The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGILLESPIE FARM - ODP - 29-00 - CORRESPONDENCE - (25)e HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Corrosives, flammable liquids, reactive, or toxic materials (as defined in the Uniform Fire Code) if used, stored, or handled on site must have a Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis (HMIA) completed and supplied to the Planning Department and the Fire Department. FCLUC3.4.5(C) NOTE: This applies to the Recreation Center(s). WATER SUPPLY Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. No commercial building can be greater than 300 feet from a fire hydrant 97UFC901.2.2.2 STREET NAMES Street names shall be verified and reviewed by LETA prior to being put in service. 97UFC901.4.5 PROJECT COMMENT SHEE�'�' City of Fort Collinsffiy 5€P 0 E Current Planning' DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: PFA PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference REQUIRED ACCESS: Access shall be provided in accordance with Engineering and the FCLUC. 97UFC901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1 ADDRESS NUMERALS Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of 6 inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable).97UFC901.4.4 CUL-DE-SAC A dead-end street cannot exceed six -hundred -sixty (660) feet in length. The turn -around at the end of the street must have a outside turning radius of forty (40) feet or more, and an inside turning radius of twenty (20) feet. Short fire lanes are permitted to facilitate a second point of access when street is greater than 660 feet. All structures beyond the 660 feet limit must be fire sprinklered if second point of access cannot be provided. FCLUC3.6.2(B)(C);3.6.6(1) 97UFC902.2.2.3 RECEIVED SEP 18 20nn CURRENT PLANNING Signature 0 CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat kSite _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: Light & Power PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference RECEIVED SEP 0 6 2000 CURRENT PLANNING CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat 'Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility Redline Utility x Landscape City of Fort Collins InPROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannine DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: Streets PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference RECEIVED SEP 0 7 2000 CURRENT PLANNING &X VU/ l ((/ -71 u U Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins PROJECT go COMMENT SH E'V" City of Fort COIlinS SEP 0 5 2000 Current Planning DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: Zoning PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference RECEIVED SEP 0 7 2000 CURRENT PLANNING Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape I& City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannine DATE: August 31, 2000 17 ��: Park Planning PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) 101' . All comments must be received --lay Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference RECEIVED SEP 07 2000 CURRENT PLANNING Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other. ZUtility _Redline Utility _Landscape =W PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannine DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: AT&T Digital PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference PVC) C O lnl�n6l_n RECEIVED SEP 0 R 9nno CURRENT PLANNING Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS 'Plat mite _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _�_Y,andscape r" City of Fort Collins PROJECT (MA COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannine DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: Post Office PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference RECEIVED SEP 0 8 2000 CURRENT PLANNING Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape city of Fort Collins DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility Redline Utility _Landscape 6M City of Fort Collins goPROJECT C�� ICU! COMMENT SHE o�SEP 0 go20d00 City of Fort Collins Current Planning By DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: Trans Planning PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference e /V ram, 0 • ODP street layout and facility type is in accordance with the Master Street Plan. 4�0 y,'f'tL4,,, Improvements of existing streets and construction of new streets need to be in accordance with City design standards, including detached sidewalks, bike lanes and W parkway. 0 y • Please provide appropriate pedestrian crossing markings on the Collector streets m the vicinity of the neighborhood activity center. • Bikeway trail shown is in accordance with the Parks & Recreation Master Plan. Please make trail wide enough to accommodate both bicycle and pedestrian users (minimum width of 8'). 40�P 0044-..+0jL M • At PDP stage, please make sure design provides for good internal pedestrian and bicycle circulation and connectivity to activity centers, existing bike/ped. systems, etc. _ , e Signature o V CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat )OSite _Drainage Report c 0tner u Utility _Redline Utility !CLandscape City of Fort Collins I have seen of the Lind ODP, this application is not consistent; However, it the Engineering Departments opinion that this is more consistent with the LUC, and MSP. In addition the proposed Bike Trail, regardless of the location at which it cross an arterial street shall be designed to cross with an underpass (Street Design Manual, Section 1.02.07). Since the Mountain Vista Plan is not complete the Engineering Department is not sure if an underpass is needed at other street crossings. ♦ In general, the alignment of the internal collector streets should correspond with the Master Street Plan alignment at the respective boundaries. The alignment of the internal north/ south collector does not correspond with the Master Street Plan. In addition, the proposed alignment does not correspond with Lind ODP. The alignment should be discussed. Also, the east/ west collector shows an offset at the eastern boundary, which is not acceptable. ♦ Has the north/ south collector street along the eastern boundary been reviewed for an adequate setback from the Overland Ditch No. 8? This is more of PDP comment and a construction issue, but an issue to consider. ♦ Please add the notes and legend as shown. ♦ Please show the actual property boundary. Does the property boundary absorb the ditch or not? ♦ As noted in the first comment of this letter, the Engineering Department would like to discuss the arterial street network connections and improvements. The impacts of this project, the Lind property, and the Richard's Lake property at full build -out would have a significant impact to County Road 11. Other connections might have to be made and should be discussed. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: August 31, 2000 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) PLANNER: ENGINEER: Ron Fuchs Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: September 27, 2000 General Comments In addition to this application, the City has received three other applications in the area. One is the Lind ODP, which is just north of County Road 52. The second is an amendment to the Richard's Lake ODP. The third is the Second Filing of Richard's Lake PDP. As you will read below, the Lind and Richard's Lake properties have an effect on the layout of this site and vice versa. As a result, the Engineering Department shall require a meeting to discuss the arterial and collector street network connections and improvements, and the City Bike Trail system. Due the wave of submittals that the City has received to meet the Amendment 24 retroactive deadline, City Staff has only reviewed this application to date. Therefore, the Engineering Department would like this applicant to work with Current Planning Department to coordinate the appropriate time for a meeting. ♦ Please see redlined comments on all sheets of the Overall Development Plans. More specific comments will be mentioned below. If you have any questions, please call me (Mark McCallum) at 221-6605 ext. 7656. Overall Development Plan ♦ The proposed City Bike Trail is shown to cross County Road 52 about 700 feet from the County Road 52/ County Road 11 intersection. The Parks and Recreation Policy Plan (Master Plan) depicts the proposed City Bike Trail to connect closer to the intersection of County Road 52/ County Road 11. The location of the connection should be discussed with all pertinent City Departments. It should also be shown on context plan to show it will connect through the Lind ODP to the north. From what Date: 9 B� Signature: 1 PLEAS SEND COPIES ❑ PLAT OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS City of Fort Collins Current Planning PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: August 31, 2000 DEPT: Stormwater PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference This ODP is acceptable by the Stormwater Department. The following comments should be addressed with the submittal of the final drainage report and plans for this project. Since there were no specific comments on the plans or report, neither was returned. If you have any questions about these comments or any other concerns, please feel free to contact Donnie Dustin (970-416-2053). As mentioned during the conceptual review for this project and in your overall drainage report, the site may need to provide retention storage (two times the 100-year volume to the pond) for the flows from the site. This will be the based on the decision of the No. 8 Outlet Ditch owners. Please contact the ditch owners to discuss the potential for release into their ditch. Please note that if they allow a release into their ditch, it may be much less than the 85.6 cfs anticipated in the report. Also, if they do not allow a release, then the retention volume (two times 100-year volume) would be approximately 38 acre-feet (3.67 inches/12 * 137 acres * 2 * 0.45 [runoff coefficient]). RESPONSE: 2. Due to the large size of this project, a SWMM analysis will be required to assess the hydrologic conditions at the site. Please submit a SWMM with the final drainage report. q GillespieMP-Ldoc I Date: 12S 00 Signature: Vl� CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ��j _ PLAT SITE DRAINAGE REPORT _OTHER NK UTILITY REDLINE UTILITY LANDSCAPE City of Fort Collins LUC Division 4.4 regulating street system block size; nonresidential and mixed -use buildings and maximum residential building height. 13) See Advance Planning Comments as they relate to the neighborhood center component. 14) All redlined documents with plan revisions shall be returned to the Current Planning Department. Additional comments and the required number of revised plans may be forthcoming as the various departments including the Current Planning Department and reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Please provide a written response to each of the above comments with the submittal of plan revisions. In addition, a revised site development plan drawn to scale which is clearly dated and labeled shall be submitted to address the above. Section 2.2.11 of the Land Use Code requires that an applicant submit revisions based on this letter within 90 days or the project application becomes null and void. Your response to the City's concerns is due by January 3, 2001. A 30-day extension to this deadline is available. Request for an extension should be directed to the Current Planning Director. If remaining issues are those that do not require plan revisions, a status report verifying continuing efforts toward resolving the issues is required within the same timeline. To facilitate the complete re -submittal of the application with supplemental materials, please have your project manager contact Ginger Dodge and/or Voneen Macklin of the Current Planning Department at 970.221.6750. Please contact me at 970.221.6750 and/or e-mail: rfuchs(@ci.fort-collins.co.us if you should have any questions or concerns related to these comments. Sincerely, Ronald G. Fuchs City Planner cc: Mark McCallum Karen McWilliams Pete Wray Current Planning File #29-00 D:\My Documents\Planning Document\Gilespie Farm\Gillespie Farm CDP first filing comments.doc 2) Section 3.6.3 (D) Spacing of Limited Movement Collector or Local Street Intersections With Arterial Streets. 3) Section 3.6.3 (E) Distribution of Local Traffic to Multiple Arterial Streets. 4) Section 3.6.3 (F) Utilization and Provision of Sub -Arterial Street Connections to and from Adjacent Developments and Developable Parcels. E. Section 2.3.2 (H)(5) — Transportation Connections to Adjoining Properties — Please explain how the CDP does/does not provide for the location of transportation connections to adjoining properties to ensure connectivity into and through the overall development plan site from neighboring properties for vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle movement. F. Section 2.3.2 (H)(6) — Natural Features — Please explain how the CDP does/does not indicate the location and size of all natural areas and features within its boundaries and estimating of the limits of development and natural area buffer zones per Section 3.4.1 of the Land Use Code. G. Section 2.3.2 (H)(7) — Drainage Master Plan — What drainage basin does this overall development plan lie within and were all criteria and constraints of the Drainage Basin Master Plan were utilized in the preparation of the overall drainage report and is this CDP consistent with the Drainage Basin Master Plan. H. Section 2.3.2 (H)(8) —Application of Housing Density and Mix of Uses Calculations — This criteria requires that any standards in the Code relating to housing density and mix of uses will be applied over the entire CDP, not on each individual Project Development Plan (PDP) review, please elaborate. 11) LUC Street Pattern Connectivity: a) Sections 3.6.2, 3.6.3 and 4.4 imply that it is in the public's best interest to have neighborhoods which transition and link to surrounding neighborhoods with a unifying pattern of streets and blocks street system with multiple direct street connections at intervals not to exceed six hundred sixty (660) feet. LUC Section 3.6.3(A)-(F) requires that the local street system provide multiple direct connections with a street system pattern of through streets to facilitate traffic movements. Streets need to connect to other streets within and through a development and to existing and future streets outside the development to serve parks, schools or other public and private lands within a neighborhood (see attached redlines). i) Factoring a road system on the north, south, west and east property lines, the street system needs to provide for both intra- and inter -neighborhood connections to knit developments together (i.e. street connections to future streets and future developable lands and internal to the property as required by LUC Section 2.3). The Code requires a minimum of three (3) potential roadway connections on each north, west, east and south property lines. A request to not comply with street connections to the west across County Road 11 into the Fort Collins Country Club would be compelling; however, the elimination of street access designations into that portion noted as Anheuser-Busch, Poudre School District Site and the Allen site (Lind Property) is not warranted. In order to comply with 2.3.2(H) there is the need to provide street connectivity on a 660 feet street system layout. We need to meet to discuss the alternative compliance as requested and submitted. b) To assist City staff and the Planning and Zoning Board in evaluating the alternative compliance of code standards, a legitimate plan meeting code standards needs to be submitted. To assist the Decision Maker in determining Alternative Compliance, a revised narrative needs to be submitted to the City addressing Land Use Code Section 3.6.3. 12) The plan needs to comply with all limitations imposed by the Land Use Code including the Land Use Standards of LUC Division 4.4 as it regulates density; mix of housing; neighborhood centers; other nonresidential development; facing uses; small neighborhood parks; and, Development Standards of 4 d. General topographical mapping at same scale as the overall development plan, please include contour lines on the overall development plan. 4) As required by the City of Fort Collins Development Manual, the vicinity map needs to include an area at least one (1) mile of the site showing the following: a. Major public facilities; are any beyond the 24-inch waterline? 5) Please provide a written narrative addressing the Overall Development Plan Submittal Requirements (3)(d)(i)-(vii) [note (i) has been addressed] as outlined by the City of Fort Collins Development Manual. (i) Statement of appropriate City Plan Principles and Policies achieved by the proposed Overall Development Plan. (ii) Description of existing and proposed, open space, buffering, landscaping, circulation, transition areas, wetlands and natural areas. (iii) Estimate of number of employees for commercial and industrial uses. (iv) Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant. (v) Written narrative addressing each concern/issue raised at the neighborhood meeting(s).... . (vi) Name of the project as well as any previous name(s) the project may have been known by. (vii) A narrative description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated. 6) Please provide a formatted breakdown of densities (gross and net) per the Development Manual. 7) Please include percentages of total land area included in the residential, business and commercial areas. 8) The location of all proposed and existing arterial, collector and connector streets and major pedestrian and bicycle routes, including major points of access need to be proposed and shown on the plan sets as required by the City of Fort Collins Development Manual. 9) The approximate location and size in acres of any public use needs to be shown as required by the City of Fort Collins Development Manual. 10) Please provide written information complementing the submitted Statement of Planning Objectives for each of the standards of LUC Section 2.3.2(H) justifying compliance with applicable land use standards: a. Section 2.3.2 (H) of the Land Use Code identifies eight possible criteria for reviewing Overall Development Plans. An ODP must comply with all applicable criteria or request a modification. A. Section 2.3.2 (1-1)(1) — Permitted Uses and District Standards — Please explain how the ODP does/does not meet the permitted uses and applicable zone district standards of zone districts contained within the boundaries of the ODP and is consistent with any applicable general development standards. B. Section 2.3.2 (1-1)(2) — Residential Densities — Please explain how the ODP does/does not meet the residential density ranges of the LMN districts. C. Section 2.3.2 (1-1)(3) — Contiguity Requirements of the Compact Urban Growth Standards — Please explain how the ODP does/does not meet the contiguity requirements that at least 1/6 of the proposed development's boundaries are contiguous to existing urban development within either the City or unincorporated Larimer County within the Urban Growth Area. D. Section 2.3.2 (H)(4) — Master Street Plan and Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards — Please explain how the ODP does/does not conform to the Master Street Plan requirements and the street pattern/connectivity standards both within and adjacent to the boundaries of the plan. Please note and identify adjacent and internal streets shown on the Master Street Plan and designation. There are four specific requirements that must be met to meet the ODP criteria: 1) Section 3.6.3 (C) Spacing of Full Movement Collector and Local Street Intersections With Arterial Streets. 3 1) Mountain Vista Subarea Plan a. The proposed CDP complies with the adopted Mountain Vista Subarea Plan for the LMN District including residential uses, neighborhood center, neighborhood park, street classifications, and trail location. 2) Neighborhood Center a. The central location of the neighborhood center works well with the surrounding LMN residential areas and proximity to the bike/greenway. b. The applicant needs to add one more use to the required minimum of two uses for the neighborhood center. The private neighborhood recreation center satisfies 1 use. The Neighborhood Park meets the requirements of the public gathering space, but not an additional use. 3) Existing Farm Cluster a. The existing farm related buildings are currently being assessed by the Landmark Preservation Society for eligibility. These buildings are located within the proposed LMN residential area and not part of a neighborhood center. An alternative approach could include this farm cluster as an additional neighborhood center, to include non-residential uses for community facilities. b. The main farmhouse and the remaining buildings could be located on a separate lot and will be included in the calculation of density for LMN requirements. The remaining farm accessory areas could be designated as open space and netted out the density calculations with LMN requirements per LUC Section 3.8.18. This would provide for long-term maintenance of the house and grounds as an option. However, the neighborhood center component of the LMN zone requiring a minimum of two uses will still need to be met with the overall development plan and subsequent project development plans. 4) Diagonal Bikeway a. The north terminal end the proposed bike trail will need to be coordinated with the final trail segment located within the Richards Lake PUD Project to the north west and any future development directly north. b. The Mountain Vista Principles and Policies ( MV-T-1, MV-NOL 1.2, 1.3.) support the described greenway and bike trail system which is off-street, to the extent possible. The trail design should incorporate underpasses at primary street crossings. These facilities will need to be coordinated with Park Planning and Stormwater Utilities and any Ditch Companies. Q. Current Planning Department; provides the following- 1) Prior to formal re -submittal, it is pertinent that City staff meets with you and your team to discuss potential issues as they relate to the Land Use Code, the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan criteria and standards. The Land Use Code requires Gillespie Farm CDP tie in with the surrounding area as a whole (east, west, north and south) including interconnecting direct vehicular and pedestrian ways with the Lind Property CDP to the north. 2) The plan needs to include reference to an Index of Drawings on the first plan sheet page. 3) The plan shall include an area beyond the property lines of the proposal showing the area and uses within one hundred fifty feet (five hundred (500') feet if natural areas are in the vicinity) of the proposal, exclusive of public right-of-way, at the same scale of the underlying proposal as required by the City of Fort Collins Development Manual. The plan shall show the following: a. Land uses, location of principal structures and major existing landscape features. b. Densities of residential uses. c. Natural features of the landscape. E Comm ity Planning and Environmenta. srvices Current Planning City of Fort Collins October 5, 2000 The Nineteenth Green Partnership C/O Parmer A. Gillespie Jr. 6373 South Grape Court Littleton, CO 80121 RE: Overall Development Plan — Gillespie Farm — First Filing Comments Dear Mr. Gillespie: This letter is in response to plans for Gillespie Farm Overall Development Plan (Current Planning File #29- 00) submitted on September 27, 2000. Please note that staff reviewed your plans and the Current Planning Department mailed request for comments to several public agencies and departments. This development proposal is subject to and shall comply with all requirements set forth in the City's Land Use Code (LUC), specifically: Articles 2. Administration (Development Review Procedures); Article 3. General Development Standards; Article 4. [Zoning] Districts; the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan; and, the City of Fort Collins Development Manual. The City of Fort Collins Land Use Code (LUC) requires that throughout all land use proceedings, the burden to comply with all applicable standards rest with the applicant. Staff, after reviewing materials submitted by the applicant, finds that revisions/re-design to the submitted plans dated 08/29/00 are warranted to meet the Land Use Code, the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan, and the City of Fort Collins Development Manual. The following lists the agencies and departments that responded: A. Stormwater Utility; B. Engineering; C. Transportation Planning; D. Engineering Pavement; E. Post Office; F. AT&T Digital; G. Park Planning; H. Zoning; I. Streets; J. Light &Power; K. Poudre Fire Authority; L. Water/Wastewater; M. Building Inspection; N. Forestry; 0. Natural Resources; P. Advance Planning; provides the following- 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020 -�4 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: Traffic Ops PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference Ile,' A"` S/rG G 7 14 e we s /e e 0,✓o1ca,C (/./v.Hef AE 4,t) '�✓/I/ imu-/Crsc<�,n-s/. C G/ /GcJr GcJ r� �`i c deL/utlgr /.dtr 7U xA/ - n / ° ! �// s.1ra-r�u✓p�:^--r Sr.-cc-ts �,"`- f Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fart Collins Current Planning DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: Adv. Planning PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference lyti GV I Gv �1 Gig Signature CHECK HEREOU WISH TO RECEIVE C PIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other _Utility _Redline Utility - andscape City of of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannine DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: Natural Resources PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II — (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference • The entire Overall Development Plan site should be evaluated for natural habitats and features. This should be accomplished through an Ecological Characterization Study. • All natural habitats and features and general buffers surrounding these habitats and features must be shown on the O.D.P. • Surrounding neighbors have contacted the Natural Resources Department about the #8 ditch serving as a wildlife movement corridor. If the Ecological Characterization Study determines that the ditch is serving as a wildlife movement corridor the connections shown to the east will need to be reevaluated. Date: 9/2y/DO CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH CEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat Site o .D. • _ Drainage Repo Other J5a, 41 _ Utility _ e Utility _ Lankape b �E'� °� t of Fort Collins DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: Forestry PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received -by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference �_) O Cow <�" .- �_ Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility Redline Utility _Landscape City ofCity F sv PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fott Collins Current Plannine DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: Building Insp. PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference Please find attached the various codes that the Fort Collins Building Department will enforce. With limited information, compliance to the current Building Codes will be enforced at time of submittal. Date: 09/19/00 Plans Analyst Rick Lee RECEIVED SEP 18 9nnn CURRENT PLANNING CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site Drainage Report _Other gami Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannine DATE: August 31, 2000 TO: Water/Wastewater PROJECT: #29-00 Gillespie Farm ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 27, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference -;doe, r;0 4� Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site . Utility _Redline Utility Drainage Report _Other. Landscape City of Fort Collins