HomeMy WebLinkAboutAMENDED CSURF CENTRE FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY - ODP - MJA110001 - LEGAL DOCS - LEGAL DOCUMENTSPassed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this 6th
day of September, A.D. 2011.
ATTEST:
OF FOl?T
•,.....,..�+0
SE
City Clerk `�� i
RESOLUTION 2011-078
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING THE APPEAL OF THE
JUNE 16, 2011, PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD APPROVAL OF
THE AMENDED CSURF CENTRE FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, on June 16, 2011, the Planning and Zoning Board (the `Board") approved an
Amended Overall Development Plan for the CSURF Centre for Advanced Technology (the
"Amended ODP"); and
WHEREAS, on June 30, 2011-, a Notice of Appeal of such decision of the Board was filed
in the Office of the City Clerk by representatives of Windtrail on Spring Creek Homeowners'
Association, Sundering Townhomes Homeowners' Association, Hill Pond on Spring Creek
Homeowners' Association, Hill Pond Condominium Homeowners' Association, and Windtrail
Townhomes Homeowners' Association, alleging that the Board had improperly interpreted and
applied relevant portions of the Land Use Code; and
WHEREAS, on August 23, 2011, after notice given in accordance with Chapter 2, Article
II, Division 3, of the City Code, the City Council considered said appeal, reviewed the record on
appeal, heard presentations by parties in interest to the appeal, and, after discussion, upheld the
decision of the Board approving the Amended ODP; and
WHEREAS, City Code Section 2-56(e) provides that no later than the date of its next regular
meeting after the hearing on an appeal, the City Council shall adopt, by resolution, findings of fact
in support of its decision on the appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS that, pursuant to Section 2-56(e) of the City Code, the City Council hereby makes the
following findings of fact and conclusions:
That the grounds for appeal as stated in the Notice of Appeal conform to the
requirements of Section 2-48 of the City Code.
2. That, .in reaching its decision to approved the Amended ODP, the Board
properly interpreted and applied the relevant provisions of the Land Use
Code, and that said decision is hereby upheld.