Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREMINGTON ROW (ANNEX) - PDP - PDP110017 - CORRESPONDENCE - (7)Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbealsa(7fcoov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 12/28/2012 02105/2013: On the illustration of Wall Plane Al the required setback states 57. Can you revise it to the required 6' and then send back the revision in a PDF 12/28/2012: LUC 4.9(D)(6)(d) The required side setbacks is an additional 1 foot for every additional 2 foot or fraction thereof of wall. On the Figure 1 of the modification request to this section the North elevation drawing states the following: Wall Plane A3 required setback = 12' 3" should be 13' Wall Plane A2 setback required = 10' 4.5" should be 11' Wall Plane Al setback required = 62" should be 6' South Elevation drawing states the following: Wall Plane C3 setback required=14'7.5" should be 15' Wall Plane C2 setback required=11'4.5" should be Wall Plane C1 setback required = 77.5" should be Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, icountvClgfcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 02/04/2013 02/04/2013: There are misspelled words (existing) on sheet PDP2. See redlines. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221.6820, wstanford( fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01 /0812013 0110812013: Site has been redesigned to a lower number of units. No issues with the changes or the reduced expected traffic volumes. TIS for the previously higher density proposal is acceptable for this redesign. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact Roger Buffington, 970.221.6854, rbuffington(cMgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 10 02/05/2013: No comments. Comment Number: 10 02/05/2013: No comments. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970.416-2313, Topic: General Comment Number: 7 12/2812012: See note #22 Below Comment Originated: 02/05/2013 Comment Originated: 02/05/2013 Comment Originated: 12/27/2011 1212712011: 4.9(D)(6)(d) 5ft side setback required if wall height is 18ft. If greater then 18ft there is an additional foot setback for every 2ft or fraction thereof in height. Wall heights on both sides exceed 18ft. The building wall height is approximately 33ft on each side both the north and south therefore the building should be setback 13ft from each side property line. The side setback is based on the vertical wall height. An eave does not serve to reduce the height of the wall. The setback modification request is based on eave height, rather than the wall height, and therefore the request is not accurate. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/27/2011 12/28/2012: See note # 23 below r 12/27/2011: 3.2.2(L)(1) Table A Two-way drive aisle width is 24ft, One-way drive aisle width is 20ft required. The drive aisles are 20ft in width which is inadequate for the two-way. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wlamarguecDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/05/2013 02/0512013: The landscape design and the design of the front yard water quality ponds require coordination to ensure all goals are being met. The water quality ponds require certain ground coverings for operation and maintenance. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/05/2013 02/05/2013: Stormwater is ready for a hearing. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, icounty(cDfcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 01108/2013 02104/2013: There is a new line over text issue on sheet PDP3. 01/08/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet PDP-3 & PDP-4. Please mask all text in the hatching on sheet PDP-4. Comment Number: 34 �,� Comment Originated: 02104/2013 02104/2013: There was no sheet PDP5 included in bur review set, Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 01/0312012 0210512013: There are still line over text issues o ets EX01 & GR01. 01/0812013: There are still line over text issues on sheets EX01, GR01 & RD01. 01/03/2012: There are line ovV on sheets 6 & 7. Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 02/0512013 02105/2013: Please show the drainage easement lines along Remington Street on sheet DR01. Comment Number: 37 Comment Originated: 0210512013 02/0512013: There is cut off text on sheet GR01. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 02104/2013 02/04/2013: There was no sheet PM1 included in our review set. Comment Number: 38 Comment Originated: 02/05/2013 02/05/2013: If Lighting Plans are being filed with this project, the detail & specification sheets provided should be shown on a 24"x36" plan sheet. Topic: Plat Comment Number. 1 02104/2013: The boundary & legal description close. 01/08/2013: The boundary & legal description close. 01/03/2012: The boundary & legal close. Topic: Site Plan Comment Originated: 01103/2012 Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970.224.6152, dmartine(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/28/2013 01128/2013: The developer will need to coordinate electric meter locations and Light & Power charges with Light & Power Engineering (970)221-6700. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Don Kapperman, , Topic: Easements Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12129/2011 12/29/2011: Comcast will require a 6' utility easement in alley. Additionally, 5' easement is needed to feed 121 East Laurel Street and any relocation is at owners expense. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970.416.2869, Ilynxwiler(a)poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 07 Comment Originated: 01/10/2013 01/10/2013: A NFPS 13R fire sprinkler system shallbe provided for all three of the proposed buildings. Contact: Ron Gonzales, 970.416.2864, rgonzalesepoudre-fire.org Topic: General4 Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/2812011 12/28/2011: The fire departm nnect shall be on the building and on the street side of the building. All buildings served prinkler systems shall have a fire department connection. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wlamargue(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01103/2012 02/05/2013: Reminder for final. 01/03/2012: At final the details of the detention pond design can be discussed including the freeboard, orifice and emergency spillway designs, etc. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/08/2013 02105/2013: Reminder for final. 01108/2013: The freeboard for the ponds should be measured from the top of the water surface elevation in the spill condition. This may be close to the F.F. elevation of the buildings. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/1112013 02/05/2013: Reminder for final 01/11/2013: A drainage easement is required for the limits of the detention and water quality areas. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221.6361, tuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/09/2013 01/0912013: Different than previously communicated to the applicant the two existing Siberian Elms along Remington are to be retained for now. The City Forestry Division will manage these two trees under our street tree management program to provide pruning and replacement as needed within the schedule of work activities. This will result in the need to provide two more mitigation trees on -site. Comment Number: 9 01/09/2013: Please provide shrubs and locations in planting beds. Comment Number: 10 01/09/2013: Existing trees 24, 25, 26 may be off site our boundary trees. Comment Originated: 01/09/2013 Comment Originated: 01/09/2013 Department: Internal Services Contact: Russ Hovland, , Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/21/2011 12/3112012: Building code still re wires inkl room Egress windows required below 4th floor regardless offire-spri r r 12/21/2011: Building code quire a PA 13 fire sprinkler system. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 1213112012 12/31/2012: New buildings less than 0 feet from another building must provide fire -rated exterior wallstopenings. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/31/2012 12131/2012: IBC Chapter 11 and State Statute CRS 9-5 requires the project to provide accessible units Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/31/2012 12/31/2012: New Green Code Requires: -Upgraded insulation for buildings using electric heat or cooling. Low -flow watersense plumbing fixtures (toilet, faucets, shower heads) are required - Low VOC interior finishes. Please see green code compliance guide for additional requirements. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224.6152, dmartine(@fcaov.com Topic: General Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan(a),fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/06/2012 01/06/2012: Add this landscape note. "Tree removal shall be performed by a Fort Collins Licensed arborist as required by code". Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/06/2012 01106/2012: These are the mitigation numbers for the following existing trees. Numberl6-1 Number 19-1 Number 23-1 Number 24.3 Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/06/2012 01106/2012: Replace landscape note number 11 with the current code requirement for soil improvement. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/06/2012 01/06/2012: Review the positon of the south most s eet tree near the electical vault with Light and Power Departments standards. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/06/2012 01/06/2012: The tree mitigation note should b ev d eting the statement "at locations provided by the City Forester". The applicant sho i tify locations for off site mitigation trees and a proposed process these trees planted. Some city ROW sites may be available and can be review th the City Forester. Locations at Colorado State university can be explored with the Camp Landscape Architect, Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: O1/06/2012 01/06/2012:Forestry has further reviewed the use of ornamental Pears as street trees to maximize on site tree mitigation. To meet the code requirement to use canopy shade trees we explored possible canopy street trees that could be used at close spacing similar to the pears. Glenleven Linden is a narrow crown tree that can be planted at 20 feet spacing. The applicant should use Glenleven Linden or another appropriate canopy tree in place of the pears where possible to maximize on site mitigation by using a canopy street tree. Lindens would need to be planted at a minimum of around 20 foot spacing. There appears to be space for 3 lindens where the 4 pears are now used in the center of the parkway. There appears to be a possible location for a Linden at the north end and south end of the parkway where pears are shown. Contact the City Forester to review or meet on site to discuss suggested locations. Pictures and locations of Glenleven Linden are available. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221.6567, mvirataL5fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 02/06/2013 02/0612013: Please correct the reference to October 1, 2002 for the LCUASS General Notes to April 1, 2007 and verify that the notes are the updated 2007 version. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 02/06/2013 0210612013: Please correct the direction of the arrow for the typical cross section on STA 13+67.53 to 14+58.00 on Sheet RD01. Topic: General Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01104/2012 02106/2013: It appears that confirmation on any easement is only needed from Century Link. Carved over for reference. 01/09/2013: Not anticipating any concerns with the addressing of this comment. The response however indicated that the variance has been revised to reflect subsequent discussions with utilities — was an updated variance request submitted? I did not see this with the submittal. 01/04/2012: The engineering variance request for the elimination of the utility easement (8') along the alley and utility easement (16) along Remington Street is considered pending thus far. The utility coordination meeting for the project held just prior to the POP submittal seemed to indicate that City utilities (water/sewer, stormwater, light and power) did not appear to have an objection to the utility easement elimination for both the alley andoemington Street. However with external ublity providers (Comcast/Xfinity, QwesUCentury Link, and Xcel) not present, final determination hasn't been verified at this ti Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/04/2012 02106/2013: Carried over fo erence, t a ars Century Link and the engineer just need to meet. 01/09/2013: Understanding that th still be an open ended item. If communication has not been made with Century Link, I can look to contact them as well. 01/04/2012: Per the requirements in Section 3.3.2(D)(7), please ensure to coordinate the undergrounding of the existing QwesUCentury Link overhead line with the development. Absent of this, the developer must provide conduit to provide for the future undergrounding of the QwesUCentury Link overhead line. Verification on whether undergrounding is to occur with the project, or conduit is provided needs to occur prior to a hearing. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221.6361, tbuchananafcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/06/2012 01106/2012:: The large spruce tree shown to be retained on the NE part of the site is very close to the walls of the building. Construction this close to the tree could cause significant damage to the roots and crown. From the landscape plan it appears the wall is 7 feet from the outer bark of the tree. The applicant should contact the City Forester for an on site meeting to review and discuss construction impact to the tree and design options. Additional tree protection notes may be required that would be developed after the on site meeting. Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416.2283, clevingston(a)fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/06/2013 02106/2013: The code requires foundation plantings at least 5 feet wide along at least 50% of high -usage building exteriors. This would apply to the west of the building, where rock mulch is proposed. (Section 3.2.1(E)(2)(d)) At time of final we will need to see more detail regarding the shrub beds in terms of plant species and quantity. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 0210612013 02106/2013: The parking lot perimeter planters look great! I am excited about how these can really boost the appearance of the alley. Feel free to get creative and think outside of the box with the plant species selection. Overall, I am excited about progress of this development. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/22/2011 12/31/2012: At time of final, please provide bike rack detail. 12/22/2011: Please call out on your site plan the required bike parking per LUC 3.2.2(C)(4). The bicycle parking should be conveniently located entrances and need to be at least two (2) feet in width and five and one-half (5%:King th, with additional back -out or maneuvering space of at least five (5) feet. Ithk Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221 6567, mvirata fc ov m Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/04/2012 0210612013: Acknowledged response in/the comment letter. We may need to coordinate with Strormwater on the potential impacts from this additional flow to the drainage system (although per the geotech report, groundwater was found at 23 feet deep below existing grade, which would seem to indicate that consistent groundwater flows impacting the drainage system is not likely). O1/09/2013: With the understanding that the parking garage is no longer part of the project, might there be basements proposed with the project that would bring up the potential of a perimeter drain system around the foundation? 01/04/2012: Please provide information regarding what dewatering measures, if any, are intended for the project for the below ground structure. If a perimeter drain system around the foundation is proposed, indicate the location on the construction drawings and ensure that such a system is located outside of right-of-way and any utility easement. How would such a system release water, would there be eventual backlighting of flows out to the street either from a sump pump/pit or direct discharge? Show the location of any sump pit on the construction drawings to ascertain how and where any discharging of flows to the surface would drain. Ideally, flows would pass through the water quality/quantity ponds rather than directly discharge. Fort Collins February 06, 2013 Jeff Hansen Vaught Frye Larson Architects 401 Mountain Avenue Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Remington Row (formerly Remington Annex), PDP110017, Round Number 3 Community Development and Neighborhood services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6760 970.224,6134 - fax kgov.com/developmentreview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Courtney Levingston, at 970-416-2283 or clevingston@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.41 Topic: General Comment Number: 3 vy (<_` Comment Originated: 1213112012 02/06/2013: Staff has questions regaT"ding how the shadow study is depicted. The shadow study may need to be revised and resubmitted prior to hearing. 12/3112012: Please provide a shading exhibit as outlined in Section 3.2.3(D) with the resubmittal. This should show the shadow cast from a 25 foot wall on November 21 st, December 21 and Feb 21st at 9 am and 3 pm and then showing the shadow cast on to the adjacent properties by the proposed project as to verify compliance. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/06/2013 02/06/2013: On Sheet PDP2 under general site notes, note number 2 should say a Type 2 review, not a type 1. Please correct. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/31/2012 02106/2013: The parking lot perimeter planters will probably need to be drip irrigated. 12/31/2012: An irrigation plan is required prior to recording final plans (Section 3.2.2(M)(3)). Please contact Eric Olson at eolson@fcgov,com if there are any specific technical questions.