Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments - 05/03/2013Citjraf Ft�tt C [lins., Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentre view May 03, 2013 Deanne Frederickson The Frederickson Group, LLC 1619 Kelmdley Ct. Windsor, -CO RE: Ridgewood Hills Residences 4th Filing Major Amendment, MJA130003, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments; you may contact the. individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Ted Shepard, 970.221-6343, tshepard fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: As mentioned by Zoning, the Parking Data Table needs to be revised so that the required number of spaces is tabulated by the number of bedrooms per unit and then correlated to the minimum number of spaces per unit (1.5, 1.75 and 2.0). Then compare this number (which is the required minimum) with the number provided. (See redlines.) Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: On the Site Data Table, it would be helpful to add a third column for Project Total. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: On Site Plan sheet 2 of 4, please consider re -designing the second point of access for P.F.A. by downsizing the easement to a bike and pedestrian access only. If left as a drive aisle that is blocked by bollards, then it will, over time, evolve into a vehicle use area or storage for boats, trailers, or vehicles under repair. Better to re -design it now so that it will take on a life as a connecting walkway than an unused hard surface area. A five foot wide walkway with landscaping would match the others. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: Site Plan sheet 2 of 4 should indicate what are the existing and/or proposed land uses to the east. What is the purpose of Tract C of Shenandoah? What is the zoning and potential land use for Shenandoah area south of Tract C? Is there a Shenandoah Master Plan that can be referenced? This would factor into how best to provide buffering along this property line. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: On Site Plan sheet 3 of 4, please provide a connecting walkway in Tract Z of Ridgewood Hills Third Filing. Sections 3.2.2(B) and 3.2.2(C)(7) call for off -site connections to logical points of origin and destination. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: There is a narrowing of the buffer yard along the south property line where the width is reduced to 20 feet. Per Section 3.8.30(F)(1), the minimum width must be 25 feet. It appears that five feet can be gained from the drive aisle which does not need to be 30 feet since the 30 E.A.E. is already_ provided on the north side of the building. And, a single -loaded parking bay needs only a 20-foot wide drive aisle. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05103/2013: The back -out space at the end of three parking bays looks like they need more depth in order for the proper maneuvering of vehicles moving in reverse. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: The two Major Walkway Spines need to be tree -lined in order to meet the definition in Section 5.1.2. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 The half -cul-de-sac at the terminus of Avondale should be labeled as temporary, to be removed and replaced with landscaping upon the extension of Avondale to the east. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: It is not clear whether or not there will be a common perimeter fence along the south and west property lines. If so, then a detail needs to be provided, perhaps on sheet 4 of 4. Such fence should be of high quality and feature stone (to match buildings) columns at regular intervals. If not, then additional landscaping will be needed to accomplish the necessary buffering. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: The Landscape Plan does not need a separate cover sheet and the sheet numbers should follow in sequence with the Site Plan. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: On Landscape sheet 2 of 5, please add trees along the two Major Walkway Spines so they are tree -lined in accordance with the definition. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: The currently approved plan from the previous applicant shows a "southeast trail connection." It appears this has the potential of tying into a connecting walkway at the Peyton Drive cul-de-sac. What is the status of this connection? It appears this connection would offer an off-street amenity for gaining access to the future commercial uses closer to South College Avenue. It is not clear why this was eliminated. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: Along the south and west property lines, be sure that buffer yards are carefully landscaped so that plant materials are matched to the grade to maximize effective screening. Where there is more exposure to the south and west, clusters of evergreen trees should be emphasized versus deciduous trees. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: For the connecting walkway on Tract Z, please show appropriate landscaping. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: On Landscape sheet 3 of 5, please show appropriate landscaping in the area where the second point of access for P.F.A. is re -designed to include only a bike/ped connection. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: On architectural sheets 3,4 and 5, be sure to provide sufficient detail to comply with Section 3.8.30(F)(7) which requires a variety of colors and materials among the buildings Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: On Lighting sheet E3P, be sure to specify the selection of the pole -mounted fixture. Note that high pressure sodium is more energy conserving than metal halide. And, high pressure sodium would match the public roadway lighting. Metal halide maybe not be appropriate in a residential neighborhood. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: It may helpful for the neighbors and the decision maker to see a context diagram that shows the larger region and how the project ties into Ridgewood Hills, Shennandoah and the future areas to the east. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221.6567, mvirata(o)fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please provide signage on both sides of the temporary turnaround indicating no parking along this stretch of Avondale Road in order to help ensure that the usage of the temporary turnaround is not impacted. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Light and Power and Environmental Planner 'should be removed as a signatory on the utility plan approval block. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The plan and profile of Avondale Road needs.to be extended as a preliminary design 500 feet to the east to demonstrate that the continuation of the roadway would be feasible with the design established by the project. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The plan and profile sheet has some general concerns on legibility of the information due to the small font size as well as bleeding and overlapping text. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Note that the stationing identified as the limits of construction on the centerline profile terminating Avondale Road doesn't appear to correspond with the plan set information. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Are the construction plans indicating that work is to be done to the existing inlet on Peyton Drive? Sheet 3 doesn't appear to show this, but Sheet 5 leaves it open to interpretation (and identifies Peyton Drive as Avondale Road). Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The construction plans will need to add General Notes and Construction Notes along with construction details as the plans progress. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Oriqinated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The extension of Avondale Road appears to depict a temporary turnaround on the plans and the plat shows an emergency access easement. Please label the area as a temporary turnaround on the site, landscape, and construction plans. The plat needs to add access easement to the emergency access easement designation as the temporary turnaround is not just intended for emergency services but for general public use. The construction plans show the use of vertical curb across the turnaround and would need to be built as driveover curb to more easily allow vehicles to turnaround. Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The design of the temporary turnaround does not provide sidewalk across the turnaround, which would need to have funds provided in lieu of its construction. Instead of needing to administer funds for the sidewalk for future development to construct, the project should instead build the sidewalk across the turnaround at this time. The driveover curb built today could remain in place and would not be required to be removed and replaced with vertical curb at the time of the extension of Avondale and the removal of the turnaround. Transitioning should be indicated and specified from the drive approach for the driveway to the driveover curb at the west end of the turnaround and then transitioning should also be indicated and specified from the driveover curb to the vertical curb at the east end of the turnaround. Note that the use of curb to define the eastern boundary of the turnaround including the curb within the parkway strip -isn't necessarily needed. The turnaround can be paved including the area between the sidewalk and the curb though for an example of this design and construction that doesn't utilize pavement, consider Apex Drive terminating at the west of the Pinnacle Townhomes Subdivision (south side of Prospect, west of Lemay), subject to approval by PFA. With the future extension of Avondale Road to the east by future development, the responsibility of then removing the turnaround and the installation of landscaping and trees in the parkway strip will be that of the property owner/HOA and not the future developer that extends Avondale. It is suggested that a design for the elimination of the temporary turnaround with the extension of the Avondale to east be provided at this time in order to have a design established for the property owner/HOA to plan and budget for and also to not require a minor amendment of the development plan in the future for when the turnaround is removed. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The developer will need to provide funds for the extension of Avondale Road that is not being built to the property line. The identification of the limits proposed to be constructed at this time should be clearly identified throughout the construction plans (not just on the grading plan sheet) in order to have a basis of understanding of what the extent of the limits are and to demonstrate that the proposed construction limits can be built without requiring offsite easements. If the water and sewer extensions with the extension of Avondale Road require cutting into portions of Avondale Road being built with the project, that removal area would need to be expanded and have funds provided for as well. The City has adopted a local street portion cost for frontage of $204 per linear foot for this year (which is subject to change if payment is provided next year). The $204 amount (if paid this year) is for one side of a local street and since both sides are needing to be extended with future development, the amount is essentially doubled. If sidewalk is being built at this time that are abutting portions of Avondale Roadway that are to be built in the future, the $204 per foot amount is reduced by $35 as the $204 amount also includes sidewalk. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 0510112013: The site plan -identifies an emergency access with with "grasspav2" on the site plan. The specifications should be identified on the construction plans as well. Is PFA acceptable to this design, especially with the vertical curb? The use of grasspav2 in right-of-way would need to be changed to concrete. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/0112013: There appears to be an opportunity to provide a sidewalk connection that links from the building on the southwest portion of the development out to the sidewalk along Peyton Drive through Tract Z that would offer additional connectivity opportunities for residents between neighborhoods. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The plans are not showing the installation of access ramps along the frontage at the roundabout crossing both Avondale Road and Triangle Drive. These will need to be built to the current City standards with truncated dome detection and won't match in appearance to the existing access ramps across each street. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: There is an existing access ramp along Triangle Drive abutting the far north of the property. This access ramp will need to be rebuilt to add truncated dome detection in accordance with current City standards. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The street standards requires that at public street T-intersections, an access ramp is provided at at least one location crossing the through street. The project will need to provide at least one access ramp along the frontage where Woodrow Drive intersects Avondale Drive in accordance with current City standards. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Both access points onto Avondale Road appear to require sight distance easements per the requirements in Figure 7-16 of the.street standards. The amount of sight distance is estimated in some regards with Avondale Road not designed to the east but does Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224.6143, lex(a)_fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/18/2013 04/18/2013: Staff would strongly recommend that the applicants work with the HOA to the south to provide the trail connection. From an initial view of the site's grading, it appears that a trail connection is not infeasible, and it would provide a logical connection to the HOA's existing trail to the south of this property. Please let me know if we can be of help in coordinating this discussion. Department: Light And Power Contact: Rob Irish, 970.224-6167, rirish fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 04/16/2013: Light & Power has existing electric facilities at Triangle Dr. and Avondale Rd. Any relocation_or_modification_to_existing_electric_facilities_will_be_at.owner's.expense. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 04/16/2013: Coordinate the electric, service and meter locations with Light & Power Engineering. Meters need to be ganged on one end of the building. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 04/16/2013: Coordinate pad mount transformer locations with Light & Power Engineering. Transformers need to be located within 10' of a drive -over surface. Maintain clearance of 8' in the front and 3' on the sides and back. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 04/16/2013: A C-1 form and a one -line diagram will be required for the club house. If 3-phase power is anticipated for the club house contact Light & Power Engineering early on to coordinate your power requirements. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 04/16/2013: Electric Capacity Fee and Building Site charges will apply to this development. Light & Power Engineering 970-221-6700. Comment Number: Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, Topic: General Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 970-416-28691 jlynxwilercDpoudre-fire.org Comment Number: 01 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: Carryover comment from conceptual review: STRUCTURES EXCEEDING 30' (OR THREE OR MORE STORIES) IN HEIGHT In order to accommodate aerial fire apparatus access, required fire lanes shall be 30 foot wide minimum on at least one long side of the building. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a MAXIMUM OF 30 FEET FROM THE BUILDING, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. 2006 International Fire Code Appendix D; Poudre Fire Authority Administrative Policy 85-5 appear to conflict with building placement. It should be noted that AASHTO has provided newer criteria regarding sight distance that has resulted in the City accepting variances to the values specified in Figure 7-16 resulting in typically a smaller required easement. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The subdivision plat certificate of dedication and maintenance and repair guarantee language needs to updated to newer adopted language. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The subdivision plat has a note regarding conveying easements specific to Fort Collins/Loveland Water District & South Fort Collins Sanitation District while the City's certificate of dedication statement indicates that the undersigned is conveying streets and easements laid out and designated on the plat. Since both entities have statements regarding the dedication of easements, it may call into question what are the easements being granted to City vs. easement being granted to FCLWD/SFCSD. Granting specific easements to FCLWD/SFCSD isn't a concern from my standpoint, though I'm wondering since their facilities are located in areas -that -are -labeled -as-U, D-& EAE it -may -be -open -to -interpretation -as -to -whether the-UD-&— EAEs are being conveyed to the City, FCLWD/SFCSD, or both. Perhaps each easement needs to be identified as to whom it is being dedicated to in order to leave out any ambiguity and on top of the U, D & EAE is also easements specifically for FCLWD/SFCSD. Or if acceptable to FCLWD/SFCSD, their statement might not have easements dedicated to them but rather indication that the utility easements conveyed to the City are subject to restrictions set forth in their note (and out updated plat language indicated in the previous comment has similar restriction language). If the easements identified as " U" on the plat were intended to only be dedicated to FCLWD/SFCSD, the'City should still have easements for these areas as well for City and other franchise utilities. If ultimately easements are intended to be dedicated to FCLWD/SFCSD, it would seem that they need to sign the plat signifying their acceptance. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The vacation statement in the plat applying to the vacation of drainage and temporary emergency access easements doesn't need specific sign off and acceptance by the City. It should read something to the effect that certain easements described on the recorded plat of Ridgewood Hills P.U.D. Third Filing recorded under reception no. are hereby vacated by this plat. Drainage and temporary emergency access easement shown on Tract T. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The subdivision plat identifies the owner and engineer of record which do not correspond to the owner and engineer listed on the site plan, and the engineer is incorrect. Given both documents require signature of the owner, the information should be coordinated. Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970.221-6573, slangenberger(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The project owes an additional $4,649.25 for the PDP TDRFee. It appears the three, 3-story buildings are positioned so that their setbacks from the fire lane exceed the maximum distance allowed by the 2006 IFC. The aerial apparatus access requirement may be offset by installing a full NFPA13 fire sprinkler system (rather than a 13R system). Comment Number: 02 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: SECONDARY ACCESS POINT Several discussion points arose during our development review meeting on 5l1/13 relative to the secondary access point proposed off of Triangle Drive. The questions were: Shall the secondary access be required? Are grass pavers acceptable? May bollards be. installed to prohibit unauthorized traffic on the EAE. I have since met with Assistant Fire Marshal Ron Gonzales to discuss these issues and have summarized the details here. Please contact me if you have questions or require further clarification. > The secondary access shall be required. This requirement will remain in effect until such time as Avondale -Road -is -extended -and -becomes -a secondary-connectorand/or as such -time -the — fire department deems the secondary access point is no longer required. Language to this effect may be included on the plat to allow for later removal of this portion of the EAE is so desired in the future. > Grass pavers are not permitted for surfacing of fire lanes. The fire lane shall have a hard surface which meets fire lane specifications (fire lane specifications have been included as comment no. 3). > The fire lane shall be signed as per D103.6 of appendix D of the IFC with "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at both both ends of the drive isle. > Roll over curbs are permitted. > Bollards are not permitted. A gate meeting the intent of 503.6 of the IFC shall be required (approved gates & barricades conditions have been included as comment no. 4). Comment Number: 03 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: FIRE LANE SPECIFICATIONS > Maintain the required 20 foot minimum unobstructed width & 14 foot minimum overhead clearance. > Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface capable of supporting 40 tons. > Be visible by signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. 2006 International Fire Code 503.2.3, 503.3, 503.4 Comment Number: 04 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: APPROVED GATES & BARRICADES ACROSS FIRE LANES The proposed bollards will not be permitted. Where security gates are installed, they shall have an approved means of emergency operation. The security gates and the emergency operation shall be maintained operational at all times. The PFA would prefer the installation of a gate at Triangle Drive which can be activated and opened from inside the cab of a fire apparatus. If this condition cannot be met, we will accept a gate that is secured with a Knox Padlock. The design and location of this gate needs to be reviewed and approved by the PFA prior to installation. Comment Number: 05 Comment Originated: 05/03/2013 05/03/2013: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Any hazardous materials shall be declared utilizing the HMIA as described in LUC 3.4.5. This would include the use of pesticides and pool chemistry. This comment is provided for information purposes only at this time, as the HMIA need not be provided now but shall be made available at time of the building permit process. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416.2418, wtamargue(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: The site is required to provide water quality treatment per City of Fort Collins standards. This can be done on -site, in the existing detention ponds, or a combination of both. If the existing detention ponds are used for this site's water quality mitigation, the ponds would need to be retrofitted to treat all the flows that drain to the ponds. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013:_P_lease_provide_documentation_on_how_this_site_will.meet_the_LI D_requirements. Specifically show 50% of the site area draining to a infiltrating treatment system and 25% of all private parking and drive aisles designed as porous pavement. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: A maintenance agreement between the existing HOA and this development is required for the off -site detention ponds. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221-6588, icounty(a)fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 9 Comment. Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The plans that were referenced in the index on the Site Plan sheet 1, were not routed to us for this review. We will need to see these the next round of review. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please change the title of sheet 8 and the index on sheet 1 so that they match. See redlines. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please separate the lines of text in the City Approval Signature Block on sheets 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 & 9. See redlines. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 & 8. See redlines. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: There are text over text issues on sheets 3, 4 & 5. See redlines. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please change the "(North)" & "(South)" in the titles of sheets 4 & 5, to "-North" & "-South" to be consistent with the rest of the plans. See redlines. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: There is text that is too bold and too small. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please change the titles of each sheet and the index on sheet 1 so that they match. See redlines. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 2 & 3. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/0112013: Please correct the matchline numbers on sheets 2 & 3. See redlines. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The plans that were referenced in the index on the Site Plan sheet 1, were not routed to us for this review. We will need to see these the next round of review. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please change "men" to "persons" in the Statement Of Ownership And Subdivision. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Are there any Lienholders? If so, please add the Lienholder signature block. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please change the name of the Surveyor signing for this Plat in Surveyor's Statement, signature block on all sheets, and also listed in the Surveyor information at the bottom of sheet 1. See redlines. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Should the date in the top right corner of the titleblock be updated? Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please change the initials of the Surveyor checking this Plat in the titleblock. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Do you have a newer title commitment? Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please change the Vacation Statement to the standard statement. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please check the Land Use Table on sheet 1. It does not match the Ridgewood Hills Third Filing Plat. See redlines. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: All easements shown on sheets 2 & 3 must be labeled and locatable, with the exception of easements to be vacated. See redlines. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please check the square footage of Tract A. on sheet 2. It does not match the Ridgewood Hills Third Filing Plat. See redlines. Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please include easement descriptions in the legend. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: There are symbols along the boundary that are cut off by what looks like text masks. See redlines. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please remove the "30" from the drainage easement note near the southeast corner of Tract A. See redlines. Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please make sure that all surrounding properties are labeled with subdivision names or unplatted. See redlines. Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please provide current monument records for the public land corners shown. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please change the legal description so that it matches the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please change the titles of sheet 1 so that they match. See redlines. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 2, 3 & 4. See redlines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please correct the easement descriptions. They should match the Subdivision Plat. See redlines. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Please mask the text in the Seat Wall Detail on sheet 4. See redlines. Department: Zoning Contact: Peter Barnes, 970.416-2355, pbarnes(cDfcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/11/2013 04/11/2013: Show total building height of buildings on elevation drawings (grade to roof peak). Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/11/2013 04/11/2013: Need to show building footprint/envelope dimensions. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/11/2013 04/11/2013: The site data table on Sheet 1 contains incorrect parking information. There are 208 parking spaces required for Tract A per the code (7 of which need to be HC), but the table states that 175 spaces are required. Additionally, there are a total of 282 spaces required for both Tracts, but there are only 253 total provided. So an additional 29 spaces need to be provided - unless the garage parking spaces indicated aren't included in the 'parking provided' numbers. If they aren't currently included, then the 'parking provided' numbers need to be changed to include them in order to remove the confusion. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/11/2013 04/11/2013: 291 bike parking spaces are required based on 291 bedrooms. The site data table indicates that there are a total of only 288 bike parking spaces. Of the 291 required, 175 need to be covered/enclosed. Per the table, only 172 are. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/11/2013 04/11/2013: Add notes stating that 1) all building and ground -mounted mechanical equipment will be screened and painted as required by the Land Use Code, and 2) all light fixtures will be down directional and shielded.