold water and be used as a wet area. This will require a variance request and notes that clearly indicate that this was done by the developer for water quality purposes. Another note should be added stating that in case the City determines that these areas have become nuisances an alternative design solution that prevents water from ponding in these areas shall be provided to the City and upon approval shall be promptly implemented by the developer. Call out slopes in all detention pond bottoms. Detailed grading sheets should be extended to cover the area to the east of Lots 291, 292 and 293 and all areas that are not detailed. Sheets should overlap entire project. The text of the grading plan is hard to read. Please clean up spot elevations. Page 14 0 9 plat. These required fire lanes shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. In addition to the design criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, the fire lanes shall meet the following general requirements: ❑ Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or concrete) capable of supporting fire apparatus weights (40 tons). Compacted road base shall be used only for temporary fire lanes or at construction sites. ❑ Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and enforceable. The HOA shall be responsible for installing the approved signage and paint, and maintaining it. ❑ Be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement. ❑ Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of the fire lane. If a fire lane is not provided, the buildings accessed from Tracts I and S shall be protected by approved automatic fire sprinklers. 97UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1 [7/6/06] The Emergency Access Easements that I specified in May do not appear on the plat and they are required to do so. (Tracts L, O, Q, and S.) 15/ 10/06] Fire lanes are required in Blocks 9, 10 and 11. Minimum width is 20 feet and this must be maintained throughout the length of the fire lane. The fire lanes shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed. The fire lanes must be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or concrete) capable of supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road base shall be used only for temporary fire lanes or at construction sites. The fire lanes are required to be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement. Number: 125 Created: 7/6/2006 [6/6/07] Was this ever submitted? I never received a copy if it was. [7/6/06] HMIA: The information submitted regarding the chlorine tablets needs to be expanded, e.g., how large is the pool, how many chlorine tablets will be on site, where will they be stored/used, etc. Number: 154 Created: 6/6/2007 [6/6/07] ADDRESSING: As mentioned last year, MFDs and SFDs shall be required to have address numerals visible both on the front and rear sides of the buildings, due to fire lane access to the rear of many of the units. Page 13 0 Topic: Utility Plans - Notes and Legend Number: 172 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please darken proposed intermediate (interim?) contours. The lighter line weight makes it appear as existing. Missing existing features like row, ramps, sidewalks, etc. Topic: Utility Plans - Phasing Plan Number: 173 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please label the future City park. Number: 174 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/07] Please replace the 9-ball sign (OM4-2)'s for type III barricades. Or are these the same things? : ) Number: 175 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 The removals shown for the existing street stub east of Barnswallow appears to be incomplete. Do you not want the rest of the sidewalk and the rest of the street stub removed? Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Janet McTague Topic: Electrical Number: 151 Created: 6/5/2007 [6/5/07] Electric services can be installed as shown. Builder should be aware that the electric meter needs to go on the same side of the house as the electric stub. Number: 152 Created: 6/5/2007 [6/5/07]0il wells will require three-phase power Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 120 Created: 7/5/2006 [6/ 12/07] This is an old comment from Doug. Please call Dana Leavitt at 224-6143 to discuss. [7/5/06] A revegetation plan is needed for the buffer zone location in tract K and may be included with the landscape plan. 3.4.2 (E) (1) (g) Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 78 Created: 5/ 10/2006 [6/6/07] EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENTS REQUIREMENTS: The tracts and private drives that were previously discussed as being required to be Emergency Access Easements still are not designated on the plat as Emergency Access Easements. Tract I and Tract S shall be designated as Emergency Access Easements on the plat, and private drives Jib Lane and Lateen Lane shall be designated as Emergency Access Easements on the Page 12 Topic: Utility Plans - Turnberry Interim Cross Sections Number: 231 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please show, label and dimension all slopes & ROW (existing and proposed). Show the ditch on the east side. Show the sidewalk and parkway on the west side. Number: 232 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/07] Please provide cross sections every 50' for the ultimate Turnberry Road design. Topic: Utility Plans - Typical Sections Number: 184 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 The typical cross section for the private drive (6) is not showing any UE's. Were any required by the utility companies or will they stay in the drive area? Also, remove all reference to "public alley" or "ROW'. Number: 185 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Interim Turnberry Road cross section needs to dedicate row to the back of the proposed sidewalk as well as the 15' UE. A sidewalk is required in the interim and that is not shown either. Also, the row on the east side is shown as proposed. Is this being dedicated with this project or should this be labeled "future" instead? Number: 186 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please provide a typical section for Ultimate Turnberry Road. Number: 187 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please label Turnberry Road sections "from station XX to station XK. Number: 188 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/071 Cross section 13 looks the same as 11. Number: 189 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Section 9 is showing barrow ditches on both sides of the street. Section 11 and 13 are showing this ditch filled in on both sides of the street. Are you filling in the east side ditch with this project? If not, is there enough room to add the bike lane in? Well need to see more info on the plans. Sheet C298 isn't really showing the ditch, the existing row and how or how the proposed grading is tying into the existing. Can all of this work be done within the existing row? If not, this development will need to obtain the additional row to construct the proposed improvements. Page 11 Number: 208 Created: 6/20/2007 (6/20/07] The roundabout striping and signage plan should go on the striping and signage sheet. What we have now on the plans is hard to read and has scanning issues. Number: 209 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/07] Please provide flowlines and spot elevations all the way around the roundabout. Number: 210 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/07] Please station the couple of driveways on sheet 261. Number: 211 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please tie the right and left flowlines into existing. Number: 239 Created: 6/21 /2007 [6/21/071 The Landscape Plan is showing the center island landscaped. Is this correct? Topic: Utility Plans - Signage and Striping Number: 190 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Morningstar striping must continue all the way to the intersection to the east. Please label existing street names in neighborhood to the west. Number: 191 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/071 Brightwater striping must be continued all the way to Turnberry Road. If already existing, please show as existing and dimension so we can see that the proposed striping is tying into it correctly. Number: 192 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please show and dimension existing striping on Turnberry Road and how your striping ties into it. Number: 193 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/071 Please provide type III barricades at all dead end sidewalks on this sheet. Topic: Utility Plans - Stormsewer Number: 204 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Stormsewer C cannot be located within a private lot. Please relocate. Number: 205 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Structures (encasements, pipes) are not meeting requirements in 12.2.2 on sheets 245, 248, 250, 253. Page 10 0 to show striping so that we can see that the sawcut and patching is falling on a lane line or in the middle of a travel lane. Patch also needs to be cut at least 2' into existing and patched in accordance with LCUASS. Please show existing ditch. Provide stationing. Number: 222 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Turnberry Road profiles are not meeting the minimum 0.5% slope requirement in some locations. Number: 223 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/07] Please take Tumberry Road profiles all the way out to Douglas Road. Number: 224 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please identify the taper and length of the right turn lane into the development. Number: 225 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/07] Rollover curb is shown on sheet 302 - should be VC. Number: 226 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Douglas Road improvements - Please show existing row and the ditch in the typical section as well as the plan view. Need to show how the existing grading ties into the proposed and if the work can be done within the existing row. Please show and dimension the existing row and asphalt. Please show existing grades for at least 50' either side. Please provide a 6' bike lane to the intersection on the east side of Tumberry if possible. Number: 227 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 South Trail Profile - retaining wall needs to be set back 2' from the walk and the sidewalk width increased 2' for the duration of the wall. Topic: Utility Plans - Roundabout Plan and Profile Number: 206 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Roundabout - Please provide spot elevations so that I can see that a 2 to 3% cross slope is being met. Number: 207 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Pavement Management will need to be routed the roundabout plan and profiles with the next round so that they can review the control joint pattern. Feel free to submit something to them before the next round to get their input as early as possible. Page 9 Number: 213 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Cruiser Lane is not meeting 2% cross slope requirements in some areas. Sheet mislabeled as just Navigator Lane. Can you move the Navigator plan and profile over so that is more easily seen? Number: 214 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Morningstar CL - Is this the true CL or theoretical? We'll need some more info on the plans so we can see how this will drain. Number: 215 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/07] Barnswallow and Brightwater not meeting 2% cross slope requirements in some areas. Try going to just one decimal point and maybe it'll round up just fine ; ) Gangway not meeting 2% cross slope requirements. Sheet mislabeled as Cruiser. Number: 216 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Sheet 279 showing more retaining walls in UE. Need to be located outside of them or get a variance for the utility companies. Number: 217 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/071 All street widenings must be dimensioned in accordance with figure 7-24. Please provide spot elevations as shown in the redlines so that I can verify that the min 2% cross slope requirement is being met. Number: 218 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/07] Parkside, Midship, Longboat, Fleet - Please provide spot elevations at all beginning, middle and end of VCs and PCs as well as through the median so that I can see that the min 2% cross slope requirement is being met. Number: 219 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 The cul-de-sacs are showing a CL with an angle point. Please correct. Number: 220 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Midship Way requires 4 flowlines or enough spots to review and eventually build it. Number: 221 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Off -site Improvements on Turnberry Road - Please dimension existing row and label Lind 1 st filing. Is the retaining wall proposed or existing? Lineweights are too similar - hard to tell where the proposed sidewalk meets existing. It doesn't look like the correct row has been dedicated. We need to dimension or label that the proposed edge to edge asphalt width has to be 36' minimum. Please provide a right flowline. Need Page 8 Number: 203 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/071 Please provide contours and grading information for at least 50' to the east side of existing Turnberry Road ROW. The typical street section in the interim is showing an existing ditch under the proposed shoulder. See comments under Typical Street Section as well. Topic: Utility Plans - Horizontal Control Number: 179 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/071 Curve and coordinate tables are missing all information. Number: 181 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/07] See comment 180. Number: 182 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please dimension sidewalks, parkways, parking stall widths, depths and drive aisles. Number: 183 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please dimension Turnberry Road ROW, plus label and dimension all easements. Existing edge of pavement shown, please show existing and proposed ROW. Topic: Utility Plans - Intersection Details Number: 228 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Missing spot elevations. Number: 229 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 The minum transition length is 30' - there are several intersections that are not meeting this requirement. Number: 230 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please provide a detail and cut section of the median ramps in Morningstar (typical is ok). Topic: Utility Plans - Plan and Profiles Number: 212 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Sheet 262 - How about adding spots for cross slopes on this sheet instead of providing cross sections? What if we did the pc's at the nose of the medians and 2 or 3 places along them? Would that work for you or? *Update - I just found some of the info on the intersection detail sheets. That's ok... but is there a way we could come up with something that will put all the info in one area so that it's easy to review and ultimately build? Page 7 0 0 Topic: Utility Plans -Grading Number: 169 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please provide spot elevations for TOW and BOW on all retaining walls and make sure that the site and landscape plans are clearly showing and labeling all retaining walls as well. Number: 195 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/071 All retaining walls must show TOW and BOW spots and refer to sheet/detail. All retaining walls must be located outside of the utility easements. All grades next to public sidewalks must be flat to nearly flat for a minimum of 2' behind the walk. Number: 196 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Existing/proposed sidewalks are both shown in greyscale. It's hard to tell where the new and the old are tying in. Number: 197 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/071 There is a retaining wall shown along Turnberry Road that needs to be at least 2' behind the sidewalk with the sidewalk being widened out an additional 2'. The utility companies will require a variance to allow this within the first 15' along Turnberry Road. Number: 198 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Missing spot elevations on several lot corners. Number: 199 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please label all slope ratios. Slopes can not exceed 4:1 in public row or where it effects public row. See Stormwater for permission to grade tract J 3:1. Number: 200 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Sheet C191 is showing what appears to be a retaining wall on the west side of Fleet in front of lots 66-69. If this is true, please show as such on the grading plans (TOW, BOW, sheet, detail) and remove from the UE. Number: 201 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Sheet C 178 is showing an offsite stormline. Please provide a legal and exhibit for our review and approval. I will give you the appropriate dedication statement to dedicate the area to the City. Number: 202 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Missing three areas on the grading sheets - not enough overlap. See red -lines on sheet C 179. Page 6 0 0 Topic: Utility Plans - Demo Number: 180 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/071 There appears to be several existing trails or sidewalks throughout the site. Are they staying or being removed? Topic: Utility Plans - Erosion Control Number: 194 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please use grey lineweights for existing and dark for proposed (typical, all sheets). Remove the Lind III info. Topic: Utility Plans -General Number: 26 Created: 5/8/2006 [6/8/07] Scanning issues with the plan sets, in particular the grading sheets. I marked up sheet C 172 pretty good so you can see what the problems are. I didn't do that for the rest of the sheets though. Main issue is the line over text. Spots are difficult to read and will not be scannable. Take another shot and well go to tech services with the next round to see if the sheets will scan ok. [12/26/061 [7/4/06] Final Compliance - May want to visit with J.R. Wilson in Technical Services after the first Final Compliance submittal to get his input as early as possible. The set still has scanning problems but this does not need to be worked out prior to hearing (it's more of a FC issue). [5/8/06] Please see Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. May need to change the scale and break some sheets into more sheets so that they scan properly. Number: 166 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please remove all conceptual Lind III information since it has not been approved yet and we can't infer that this layout has been reviewed and approved in any way. Number: 167 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Remove shading from the key maps. Just box out the area being shown on the sheet : ) Number: 176 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 See red -lines for other comments. Number: 177 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/071 Please correct the street cut note by removing the word "current", each sheet. Number: 178 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/07] Please label all offsite street names, all sheets where shown. Page 5 Number: 145 Created: 12/28/2006 16/20/071 Just checking .... do we have all of the easements needed by the utility companies or do we need to dedicate the 8' UE either side of the drive still? [12/28/061 An 8' utility easement is required on both sides of the "alleys" or private drives. Number: 155 Created: 6/8/2007 [6/8/07) From Technical Services: 1. Boundary and legal close but do not match. See redlines. 2. Same problem with text and lines. Also line weight for lot boundaries is too light (fine) to reproduce. 3. Sheet 3 of 6 - "Apparent prescriptive easement", no such animal. Prescriptive easements are adjudicated, list case # and ruling. 4. There are a number of red line comments on plat - missing data, poor expression of data. The text quality is minimal - dithered test is not effective. Number: 240 Created: 6/21/2007 [6/21/071 Darken the "proposed line" and state what the line is for. See red -lines. Number: 241 Created: 6/21/2007 [6/21/071 Correct the spelling of "site" in the sight distance easement label. Topic: Site Plan Number: 170 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/071 Please show and label all retaining walls. Number: 238 Created: 6/21/2007 [6/21/071 See comments under Landscape Plans. Topic: Soils Report Number: 242 Created: 6/21/2007 [6/21/071 Please provide a soils report and reference it on the cover sheet notes. Topic: Utility Plans - Cover Sheet Number: 168 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/071 Please add "for reference only" to the index under Sheets 1-6 Plat. Page 4 Number: 171 Created: 6/20/2007 16/20/071 Please show and label all retaining walls including TOW and BOW spot elevations. Number: 233 Created: 6/21 /2007 [6/21/071 The landscaped center island is really nice but (unfortunately), the City won't allow artwork or anything else that might encourage people to walk out to the middle and look at it. The Dry Creek bed might come across as a pathway and people might start trying to cut through. Is there any way to end the path a little before the edge or hide the opening with planting materials so that people won't see it? Or do you have any other ideas, Terence? We can talk about this more before you submit again. It wouldn't hurt to get Eric Bracke's take on it too. Number: 234 Created: 6/21 /2007 [6/21/071 Show Phasing -just a suggestion but what if you put this on the overall Landscape Plan sheet and take off some of the information so help with scannability. Or ?? Number: 235 Created: 6/21 /2007 [6/21/071 Label and dimension all easements. Number: 237 Created: 6/21 /2007 [6/21/071 Label/identify all retaining walls. Topic: Plat Number: 118 Created: 7/4/2006 [6/21/071 [12/26/061 [7/4/06] Provide a tract table (who owns and maintains each tract). Number: 119 Created: 7/4/2006 [6/8/07] [12/26/061 [7/4/06] Scanning requirements in Appendix E6 aren't being met. Number: 133 Created: 7/ 11 /2006 16/8/07] [12/26/061 [7/ 11 /061 From Technical Services: Text over text and line over text. Please correct and see Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. Number: 134 Created: 7/ 11 /2006 16/8/071 [12/26/061 [7/ 11 /06] From Technical Services: How was Turnberry Road dedicated? Page 3 Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 42 Created: 5/9/2006 [6/8/07] The right-of-way (RO)M for the existing street stub needs to be landscaped and maintained by this development (unless you wish to pursue the vacation process as discussed previously). Please update the Landscape Plans to reflect that and make the appropriate notes on the plan set. The DA will have language regarding this as well. [12/26/061 [7/4/06] Repeat. Final Compliance. The developer has two choices for the street stub's existing ROW. First choice is to research who would receive the ROW (neighbor to north? Or the other site's HOA?) and then work out an access easement to connect your sidewalk through there OR leave the ROW as is and then agree to maintain the area with this development's HOA. If this is the option you would prefer, then the sidewalk could be repositioned away from the lot to the south and the area could be landscaped as more of an entry feature to your development. [5/9/06] Need to show the existing rights of way and what you are planning to have vacated. Will need legals and exhibits for each proposed vacation along with an $800 filing fee for each vacation. Larimer County Filing Fees also apply but those will be determined at a later time. Number: 111 Created: 7/4/2006 16/20/07] [12/26/061 [7/4/06] Final Compliance - Please note on the Site and Utility Plans that driveway access will not be allowed for the "A" lots on Daysailor and Outrigger and that all garage/driveway access must occur off the alley or private drive. This note will also be made in the Development Agreement. Number: 165 Created: 6/20/2007 [6/20/07] The ROW along Turnberry Road needs to be dedicated to the ultimate cross section (including the right turn lane into the site) plus the 15' UE. Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 55 Created: 5/9/2006 [6/8/07] [12/26/061 [7/4/06] Final Compliance - Just keeping this comment alive until these conditions are included in the DA. [5/9/06] Landscaping in the median will not be maintained by the City, nor will any damage to the road caused by the irrigation system. All landscaping/road damage must be maintained by the development and the future HOA and language as such will be included in the Development Agreement. Landscape medians must include drainage facilities to handle sprinkler runoff and nuisance flows. Refer to Appendix C for all other requirements. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Vignette Studios Date: 06/21/2007 c/o Terence Hoaglund 144 North Mason, Suite 2 Fort Collins, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for WATER'S EDGE AT RICIiARD'S LASE - FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: General Number: 153 Created: 6/5/2007 [6/5/07] All of the tracts Macts A - Z) shown on the subdivision plat must be identified on the Site Plan. Number: 164 Created: 6/ 14/2007 [6/ 14/07] Planning & Zoning (Current Planning) has some very minor comments that are on red -lined Site, Landscape, Building Elevations, and Subdivision Plat Plans being forwarded to the applicant. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: General Number: 160 Created: 6/ 12/2007 [6/ 12/07] Buffer zone to labeled as "Natural Area Buffer Zone". Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 163 Created: 6/ 12/2007 16/ 12/07] Add additional plants within the buffer area. Provide a variety of ground cover, understory, and trees in the plan. Provide plant list for all plant material within buffer zone. Topic: Plat Number: 161 Created: 6/ 12/2007 [6/ 12/07] Add buffer zone line to the plat, labeled as Natural Area Buffer Zone. Number: 162 Created: 6/ 12/2007 16/ 12/07] Relocate the edge of the buffer zone to the west edge of the trail. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 159 Created: 6/ 12/2007 [6/ 12/07] Add Limits of Development (LOD) to all plan drawings in the utility set of plans. Page 1