HomeMy WebLinkAboutWATER'S EDGE @ RICHARD'S LAKE - FDP - 58-86K - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 -The detention pond has been enlarged to do away with the majority of
the walls.
Topic: Stormwater- Detention Pond Variance Request
Number: 62 Created: 5/9/2006
[5/9/06] The variance request to allow for the water quality portion of the
detention to be included in the quality volume would be allowed as long as a
full foot of freeboard is still provided. Right now even with that variance
only 0.86 ft of freeboard would be left.
Accomodations have been made to provide the full foot of freeboard.
A variance will not be required.
Topic: Stormwater- Grading
Number: 83 Created: 5/ 12/2006
[5/ 12/06] Please make sure all grading is contained on -site especially for
the north area along the Sierra Monte Heights subdivision as any grading in
that area would be very controversial.
Understood.
Topic: Stormwater- Off -site Flows
Number: 84 Created: 5/ 12/2006
[5/ 12/06] Please document in the report how the off -site areas that are
contributing flows toward this development were calculated.
We have met with storm water and discussed this. These are also
documented in the Original Master drainage report.
Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Gary Lopez
Topic: Zoning
Number: 2 Created: 5/ 1 / 2006
[5/ l/06] Vicinity map showing project site (grid lines) appear to be mis-
located east of County Rd. 11
This has been corrected.
Number: 3 Created: 5 / 1 / 2006
[5/ 1/06] Additional landscape screening for well from lots 321-325 on
Navigator Way as well as on one side from houses in Hearthfire PUD 1st
which back up to well.
Understood. This will be addressed in the detailed landscape plans.
Number: 4 Created: 5/ 1 /2006
[5/ 1/06] Indicate street names on landscape plans.
Done.
This represents staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments
at this time. Additional comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming.
Another round of staff review is determined to be necessary. This proposal
is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the
date of this comment letter, being May 17, 2006) as set forth in
Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be sure and return all red -lined
plans when you re -submit. The number of copies of each document to re-
submit is shown on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet.
Page 15 of 15
[5/ 15/06] Please show some striping and design for the piece of
Brightwater that is to be taken from 'interim' to 'ultimate' with this proposal.
Done.
Number: 91 Created: 5 / 15 / 2006
[5/ 15/06] Can we get the ramp configurations at Brightwater/Fleet and
Brightwater/Longboat to provide a straight crossing of the cross streets?
See redlines for clarity.
Done.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue
Contact: Basil Hamdan
Topic: Stormwater- Ditch Company Approval
Number: 56 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] Any drainage into the Richard's Lake will need to receive approval
from the ditch company that owns that reservoir. Drainage tying into the
Richard's Lake outfall, will need approval from the Windsor Reservoir Ditch
Company.
Understood.
Topic: Stormwater- Drainage Design
Number: 60 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] The SWMM model used to design the pond was only divided into 3
basins, the widths used in that SWMM model are very large resulting in
smaller detention volumes. Please use realistic overland flow lengths, as the
ones currently used are very large.
Stantec has met with Basil Hamdan and agreed on the criteria.
Stantec has remodeled the detention volume requirement.
Topic: Stormwater- Modifications to the Richard's Lake original
detention outlet
Number: 57 Created: 5/ 9/ 2006
[5/9/06] Since this project proposes to release into the Richard's Lake
outlet outlet pipe, please show how the first filing pond outlet system will be
modified to remove the retention and retrofitted into a detention outlet.
An orifice plate will be added to the existing structure.
Topic: Stormwater- Release into Richard's Lake
Number: 59 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] It seems from the grading Plan that there will be some release
from the back of the lots along Brightwater Drive with no treatment, the
grading does not show how these will be conveyed into a water quality
treatment area prior to being released into Richard's Lake property.
Grading has been detailed to show how this works.
Topic: Stormwater- Detention Pond Grading
Number: 61 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] The design of Detention Pond 1 shows two tiered walls
surrounding the whole pond. This design will need to provide maintenance
access. Retaining walls will need a structural design at final, and it is
strongly suggested that the pond be appropriately landscaped to enhance its
aesthetics.
Page 14 of 15
crosswalk locations at a position to the left of the parking area, to improve
visibility between motorists and pedestrians.
Morningstar Drive has been redesigned with input from engineering
and traffic.
Number: 99 Created: 5/ 15/2006
[5/ 15/06] Per Fig 8-1 LCUASS and TIS Fig. 8 data, Turnberry @
Brightwater and Turnberry @ Morningstar require north bound left turn
lanes.
Understood.
Number: 100 Created: 5/ 15/2006
[5/ 15/06] Per Fig. 8-1 LCUASS, any arterial intersection requires left turn
lanes. This development is increasing the north bound left turn volume 6
fold at Douglas Rd and Turnberry. As such this development should provide
the left turn lane or provide appropriate funding towards the future left turn
lane at Douglas Rd.
Understood. Our traffic consultant, Matt Delich, will follow up to
discuss further.
Number: 101 Created: 5/ 15/2006
[5/ 15/06] This project has completed its intersection capacity reservation
at Lemay and Vine.
Understood.
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill
Topic: Ped Connections
Number: 85 Created: 5/ 15/ 2006
[5/ 15/06] Connection from Barnswallow Circle to Gangway; then through
block as a more direct access to the future park. See redlined site plan for
clarity.
Done.
Number: 86 Created: 5/ 15/2006
[5/ 15/06] Please ensure that Tracts A, C, D, E, and F are designated as
public access easements.
Understood.
Number: 87 Created: 5/ 15/2006
[5/ 15/06] Need ramps at the trail crossing of Navigator.
Done.
Number: 88 Created: 5/ 15/2006
[5/ 15/06] Remove the ramps at the apex's of Jetty Ct., Fleet Ct., and
Companion Ct. please.
Done.
Number: 89 Created: 5/ 15/2006
15/ 15/06] Please double check the cross -slopes of driving ways which cross
sidewalks. The grade of the sidewalk cannot deviate over 2% and these
crossings. Thanks.
Done.
Number: 90
Created: 5/ 15/2006
Page 13 of 15
Turnberry than at Brightwater and Turnberry. The TIS needs to include the
expected volumes on Morningstar (east and west of the Roundabout), and
on the southern portion of Brightwater.
Figure I shows the peak hour approach volumes at the subject
Morningstar/Brightwater roundabout. By inspection, this roundabout
would operate acceptably. All legs of this intersection will have
traffic volumes that are commensurate with that of a residential
local street. A detailed letter of response from Matt Delich is included
with this submittal.
Number: 94 Created: 5/ 15/2006
[5/ 15/06] The TIS indicates the possibility of some streets being "over
classified" and a re-evaluation may be appropriate. At this time and per the
City Traffic Engineer, the City is not adverse to the developer doing the work
to achieve the re-classification. The City will act as the review and approval
entity if the project development team chooses to undertake the
reclassification work.
The developer does not plan to apply for re-classification of the
referenced streets.
Number: 95 Created: 5 / 15 / 2006
[5/ 15/06] Per the City Traffic Engineer, the Roundabout (Rbt) shown
internal to the project is too large. The inscribe diameter should not be
greater than 100'. The large size promotes faster circulation speeds. Speed
profiles and fastest path drawings should be developed and submitted with
the revised Rbt.
The roundabout has been redesigned with input from Eric B.
Number: 96 Created: 5/ 15/2006
[5/ 15/06] Scaling of the circulating roadway width indicates about 20-21'.
The City recommendation is to hold the width no greater than 16' fl-apron
edge, unless justification is provided to consider wider.
Understood.
Number: 97 Created: 5/ 15/2006
[5/ 15/06] Traffic has safety concerns with the proposed medians at the
intersection of Morningstar and Turnberry. These wide medians are
problematic for left turning traffic as well as thru movement traffic. Left
turns have increased ability to conflict and have a reduced ability to see
advancing thru vehicles while trying to make their left turn. The medians
are acceptable further into the project but they need to be significantly
reduced, or eliminated at the Turnberry intersection.
The medians have been retained and redesigned. A left turn lane has
been provided.
Number: 98 Created: 5/ 15/2006
[5/ 15/06] Morningstar does not meet any of the LCUASS local residential
spec's. As such Traffic is basically ok with the median configuration (except
at the Turnberry intersection), but believe the parking should be
inset/recessed parking, versus an on -street configuration. The proposed
configuration is wide and we would prefer to see more curb line and the
Page 12 of 15
[5/ 10/061 For addressing of single-family attached units, give each
"cluster" a street number and also a unit letter.
Understood.
Number: 74 Created: 5/ 10/2006
[5/ 10/06] Address the properties consecutively on the courts, because
west -odd, east -even does not work.
Understood.
Number: 75 Created: 5/ 10/2006
[5/ 10/06] Cul-de-sacs must not exceed 150 feet in length, or they require a
turn -around.
Understood.
Number: 76 Created: 5/ 10/2006
[5/ 10/06] Minimum water supply for the MFD and SFA are 1,500 gpm at
20 psi residual, with no structure farther than 300 feet to a fire hydrant, on
600-foot centers. Minimum water supply for the SFD is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi
residual, with no structure farther than 400 feet to a fire hydrant, on 800-
foot centers.
Understood.
Number: 77 Created: 5/ 10/2006
[5/ 10/06] The "private drives" do not meet the definition of private drive as
specified in the FCLUC, and in single-family developments, a private drive
can connect to only one public street or private street.
The site design has been modified per the interpretation request by
Cameron Gloss. A modification request will be generated to allow two
of the private drives, which will be named, to connect to two public
streets (Cruiser Lane and Brightwater Drive).
Number: 78 Created: 5/ 10/2006
[5/ 10/061 Fire lanes are required in Blocks 9, 10 and 11. Minimum width
is 20 feet and this must be maintained throughout the length of the fire
lane. The fire lanes shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained
unobstructed. The fire lanes must be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather
driving surface (asphalt or concrete) capable of supporting fire apparatus
weights. Compacted road base shall be used only for temporary fire lanes or
at construction sites. The fire lanes are required to be designated on the plat
as an Emergency Access Easement.
Understood.
Number: 79 Created: 5/ 10/2006
(5/ 10/06] The roundabout at Morningstar and Brightwater must have
rollover curbs.
Understood.
Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Ward Stanford
Topic: Traffic
Number: 93 Created: 5/ 15/ 2006
[5/ 15/061 Per the Street Master Plan, Brightwater is the collector street and
the portion of Morningstar west of the Parkside Dr is a Collector. The TIS
indicates that more traffic will enter/exit the subdivision at Morningstar and
Page I I of 15
This will be shown as being demolished on the final plans, with a
pedestrian ramp added as required.
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Bruce Vogel
Topic: Zoning
Number: 5 Created: 5 / 2 / 2006
[5/2/06] Trees must conform to streetlight/tree standards.
Done_
Number: 6 Created: 5 / 2 / 2006
[5/2/06] Before specific comments can be made, I suggest that we have a
utility coordination meeting on this project with all participating utilities.
There appears to be several areas that could cause some conflict. We will
also need to know what type of buildings are going in and possible meter
locations. Also, is this project going to be built all at one time or phased?
The project will be phased. The utility coordination meeting was held
May 17.
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carte Dann
Topic: Fire
Number: 67 Created: 5/ 10/2006
[5/ 10/06] Per the Larimer County Rules of the Street, continuous streets
need continuous names (Companion and Fleet line up, Zephyr and
Outrigger line up).
Per meeting with PFA and Tech Services, Zephyr has been renamed to
Outrigger. Decision was made not to continue using Fleet for the
courts directly north of Fleet. These are now named Squib and Skiff
Courts.
Number: 68 Created: 5/ 10/2006
[5/ 10/06] At the point where Gangway turns 90 degrees, it must be
renamed (between lot 297/298 on plat sheet 5).
Name has been changed to Plank Lane.
Number: 69 Created: 5/ 10/2006
[5/ 10/06] Companion Street and Companion Court are not allowed, nor is
Fleet Drive and Fleet Court. Once you use the street name, changing the
"suffix" is not allowed (from Street to Court or Way or Lane, etc.).
Companion Court is now Skiff Court.
Number: 70 Created: 5/ 10/2006
[5/ 10/06] Windward is too much like Windwood, so it must be changed.
Windward is now Daysailer Way.
Number: 71 Created: 5/ 10/2006
[5/ 10/06] Backwind Lane does not need to exist. The two streets coming
from either side keep their names up until the apex.
Backwind Lane is no longer used.
Number: 72 Created: 5/ 10/2006
[5/ 10/06] Zephyr Road already exists, so it must be renamed.
Zephyr is now Outrigger Way.
Number: 73 Created: 5/ 10/2006
Page 10 of 15
Number: 47 Created: 5/9/2006
[5/9/06] See 7.4.1.A.6 for transitions for roadway shifts and lane drops.
Understood.
Number: 48 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] See 3.6.6 for emergency access requirements.
Done.
Number: 81 Created: 5 / 11 / 2006
[5/ 11/061 A striping sheet must be provided and approved before going to
hearing.
Understood.
Topic: Street Names
Number: 8 Created: 5/8/ 2006
[5/8/06] Zephyr is already taken (south of Kechter, west of Timberline).
Zephyr has been replaced by Outrigger Way, an extension of an
existing street name in the subdivision to the south.
Number: 45 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] Streets have not been named in accordance with our street
naming criteria. Suggest a meeting between PFA and Tech Services to clear
up the issues as soon as possible.
The current plan reflects the results of the meeting with PFA and
Tech Services.
Topic: Utility PIans
Number: 22 Created: 5/8/2006
[5/8/06] See Appendix E4 for all information that must be shown on the
plans before going to hearing. Please complete the checklist and submit
with the next round of review. Any information not shown on the plans
required by the checklist will become a new comment that will need to be
addressed before going to hearing.
Understood.
Number: 23 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] Horizontal Control Sheet - Please label and dimension all
sidewalks, crosspans, parking stalls, drive aisles, easements, etc.
Done.
Number: 26 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] Please see Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. May need to
change the scale and break some sheets into more sheets so that they scan
properly.
Done.
Number: 28 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] Incomplete Legend.
Legend has been corrected.
Number: 29 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] Sheet 13 shows an existing street stub or driveway on the north
side of Brightwater just west of Longboat Way. This will need to be closed.
Please provide a pedestrian ramp as required for a T-Intersection.
Page 9 of 15
Number: 33 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] Morningstar is considered a collector unless this development
goes through the formal process to have it downgraded. No crosspans are
allowed in collectors so the one at Morningstar and Turnberry will have to
come out (unless the road is formally downgraded of course).
Per existing city classifications, Morningstar is a collector west of the
intersection with Brightwater. Morningstar between Brightwater and
Turnberry is classified as a local connector. Cross pans are not
restricted on local connectors. However, at this time a crosspan is not
required.
Number: 35 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] No plan and profiles were given for any street in this submittal.
Please see Appendix E4 for the minimum information required before going
to hearing. Expect more comments to follow in the next round.
Plan and profiles are provided with this submittal and are designed
per City of Fort Collins Criteria.
Number: 36 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] Eyebrows must be designed in accordance with Figure 7-23, those
shown are not.
Eyebrows have been replaced with cul-de-sacs.
Number: 37 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] Sight distance triangles and calculations need to be shown on all
plan sets and dedicated on the plat.
Done.
Number: 38 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] Cul-de-sacs must be designed in accordance with Figure 7-19 and
7-21 with detached sidewalks. See 19.2.3 for minimum parking
requirements in a cul-de-sac.
Done.
Number: 43 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] The typical street sections on the utility plan cover sheet are
incorrect. Please see chapter 7 in LCUASS and red -lines. Need an ultimate
typical street section for Turnberry in addition to the two additional sections
for Morningstar (if the median stays).
Typical street sections have been corrected.
Number: 44 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] This project is responsible for the design and construction of the
interim along their Turnberry frontage plus a 1000' of preliminary design to
the north and south. Some of the preliminary design may have been done
by the Lind development and may be used to fulfill all or a portion of this
requirement. This project is also responsible for the ultimate design along
their frontage plus the 1000' offsite.
Understood.
Number: 46 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] Consistent radii shall be used in accordance with 7.4.1.A.3.
Understood.
Page 8 of 15
[5/9/06] From Technical Services: Sub title needs to be fixed to include
unplatted area of Richards Lake and except out the City owned parcel.
Done.
Topic: Street Design
Number: 12 Created: 5/ 8/ 2006
[5/8/06] Only one typical section is provided for Morningstar when there
appears to be three according to the horizontal control sheet in the utility
plans. What are the typical sections for the remaining two? Will need to see
these before any approvals are given.
Number: 13 Created: 5/ 8/ 2006
Sections have been added.
[5/8/06] The median in Morningstar is being discussed and has not been
approved as of yet.
This has been discussed and agreed.
Number: 14 Created: 5/ 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] The T-Intersection at Gangway and Brightwater needs a
pedestrian ramp on the north side.
A ramp has been added.
Number: 15 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] The intersection of Morningstar and Parkside needs pedestrian
ramps on the east side.
Ramps have been added.
Number: 16 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] Remove the north south pedestrian ramps on Gangway.
Done.
Number: 17 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] Richard's Lake subdivision stubbed out Barnswallow to your
property line and this development is tying into it in such a way that the
existing street stub is left going nowhere. This development will need to
turn the intersection into a T-Intersection and remove the existing street
stub or realign your streets so they tie in better.
Understood.
Number: 18 Created: 5/ 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] Provide directional ramps on the north side of Brightwater and at
Morningstar/Turnberry (currently showing the old radius style).
Done.
Number: 31 Created: 5/ 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] The minimum centerline radius of 600' is not being met on
Brightwater (minor collector). Please see chapter 7 in LCUASS for other
standards not being met.
Stantec will submit a variance request for this.
Number: 32 Created: 5/ 9/ 2006
[5/9/06] Little to no information was provided for existing offsites within
150' of the project. The next submittal showing this information may trigger
new comments and may require additional changes to the plan sets.
Understood.
Page 7 of 15
0
[5/9/06] Landscaping in the median will not be maintained by the city nor
will any damage to the road caused by the irrigation system. All
landscaping/road damage must be maintained by the development and the
future HOA and language as such will be included in the Development
Agreement. Landscape medians must include drainage facilities to handle
sprinkler runoff and nuisance flows. Refer to Appendix C for all other
requirements.
Understood.
Topic: Pavement Management
Number: 7 Created: 5/ 8/ 2006
[5/8/06] From Rick Richter: Some high swell soils, will need to address
that in the pavement design later.
Understood.
Topic: Ped Connections
Number: 9 Created: 5/8/2006
[5/8/06] Need to provide pedestrian connections to Beamreach and
Catamaran Courts. Tract F needs to include an access easement in
addition to drainage and utility easement specified.
Pedestrian connections have been added, an access easement is
shown on the plat.
Number: 19 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] Provide enough space between lots 168 and 169 at the corner of
Companion/Helmsman for the sidewalk connection in Tract A. Typically,
an additional 2' is required on either side of the sidewalk at minimum but
this might present landscaping problems. May want to make it wider or just
put the whole width in concrete and widen out the sidewalk 4'.
Done.
Topic: Plat
Number: 63 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] From Technical Services: Boundary and legal close but do not
match. Several numbers do not match.
Corrected.
Number: 64 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] From Technical Services: Please show ties to oil radii. Locate
easement.
Done.
Number: 65 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] From Technical Services: Does the City own Tract J? If so, it
should be excepted out of ownership.
The neighborhood park was Tract J as part of the 1st filing. This
reference to Tract J has been removed from these plans and is
excepted out of ownership for this submittal. This is not to be
confused with Tract Jon our plans, which contains the oil well site
on the north side of Cruiser Lane. This Tract J is not owned by the
city and is included in this submittal.
Number: 66 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
Page 6 of 15
[5/ 11/06] Please contact Eric Bracke regarding the roundabout design.
Eric has provided input to the revised roundabout design.
Number: 82 Created: 5 / 11 / 2006
[5/ 11/06] See redlines for other comments. Jim - we might want to go over
the typical street sections before you resubmit. I noticed you're mixing curb
types with this one and we need to make sure its real clear what goes
where. Thanks!!
Redline comments have been addressed.
Topic: Grading
Number: 27 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] Slopes can not exceed 4:1 and grades at the back of walk must be
flat to nearly flat for a minimum of 2'. Some areas have extremely steep
slopes shown (not labeled) and may require a retaining wall. Utilities are
another concern (no structures are allowed in utility easements). All lots
less than 50' will need to show the driveway and utility locations on the plan
sets to make sure everything fits, including the street tree. A utility
coordination has been set for 2pm next Wednesday, the 17th of May to work
out all the issues. All items must be resolved and approved by the utilities
prior to going to hearing.
Understood
Number: 40 Created: 5/9/2006
[5/9/06] Maximum drainage across a public sidewalk is 750sf or provide a
sidewalk chase.
Understood We will be providing chases to drain Alleys.
Number: 41 Created: 5/9/2006
[5/9/06] Sidewalk grades are an issue. It appears that you are exceeding
maximum slopes per ADA requirements. Please label all sidewalk slopes
where appropriate.
Done.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Number: 51 Created: 5/9/2006
[5/9/06] All landscaping within the medians must conform to the sight
distance note. There may be sight distance issues with the landscaping
within the medians at the intersections along Morningstar.
The current design has been reviewed for conformance to
requirements.
Number: 52 Created: 5/9/2006
[5/9/06] Show all utilities.
Done.
Number: 53 Created: 5/9/2006
[5/9/06] Show, dimension, label all sight distance easements.
Done.
Number: 54 Created: 5/9/2006
[5/9/06] Show, label, dimension all easements, row.
Shown on site plan.
Number: 55 Created: 5/9/2006
Page 5 of 15
Done.
Number: 24 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] Need to dimension all sidewalks and trail widths.
Done.
Number: 25 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] Is this project being phased? If so, each phase will need to meet
emergency access requirements. Each phase must be stand alone and do
not leave necessary improvements to future phases.
Project will be built in 3 phases. The site plan has been updated to
show the phasing and demonstrate emergency access requirements
have been met for each phase.
Number: 30 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] A modification is required where street spacing exceeds 660'. This
spacing requirement has been exceeded in numerous areas.
Per discussions with Susan Joy and David Averili, an alternative
compliance request has been submitted in which a pedestrian
connection is proposed as an alternative in cases where the street
spacing exceeds 660' per Fort Collins LUC Section 3.6.3(M.
Number: 42 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] Need to show the existing rights of way and what you are planning
to have vacated. Will need legals and exhibits for each proposed vacation
along with an $800 filing fee for each vacation. Larimer County Filing Fees
also apply but those will be determined at a later time.
Understood.
Number: 49 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] Parking stalls need to be 9x19'. Can overhang a sidewalk up to 2'
and reduce the parking stall to 17' but the sidewalk width needs to be
increased an additional 2' to make up for it.
This has been corrected.
Number: 50 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] Does the sidewalk between the MF units off Cruiser qualify as a
major pedestrian spine in lieu of a public street? Will need a utility
coordination to make sure the utilities can serve the MF areas as proposed.
The sidewalk between the SFA units off Cruiser is not required to be a
major walkway spine. The primary entrance to each unit is
connected to and no further than 200' from a street sidewalk per Fort
Collins LUC 3.5.2(C)(I).
Number: 58 Created: 5 / 9 / 2006
[5/9/06] There are so many requirements not shown on the various plan
sets that it is difficult to review this set with any detail. Some comments
will change the layout slightly which may trigger more comments if the
changes still do not meet standards. See LCUASS for all other standards
and requirements not already commented on and bring the plan sets into
conformance. More comments to follow when more detail is given.
Understood.
Number: 80 Created: 5/ 11 / 2006
Page 4 of 15
0
Beginning with the next comment (from Current Planning/Tara Leman) the
remaining comments in this letter are the same as in the previous City staff
comment letter dated 5/25/06.
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Tara Leman
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 4 / 20 / 2006
[4/20/06] Regarding Proposed Street Names: Backwind Lane, Companion
Street, Cruiser Lane, Gangway Drive, Helmsman Street, Jetty Court,
Navigator Way, Transom Lane, Windward Street, and Zephyr Street are
acceptable street names and have been reserved in the Larimer County
Street Inventory System.
Thanks. Zephyr Street has been replaced by Outrigger Way and
Backwind Lane has been eliminated per subsequent comments.
Companion Court cannot be used in conjunction with Companion Street.
Fleet Court cannot be used in conjunction with the existing Fleet Drive. If
you would like to submit additional names, please contact Tara Leman at
970-416-2283 or tleman@fcgov.com.
Companion Court is now Skiff Court, Fleet Court is now Squib Court.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
Number: 11 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] There is a trail shown on the Site Plan parallel to Barns -wallow
Circle in Tract F that does not appear on the utility plans.
This has been added to the utility plans.
Number: 20 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] A sidewalk is shown to the north from Tract A but doesn't show
what it connects to on the utility plans. The Site plan vaguely shows an
equestrian trail but nothing is dimensioned and it is not shown where the
trail goes to the east.
The sidewalk and trail been clarified on the site and utility plans.
Where does the existing equestrian trail go? It disappears at the northeast
corner of the property (site plan), does not appear on the utility plans except
for "kind of, sort of on sheet 12 which is the grading plan. In addition,
there appears to be an existing trail on the north side of lots 112-114 and a
driveway of some sort onto Tumberry Road. Is this being realigned? If not,
will need access easements on these lots. This driveway may need to be
closed. Will need more info before a determination can be made.
This area has been reworked in the resubmitted plans.
Number: 21 Created: 5 / 8 / 2006
[5/8/06] All sheets, all plan sets, need to show all existing features within
150' of the project boundaries so we can see how you're tying in and that all
separation distances, street alignments, etc, are being provided.
Page 3 of 15
eliminated. The lots/units should be numbered consecutively, 1
through whatever, as they are on the subdivision plat, without block
numbers.
Lots/units are now numbered sequentially, with no block numbers.
6. On Sheets 2, 4, and 6 of the Site Plans the street name Turnberry
Road (County Road 11) should be added where appropriate.
Done.
7. The existing detention pond at the northwest corner of Turnberry
Road and Brightwater Drive should be labeled on Sheet 6 of 17 of the
Site Plans.
Done.
8. The Future City Park site should be labeled as such on Sheets 2 and
5 of the Site Plans.
Done.
9. Richard's Lake should be labeled on sheet 5 of 17 of the Site Plans.
Done.
10. The required "neighborhood center" in the LMN - Low Density
Mixed -Use Neighborhood District, per Section 4.4(D)(3) of the LUC,
should be labeled on Sheet 3 of 17 of the Site Plans. Somewhere in
the General Notes on Sheet 1 of 17 of the Site Plans it must
identify and describe the neighborhood center regarding the
necessary 2 uses. This must be done to ensure that the
aforementioned section of the LUC is being satisfied.
A general note has been added specifying the two uses as
community facility (meeting room that can be publicly leased) and
neighborhood recreation facility.
11. The county subdivision north of Water's Edge at Richard's Lake is
actually Serramonte Highlands (not Heights) and is in the FA1 -
Farming Zoning District in Larimer County.
Done.
12. It appears that there are only 15 sheets (not 17) in the Site Plan,
Landscape Plan, and Building Elevations set of plans. The sheet
numbers should be changed to reflect this.
Done.
13. The previous comments relating to the labeling of streets, Future
City Park, Richard's Lake, neighborhood center, and existing
detention pond apply to the Landscape Plans, as well.
Done.
14. City staff is strongly recommending that a utility coordination
meeting be held, and the sooner the better. Susan Joy of
Engineering will help you schedule the meeting.
A utility coordination meeting was held May 17. Current plans
reflect decisions.
Page 2 of 15
L�
Water's Edge at Richard's Lake
Response to PDP staff review comments dated May 25, 2006.
Staff has reviewed your submittal for WATER'S EDGE AT RICHARD'S
LAKE, PDP - TYPE 2 REVIEW, and we offer the following comments:
The following comments are being forwarded to the applicant since the
original letter dated 5 / 17 / 06:
1. As stated at staff review on May 10til, the west face of Block 13
exceeds the allowable 700' without a mid -block pedestrian
connection, as set forth in Section 4.4(E)(1)(b) of the Land Use Code
(LUC). Either a pedestrian connection must be included within that
block to meet the maximum 700' distance or a modification of the
standard must be submitted to City staff for review, with the Planning
&, Zoning Board being the ultimate decision -maker on the
modification request.
A mid -block pedestrian connection has been added.
2. The Project Development Plan (PDP) does not satisfy Section 3.6.3(D) -
Spacing of Limited Movement Collector or Local Street Intersections With
Arterial Streets of the LUC as it relates to the northeast portion of the
development. The distance of the property line along Turnberry Road
is approximately 750' - 800' long and no street connection between
Turnberry Road and Zephyr Street is being proposed. The
aforementioned LUC section requires that, in this case, a local street
connection with an arterial street (Turnberry) be spaced at an interval
not to exceed 660'. The applicant must provide the necessary street
connection or submit to City staff a request for Alternative
Compliance based on criteria set forth in Section 3.6.3(H) of the LUC.
An alternative compliance request has been submitted per Section
3.6.3(H) of the LUC and is included with this submittal. Two
pedestrian connections are provided between Turnberry Road and
Outrigger Way (previously known as Zephyr Street).
3. The Utility Plans have notes that state "See Landscape Plans for
Decorative Landscape Berm" along Lots 10 - 27 on the north side of
the PDP, just south of Serramonte Highlands. The Landscape Plans
do show landscaping in the buffer area between the 2 developments
but no "Decorative Landscape Berm". This is somewhat important in
light of the fact that residents in Serramonte Highlands are very
opposed to the density in this portion of the development.
The berm is now shown on the landscape plans.
4. There is no graphic symbol for Ornamental Trees in the Legends on
the Landscape Plans.
This has been corrected.
5. The "block numbers" as shown on the Site and Landscape Plans are
confusing and somewhat difficult to follow. They should be
Page I