HomeMy WebLinkAboutLITTLE BEAR'S CHILD CARE - FDP - FDP120012 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 -RESPONS- Please see the revised silo plan
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
06/192012: Please block out around the text on sheet 2. See redlines.
RESPONSE: Ple.;se : vu i,,u rcvued tr.le piun.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanford@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/20/2012
06/20/2012: Signing and Marking notes should be revised to state "local entity traffic engineer"
at each instance that they currently state "local entity engineer'. This is a permanent change to
the signing and marking notes. Please revise your standard note file to reflect the change.
RESPONSE'
Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/202012
06/20/2012: If sign is moved, it is strongly suggested that the new location is coordinated with
the locations of the existing water/sewer services and fire line so that the sign does not
interfere with future maintenance of these services.
RESPONSE. ,leayeu. li ki, sign neuves, it will gu ;hiough the sign permit process
-
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/192012
06/19/2012: If additional landscaping is planned along Riverside, show existing water/sewer
services and fire line and provide the required separation distances.
.,_ b;- jNSE: No additional landscaping is proposed along Rwersio�_
Department: Zoning
Contact: Gary Lopez, 970-416-2338, glopez@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/15/201206/15/2012: Reminder that all signs and their
locations are not approved by the PDP or theFDP. A separate sign permit is required for approval, this
includes refacing of existing signs.
RESPONSE: We have labeled the sign as an existing sign, the future location of which is to be determined
through the separate sign permit process.
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
0611912012: Please change the sheet number to 4 of 4.
RESPONSE: Please see the revised elevation sheet.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
06/19/2012: Please change the datum for the benchmark on sheets 1 & 2. The City of Fort
Collins Vertical Control Network is on the 1929 Datum (unadjusted).
RESPONSE. Revised.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
06/1912012: Please remove "Riverside II Condo Amended" from the sub -title. The Site Plan
shows Lot 2, Viking I Subdivision being part of this project. Please add this to the sub -title.
RESPONSE: [Revisedj
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
06/192012: Please coned the lot designations on sheets 3 & 4. See redlines.
RESPONSE. [Revised]
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
06/192012: There are line over text issues on sheet 3.
RESPONSE: [Revised]
Topic: General
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
06/19/2012: The 2 legal descriptions for the right of way dedication state that the land is for
easement purposes. Please change this to right of way.
RESPONSE: We have changed this as requested.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
06/19/2012: Please block out around the text on sheet 3. See redlines.
RESPONSE: Piea&t: c-:e sndscape plan
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/192012
06/19/2012: Please increase the size of the legal description text on sheet 1. See redlines.
RESPONSE: Please see the revised site plan.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
06/192012: Please increase the text size on sheet 2. See redlines.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/05/2012
O6/05/2012: There is an existing streetlight on Elizabeth St. as shown on the site plan. Street
tree locations must be adjusted to provide 40 ft. clearance between the light pole and street
trees (15 ft. if the tree is an ornamental type).
RESPONSE: We have double cl ie�ked to ensure that these separation distances are adhered to. We have
a canopy street tree just over 40 feet away, and an ornamental just over 15 feet away from the street light.
Department: PFA
Contact: Ron Gonzales, 970-416-2864, ronzales@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1. Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
06/19/2012: Address numerals required to be visible from the street fronting the property.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 2. Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
06/1912012: This is classified as an 1-4 institutional day care facility. It is required to be
licensed by the State of Colorado.
RESPONf - Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 3. Comment Originated: 06119/2012
06/1912012: The existing fire sprinkler system shall be extended to cover any new areas in
need of proper fire protection coverage.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 4. Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
06/19/2012: Should grease -laden vapors be generated while heating meals, fire protection will
be required under a Type 1 hood.
RESPONSE. Acknowledged.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, waamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
O6/19/2012: Please use the City's hydrology computation method per our Stormwater Criteria
Manual. This should actually reduce the quantity detention volume requirement.
RESPONSE see revised drainage report
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/19/2012
06/19/2012: Discussions need to take place on what treatment method is best for water quality.
P? SPONSF sec revised drainage reps
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated 06/19/2012
O6119/2012: Stormwater is ready for a public hearing.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged.
Department: Technical Services
RESPONSE: Acknowledged.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tuchanan@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/2012012
06/20/2012 Label all existing trees as to type and size with intent to protect, transplant or
remove. It appears all existing trees are can be retained. Meeting with City Forester on site can
provide this information to the applicant to record on the plan.
RESPONSE: We do intend to retain all existing trees, and therefore we are not triggering any transplant
issues nor are we triggering any tree mitigation issues. We did meet with Tim Buchanan on the site and
have included this information on the landscape plan.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/20/2012
06/20/2012: Add tree protection notes in 3.2.1 G
RESPONSE: We have now added this note. Please see the revised landscape plan.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/20/2012
06120/2012: There are two existing maple trees on the west border of the parking lot. These
two trees are not shown on the plan as existing. New trees are shown where these trees are
located.
RESPONSE: It was an inadvertent error that we left these trees off the drawings. We intend to retain these
trees (as well as all other existing trees).
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/20/2012
06/2012012: Separation distances for trees are 10 between water and sewer mains and 6 feet
for service lines.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224-6152, dmartine@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/05/2012
06/05/2012: Records show that the existing building has 5 electric meters of 100 amps each
(500 amps total capacity) at 120/240 volt single phase. If any changes to the existing electric
service is necessary, please contact Light & Power Engineering at (970)221-6700.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/05/2012
06/05/2012: Electric development charges will apply for the lot at 1230 E. Elizabeth, even if no
power is required to the site.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/05/2012
06/05/2012: Clearance of 8 ft. on the front (door) side, and 3 ft. on the other three sides of the
transformer must be maintained. Also, the transformer must be accessible to utility personnel
and equipment. The electric meter(s) must be accessible to utility personnel at all times without
obtaining permission or an escort.
RESPONSL the transformer is accessible from the Riverside Avenue outside of any fenced area
06/19/2012: Please confine with Water/Wastewater but engineering would request that existing
and proposed (if applicable) water, sewer, and services be shown on the grading plan if a
utility plan is not provided.
RESPONSE: We did not receive this request from WM/W and are not able to find the location of the water
and sewer services for this building.
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/192012
06/192012: Thank you to the Owner, Applicant and Consultant's for addressing the conceptual
review comments adequately.
RESPONSE: You're welcome
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/192012
06/192012: As mentioned in Conceptual Review this project is responsible for dedicating right
of way for East Elizabeth to meet the 76' wide right of way for collector with parking. The Viking
I subdivision plat shows 60' was dedicated previously, however the right of way proposed to
be dedicated by separate document is only 6' and the proposed dedication is shown as 7' on
the site plan. Please provide additional information to support only dedicating 6' of additional
right of way. If no other documents support a situation where this project is responsible for half
the remaining right of way then 8' will need to be dedicated.
RESPONSE: Please see the accompanying dedication documentation for 1 foot of additional ROW along
Riverside, and an additional 8 feet along East Elizabeth.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/192012
06/192012: It appears that fencing is proposed inside of the existing access and utility
easement off of Elizabeth Street. The fence will need to be located outside of the easement.
RESPONSE: We've submitted a formal application to vacate this easement on Friday July 20"i.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 06202012
06202012: The sign along Riverside exists within the Right of Way. Please remove the note
from the plans "existing sign to remain". Further discussions will need to occur with Zoning and
an encroachment permit may be an option.
RESPONSE: We have labeled this existing sign as an existing sign, the future location of which is to be
determined through the separate sign permit process.
Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573,
slangenberger@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/14/2012
06/14/2012: The project owes an additional $215 for TDR fees. The acreage calculation on the
application did not match that identified on the site plan.
RESPONS- We submitted this fee as soon as we received this comment, so it has now been paid.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/082012
06/08/2012: No comments.
LITTLE BEARS CHILD CARE
COMBINED PDP/FINAL
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
7/25/2012
Department: Current Planning
Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970-416-2283, clevingston@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/14/2012
06/14/2012: Is the Shed exisiting or proposed? If proposed, please provide detail on
elevations.
RESPONSE: The shed elevations are now shown on sheet 4 of 4
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/14/2012
06/14/2012: Please call out the location of the transformer on landscape plans. All utilities must
be screened.
RESPONSE Please see the revised landscape plan,
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/142012
06/14/2012: Please call out where the main entrance will be located.
RESPONSE: Please see the revised plans
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/052012
07/052012: For final, please include the owners information on the title page.
RESPONSE. This information is now included on the title page.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/14201206/14/2012: For final, please provide bike rack,
trash enclosure and automobile parking stalldetail to ensure each meets the LUC standards.
RESPONSE. Please see the details loi ihese items now, included on the revised site plan
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/142012
06/142012: Plese call out the limits of development. I believe this is signified by the dashed
line, correct?
PESaDNSE. Please see the revised sde p';an which now flows the limits of development.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/142012
06/142012: The Land Use Code only requires 1 handicapped parking space LUC3.2.2(K)
RESPONSE . eQ� cuLJGed aic w:.uei -iovan ou two spdcca w uluw Oie i'iandicap parking spaces t0 be
wide enough to meet standards.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970-221-6603, agingerich@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/19/2012