HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE GROVE AT FORT COLLINS - FDP - FDP110015 - CORRESPONDENCE - (48)�._._ WJNPTRAIL Ot�
r w.--f§PRING`CREEK
___
• � w
MMN i
�\ n
_r$
f i a(i
--------------
L
N,..✓ gyp♦ /A
C ft.,UE BE
w nesmexnu
THE GARDENS
ON SPRING
CREEK
�N uwnn+nrvenu�°u;
/ CSURF
PROPERTY
i
i
THE GROVE
AT FORT COLLINS
FlWLLC LOGMEMFVN
LEGEND
'•'�'
rcaa.:
�.
mumreau.r¢mrl.urr
+a
me
w r w
rwarun.cspm
NOTES.µ4
FW
eeN:
l.'1B' POOL FENCE
SITE PLAN
oswroxuxwx.
ttwc r-w•-o'
7 OF 23
No Text
CSURF PROPERTY
NOTES
THE GROVE
AT FORT COLLINS
FW4 O ILOPMENT PV
�I
FCP
SrFE PLAN
5 OF 23
LEGEND
_ ®
me ersuu
,:Y.S
unwn®
�
w�w¢rt ��ueaem.�muea�L
uvxxa�nnusam[
❑
vnunu®mwnw[WF.cwasp
f3
aamwml
t40iES
nmv�.uwo aarw. m�'wva
THE GROVE
AT FORT COLLINS
FINK MELgT1ENi Pl
FOP I
ms®n�T�I
4 OF 23 j
on
LEGEND
w.vg.a.c.era
�YH _ onn¢ars«rrt
Si' 1
1
l - o
'rr
� s tlQTES:
__-___ _..
THE GROVE
AT FORT COLUNS
M OEVELCN WM
�I
cw
SITE PLAN
3 of 23
m�wiibnEw®mAraiml/Wn�ME\ MXsu1MX
THE GROVE
AT FORT COLLINS
rwnaeE.aP.Exrww
NRCWR WOI/➢O
C
Y i ',.gyp rcnmx.
���;E PUMP AND FI%.IT�TATIONPUMP AND FIbIT STATION �n
K }RUEhb tRl
W EF4
OVERALL SITE PLAN I
2 OF 23
1 '26 nsecp mgT
gro
e
THE GROVE AT FORT COLLINS
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH, RANGE 69 WEST
OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO
NC
RL
�. E
G SITE
C W
y
co E W
,.«►s C7
w VEl. W
HOSP. J
y 0
NC, NC U
DROAD
d R ,,rm.4 F IN
SChL ,e MI.
THE GROVE
AT FORT COLLINS
FIWLOEV WWENIPU
FW
SITE PLAN
1 of 23
• Page 1 of 1
Steve Olt
From:
Lindsay Ex
Sent:
Tuesday, December 06, 2011 8:22 AM
To:
'Sarah Burnett'
Cc: Steve Olt; Poncelow, Stacy - SSC
Subject: Fence design at the Grove
Attachments: SITE PLANS.pdf
Good morning Sarah,
As you've seen in the resubmitted final plans for the Grove, the applicant has provided an alternative
fence design to the originally approved design during the PDP process. This new fence is an ornamental
wire fence, whereas the old fence was a metal picket fence. Based on Council's requirement to ban pets
from the Grove property and the neighbors concerns regarding wildlife corridors being diminished as a
result of the fence, staff tried to work with the applicant to select a different design that increased wildlife
connectivity on the site.
From discussions with the applicants and several neighbors, many felt that a wood -based fence would not
be compatible with the project's modern architecture. However, this revised design (see attached .pdf
document, page 2 of the pdf), in staffs opinion, is less desirable than the originally approved metal picket
fence. Based on a brief discussion with the applicant yesterday, staff is now trying to work with Campus
Crest and their consultants to modify the originally proposed, metal picket fence from 6' in height down to
4' in height. This would provide a fence that is compatible with the site's architecture, still provides a
significant discouragement to residents and passers-by to enter into the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone,
while increasing the ability of wildlife to jump over the fence as needed.
I appreciate all the feedback you and your neighbors have provided on this issue, and hope that we are
reaching a resolution as to what the best fence is for this project. I'll plan on seeing you tomorrow, where I
expect more details will be provided on the fence type.
Please let me know if you have any additional thoughts and forward this on to others as you see fit.
Thanks again!
Lindsay
Lindsay Ex
Environmental Planner
CDNS I City of Fort Collins
lex@fcgov.com
970.224.6143
Office Hours: M 8-5; T-Th 8-12
12/6/2011