The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPROSPECT STATION - PDP - PDP130004 - CORRESPONDENCE -02/27/2013: The bicyclist on the building are considered signage. Signage is a not approved through the PDP/FP process. Signs and their locations are approved through separate sign permits. Please remove these from the elevations plans. At this time it can not be determined if the Clock on the building is considered a sign. Please provided greater detail of the clock face. If it is considered a sign the above statement applies to the clock also. 1,iii Comment Number: 2 02/27/2013: LUC 3.5.1(1) Mechanical/utility equipment conduit...) locations need to be identified on the plans w screen/painted. 1� How is the transformer screened? Can the a wall or screening fence? Comment Number: 3 02/27/2013: The bicycle parking located in required bicycle parking spaces. Comment Number: 4 t h), 02/27/2013: LUC 3.2.2(L) Ca are limited to 40% of the total will require a modification to th designated by„ajsign that they Park LUC 3.820(C) At least c or a private park that is 10, rl R), how this�baetng met, there 3: "'LightMfixtures labeled CC t Originated: 02/27/2013 , meters, boxes, such equipment is be located closer to th`elbuildinq behind iment Originated:NO2/27/2013 be used to comply with NIL Comment Originated: 02/27/2013 are only allowdfLong-term parking areas and [,area The proposed plans exceed this 40% and addition,the combact Waces will need to be Originated: 02/28/2013 f the dwellings shall be located within 1320 ft of a q ft in size and publicy accessed. Please Idenfity 1sho be two public parks near by, High School sdjo verify if they meet the standard. Comment Originated: 02/28/2013 FF are uplighting. It is unclear why the same desired not 156,,I thieved with downlighting. This may require alternative compliance for Comment"Number: 7'"' 1 Comment Originated: 02/28/2013 i111l�1, 02/28/2013: LUC 3.5.1(G) All structures over 40ft in height require a special height review that tl1 ItlI�h requires both ashadow and visual analysis (see section for details). location(s) on every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler or fire alarm system. The top shall not be higher than 6 feet above finished floor. 2006 International Fire Code 506.1 and Poudre Fire Authority Bureau Policy 88-20 Comment Number: 07 Comment Originated: 02/20/2013 02/20/2013: PREMISE IDENTIFICATION New and existing buildings shall be plainly identified. Address numbers shall be visible from AEI}, the street fronting the property, plainly visible, and posted with a minima iof six-inch numerals on a contrasting background.` ' 2006 International Fire Code 505.1 , 1 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment 03/04/2013: The site disturbs more than'10100,0 sq-ft therefo(diErosion and SedimeriF06ntrol Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion conntrr I requirements are in the '�r,1}; { ntt Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments D. Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. If you n411Jt4 need clarification concerning this section, or if there are an.y questions please contact Jesse i #k11 Schlam 970-218-2932 or emailt(a7 ischlam @fcaov.com 1 lth. Department: Transportation Planning Contact: Emma McArdle,jj, 970-224-6 Topic: GeneralANI I 3 t+Number: w11 �� Comment Originated: 03/04/2013 3: Thank you fob including a pullout as we discussed in the conceptual review for this fhe size looks Ito as we discussed: Can you please do one final verification by pullout size with atu Wing templa e�for a 40' bus at the speed of Prospect at this �cof and/or .W,ard Stanford for questions on this. Please !�ntact mysel �itltliii t mbe r:,, 2 Comment Originated: 03/04/2013 iitlltR . 3 Please include the crosswalk across Prospect for the trail on your site plan. tact: Aaron Ive'rsi Topic: General Comment t 03/06/2013: mlber: 3 Comment Originated: 03/06/2013 ?Thie TIS for Prospect Station concludes that the Pedestrian LOS cannot be kki}ui No; iteria.We will need to have more information about the specific reasons the of achieved, and what would be needed to meet the standard. The way it is provides no recommendations or mitigation. We need more information so that we camaeciae whether or not this project needs to make off -site improvements to meet the LOS standard. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416.2313, nbeals(a)fcclov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/27/2013 a Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/19/2013 02/19/2013: After the plans are final, an Autocad drawing (versiion 2008) of the utility plan will need to be sent to Terry Cox at TCOX@FCGOV.COM. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler(cDpoudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 01 02/20/2013: GROUP S-2 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throui parking garages (Group S-2 occupancy) in accordance beneath other groups. Exception: Enclosed parkng gi occupancies. r�r ( , � 2006 International Fire Code 903.2.9 & 903`:M �1 Comment Number: 02 N }I, 02/20/2013: BALCONIES AND DECKS Sprinkler protection shall be provided for exterior dwelling units where the build;ingisr,of Type V con 2006 International Fire Codef903.3.12 , Comment Number: 03�a' 02/20/2013: FIRE STANDPIPE SYSTEM Originated: 02/20/2013 paildings clas`sifi�ed as enclosed IBC 406.4 ORhere located located beneathtGrouD R3 Originated: '0490/2013 and ground floor patios of Originated: 02/20/2013 Standpipe �sy ie ',lshal be provided in ew"Uilildings"and stRuctures in accordance with Section 905,'or the 2006 nternational Fire" b e. Approved standpipe systems shall be installed �(ii4l+yt' . ` 1 ,h j throughout buildings w e��the floor level�of the highest story is located more than 30 feet above the lowest level Afire department vehicle access, or where the floor level of the lowest . , ... story�loccated morre h��a mz30 feet below theihighest level of fire department vehicle access. The standpipe ys{tem shall op able of supplying at minimum of 100 psi to the top habitable floor. An approve fire pump may bet{required to achieve this minimum pressure. I rFire Code Sections 905and 913 i Comment,Number 1 04 Comment Originated: 02/20/2013 Fire Department Connections shall be installed in accordance with NFPA standards. Fire department connections shall be located on the street side of buildings, fully visible and .Ofll recognizable fromtthe street or nearest point of fire department vehicle access. The location of .the FDC shalt be approved by the fire department. N, �`ii IN 20}06 International Fire Code 912.2 Co`mmeotiNu tuber: 05 Comment Originated: 02/20/2013 02/2012013: ROOF ACCESS New buildings four or more stories in height shall be provided with a stairway to the roof. Stairway access to the roof shall be in accordance with IFC 1009.12. Such stairways shall be marked at street and floor levels with a sign indicating that the stairway continues to the roof. 2006 International Fire Code 504.3 Comment Number: 06 Comment Originated: 02/20/2013 02/20/2013: KEY BOXES REQUIRED Poudre Fire Authority requires at least one key box ("Knox Box") to be mounted in approved Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan(cDfcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/06/2013 03/06/2013: Contact the City Forester for an on -site meeting to review existing OR and any need to provide mitigation and the need to provide identification, condition assessment and size. Comment Number: 2 j Com assessment Originated: 03/06/2013 03/06/2013: Existing trees to retain along Prospect need to be`I'� d as to species. Theccurb for the 1"s?4 i#i ` ,,, . proposed Transfort pull out appears to be (lose#town existing tree and may impact the root system. Review the curbs placement with City Forester at the on -site meeting. Department: Historical Preservation Contact: Josh Weinberg, 970-221.6206, Topic: General 11!r ", Comment Number: 1 The proposed plans appear to Prospect, that has been deten Department: Ma spatial LUC 3.4. � Comment Originated: 02/25/2013 se impact on the adjacent building, 303 West jlfv�lig� 16e for designation as a Fort Collins ?Ii ib ) I1!1; n nd south serveas a buffer between the maintains a historic view corridor, and of the historic building and surrounding area, ComM0Number'`iE1' Comment Originated: 02/19/2013 02/19/201#3# ,he bwldinkgfheight of 4 stories typically triggers the need for a fire buster pump, which will likely need 3 ph`ase power. Please coordinate power and special metering requirements #i Light & Power Engineering 970 221-6700. 4 `suu,., r 9 9 9( ) Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/19/2013 02/19/2013: jTh�e developer will need to coordinate power requirements and transformer lill{T~ ltt ocation with'Light & Power Engineering. The electric transformer pad must be a minimum of 2 �lr�rf� feet from! ny sidewalk. A Commercial Service Information (C-1) form will be needed for all non residential services. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/19/2013 02/19/2013: After the plans are final, a 1-line diagram of the electric service(s) will need to be provided to Light & Power Engineering. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/19/2013 02/19/2013: An off -site utility easement adjacent to Prospect Rd. along the front of the adjacent property to the west may be required to bring 3 phase power to the site. existing easement on lot 1. Specifically the Access and emergency access easement portions that will now have the parking and sidewalk improvements included inside of them. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 03/05/2013 03/05/2013: Sheet 4 - Provide a note at the trail crossing onto Prospect that the site contractor will need to tie to and match existing. This is due to construction occuring currently on MAX and some grades may not reflect in the field what is shown on these plans. Topic: GeneralINl '' Comment Number: 2 Coin ment Originated: 02/28/2013 ifli� 02/28/2013: A letter of understanding will be required fromthe property owners to the south AMf4t *u i stating that they are aware of the proposed portion of Tamasag easementivacation and do not 111 J. take issue to the impact on their property., "�4','., Topic: Plat it ik Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated1l3/05/2013 03/05/2013: The Mason Trail Easement vacation is cited within�the easement and dee 141411MIMN rttt*tEt �a agreement for Rec. # 20090061268. City of'F.�o ft4Collins�woulydi ike to proceed with the Modification of easement as per paragraph 10 of this `agreement, however in order to achieve the "purpose and use" of the}sement to install, perate,maintain, repair, reconstruct, replace, inspect and remove the traiii wwe will need to reser`ve`m 6portion of the easement on the west side of the trail. f, '� i�i+, Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/05/2013 03/05/2013: EasemenqN t should be inlcluded fo�dth , s£Stat o . This will be a transit ,fii1 tfflf�ff,fln �a th �ft i �t ��€ � easementiandlspeciflc�lanouaoe may needle added toitI,, blat for what is included in a Topic: R�e6"p';�d�its - Soils, Su Comment Number:. Ntlfl�+ A02/28/2013 Please iitRr�;3,�Ptti j i 11 supply a pavement proyideja copy`of soi Topic: Site PI'ant Comment Originated: 02/28/2013 ict Tome KKdo� tman�for additional information, 970-221-6576. Please for the bus stop,in Public Right of Way on Prospect. Please ement design report on next submittal to Tom Knostman. Comment'Number: 13 4fji Comment Originated: 03/06/2013 03/06/201318treet trees along Prospect need to be located so that they will work with in the "future" parkway,## A note or callout may need to be added to the landscape drawings to delineate thei�Iddation and ensure they won't need to be removed when prospect is widened. Department-IEnvir'ori"m"ental Planning Contact: Lindslay, Ex, 970-224.6143, lex(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 02/21/2013: No comments. Comment Originated: 02/21/2013 03/01/2013: Bicycle parking is meeting the standards. However the chart on pg A2 and the corresponding narrative are incorrect. The chart shows 9 2-bedroom units but there are actually 10. The narrative shows 59 total bedrooms but there are actually 69. Please correct for revisions. FYI - The most recent bicycle standards can be found at 3.2.2(CY(4). Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/01/2013 03/01/2013: Planter boxes or some landscaping at the entrance/exit required per 3.10.4(D)(c). 4 Comment Number: 3 Coma 03/01/2013:. The proximity to the Mason Trail is a little too traffic for the trail. Please provide a bit more space with atc allow for the activity from the live -work units and the retail AVIY engineering's comment regarding vacating the easement. 1. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970-221.6603, Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 '`1?t'ii:#=ay replaced and relocated to Comment Number: 4 Sheet 3 - Letter parking garage is Originated: 03/01/2013 nodate the through lard and soft scape to should correspond to Comment Originated: 03/04/2013 utilities are being removed, ;mment Originated: 03/04/2013 Ijacent property owner prior to ts, fire line, grading, etc. lieu of a letter we would Comment Originated: 03/04/2013 on the plat and and plans for the Transfort Bus Comment Originated: 03/04/2013 - Bike parking is not allowed within the public right of way. Please iinq from this sheet. Comment Originated: 03/04/2013 4 - Discussions with Transportation Staff and planning has raised concerns )se proximity to the Mason Trail for safety and maintenance. Furthermore, the public trail to be used as the access to the private property along this Comment Originated: 03/04/2013 The Mason Trail Easement vacation is cited within the easement and deed agreement for Rec. # 20090061268. City of Fort Collins would like to proceed with the Modification of easement as per paragraph 10 of this agreement, however in order to achieve the "purpose and use" of the easement to install, operate, maintain, repair, reconstruct, replace, inspect and remove the trail we will need to reserve a 6' portion of the easement on the west side of the trail. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/05/2013 03/05/2013: Sheet 3 - Some consideration should be taken into vacating portions of the M City of ; Fi;rt Collins: -1� Ro,(ES (0MN'9-JFS 12 March 06, 2013 Cathy Mathis TB Group 444 Mountain Avenue Berthoud, CO 80513 RE: Prospect Station, PDP130004, Please see the following summary of comments from submittal of the above referenced project. If-youhavi individual commenter or di�eci;your questions through sIorson@fcgov.com.A1 '1 1 `` 1141 N111i 1 Department: CuRent Plann Contact: Seth Lorrson ;kh, .9i Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentre view de`ireviewing agencies for your �anycomments, you may contact the firwh Lorson, at 970-224-6189 or riunaing tlevations Il1j1jlN N91110 Commeht Number.Comment Originated: 03/01I2013 03/01/2043.The northa. televation along the parking structure, without the 60% glazing, is required to+rriitigate with',ample, enhanced architectural features such as a change in massing N111111.�}, �r" or materials, enhanced landscaping, trellises, archades or shallow display window cases." ea;u;i (Sec. 3.10.5(G)1Itappears that this standards may be met with the proposal but it is difficult to tell how the landscaping will integrate with the building. Will trellises be included with the accent 1. K Comment Originated: 03/01/2013 03/011,2013: The south elevation is required to carry the brick base element around this side. Additionally, the upper floors have large expanses of blank stucco walls. This building face is prominent along the Mason Trail. Is there a reason for not having windows and/or balconies along the sunniest side of the building? Please provide greater architectural detail and articulation. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/01/2013