HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE GROVE AT FORT COLLINS - FDP - FDP110015 - CORRESPONDENCE - (55)1 � I
�_ AAAp
GILCMIAD WAY
Tcmp Fence 6=Alvt
slope establishment and
J
CENTRE FOR I
ADVANCED TECHNOLOCy 'I
:.fITR
v
_mod %!/!!(f((!//�. 1 S' +���= /////�/4.44./MTVn1l%"✓l'�i
f Nd
r` E
Y,
zr n
_ RILL D ROAD
V n// - - ya/yMLlllta a L`"LJ eT
xE'iilt'�(i0'F�'durmg mass grading, _ .'�7 . _ id- .. `UL .RPw 3a
1
61A
Q L C
STORM
MWNT
I IMMEIrIIIIIIIIII
'4'7i Y'aar
QE-SE10R1(lll , ;
Temp Fence duriag mass grading. --
slope establishment, utilij }
infristtucture installation & canal relocation. /"
13 Every 100' in this area,
a fence panel will be
raised I' off ground.
A ,l AglpD E NOTED Twl Yr ERO9W CW,Ra hY . CIAT AS A PEEISIE
IAOAIp)IRL NNl Rr EWER. d1 oMER ufA9q[s, wr E ML655YY r0 wsOE
. T[ MYACItlI SMOG YD/d W.. Q ESr NYASpBXr AIIATLSB V.)
1 BAd BNtllc P.1p IB RAEIIIID TR40Wr OpXST11KTfN. W 1111E BNALL
IS ENCESR6 AWInWAL YD/W DIRRE I ®/Pp LRPI DWdR PRGRA., )EPICTDD
RiawRREEO.1 AUTHORIPETSMIKIION ou mWwplO m2 CWwnas a AS
SdRF/li E µLA4a 10 ERJSS Rs WIVE SMFMUIS,
AL
fYEuxc RA�FAMUD's s BE LBCATEO Ar LLAST PIE NVNORF➢ (IW) FEE) 1.
A
BµD WELTING rINTAOCWTAINA. RE
B. MIS SAp3W EWMUL PLAN IS S.WiklL W N.NE. AS BOCK, ORAPNILAL S`AR.S
WA,, 1. IWL IANA9BODY
AREA MUSJ EAETSt
�TWAREA THAT
MAY NET BE rB S44E, NOR ARE MEY NEQSSAAA1.. IN WIIR ENAC1 LR.TPI.
w1 NOT L. NUR AI. lD PECRY RM, ESP, RW Pr, did BE WA& I[0 ROD A
OEGr, Aim RI W WMNAOE WA1
c. ra cWsi SNUL RE R "WREMERE ra ALL Ndi RsM .,Am ..AWE
.. ETC.) AM COMRIµQ BIM ddN1WW AOMWIES. II BIwL E ME
L CW. ... w6rz s1lNIGE MWASTERs) AND ABRR. SA R.n. W1M
YEISWE. ARE MOPEIDLWP ,=µD FpLOBCU. REWI RI i0 Y.IA4C ENO91w [W INQ
( �� m ce ORANADE AI SANf'f E6FEOST BEETBW A
D. CWWACRfl ."'L RI TNC APVRroR1AIT EROgW cwMP WASH S
CWTAAWAI AREA DR. ILL .1 . N .Is 10 pECR FLW .QP RGN
S OR BE WABNEO w,o A RED, a WATER, ARMAND M DRAINAGE WAr WYPSTQT.
ECOIgPG ,E ME CdI WJn0N SEWDWRI AND LEKL Df Es S,IAIuzFnW.
Au BE IDEATE➢ W FUT, BINDS GROPy, AND Cw1MRNI LN IP SIV,LL E
nNEO DUM.
E' ' DRAINS,
TNEWS
SwALMESM, MO""AIINNMENGAVGANs IINiiA SITE 11. 1O'. SIA8 uim
C0WWJcnW .TAPNO IS CENCRAur EIRI M =DR W ,RMT A MIS INCLUDES
I.AXN_
NNF PRORCnW BNA t RE .O,Vm. Y WSE.r, To ME GMpWNPnO BOXFAQ
N ING S
IME AND LYIpI. 0e.. ERAS-PRKM idiE FW SAW SPL WING BASS ER
TELPPTYr �L STOPIPIL� MATEDAL STERAGE EWSMOCWN MABFP., WRISICAS.
WIABLE TESTS LTC OVER IV. sNAu E IMNE .. Alq M.VNrAIIIID
PMKL SOLNS A. PAAW., EIL,I
ALCWPNWr IM S.NO EYRRE NEI AND ADAPTED A. xECESSYr AS CPI.1wICMw
MWB9ES µD/R OCCVS IN OREN LTIMWS.
G CDiidd IN I. MRSERNE FOR STAERWC ALL YVFS. PYI� y YdS, S.Rdi
M. I I DBAR, 0.CNNG, AYOgo NM1PNIW PA64w En RMIpY. AND.,
O ADDITWA, TREB W ET RENEW AN' E WEES'NRr 10 ESTA815X KET.IIK
L M LdMACIOR AMO ALL 9NBWNMACICM RRL CDYMAR MM O[ Utt'S
CLNSWLEDER M.9EC1. By QAyIG ERERAWAS READ INGS YE IX "'Too"WER
ARE STAMMEE NNE.EA
WMJrI RD PNEATE RL.P. WMWI S, MILx, w E INSI'I NIEN. IS NAZYDWS
TD ME PUBLIC NEALT AND WELFYE.
Temp Fence AFTER mass gi duig,.
N
slope establishment, utility.') r
infrastructure installation &canal
NI
II
1
II
III
ADIFAAM
i
T31CRAR/Wl
?2RD PrLAG
Temp Fence AFTER mass grading.
I
slope establishment and utility
infrastructure mu,tllationq "
1 n
STORM THE CARDE'NS
\\
DRAIN N OR SPRIND
-
CREEE
_ cam
( Y
WATER
v
NATHRAL
RESIXI%-E
RESEAWH
CENTER
LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT NOTES:
EEA m B.-Rs fcA AroRsCTW WRNG LDN.,Ruc,wx. AS alzn.wm w ME L.
sod,VBGFK-
DE LE 1.). 1 . RIDD IIW LF'AMEE EBP®M n 9W¢LTpl6
1EA(01) RNRWGN (1) Ww E fcuDRED.
R 1NL LBRM OF UEKL0WW1 M WROl A p.. BE NEA. OR ME READ 'MDR
W-NSABILTY GPIBMULTW BARRIER FENPNO ADMIRED BITl SILT KNEW, SAID
DELINEASM BI WTAT A IN AU BE IN CIXIFPwYLE AIM ERGBW GWMP NOR
AS W WIT, LEE,
m. MW 0. WAS K WI.T A DESIGNATED As thYLPY. uwtt E D1.19 i'
WALL E IWRD Ix BE, ANDpM.TW l0 TA FIgyERT.", EARd. BAR, ARE.
ALL BE LDKRW Wm S.WN ii ANIL IN . AND M.C. NM
CWSIR . END"T MEANS MILE W. M us K2f.nW wTNx RWLYM1
uwTS GF (WARDI WE YEAS AIAI W. PESTERED m A EDxwnw I.A.TO SIR
1WN M.T Aid N Ex51Ln RdiW TO LWSMucnW. BEE ME D9PtlEyBQg
AsWoAIES, AIL FM .DBInCNAI. wrfNlunnM. Br RED. EA
r. ME LAPIS E DCW.W ENT IN TRACT A ARE APPDOSMAIT Al MIS WE. AM
REM( 1 THE NINwuN ANnavARD IsSNEED ARE. sLWLO AODIT.1 AEA P
. A E OTIIIS) ... GPISRdWU. I W STACNIS. RYPW. 1 M
MARAI s.. AW ME MINE, WE WITS Q OEREL ENT AY E ADJRRp
ALWIN AM PRDPER LNma OA CWMQ AE.AIES DR. E IELENENIAD.
r. 'WEE SBASWI EWS.AARS (1.. .1. AIXNER ARE WIDER NE IMSI wx9T
AEW WNT "EOINC OERRWW. GISRWRED AREAS wLL E MEAIED WM WRPI A.
PEKNTAIXIERR W EATER PARWIYK4p1 S PROO W ERGCPIMME W SM
ERERDEA
ruunu,.NPw w+wNcxNren W
eoLGP.m
wax E belMP.
�. t:BlF belo�e yaA tlFiBi
NORTH
®
g
IW O W WDI..L
ED
I i IN FEET 111.
LEGEND:
BERE -.,:-
PREADDEMKTxD D BRI
SSW,
,WNsEED
RERmEI sraP wlEr �
W`t
..
vRIXDYD LpITpIR
fr
CASTMC CDNTLR :In}
.S
roogD sxlE
RADWSED 1,RB N wrnT
RRINRTI E.IRA I
PEOESWAR A=oIS RAYS SIR
W .
P.zL
YPRopMAa B. W DEHLLMNE.,-------------
SASWL IUD K EPA
Lew»LAN BANDAN,
EASTAS RI FL000.1
EusnxL fcvrOs ..�.'_
'gl/2]�12.'
srr.IE W.mE DAE
vDNa.E mAalxc SEA l P..
z =
BLi TEx4 O
Q 1
LLI on
PLµIEU wNRY PRDRCTM O
Y
Z W l
SmuEW TIY
O
»LE,..CD. O
Z
Zw
wA,1Q nmAUArw (suwlwl. ERASE) O
CWLER WASNWT AREA �
Y�
GENERAL NOTES:
S..
WE. ,rPL-A. L... Al NXCWI UFENDRtlNp —
GN�ES ML -w XARAR ,XM SW pl T6E DRAWx0S R
BE1ME NESPCN...1 DC ME CDXM= N YEwFV ME
ERRENLE MALL UNERSSW ND OTLITES IN Trt YEA Q TR
NEN». BEFME CWPENUNG NEW CMSMUCTW, TIE WNTLACIM
ENAI E RLBPW%LC fCP LWATND 4L NMMRYd1N0 xTIATL9
AM SNALL BE REEPWABIE FW ALL DwwDWN IwCERURWND
N
R
A
nulrc.
q
z E»D9W LONDW.. P»IL,IES Brz AND... w0 E.ED IATW
E,NWS DR.F .an EWJnCwS.
��•
a'-
S. 4F I/.MDYYE EWS M MDIWCM4..A. w
SE[OI�IGM/�NMG. SiEIEFRD91W FAB111L/BLAXN[,5.
SIRE NTON. N RW AK AND DMEN TERRI AID PEWARENT
.. YE Di S A.IIn 0, T¢ uND use Lace . ALL4WYE USES
I�
N,AN ME'NA,WAL NADIATE WIER zDNE- BE)'(A To
v`Y'WPWExM Br DwIEr QswNIw:Fin YPnI . . W
fin
gR
,
P<
a
€<
wfcmT"
iAn
See FROSpI L W B ASSAdxD
ON I D . IA
9D9(w Cp11RQ xorzs W SIIQ1 C$$. AS 1FLL As aTY9 W
DI
[EI ¢y
Z
Q
J
d
J
O
�a
�c 0
z
0
V/
City of Fort Collins, Colorado
UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL
LLJ
AA.MD -City "EnBI'nwry
cdeclD'n By
own or y
LELNEn DY.
LaRmwefef L Ll)' Mle-
CNL 0
..ED.. BE...
,PAI.E..:n
P64
Usets
Page 3 of 3
CHRIS RUSS
Vice President Land Development Entitlement
Campus Crest Development 1 2100 Rexford Road #414 1 Charlotte, NC 28211
O: 704.496.2528 1 NYSE: CCG
chris.russ(a)camouscrest.com I www.camouscrest.com
2/21/2012
Page ? of')
movement of the area's species can be applied to reduce the impacts of this fencing?
2. 1 concur with Marc regarding including the final exhibit in the DCP.
Let me know how you would like to proceed. I am in the office the rest of the afternoon and would be happy to
coordinate a conference call amongst all of our parties to facilitate this discussion.
Thank you,
Lindsay
970.224.6143
From: Chris Russ[mailto:chris.russ@campuscrest.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 11:05 AM
To: Lindsay Ex
Subject: The Grove Temp Fence...
Lindsay:
To better clarify, I have attached a picture of the temp fence (screening will be added). We can utilize this
example type of fence using the'feet' you see in the sensitive areas along the natural buffer area. That way we
avoid ground penetration and more earth disturbance. In the exhibit attached, you'll see the initial proposed fence
line and then the secondary fence line after the boundary slope and utility work is complete. We estimate this
being done over the next 3-4 months. I'm further proposing at your request that we raise one panel (-8' long) one
foot in the air every 100' in the highlighted areas, which I think match up with the areas you requested.
Give me a call to discuss once you receive. Thanks
CAMPUS(MCREST
So.aarvr
2/21/2012
Page 1 of 3
Steve Olt
From:
Lindsay Ex
Sent:
Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:53 PM
To:
'Chris Russ'
Cc: Brian Varrella; Marc Virata; Steve Olt
Subject: RE: The Grove Temp Fence...
Chris,
Staff has reviewed the graphic that you sent along this morning. We offer the following comments:
Engineering (Marc Virata, 970.221.6567; mvirata@fcgov.com)
1. From an Engineering perspective, this fencing that occurs within Tract A that then abuts Centre
Avenue should be situated such that the fence has some separation from the public sidewalk along
Centre Avenue; 2 feet is what we typically try to achieve. Absent of an explanation from Campus
Crest that documents constraints and/or needs, the fence should be indicated as having a 2 foot
offset from the back of sidewalk along Centre Avenue. The intent of fences not being up against
the sidewalk is to reduce ped/bike friction with such a barrier.
2. The fence drawing and exhibit that is being discussed should be included as an exhibit to the
Development Construction Permit, so staff can ensure compliance throughout the construction
process.
Floodplain staff (Brian Varrella, 970.416.2217, bvarrella@fcgov.com)
1. It is unclear where the fence is located as it relates to the floodway boundary. It actually looks like
the fencing is supposed to follow the floodway boundary. Based on this document, I cannot discern
whether the fence is in or out of the floodway. Campus Crest needs to send
evidence to Stormwater that the fence will not be in the floodway, and identify what methods their
company will use to self -police the boundary. Once these methods are established,
please document them in a letter and have your engineer stamp the letter. Unless the letter is in
hand, Floodplain Administration will have to treat this case as fencing in the floodway subject
to Chapter 10 standards of City Code. The letter shall also be included in the DCP.
Environmental Staff (Lindsay Ex, 970.224.6143, lex@fcgov.com)
1. This morning, during our discussion, you indicated that the fencing would be completely contained
within the approved Limits of Development. When I view this graphic, I see two key concerns:
a. On the north side of this project, the temporary fencing locations will place a fence in a
wetland and will allow for vehicles to traverse over top of wetlands for a significant duration.
As per the Utility Plans, tracking mats will need to be placed on top of any area surveyed as
a wetland and will need to remain in place for as long as the temporary fence is located over
the wetlands. Also, as we discussed, the entire southern boundary of the wetlands should
be flagged/staked with ribbon to indicate where the temporary encroachments are/are not
occurring
b. On the south side of the project, the LOD is essentially synonymous with the south property
boundary. As per the graphic that was sent earlier, the fencing extends further south to
encompass the entire canal relocation project. While this fencing location is off -site, and the
canal relocation is not regulated by our Land Use Code, the wildlife corridor that was
established in the planning process is regulated. Contrary to what we discussed this
morning, the east -west corridors on this portion of the project are now planned to be
completely blocked. This leads to several more questions such as how will the equipment
move across the existing canal, what tree protection standards will be put in place, etc?
While staff is pleased to see the elevation of a number of sections of the chain -link fence to
accommodate near ground wildlife movement, the blocking off of the east -west wildlife
corridor has never been discussed. Perhaps we need to establish a definitive timeline for
how long this area will be blocked off, and what mitigation efforts to ameliorate the
2/21/2012