Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPRING CREEK FARMS NORTH SECOND FILING - FDP - FDP120005 - CORRESPONDENCE -Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington(a0cgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: See redlined utility plans for other comments. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 07/3012012 07130/2012: Add a note on Sheet L-5 outlining required separation distances from water and sewer lines. Adjust trees and shrubs to provide these separation distances. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416.2313, nbeals(@,fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/31/2012: Sheet L6 should be removed. Reminder All signs and their locations are not / approved in the FDP process. Approval for signs and their locations are approved through a ^ -5 0-5 separate sign permit. �_` �� . Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07I3112012 Cd 07/31/2012: Detention Native Seed Mix needs approval from the Environmental Planner Q Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/31/2012: Zoning did not receive any elevations they need to be included with the FPD. The elevation Drawings should include Mechanical/Utility Equipment locations with a note on how they will be screened/painted. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/31/2012: Was the modification request submitted and approved concerning the parking standards? If so a note on the plans should reference the Modification approval. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/3112012 07/3112012: Accessibility parking shall be designated by a sign. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221.6854, rbuffinotonofcoov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: Consider serving Bldg 2.1 and Bldg 2.2 from the water main in Charles Brockman or from mains in Joseph Allen and the N/S drive. This would save over 500 feet of 8" water main. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: There are labels or text boxes covering water/sewer lines in several locations on the plans. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 07/3012012 07/3012012: Fire line valves shall NOT have locking lids. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/3012012: Call out/label curb stops. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: Add manholes at the end of sewer stubs west of Joseph Allen. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: label drop manhole connections and add drop manhole detail. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 07130/2012 07/30/2012: Show storm crossings on sanitary sewer profiles. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: Why is the sanitary sewer between MH3 and MH7 so deep? Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: Add steel casings on water mains and sanitary sewers at all locations where these pipes are crossing below storm drains 24" or larger. Include the casing diameter and thickness. Show casings on overall utility plan and all sanitary and storm plan and profile sheets. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: Add steel casings on water mains and sanitary sewers at all locations where these pipes are crossing below storm drains 24" or larger. Include the casing diameter and thickness. Show casings on overall utility plan and all sanitary and storm plan and profile sheets. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: The fire line sizing needs to be finalized prior to signing mylars. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/3012012: Joint encasement or wrapping on storm drains greater than 15' is at joints only. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/3012012: Show all service lines and fire lines on the sanitary and storm plan and profile sheets. 6+ku'? Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, icountv&.fcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: There are 2 line over text issues on sheet SP.2. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970.221-6820, wstanford(&fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comme Originated: 07/31I2012 07 1 012: i of re c i Utility Pla . able to v ify if previou com ents er ad r ss Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221.6854, rbuffington(afcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/3012012 07/30/2012: As noted during PDP, schedule a joint meeting with PFA and myself to discuss number and placement of hydrants and the locations of the4 FDC's. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: Label the tees for fire hydrants as swivel tees. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: Valving in table on lower left of sheet C.14 does not always correspond to plan view. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: Development Construction Standards require thrust blocks at certain locations. Label/note thrust blocks on C.14. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 0713012012 07/30/2012: Water services must be the same size as the meter to a point 5 feet downstream of the meter pit. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 0713012012: Move gas lies or meter pits to avoid having the gas line between the curb stops and meter pits. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 0713012012: Are all the water services 2"? Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/3012012: HDPE (DR9 with stiffeners at compression fittings) can be used for 1%" and 2" water services from the water main through the meter pit. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, Icounty(a),fcgov.com Topic: Plat Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/0112012: Please correct note #7 on sheet 1. This should be Ou0ot A. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: Why is the west line of Ou0ot A, Spring Creek Farms North not shown on this plat? It is the basis of bearings, and is lied to in the legal description. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08101/2012 08/0112012: Please spell out SCFN in the ROW dedication notes and all other notes on sheet 2. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: Building Envelopes A & 5 need another tie to locate them. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08101/2012: Please add dimensions for the Emergency Access Easement where shown. See redlines. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: Please change the chord bearing for the curve at the southeast comer of the boundary. It does not match the legal description or the Spring Creek Farms North plat. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: Please add a curve # to the curve on building envelope L. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: There are 2 lines on building envelope L that need line data. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 O8/0112012: Please hatch the utility easement to be vacated on Joseph Allen Drive. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 08101/2012 08/01/2012: What are the 2 dashed lines near the northwest corner of the boundary. See redlines. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08101/2012: There are text over text issues on sheet 2. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 08/O1/2012 O8/01/2012: Please add EAE Emergency Access Easement to the legend. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 08101/2012 08101/2012: Please correct the spelling of North along the north side of Charles Brockman Drive. See redlines. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: Please consider adding a light hatch for the emergency access easement. It would make the viewability of the plat much better. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: Please change the sheet numbering. c Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountv(glfcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 22 08101/2012: The sheet title shown on sheet A-9 & A-1 does not match. Comment Number: 23 08101/2012: There is a text over text issue on sheet A-10. Comment Number: 24 08/01/2012: Where did the addresses on sheet A-12 come from? Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 Comment Originated: 08/0112012 Comment Originated: 08/O1/2012 Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: There are line over text issues on sheets C.3, C.14 - C.21, C.25, C.26, C.28, C.29 & C-001. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: There are text over text issues on sheets C.10, C.12, C.13, C.25, C.26. Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: Please correct the sheet title on sheet C.21 & C.30. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: Please add a north arrow to sheet C.28. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 O8/0112012: Please correct the detail on sheet C.42. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 08/0112012 08/0112012: There are many line over text -issues on sheets L-1, L-2, L-3, L-4, L-6, 1-1. 1-2 & 1-3. Comment Number: 21 08/01/2012: Please correct the title of sheet L-3. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 08101/2012 08/01/2012: We were not routed these plans. If these plans are to be filed, we will need to review them prior to mylar. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 O8/O1/2012: The legal description closes. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/0112012: The boundary on sheet 2 is missing curve data. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08101/2012 0810112012: The area shown in the legal description is the same as the area of Lot 1 shown on sheet 2. Please show the total boundary area. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wlamargue(a�fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: The detention pond needs to meet the Landscape standards. The grading looks changed since the last PDP submital and the natural features look to have been reduced significantly. This issue needs to be discussed. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/3012012: The pond spillway needs to be better defined and labeled on the detailed grading plan with spot elevations. Please better describe in the text of the drainage report how the flow will spill east onto Timberline Road. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: Please provide street calculations for the private streets. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: Please calculate the c-factor and percent impervious for the entire site including off -site arterial streets. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: Please remove Basin 2 from the detention pond release calculations since this basin is not draining to the pond. This will reduce the pond release to 8.20 cis. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: In several location, the HGL is very close to the manhole lids and the EGL may be higher than the lid. These lids need to be locking. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: The run-down located at Timberline and Drake needs to be designed per the , Urban Drainage Manual. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 07130/2012 07/3012012: Riprap details need to be included in'the plan set. Temporary erosion control is also needed until vegetation matures. City required the riprap to be buried. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: Please provide a pond summary table on the drainage plan. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 0713012012 07130/2012: The SWMM model has 19.42 acres instead of 19,52, Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/3012012: Please include the HGLs for all the storm lines. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 0713012012: No Landscape Plan was received. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, Icounty(a)_fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416.2283, clevingston(o)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/30/2012: Megan Harrity, with the Ladmer County Assessor's Office, commented that a portion of land on Joseph Allen Drive, is still owned by SC Residential LLC, parcel number 87194-23.002. In April deeds of conveyance were recieved, except the above mentioned portion. This is after the deed made the changes and all of Lot 1 came under DTMF Investments (everything except Joseph Allen Drive). Megan Harrity can be contacted at 970-498-7065 or mharrity@larimer.org Contact: Don Kapperman, , Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/06/2012: Any relocation of Comcast utilities is at developers expense. Additionally, Comcast currently has plant on west side of Timberline and on south side of Charles Brockman Drive. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416.2418, wlamargue(dfcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: 1. Please meet the require criteria in the Erosion Control Report, section 3.3 in the submitted drainage report has not met the report requirements. 2. Straw Bails are no longer a valid BMP in Fort Collins, please use a different and adequate BMP. 3. On the Initial Erosion Control Sheet, the water lines do not need to be shown, and the perimeter protection needs to be addressed. 4. On all three sequences of the Erosion Control Plan VTC needs to span the whole access points, not just half. (Also double check the dimensions, they look off.) Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/3012012 07/30/2012: The detention pond has slopes of 3:1 all around the perimeter. The minimum slope is 4:1. Please revise. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/30/2012 07/30/2012: The water quality capture volume is required to be in addition to the quantity detention. This would make the total required detention around 4.6 acre feet. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970.221.6361, tbuchanan(a.fcaov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/31/2012: There are a couple of gaps in the row of street trees along Joseph Allan Drive that could receive street trees. It appears that an additional street tree could be added along Charles Brockman close to Timberline. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/31/2012: Green Ash is a still used as a street tree at different location on the project so they should be changed to a species on the City Street Tree list such as Bur Oak and/or Honey locust. Lindens are now used as street trees but we ask that they not be planted along arterials due to road salt issues. Using Catalpa for the two lindens on Drake would address this. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 07/3112012 07/31/2012: Is it possible to use additional conifer trees along the buildings that front on Timberline and Drake? A greater mix of deciduous and conifer forms could be beneficial in these areas. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/31/2012: Street trees would be required between sidewalk and curb along Timberline. Is the water line prohibiting planting street trees in this section to meet the required separation distance? Are there any alternative options? A possible alternative would be to see if some ornamental trees could be planted in the parkway. Project Planner would first need to review this with the Utility to see if this was even possible. If street trees cannot be placed in their standard location then try to maximize tree planting in the area between the building and sidewalk along Timberline. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970.224.6152, dmartine(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/1312012 07/13/2012: Paper copies or a pdf of the recorded plat and the final utility plan will need to be provided to Light & Power Engineering (Doug Martine). Also, after the utility/site plan is complete and approved, an AutoCad drawing to the plan needs to be sent to Terry Cox (TCOX@FCGOV.COM). No further comments. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416.2283, clevingston@fcgov.com Topic: General Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slancienberger(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Number: 54 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 0712712012: In addition to the utility easement along the west side of Joseph Allen that is identified on the plat to be dedicated by separate document, easements by separate document also need to be dedicated for the stormdrainage pipes and ponds, the water and sewer stubs that extend west past the row and for the grading along Drake and any grading that may need to be done west of Joseph Allen Drive row that is outside of the utility and drainage easements that need to be dedicated. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 07/2712012 0712712012: These easements are still needed and have not been shown on the plat or the plat. Because this property is no longer included in the boundary of the plat these easements will need to be dedicated by separate document. There is a processing fee of $250 plus recording fees for each easement to be dedicated. Due to the boundary change the project will have a credit on the fees I have not had a chance to calculate what that is yet, but do not pay for the easement dedications until I can get that calculated. 05/10/12: Per the utility plans drainage easements are still needed on the east side of Joseph Allen and are not yet being shown. 02/2812012: At the northwest comer of East Drake Road and Joseph Allen Drive where the drainage pipes extend into Outlot A a drainage easement(s) are needed. Number: 18 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: 02/28/2012: If Poudre Fire Authority requires the private drives to be named, those names will also need to be placed on the plat with private drive or street like private drive in parenthesis after. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970.221.6361, tbuchanan(agfcov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/3112012: For City street trees between the sidewalk and curb the City Forester asks that Bur Oak be used in place of English Oak. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/31/2012: Sensation Maple should be listed with Shade trees and specified as 2.0-inch caliper. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/3112012: Frontier Elm has experienced some cold hardiness problems in Fort Collins. Designers are often using Accolade Elm when one of the new elms is used. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/3112012 07/31/2012: White Fir often does not do well in the high clay soils on the east side of Fort Collins. Fat Albert Blue Spruce would be a good substitute. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221.6573, slangenberger(Mcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 72 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/2712012: Intersection details. For the Timberline Driveway. With this detail it looks like all the drainage from Timberline is going to be coming in this driveway across the sidewalk. Is that the intent? If so the drainage needs to be brought into the site using sidewalk culvert not in the driveway over the sidewalk. If that is not the intent then just make sure that a pan is clearly shown on the crosee section of the driveway that you provide. Since this will not match the standard section shown on the driveway cut a section is needed to show what the grades are and how this works. Comment Number: 73 Comment Originated: 07/2712012 07/2712012: Intersection details. For the Joseph Allen/ Drake intersection. Additional elevations are needed, the transition point (distance and elevation is needed) and additional information on the changes at the center of the road are needed. Comment Number: 74 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/2712012: Additional details are needed for the median work. #703 for the curb type and then 704-13, 705, or 705a as appropriate. Comment Number: 75 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/2712012: The Drake Road plan by Aspen. In addition to the comments already noted that also apply to this sheet. This sheet is not correctly showing the removal of the median in the roadway. Comment Number: 76 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: The connection is shown on the UP as the permanent sidewalk, but is labeled as temporary asphaslt sidewalk on the site plan. It can be either, just make sure the plans match. 5/10/12: This connection is now being shown as a detached asphalt path. With final plans we will need to see the tie in point shown as well. 02/28/2012: An off site pedestrian connection is needed to connect this site to the Power Trail. This connection can be a temporary asphalt path or can be the concrete sidewalk built in the ultimate location. If it is to be built in the ultimate location the design for Drake will need to be done to verify location and elevations. Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/2712012: 07/27/12: The radii on the entrances are shown larger than allowed. The radii need to be in accordance with table 8-2. Which identifies a4t radius on the driveways off of W S r Joseph Allen and 2W'W for the entrance off of Timberline. 02/2812012: Provide 15' radiuses on approaches to driveways along Joseph Allen and min. 20' radiuses on approaches to the driveway along Timberline Road. Comment Number: 53 Comment Originated: 0712712012 0712712012: Garage 1 based on the building envelope on the plat is not within the building envelope (guessing either the envelope or the garage location changed at some point). This also means that as shown the water main runs through the building envelope and is not within an easement. V Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970.221.6573, slanclenberger(dUcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 65 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: Will need to add a note to the Drake Road plan and profile sheet regarding the existing water service to the median, what needs to be done with that and how. I have sent an email to Parks to find out what this note should say. Obviously the note will be different depending on if there is any landscaping or not to remain, so if you could let me know the plan that would be great. omment Number: 66 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: Please label the limits of the concrete at the Drake/ Timberline intersection. If it is not right at the PC where you are tying in it will impact the tie in and pavement patch. Comment Number: 67 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 0712712012: For the left turn lane and the right turn lane I need the taper length and storage/ bay length labeled so I can check the design. It looks like you may have intended to do this on the cross section sheet, but the numbers are too small for me to read. Comment Number: 66 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: Drake Road Cross sections. Need to provide elevations for the flowlines (medians and edges) and existing and proposed slopes on all sections. As part of the cross section review I am going to be looking at is what the overall x-section will be when the street is milled and overlayed and we ideally get one slope from median or crown to gutter. Without knowing what the elevations of these points are and doing the manual calculations I can not fully determine that. Comment Number: 69 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: Drake Road Cross sections. Whey doesn't this stationing match the design stationing? All three plans have different stationing. This makes it incredibly difficult to compare things between sheets. It all needs to be the same stationing or at least if not numbered the same start at the same point. Comment Number: 70 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: Drake Road Cross Sections. I know that you are two different firms doing the design, but I need to see the north flowline and curb location on these cross sections. As much as I can match things up the slopes shown on the cross sections do not always seem to match those shown on the north drake curb plan by Aspen Eng. Comment Number: 71 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: Intersection details. For the Loop Drive details. The grades shown are okay provided you realize that these driveways will need to be built per drawing 707 and the maximum slope across the walk area is 1:48 and it will work with the elevation points you have provided. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Shed Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenbergerOfcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 55 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: Please place the couple of notes I added on the grading plan indicating what sidewalk is to be built with this plan. I think I know what you are intending to do, but these notes will help to make it clear what the intent is. Comment Number: 56 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: For the stormline that will run under the future extension of Charles Bookman Drive please show the planned roadway elevations so I can verify that minimum cover is being provided. I assume that the prior project showed a preliminary design for this extension - that can be used, you do not need to design the road. Comment Number: 57 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: Please provide the existing slopes that are being tied into for the extension of Joseph Allen Drive. Comment Number: 56 Comment Originated: 07/2712012 07/2712012: Need to identify the location of the Loop Drives on Joseph Allen Drive. You can id the centerline and label the width of the drives or sta each side of the drive. Either works. Comment Number: 59 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/2712012: Showing a curb return grade that doesn' meet minimum grade at Drake/ Joseph Allen. The profiles and intersection detail also do not match. Comment Number: 60 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: Need to provide a detail for the changes to the east median that you are proposing. How are you proposing this to be done? Will want enough of the section replaced that it is a solid mass. Comment Number: 61 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/2712012: Where is the existing crown line in Drake? Does it change with the removal of the median and/ or with the change to the east median nose? Please show and label it on the plans. Also provide a centerline profile for the area where you are removing the median. Comment Number: 62 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/2712012: Add the street cut note to the Drake Road plan and profile plan. Comment Number: 63 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/2712012: The limited pavement patch you are showing for the median removal maybe possible if the contractor is really careful) and doesn't have any edges that break or ravel. It is quite possible that the patch will have to go out to the middle of the lane. At the west end you will have a patch out to the middle of the adjacent lane since the minimum patch width is 6 feet. Comment Number: 64 Comment Originated: 07127/2012 07/2712012: Need a detail for how you are going to end the west median. What are you proposing to do? Is there any landscaping that will be left? The landscape plan does not show this area. Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970-416-2283, clevingston(gfcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 0712112012: There is a change in the number of exterior parking stalls. Where did that parking space go? Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/3112012: Although this plan meets the standard in terms of bike parking, it is relatively underserved as compaired with recent similar development proposals in the area. That being said, after speaking with Ron Gonzales with Poudre Fire Authority and our Chief Building Official, Mike Gebo, we see no reason not to allow additional bike parking spaces in racks under the open stairs. Please detail this on the plans and update the plans accordingly (zoning inspections) if the applicant desires. Comment Number. 4 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/31/2012: Please add the residential units/ rooms in the mixed use building to the parking data table on the site plan. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221.6573, slangenberger(a)fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: 1 think that there might be just one of these, but it is not labeled and a similar looking mark is shown on Joseph Allen right behind the inlet, but that doesn't make sense as a sidewalk chase. 02/28/2012: Need to show proposed sidewalk chases out to existing and proposed streets. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07127/2012: 07127/12: Unless there is several feet of extra width on the existing bike lane the cut and match line for the curb along Drake will need to be the stripe between the bike lane and the travel lane. I spoke to Rob Mosbey, Engineering Project Manager who along with the Engineering Inspector who will make the decision regarding the limits of patching briefly about this. And the bike lane line seems to be the edge for the patch. If you have questions about the patching limits I would ask that you talk to him since he will be the decision maker on this in the field. 02/2812012: Drake Road design; See standards for saw cutting existing asphalt; sawcut at lane line or center of a travel lane. Two foot from the existing edge of asphalt isn't adequate unless it happens to fall along the existing lane line. Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 07/27/2012 07/27/2012: The storm drain in Joseph Allen Drive does not appear to have adequate cover at the low point in the street. A minimum of 3 feet from top of pipe to top of asphalt is needed to meet minimum cover requirements. 02/28/2012: Drake Road design; When cross sections are provided you will need to show the storm drain pipe elevations and the cover over it. Need to verify it meets minimum cover requirements. Comment Number: 52 Comment Originated: 07/2712012 07/27/2012: Please see the couple of comments on the general notes. Fort Collins � August 01, 2012 Chris Laplante McWhinney 2725 ROCKY MOUNTAIN AVE #200 Loveland, CO 80537 ®RAr RE: Spring Creek Farms North Second Filing, FDP120005, Round Number 1 Community Development and Neighborhood services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970,224. 6134 - tax fcgov com/developmentreview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Courtney Levingston, at 970-416-2283 or clevingston@fcgov,com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416.2283, clevinaston(a)_fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/31/2012: Please include heights on final elevation plans. Per the Land Use Code, building height is measured from average finished ground level to the highest pioint of the roof structure (not the eave). Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/01/2012: Along Drake some of the street trees are at 50 foot spacing. Add ornamental trees 15 feet from the lights and adjust spacing down between trees to around 30-35 feet between trees along Drake. Ornamental trees should not be used in the site distance triangle. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/01/2012 08/0112012: Green Ash is not on the City of Fort Collins street tree list, but can be planted on the private property portion of the project. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/31/2012 07/2112012: On page SP-1 (site plan) the first note should be "Medium Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood District" additionally, on the signature block, the Community Development and Neighborhood Services Director signs off as opposed to the Current Planning Director.