HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE GROVE AT FORT COLLINS - PDP - 16-10B - CORRESPONDENCE - (58)Page 2 of 2
building facades are not reflected on this graphic, however, the building footprints, scale, placement and
heights are accurate. The graphic will be updated with the new fagade treatment for the open hose
planned for this Wednesday, April 27th.
>
>
> 3. Your current position on the legitamacy of the current pdp and odp given Mr. Eckman's most recent
legal advice on the matter.
> City staffs position on the legitimacy of the current The Grove at Fort Collins, PDP and the Amended
CSURF Centre for
> Advanced Technology, ODP is that both PDP and the ODP currently in the City's development review
process are valid as
> they relate to the General Procedural Requirements set forth in Division 2.1 and the Common
Development Review Procedures
> for Development Applications set forth in Division 2.2 of the Land Use Code. As such, staff may
continue to review both
> development requests and schedule them for the required Planning & Zoning Board public hearing(s)
at such time they
> are considered to be ready for deliberation and decisions.
> Kevin Barrier
4/28/2011
Page 1 of 2
Steve Olt
From:. Kevin Barrier [kevin@kevinbarrier.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 4:18 PM
To: Steve Olt
Cc: Richard Thomas; Paul Eckman; Ted Shepard; Karen Cumbo; Sarah Burnett
Subject: RE: The Grove
Thank you Steve. I appreciate your time.
Kevin Barrier
On Apr 28, 2011 4:14 PM, "Steve Olt" <SOLT@fcgo_v_.com> wrote:
> Kevin, -
> Staff responses are below, following each of your requests. Hopefully these responses satisfy your
requests.
> Steve Olt
> City's Project Planner
> 970-221-6341
> solt a,fcgov.com<mailto:soltCwfcQov.com>
> From: Kevin Barrier[mailto:kevinrakevinbarrâ–º_er_co_.m]
> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 6:34 PM
> To: Steve Olt; Paul Eckman; Sarah Burnett; Richard Thomas
> Subject: The Grove
>
> Steve,
> A while back I asked to be forwarded relevant new documents, and communication between staff and
the grove / ripley. Could you provide that please? Currently I'd specifically like to request:
> 1. The staff comments that were supposed to have come out on Friday.
> The staff comment letter dated April 22, 2011 is attached to this e-mail.
> 2. The schematic drawings that Linda thought had been submitted with the revised PDP submittal, but
no one at the City seemed to have seen, and wasn't with the files that the City posted.
> Attached is the schematic drawing provided to me by Linda Ripley on April 25, 2011 with the
)following additional information from Ms. Ripley:
> The cross-section illustrating how the buildings are oriented on the site is attached. The updated
4/28/2011