HomeMy WebLinkAboutBDR FOUR-PLEX, 621 S. MELDRUM ST. - PDP120030 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: The applicant's conceptual review response letter indicates that the 14' front
building setback matches the existing contextual setback. Documentation will be needed
verifying the front setback of one or both of the buildings on abutting lots.
Response: Revised
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: The parking stall depth for residential parking needs to be a minimum of 18'. This
distance can be reduced to 16' if the space overhangs a minimum 6' wide landscape area
(Sec. 3.2.2(L)(4)). The site plan shows 16' deep stalls, but doesn't dimension the width of the
landscape setback. Putting a scale on the drawing, the setback is less than 6, meaning the
stalls would need to be 18' in depth.
Response: Revised. We now have 6' landscape setback (16' stall with 2' overhang)
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: Label the surface material of the parking lot (asphalt or concrete).
Response: Labeled as asphalt
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: New 6' privacy fence is labeled along north lot line. A similar fence is required
along the south lot line for the parking area. A fence appears to be shown on the plan. Please
label the height of the fence and whether it's new or existing.
Response: Fence is now a 5' privacy fence with detail shown on sheet LS1
Department: Traffic Oper, n
Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanford@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: No additional comments.
Topic: Traffic Impact Study
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: For the record, the TIS was waived.
Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Add the curb stop and meter pit at the front of the lot preferably between the curb
and sidewalk. Get locates on gas and electric in that area and show on plans.
Response: Curb stop and meter pit added. Existing gas and electric labeled.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Revise note on tapping saddle as shown on the redlined plans.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Show a minimum of 3 feet between the domestic service and the fire line.
Response: Comment acknowledged. 3' shown between fire and domestic lines.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Peter Barnes, 970-416-2355, gbarnes@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: The wall height of the stair enclosure on the south side appears to be 215. This
requires aside setback of 7' per 4.9(D)(6)(d). The setback distance isn't shown on the site
plan, but it scales to less than 7'.
Response: Line of the required setback per 4.9(d)(6)(d) has been shown on the east and west elevations for
reference.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: label the finished grade line on the elevations.
Response: Finish grade has been noted on the elevations.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: General note #13 on the site plan needs to be removed. It doesn't apply to this
project.
Response: Deleted
Graphically it do of look like it. If It is not, show bearing & c ice to accepted corner.
Response: Comment acknowledged.A new corner was set. The old corner was removed as well as the note
referencing it.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountV@fcgov.com
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: If the Athur Ditch easement is existing, please note. If it is being dedicated by this
plat, a signature block & a signature by an appropriate Ditch Company representative is
required. The signature block must acknowledge & accept the easement dedication.
Response: Signature block added.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Are there any lienholders? If so, please add a Lienholders signature block.
Response: No lienholders.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please change "measured" to "assumed" in the Basis Of Bearings statement
(Note #1).
Response:
Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated:
12/04/2012:
Are there any easements being vacated by this plat?
Response:
No easements are being vacated.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated:
12/04/2012:
Please correct the labels to the east of the property in Block 96.
Response:
Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated:
12/04/2012:
Please add "Basis Of Bearings" to the north line of the property.
Response:
Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated:
12/04/2012:
Why is this property being replatted?
Response:
As a single instrument for multiple easement dedications.
Topic: Site Plan
12/04/2012
12/04/2012
12/04/2012
12/04/2012
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The project name does not match the Subdivision Plat. We are suggesting that the
Subdivision Plat name change, so this may need to change.
Response: Revised
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: There are line over text issues.
Response: Reviewed and revised
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The Owner's Certification of Approval shows Elizabeth And City Park Corner LLC
as the owner. Is this correct?
Response: Revised to BDR, LLC
Subdivision Plat ie change, so this may need to change.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 20
12/05/2012: There are line over text issues.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 21
12/05/2012: There is a text over text issues.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: We are suggesting that the Subdivision Plat name change, so this may need to
change.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated:
12/04/2012
12/04/2012: We would like the name to change, as a BDR is a city review process.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated:
12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The boundary and legal description close.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated:
12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The name in the Statement Of Ownership And
Subdivision does not match the
name in the title.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated:
12/04/2012
12/04/2012: All easements must be locatable.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated:
12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please provide both record and measured bearings & distances.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated:
12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please make the set & found monument symbols the same size in the legend and
on the boundary.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please add a distance to the found property corner on the west side of the alley.
See redlines.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 8
Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Is the found pin at the southeast comer of the boundary at the accepted comer?
Comment Number: mment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Is the piping that drains the roof sized for the 100-yr storm.
Response: Most of the roof drain connections were replaced with at -grade downspouts and metal sidewalk
chases that discharge into a swale. The remaining pipes are adequate for the 100-year storm.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The retaining walls look toy be in conflict with existing trees that are located on
adjacent properties and may compromise the health of these.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: A pld with an underdrain may be the best treatment for the water quality pond.
Response: Comment acknowledged. With this submittal, a traditional EDB was sized with a 12-hour drain
time (min. 0.50" dia. orifice openings).
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, LountyC�fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: We are suggesting that the Subdivision Plat name change, so this may need to
change.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: We are suggesting that the Subdivision Plat name change, so this may need to
change.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: The sub -title should match the Subdivision Plat.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: The descriptions of benchmark CSU2 on sheets C0.00 & C0.01 do not match the
published Clty of Fort Collins Vertical Control Network description.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: There are line over text issues on sheets C1.00, C2.00 & C3.00.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The project name does not match the Subdivision Plat. We are suggesting that the
Response: Comment acknowledged. The easement width was revised to 8'.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please add our standard note to the plat -"There shall be no private conditions,
covenants or restrictions that prohibit or limit the installation of resource conserving equipment
or landscaping that are allowed by Sections 12-120—12-122 of the City Code."
Response: Comment acknowledged. Note added.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
11/30/2012: No comments.
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869,
Topic: General
Comment Number: 01
Comment Originated: 11/30/2012
j lynxwiler � poudre-fire.org
Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: PREMISE IDENTIFICATION
Address numbers shall be visible from the street fronting the property, plainly visible, and
posted with a minimum of six-inch numerals on a contrasting background.
2006 International Fire Code 505.1
Response: Comment noted.
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, Ilynxwiler@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 02 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: BALCONIES AND DECKS
Sprinkler protection shall be provided for exterior balconies, decks, and ground floor patios of
dwelling units where the building is of Type V construction.
2006 International Fire Code 903.3.1.2.1
Response: Comment noted.
Comment Number: 03 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: KEY BOXES REQUIRED
Poudre Fire Authority requires at least one key box ("Knox Box") to be mounted in approved
location(s) on every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler or fire alarm system.
The top shall not be higher than 6 feet above finished floor.
2006 International Fire Code 506.1 and Poudre Fire Authority Bureau Policy 88-20
Response: Comment noted.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: There are concerns about the proposed roof drain on the south side of the
property that extends into the right-of-way and daylights into the curb and gutter. Please
provide more information about the proposed depth of this roof drain in the right-of-way or
redesign to terminate the drain at the back of sidewalk and run the water through a sidewalk
chase and channel to the curb and gutter
Response: Roof drains terminated prior to sidewalk with metal sidewalk chases added.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: You are showing approximate asphalt patching limits on sheet C1, please add our
street cut note to all sheets that show approximate patching limits.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please update General Note #5
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please revise General Note #34 to reference the City of Fort Collins
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-221-6501, tsiegmund@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Construction details were not included with this submittal
Response: Will be provided at Final design
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Proposed utility plan and profiles were not included with this submittal.
Response: Will be provided at Final design
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please add our Site Distance Easement Restrictions language to the plat- contact
me for an updated copy of this language.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Easements dedicated on the plat need to be locatable. The site distance
easement dimensions are not clear.
Response: Comment acknowledged. The easements are locatable.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Arthur Ditch representatives will need to sign the plat.
Response: Comment acknowledged. A signature block for Mark Taylor was added.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The current standard for utility easements along alleys are 8 feet wide. See
LUCASS figure 7-11 F.
Response: The .Iding elevations have been revised to men a intent of 3.5.1 (A) and (B).
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Other choices might be more appropriate than potentilla for planting in the small
bioswale along the south property line.
Response: Plantings have been revised
Department: Current Planning
Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, Lholland@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/07/2012
12/05/2012: It is difficult to tell which areas are to be mulch vs. cobble. We want to make sure
that areas surrounding drain inlets and drainage areas are cobble. The bio-swale should be
cobble as well. Perhaps areas to be cobble can be clarified with a general note. Also a
smaller sized cobble would be more appropriate.
Response: Hatches have been revised. 1.5"-3" Angular rock is now incorporated in the detention area.
Large cobble is preferred for aesthetic around the foundations and fences
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-221-6501, tiegmund@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: 3. The cross -sections provided on sheet C3 are both labeled A -A but the plan
references cross-section B-B. Also, please show the property lines in relation to the proposed
retaining walls to clarity that the walls do not encroach on the properties to the north and south.
Response: Comment acknowledged. Cross section designation updated and property line added to the
section details.
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: A temporary construction easement/agreement from the adjacent property owners
will be required for the concrete retaining wall construction on the north and south property
lines.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/0412012: Arthur Ditch representatives will need to review and sign the utility plans
Response: Comment acknowledged. A signature block for Mark Taylor (i.e., ditch representative) was
added to the plat and cover sheet.
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012-. The existing sidewalk along the frontage of the property does not currently meet
our minimum sidewalk width requirements for a residential local street. If 50 percent or more of
the existing sidewalk is removed or damaged as part of the construction of this project then a
new 4.5 foot wide sidewalk will be required with the developer responsible for the costs
associated. Please add a note referencing this to the plans.
Response: Note #13 has been added on sheet LS1. Removal noted on sheet C1.00 and proposed shown
on sheet C3.00
City of
111�f1
December 07, 2012
Cathy Mathis
The Birdsall Group
Berthoud, CO 80513
RE: Big Deal Four Plex, PDP120030, Round Number 1
Community Development and
Neighborhood services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
kgov.com/developmentreview
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your
submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the
individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Jason Holland, at 970-224-6126
or jholland@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Current Planning
Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, Iholland@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
The drive isle appears to be 23 feet wide, 24 feet is the standard dimension.
Response: Drive is 24' wide
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/07/2012
12/05/2012: A small detail, you might as well reverse the hinges on the trash side door, north
side.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/07/2012
12/05/2012: Need elevation/detail for perimeter fence and walls. The detail on the utility plans
shows a fence design that is too utilitarian, we need to see a more residential oriented design.
We are concerned about the cumulative impact of the wall / fence height and design on the
neighboring properties. We would like to see the heights minimized. Please present options
for a wall surface finish / texture that is enhanced.
Response: Priviacy fence it 5'. Detail is provided for the fence on sheet LS1
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/07/2012
12/05/2012: The building design / elevations do not meet the intent of Section 3.5.1, most
notably 3.5.1(A) and (B). Please explore and present different options and modifications to
make the design more complementary to the architectural character of the neighborhood.