Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAMENDED CSURF CENTRE FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY - ODP - MJA110001 - CORRESPONDENCE - CORRESPONDENCE-HEARING (10)Page 2 of 2 From: Karen Cumbo Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:59 PM To: 'lliley@lilleyrogersmartell.com' Subject: FW: Concerns Regarding Council Appeal Decision Lucia,, Here are the two communications with Sarah that I am aware of Karen Karen Cumbo Director, Planning Development and Transportation City of Fort Collins 970-221-6287 From: Sarah Burnett [mailto:sarahmburnett@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 8:39 AM To: Darin Atteberry Cc: Karen Cumbo; Steve Roy Subject: FW: Concerns Regarding Council Appeal Decision I'm sorry we weren't able to connect on Friday. Attached is a letter outlining the concerns. I hope you are able to share the contents with the Council's leadership team. From: sarahmburnett@hotmail.com To: datteberry@fcgov.com; kcumbo@fcgov.com Subject: Concerns Regarding Council Appeal Decision Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:33:10 -0600 Darin and Karen, I would like to meet as soon as possible with either or both of you regarding the City Council's ruling on the ODP and PDP appeal last Tuesday. I would be available to explain those concerns at your convenience. I would also be interested to learn of the process from this point onward (e.g., what are the steps and how long do they take?). Sarah Burnett. 219-6679 8/31 /2011 Page 1 of 2 Steve Olt From: Lucia A. Liley [Ililey@lileyrogersmartell.com] Sent:, Tuesday, August 30, 2011 7:36 PM To: Karen Cumbo Cc: Steve Roy; Paul Eckman; Ted Shepard; Steve Olt; Janelle P. Kechter; linda.ripley@ripleydesigninc.com; Nick Haws; Ted Rollins (twr@txgcapital.com); Mike Hartnett (MSH@campuscrest.com); Joshua C. Liley Subject: RE: Concerns Regarding Council Appeal Decision Everyone, I only accidentally discovered today this effort, ongoing since last Friday, to apparently try to reopen the hearings on the ODP and POP based upon nothing more than the opponents' disagreement with the appeal decisions, all of which they had the opportunity to fully air at the appeal hearings. The opponents' disagreement may have been expressed to Council members, but we know that it has been expressed to City staff. What could possibly be the justification for, at a very minimum, not informing the applicant, whose project is at stake, of the conversations and potential impact on the vote to approve the resolutions? If the situation were reversed, can you even imagine a situation in which the neighborhood opponents would be kept in the dark about a challenge to these decisions and without any opportunity to respond in advance? The email from Sarah Burnett asks that the letter outlining their concerns (which we have not yet even received) be sent to the Council's leadership team. I would like to know if that has happened. I would also like to know if any of the opponents' written communications have been given to Council. Finally, I would ask that we be given the same opportunity as project opponents to talk with Karen, Steve Olt, Ted Shephard and a representative of the City Attorney's Office about the issues the opponents' have raised so that there is some semblance of a level playing field moving into next Tuesday. Thanks. Lucia From: Polly Bennett [mailto:PBennett@fcgov.com] On Behalf Of Karen Cumbo Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 2:24 PM To: Lucia A. Liley Subject: FW: Concerns Regarding Council Appeal Decision Lucia — She had two ' 1" s in Liley after the @ Polly- 8/31/2011