Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutODELL BREWING CO. EXPANSION - MAJOR AMEND./REPLAT - 21-08 - CORRESPONDENCE - (11)• j 0 Be sure to indicate the re -distribution of the bike racks as indicated at the project review meeting. ADDITIONAL BIKE RACKS HAVE BEEN ADDED AND DISTRIBUTED AT BOTH THE PROPOSED AND EXISTING BUILDING ENTRANCES. The west facing wall between the truck doors and the future phase two addition faces the residential zone. Please consider adding masonry wainscot and horizontal reveals to create shadowlines in order to soften the appearance of this wall. ADDITIONAL DESIGNED DETAILS HAVE BEEN ADDED ALONG WITH LANDSCAPING TO SOFTEN THE APPEARANCE OF THE WALL. The landscape feature in the walkway that connects the parking lot to the public entrance leaves only five feet per side for clear passage. Will this be enough space for bicyclists and pedestrians to maneuver? Be sure to leave sufficient space to remove a bike from the rack without blocking the walk. As is, it looks tight. ADJUSTED SOME OF THE OF THE BIKE PARKING AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE ADDITIONAL MANEUVERING. As the comments are minor, there are no redlines. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely: Ted Shepard Chief Planner Page 6 • 0 Number: 2 Created: 7/28/2008 [7/28/08] Please show dimensions of addition, note building envelope and footprint. DIMENSIONS FOR THE EXPANSION IS SHOWN WITH NOTES REGARDING THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AND FOOTPRINT. DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. Number: 3 Created: 7/28/2008 [7/28/08] Please note the building height on the elevations as well as the colors that will be used. BUILDING HEIGHT AND COLORS TO BE USED ARE INDICATED ON THE RESUBMITTED ELEVATIONS. Number: 5 Created: 7/29/2008 [7/29/08] What is the proposed surface for the truck yard/visitor parking area? Please see 3.2.2(D)(3)(C). CONCRETE AT A THICKNESS OF 8" Comments from Current Planning: The two CC light fixtures along the west property line adjoin residential properties zoned R- L, Low Density Residential. In order to avoid any light trespass, these fixtures must be equipped with the House Side Shield. A NOTE ON THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN HAS BEEN ADDED. Be sure that the three DD wall -mounted fixtures above the truck bays are described as being fully shielded. A NOTE ON THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN HAS BEEN ADDED. As an industrial building in the Industrial zone, the site is not required to have a connecting walkway between Lincoln Avenue and the public entrance. But, given the popularity of the brewery and the number of visitors arriving by bike, please investigate the feasibility of providing a walkway out to Lincoln. Perhaps the crusher fines garden path could be extended south to the edge of pavement. This would have the benefit of separating bikes and pedestrians from vehicles at the parking lot entry. A FUTURE LINCOLN AVENUE WALK CONNECTION IS SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN. FINAL ALIGNMENT TO BE CONFIRMED ON FDP AS IT RELATES TO THE AGREED UPON LINCOLN AVENEU STREET SECTION. Please label the crusher fines garden path to the Landscape Plan and to the Drainage and Grading Plans. FUTURE LINCOLN AVENUE WALK CONNECTION IS LABELED. SEE NOTE ABOVE. On sheet 2 of the Landscape Plan, be sure to update the cross-section details to reflect the higher berm as indicated at the public hearing for the setback modification. THE CROSS- SECTION DETAILS REFLECT THE BERM HEIGHT APPROVED AT THE SET BACK MODIFICAITON HEARING AND CORRESPONDS WITH THE PROPOSED GRADING PLAN. Page 5 Number: 19 Created: 8/16/2008 [8/16/08] The letter dated June 23, 2008 from David Kasprzak to Matt Delich regarding the Traffic Impact Memo Info has a statement about daily trips for truck traffic. Please clarify if that is 10 daily trips for Semi's and 10 additional daily trips for delivery trucks, or if that is 10 total trips from semi's and delivery trucks. THE TOTAL IS 10-IN AND 10-OUT DAILY TRIPS FOR BOTH SEMI -TRAILER AND DELIVERY TRUCKS. (TEN ROUND -TRIPS FOR ALL TRUCKS) Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 16 Created: 8/15/2008 [8/15/08] The release rate for the detention pond in basin B-1 includes the infiltration rate as well as the orifice release rate for the sizing of the volume required. Discussions are needed to determine if this will be allowed or if just the .29 cfs release rate from the outlet structure can be used to size the volume required in the pond. FOLLOW-UP DISCUSSIONS WITH THE STORMWATER UTILITY CONCLUDED THAT POND 1 WILL PROVIDE AS MUCH VOLUME AS POSSIBLE USING ONLY THE ORIFICE RELEASE BEFORE UTILIZING INFILTRATION RELEASE. Number: 17 Created: 8/15/2008 [8/15/08] Please clarify how the western edge of the property is to drain. A positive outfall is needed, unless other approved mitigation techniques are used like the dry well. AN INTERCEPTOR SWALE IS GRADED WITH POSITIVE DRAINGE TO A DRY WELL. Number: 18 Created: 8/15/2008 [8/15/08] A resolution needs to happen for the percent impervious ratio on the impervious pavers. We can work with Urban Drainage and find out what they use as their standard. The hydrology and pond calculations will then need to be modified to reflect the change. AS DISCUSSED IN A FOLLOW-UP MEETING WITH STORMWATER STAFF, THE UDFCD WORKSHEET FOR EFFECTIVE IMPERVIOUSNESS OF TRIBUTARY CATCHMENTS WITH POROUS PAVEMENT WILL BE USED, AND ALL SUBSEQUENT DRAINAGE COMPUTATIONS WILL BE BASED UPON ITS RESULTS. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: WaterMastewater Number: 15 Created: 8/12/2008 [8/12/08] Where will the wastewater sampling/monitoring station be located? THE WASTEWATER SAMPLING/MONITORING STATION WILL BE LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: ZONING Number: 1 Created: 7/28/2008 [7/28/08] Plant counts and types are not called out on the actual landscape plan. Please add. ADD PLANT COUNTS AND TYPES TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. Page 4 P Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Alan Rutz Topic: Light & Power Number: 7 Created: 8/12/2008 [8/12/08] Provide a Commercial C-1 form and Electric One Line Diagram. PRELIMINARY DOCUMENTS PROVIDED WITH THIS RE -SUBMITTAL. FINAL DOCUMENTS TO BE PROVIDED WITH BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. Number: 8 Created: 8/12/2008 [8/12/08] Normal site and development charges will apply to new development. ACKNOWLEDGED. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 20 Created: 8/20/2008 [8/20/08] ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY: If the testing/tap room (public use) has an occupancy load of 50 or more, it must meet requirements for an Assembly Occupancy (exiting, exit signage, emergency lighting and occupant load sign). THE TASTING/TAP ROOM COMPLIES WITH THE ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS. Number: 21 Created: 8/20/2008 [8/20/08] FIRE SPRINKLERS: Per previous discussions, the addition must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers that tie into the existing system. THE DESIGNED ADDITION IS EQUIPPED WITH AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS WHICH ARE TIED INTO THE EXISTING SYSTEM. Number: 22 Created: 8/20/2008 [8/20/08] HEIGHT: What is the maximum building height? MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 38'-6". Number: 23 Created: 8/20/2008 [8/20/08] FIRE HYDRANT: On the Project Development Plan (sheet 1 of 1), please show the fire hydrant located to the east of the site. (It is shown on the utility plan.) THE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EAST OF THE PROJECT SITE IS SHOWN AND LABELED ON THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN. Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Ward Stanford Topic: Traffic Number: 4 Created: 7/28/2008 [8/16/08] Per LCUASS policy, (Fig. 8-1, Note 1) A left turn lane into the site is required if the access (es) remain full movement. If the site is approved for the additional access, a second left turn lane or a continuous left turn lane may also be required. SUBJECT TO FURTHER DISCUSSION AS IT RELATES TO THE ANTICPATED RECLASSIFICATION OF LINCOLN AVENUE TO A 2-LANE ARTERIAL WITH CENTER LANE. Page 3 • The second is to close the existing driveway and take all access off the new driveway. Traffic Engineering would consider this option provided that the new driveway does not conflict with the existing driveway on the south side of Lincoln. If you choose to pursue this option, please show the existing driveway on the south side of Lincoln and update the variance request evaluating the separation distance and safety concerns between them in addition to the separation distance between the new driveway and Third St. Traffic will evaluate the new request and make a determination based on the new information. The third option is to take access off Buckingham to the north. This would not trigger any improvements to Buckingham itself and would only require an access easement through the northern Odell property. While none of the options discussed here are listed in any preferential order, this last option may be the better one for your clients in the long term. With all access restricted to right in, right out along Lincoln, having a second point of access to the north may be a good thing for Odell's overall circulation. It may also solve any emergency access requirements PFA might have. Speaking of PFA, please be sure to discuss emergency access requirements directly with them. I do not know what those might be and can not speak for that department. SUBJECT TO FURTHER DISCUSSION AS IT RELATES TO THE ANTICPATED RECLASSIFICATION OF LINCOLN AVENUE TO A 2-LANE ARTERIAL WITH CENTER LANE. Number: 11 Created: 8/12/2008 [8/12/08] Please provide a site and landscape plan with the next submittal. 8 SITE PLANS AND 6 LANDSCAPE PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. Number: 12 Created: 8/12/2008 [8/12/08] Please see Appendix E4 for all design requirements for the plan sets. It's not an all inclusive list of LCUASS but it's pretty close anyway. Please complete and submit E4 with the next submittal. Any items left off the plan set will become a new comment to be addressed prior to plan approval. THE APPENDIX E4 CHECKLIST WAS INCLUDED WITH THE FIRST SUBMITTAL; HOWEVER, A NEW ONE FOR THIS RE -SUBMITTAL HAS BEEN PROVIDED. Number: 13 Created: 8/12/2008 [8/12/08] Please see Appendix E6 for all scanning requirements. ACKNOWLEDGED. IT IS UNDERSTAND THAT FINAL MYLARS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL TECHNICAL SERVICES FEELS THAT SCANNING WILL NOT BE COMPROMISED. Number: 14 Created: 8/12/2008 [8112/08] The grading must be flat to nearly flat for a minimum of 2' behind the ultimate sidewalk along Lincoln. SUBJECT TO FURTHER DISCUSSION AS IT RELATES TO THE ANTICPATED RECLASSIFICATION OF LINCOLN AVENUE TO A 2-LANE ARTERIAL WITH CENTER LANE Page 2 ram= STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Cite of Fort Collins wmmb o DAVID KASPKZAK/BRUCE HENDEE BHA DESIGN INCORPORATED 1603 OAKRIDGE DRIVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 Date: 8/25/2008 Staff has reviewed your submittal for ODELL BREWING COMPANY EXPANSION -MAJOR AMEN DM ENT/RE PLAT, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: General Number: 6 Created: 8/6/2008 [8/6/08] If new trash/recycling enclosures are to be added, locate along the north elevation. NO NEW TRASH OR RECYLING ENCLOSURES ARE PROPOSED. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 9 Created: 8/12/2008 [8/12/08] This development is responsible for the design and construction of Lincoln Avenue to a 4 lane arterial as identified on the Master Street Plan plus an additional 1000' of preliminary design on either side of the property. The city would consider taking cash in lieu of actually constructing the road improvements depending on the timing of the Fort Collins Brewery development on the northwest corner of Lincoln and Lemay. It all.depends on the timing of the two projects and what makes the most sense. SUBJECT TO FURTHER DISCUSSION AS IT RELATES TO THE ANTICPATED RECLASSIFICATION OF LINCOLN AVENUE TO A 2-LANE ARTERIAL WITH CENTER LANE. Number: 10 Created: 8/12/2008 [8/12/08] The variance request for driveway spacing was denied for the following reasons... Lincoln Avenue is called out as a 4 lane arterial on the Master Street Plan and as development occurs, each property owner is responsible for the design and construction of their frontage to bring it up to standard. The ultimate cross section includes a median to restrict the left turn movements along the street making the current driveways right in, right out only in the future. In addition, we will be consolidating as many of the existing accesses as possible and will not be allowing additional drive cuts to the properties fronting Lincoln. This particular area is going through some major changes in the near future and the new developments coming in will bring more and more traffic. More traffic, bigger streets and higher traveling speeds mean a greater potential for accidents. With that said, Traffic was not inclined to grant an additional access point to this project. However, we discussed a few options that your clients may wish to explore. The first option is to take all access off the existing drive and construct a drive around the north side of the building within the proposed access easement that will connect to the new parking lot. Page 1