Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWATER'S EDGE @ RICHARD'S LAKE - PDP - 58-86J - CORRESPONDENCE - (8)[5/8/06] Sheet 13 shows an existing street stub or driveway on the north side of Brightwater just west of Longboat Way. This will need to be closed. Please provide a ped ramp as required for a T-Intersection. Number: 112 Created: 7/4/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Key Map needs to be updated to match current layout. Number: 113 Created: 7/4/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Before Hearing - There seems to be some confusion about the cross section requirement. The spots for FL and CL are only for Locals where CL and FL stationing is being used in lieu of using only CL stationing (as the code requires). Cross sections are still required every 50' for all Arterial and Collector streets and they need to contain all information required on the checklist or LCUASS. Spots for the locals are required in final compliance, cross sections for collectors and arterials are required before hearing. 'Update - Sheri has agreed to take a striping sheet showing existing row and the proposed edge of pavement on the east side of Turnberry versus cross sections at this time. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Plat Number: 147 Created: 1 /4/2007 [1/4/07] Need an 8 ft. utility easement along all tracts unless the tracts are identified as blanket utility easements. An 8 ft. utility easement is needed along both sides of the private drives. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann Topic: Fire Number: 142 Created: 12/26/2006 [12/26/06] PFA approves the modification request pertaining to Section 3.6.2(L)(1)(b) of the FCLUC. Please note that PFA's "emergency response addressing requirements", which the modification addresses, are based on the above section of the FCLUC. The LUC, which specifies a private drive ... "is connected to only one street", is driving the modification request, not PFA's addressing requirements. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Yours Truly, Steve Olt City Planner Page 6 0 Number: 32 Created: 5/9/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Just concerned with interim Turnberry improvements and where the existing row is (do we need offsite row?), the taper to the north (do we have enough row to accommodate it?) and the left turn at Douglas. John Gooch is submitting that information with the intention of clearing up these questions and going to hearing August 17th. All other comments will follow in the Final Compliance submittal. [5/9/06] Little to no information was provided for existing offsites within 150' of the project. The next submittal showing this information may trigger new comments and may require additional changes to the plan sets. Number: 47 Created: 5/9/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Carrying this comment forward until the plans show how the proposed is tieing into the existing (see comment 32). [5/9/06] See 7.4.1.A.6 for transitions for roadway shifts and lane drops. Number: 137 Created: 7/11 /2006 [12/26/06) [7/11/06] Final Compliance - The Morningstar median has been approved with the condition that the median west of the roundabout is carried through to the Hearthfire intersection. The proposed center turn lane is unnecessary as there are no access points or driveways on either side of the street. Unused pavement breaks down faster and increases the maintenance cost to the city so no variance can be granted. The other option the developer has to remove the median for the entire length of the road to Turnberry. Note - This comment does NOT need to be addressed prior to hearing. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 22 Created: 5/8/2006 [12/26/06] [7/5/06] Thank you for submitting the checklist with this round. Just as a reminder, only highlighted items are required and reviewed before going to hearing. All unhighlighted items on the checklist are required in Final Compliance and are not reviewed prior to that. You will turn in a "fresh" E4 at the first round of final showing that all required items have been addressed in the plan sets or it'll trigger other comments. [5/8/06] See Appendix E4 for all information that must be shown on the plans before going to hearing. Please complete the checklist and submit with the next round of review. Any information not shown on the plans required by the checklist will become a new comment that will need to be addressed before going to hearing. Number: 26 Created: 5/8/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Final Compliance - May want to visit with JR in Tech Services after the first final compliance submittal to get his input as early as possible. The set still has scanning problems but this does not need to be worked out prior to hearing (it's more of a FC issue). [5/8/06] Please see Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. May need to change the scale and break some sheets into more sheets so that they scan properly. Number: 29 Created: 5/8/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4106] Final Compliance, issue still remains open. Page 5 i 0 Topic: Plan and Profiles Number: 136 Created: 7/11 /2006 [12/26/06] [7/11/061 Final Compliance - turn on existing layer. Topic: Plat Number: 63, Created: 5/9/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Repeat. [5/9/06] From Technical Services: Boundary and legal close but do not match. Several numbers do not match. Number: 64 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Created: 5/9/2006 [5/9/06] From Technical Services: Please show ties to oil radii. Locate easement. Number: 118 Created: 7/4/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Provide a tract table (who owns and maintains each tract plus what each tract is for). Number: 119 Created: 7/4/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Scanning requirements in Appendix E6 aren't being met. Number: 133 Created: 7/11/2006 [12/26/061 [7/11/06) From Technical Services: Text over text and line over text. Please correct and see Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. Number: 134 [12/26/06] [7/11/06] From Technical Services: Created: 7/11 /2006 How was Turnberry dedicated? Number: 135 Created: 7/11 /2006 [12/26/06] [7/11/06] From Technical Services: This is a preliminary plat - will need to see again in Final Compliance for more detailed comments. Topic: Street Design Number: 12 Created: 5/8/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Before Hearing - The proposed section of Morningstar west of Navigator does not tie into existing and does not meet standard. Why are there 10' sidewalks proposed for two sections west of the roundabout? [5/8/06] Only one typical section is provided for Morningstar when there appears to be three according to the horizontal control sheet in the utility plans. What are the typical sections for the remaining two? Will need to see these before any approvals are given. Page 4 Number: 145 Created: 12/28/2006 '[12/28/06] An 8' utility easement is required on both sides of the "alleys" or private drives. Number: 146 Created: 12/28/2006 [12/28/06] A Utility Coordination is required to make sure the lots can be served with the proposed layout and before the layout can be approved. Topic: Grading Number: 27 Created: 5/8/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Final Compliance. [5/8/06] Slopes can not exceed 4:1 and grades at the back of walk must be flat to nearly flat for a minimum of 2'. Some areas have extremely steep slopes shown (not labeled) and may require a retaining wall. Utilities are another concern (no structures are allowed in utility easements). All lots less than 50' will need to show the driveway and utility locations on the plan sets to make sure everything fits, including the street tree. A utility coordination has been set for 2pm next Wednesday, the 17th of May to work out all the issues. All items must be resolved and approved by the utilities prior to going to hearing. Number: 41 Created: 5/9/2006 (12/26/06] [7/4/06] Final Compliance - Please show slope info. [5/9/06] Sidewalk grades are an issue. It appears that you are exceeding maximum slopes per ADA requirements. Please label all sidewalk slopes where appropriate. Number: 108 Created: 7/4/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Show existing grading for a minimum of 50' and tie proposed into existing. Hard to tell if offsite grading is occuring due to the large property boundary line weight. Will need to see this to determine if offsite easements are required. Please reduce the line weight widths on the extra thick ones for legibility - all sheets. I can push this to Final Compliance IF it is agreed that if offsite grading easements are needed and can't be obtained, then the grading will need to change to pull everything back on site. Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 55 Created: 5/9/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Final Compliance - Just keeping this comment alive until these conditions are included in the DA. [5/9/06] Landscaping in the median will not be maintained by the city nor will any damage to the road caused by the irrigation system. All landscaping/road damage must be maintained by the development and the future HOA and language as such will be included in the Development Agreement. Landscape medians must include drainage facilities to handle sprinkler runoff and nuisance flows. Refer to Appendix C for all other requirements. Topic: Overall Utility Plan Number: 114 Created: 7/4/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Final Compliance - Hard to read, probably won't scan. Suggest breaking this out into more sheets for legibility. Page 3 [12/26/061 [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Comment 100 by Ward Stanford in Traffic will require that this required left turn lane will have to be either designed and constructed with this development or just designed with an equivalent cash amount to construct it in the future in the form of a contribution in aid. I will bring the matter to Trans Coordination today if possible or next week at the latest. Will need a preliminary design/layout prior to going to hearing. Number: 105 Created: 7/4/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Final Compliance - The ramps at Jettyand Skiff are not correct. Please treat as a T-Intersection. Number: 106 Created: 7/4/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Before Hearing - Please provide a section through the proposed retaining wall on the north side of lots 112 and 113 so that we can determine if offsite easements are required. Please indicate the property line on the section and consider the excavation requirements to install the wall. How tall will it be? Will need bottem and top of wall spots on the utility plans. Number: 107 Created: 7/4/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Final Compliance - Missing ramps at Fleet and Morningstar as well as a ped refuge area in the median. Also, there is an extra ped refuge shown on Morningstar that has no purpose (located east side of Longboat), please remove. Number: 110 Created: 7/4/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Final Compliance - Shouldn't the ramp and the sidewalk line up at the south side of the MF/Parkside and Cruiser? Number: 111 Created: 7/4/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Final Compliance - Please note on the Site and Utility Plans that driveway access will not be allowed for the "A" lots on Daysailor and Outrigger and that all garage/driveway access must occur off the alley or private drive. This note will also be made in the Development Agreement. Number: 117 Created: 7/4/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Driveways must be perpendicular to the road (plus or minus 10 degrees) for a minimum of 25'. Number: 143 Created: 12/26/2006 [12/26/06] All comments from the last round were carried forward because only a modification request was received with this round. Number: 144 Created: 12/28/2006 [12/28/06] The proposed median in the local street will not be landscaped or maintained by the city. In addition, it must remain in row (not in a tract) and no structures of any kind are allowed within it. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins VIGNETTE STUDIOS 144 N MASON ST #2 FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Date: 01 /19/2007 Staff has reviewed your submittal for WATERS EDGE AT RICHARD'S LAKE PDP - TYPE II, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Before Hearing Number: 138 Created: 7/11 /2006 [12/26/06] [7/11/06] In order to go to hearing, please address all "Before Hearing" comments but basically what I need is the Morn ingstar/Turn berry intersection design showing the reworked median with the striping called out and dimensioned, an interim striping sheet for Turnberry showing the existing row, proposed edge of pavement, burrow ditch(?) on the Lind side and the taper lengths called out to the north so we can see if offsite row is needed, and the left turn at Douglas design with the taper lengths called out and the row shown (offsite row needed?). We can leave the retaining wall cross section to Final Compliance if all agree that it may need to be moved back into the site to avoid offsite grading or that offsite easements may be required. I'm not going to return any redlines since we're going to work out the important issues informally. All other comments are Final Compliance comments and do not apply at this time. Topic: General Number: 21 Created: 5/8/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Repeat. Final Compliance item with the understanding that we'll have to work through any new issues at that time. [5/8/06] All sheets, all plan sets, need to show all existing features within 150' of the project boundaries so we can see how you're tying in and that all separation distances, street alignments, etc, are being provided. Number: 42 Created: 5/9/2006 [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Repeat. Final Compliance. The developer has two choices for the street stub's existing row. First choice is to research who would receive the row (neighbor to north? Or the other site's HOA?) and then work out an access easement to connect your sidewalk through there OR leave the row as is and then agree to maintain the area with this development's HOA. If this is the option you would prefer, then the sidewalk could be repositioned away from the lot to the south and the area could be landscaped as more of an entry feature to your development. [5/9/06] Need to show the existing rights of way and what you are planning to have vacated. Will need legals and exhibits for each proposed vacation along with an $800 filing fee for each vacation. Larimer County Filing Fees also apply but those will be determined at a later time. Number: 104 Created: 7/4/2006 Page 1