HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHOICE CENTER MIXED-USE REDEVELOPMENT - FDP - FDP110002 - CORRESPONDENCE -City of
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Zoning's Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Peter Barnes
Page 15 of 15
City of
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Water -Wastewater Engineering's Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Roger Buffington
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 1 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: The water services to Building 2 (mixed -use building) are currently shown as a 3" and a 4".
It is assumed that the 4" is for the residential portion of the building. The 3" seems quite large for the
9300+/- square feet of commercial space. In addition, the total development fees (including water rights)
on a 3" commercial service are in excess of $405,000. Is the 3" the correct size?
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 2 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Clarification is needed on the labeling of the sanitary. The City has required that the line
be oversized. Since the sewer will be a re-route of an existing City trunk sewer and will extend beyond
the point needed to serve Choice Center, the City has completed the design of the sewer using the
original alignment and profile prepared by Choice Center. The portion of the sewer from the connection
to the existing City sewer up to and including MH-5 will be constructed by the developer with the City
paying oversizing. Beyond MH 5, the sewer will be constructed by the City.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 3 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: The existing 6" water main south of Stuart Street continues south through the park and will
be crossed by Storm Line "B". Add this water main to the storm plan and profile.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 4 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Show water and sewer services and fire lines in the storm drain profiles.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 5 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: On water details sheet, add a note on Water Lowering A as shown on the redlined plans.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 6 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: At all locations where the storm drains cross over water mains the storm drain joints within
10 feet of the water main must be encased or wrapped with a product equivalent to "EZ Wrap". Show
this in the storm profiles and add appropriate notes.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 7 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Move the 8" valve in Stuart as shown on the redlined utility plans.
Initial Date: 08/2612011 Issue ID: 8 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Add an 8" valve in Choice Center Drive as shown on the redlined utility plans.
Page 14 of 15
City of
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Traffic Operation's Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Ward Stanford
Initial Date: 04/22/2011 Issue ID: 204 Topic: Landscape Plans Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 04/22/2011: Traffic would like to see the 3/4 median trees placed more in the main width of the median
to give the tree more growth time, and the branches more room, before extending out into the roadway
area as they grow. This comment may be amended once I'm able to have a brief discussion with
Forestry. Expect further comments shortly to maintain or revise this comment.
Page 13 of 15
City of
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Traffic Operation's Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Ward Stanford
Initial Date: 02/23/2011 Issue ID: 197 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: 04/22/2011: Comment remains unresolved. For some reason I only received an autoturn exhibit this
submittal.
[2/23/11 ] Utility Plans - S&S Plan, sht 18, Stuart St S&S detail: move the Stop Bar to the right hand
side of the access from the parking lot. Delete the word "STOP" also. It6s an on -going maintenance
issue and not necessary since there is an R1-1 sign.
Initial Date: 02/23/2011 Issue ID: 198 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: 04/22/2011: Comment remains unresolved. For some reason I only received an autoturn exhibit this
submittal.
[2/23/11 ] Utility Plans - S&S Plan, sht 18: Remove the word "STOP" at all locations that also have an
R1-1 sign. On -going maintenance issue and unnecessary.
Initial Date: 02123/2011 Issue ID: 199 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: 04/22/2011: Comment remains unresolved. For some reason I only received an autoturn exhibit this
submittal.
[2/23/11 ] Utility Plans - S&S Plan, sht 18: Remove the R3-5R sign at the exit of Choice Center Drive
onto College. The median and the R3-1 sign give adequate info to motorists that there only option is to
the right.
Initial Date: 02/23/2011 Issue ID: 200 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 1 Status: -Active
Issue: 04/22/2011: Comment remains unresolved. For some reason I only received an autoturn exhibit this
submittal.
(2/23/11] Utility Plans - S&S Plan, sht 18: Remove the thru/right roadway stencil on Stuart at College.
Initial Date: 02/23/2011 Issue ID: 201 Topic: Traffic Impact Study Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: 04/22/2011: Comment remains unresolved. For some reason I only received an autoturn exhibit this
submittal.
[2/23/11] Please provide a copy of the most current TIS with the next submittal.
Initial Date: 02/24/2011 Issue ID: 202 Topic: Traffic Impact Study Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: 04/22/2011: Comment remains unresolved. For some reason I only received an autoturn exhibit this
submittal.
[2/24/111 A TIS memo discussing the changes from the original plan was to be provided, but was not
received. Please provide the TIS memo with the next resubmittal.
Page 12 of 15
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Technical Services's Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Jeff County
Initial Date: 04/20/2011 Issue ID: 210 Topic: Site Plan Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: The benchmark description still does not match the Plat & Utility Plans.
04/20/2011: The benchmark on sheet 1 does not match the Utility Plans and is incorrect.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 213 Topic: Plat Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Please add a note for linear measurements, per State Statute 38-51-106(I).
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 214 Topic: Plat Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Please correct the bearings in the legal description. There are boxes in place of the
seconds symbols.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 215 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/2612011: Please correct the sheet numbering on the Index of Drawings on the cover sheet.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 216 Topic: Landscape Plans Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: No comments.
Page 11 of 15
0
Ct
F8ryf ottins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Stormwater Engineering's Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Wes Lamarque
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 200 Topic: Floodplain Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Site Plan:
1. Please modify per redlines.
2. The floodplain boundary linework is illegible. Please provide adequate detail to discern between
lines and between specific flood zones in current effective and proposed conditions.
3. REPEAT COMMENT: Add standards notes identified during the review on April 21, 2011, as
follows:
• All activities in the current effective floodplain and floodway are subject to the requirements of
Chapter 10 of City Municipal Code.
• No storage of materials or equipment in the floodway before, during and after construction.
• All activities in the floodplain and floodway must be pre -approved through floodplain use permit and
no -rise certifications. No certificate of occupancy will be issued without no -rise re -certifications and
FEMA Elevation Certificates.
• Landscape changes in the floodplain and floodway must be pre -approved through floodplain use
permit and no -rise certifications.
• All proposed conditions determined by CLOMR Case number 09-08-0735R effective January 29,
2010.
• Placement of new vegetation in the floodway in a location or of a quantity or type that is determined
to likely result upon maturity in an increase in base flood elevations is prohibited. No -rise certification is
required for all site work including landscaping within the floodway.
• Add note specifying the required maintenance of the flood control channel per the CLOMR.
4. Add and label all BFEs in ft-NGVD29 and in ft-NAVD88.
5. Add and label all cross section lines.
6. Add a note specifying the irrigation requirement for TRMs.
Utility Plans:
7. Please modify per redlines.
8. REPEAT COMMENT: CLOMR work maps: remove from plan set sheets 1 through 6 of 8.
9. Grading, drainage and erosion control plans: Modify per redlines.
10. REPEAT COMMENT: Erosion control and drainage details: check riprap detail as redlined.
11. REPEAT COMMENT: Show tie in to Mason Street BRT stilling basin on plans.
Landscape Plans:
12. REPEAT COMMENT: Include irrigation where specified by CLOMR.
13. The floodplain boundary linework is illegible. Please provide adequate detail to discern between
lines and between specific flood zones in current effective and proposed conditions.
14. REPEAT COMMENTS: Add Floodplain Exhibit to landscape plans.
Page 10 of 15
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Stormwater Engineering's Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Wes Lamarque
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 196 Topic: General Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Notes, including specifications and procedures, need to be added to the storm sewer plan
and profile sheets regarding grouting of the existing storm sewer's joints. These can be obtained from
Connell Resources and need to be submitted to the City for review and comments.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 196 Topic: General Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Please add a note that the existing storm sewer is to connect to SDOS MH-1 and the MH
is to be core drilled and grouted.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 197 Topic: General Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Please provide the additional design information for the mechanical water quality device to
determine the size and percent of particle removal. (Herman Feissner is providing this by email)
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 198 Topic: General Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Please provide temporary erosion control over the topsoil for the riprap detail on sheet 35.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 199 Topic: General Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Please add a note on the erosion control plan that the PLD's and the grass buffer shall not
be constructed until the end of the site construction sequence to preserve the integrity of the water
quality feature. Any construction contamination to these features would need to be mitigated before
release of a C.O. for any structures.
Page 9 of 15
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Stormwater Engineering's Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Wes Lamarque
Initial Date: 02/17/2011 Issue ID: 179 Topic: General Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: In progress.
04/22/2011: In progress.
[2/17/11 ] Please provide easement documentation for the storm sewer located on City Parks property.
Initial Date: 02117/2011 Issue ID: 180 Topic: General Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: In progress
04/22/2011: In progress.
(2/17/11] Water draining from the south parking lot has increased the flows onto City Parks property
and written permission is required to increase these flows. City Stormwater staff can assist in acquiring
this.
Initial Date: 02/17/2011 Issue ID: 181 Topic: General Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Repeat comment.
04/22/2011: 1 could not find the cross-section. Please add it to the landscape plan and the draiange
details in the utility plan set.
[2/17/11 ] Please provide a detail (cross-section) for the grass buffer being proposed to provide water
quality mitigation for the southern parking lot.
Initial Date: 04/19/2011 Issue ID: 186 Topic: General Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Repeat per meeting on 8/26/11.
04/19/2011: More information is needed on the connection of the flood control channel with Spring
Creek. In referencing the CLOMR for the flood channel, it appears that low flows in Spring Creek will
back up into the flood channel. This will create a wetland within the flood channel. The plans also do
not show the scour protection within Spring Creek that was designed with the BRT CLOMR.
Coordination needs to take place between these two projects for a design that meets all parties design
needs and City requirements.
Initial Date: 04/19/2011 Issue ID: 187 Topic: General Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Easement documentation needed.
04/19/2011: The outfall for the proposed storm sewer still needs to be completed and agreed on by all
parties.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 193 Topic: General Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: A detail (cross-section) is needed for the double 21-inch pipes at the outfall into Spring
Creek. The wall needs to be shown and how the pipes integrate with the wall.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 194 Topic: General Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Please label public or private for all the storm sewers on the plan and profile sheets.
Normally this is done on the profiles with labeling for each pipe section between manholes.
Page 8 of 15
•
40
City of
Ford Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
PFA's Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Carle Dann
Initial Date: 02/15/2011 Issue ID: 136 Topic: General Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: PUBLIC -SAFETY RADIO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM
Where adequate radio coverage cannot be established within a building, public -safety radio amplification
systems shall be installed in the following locations:
1. New buildings greater than 50,000 SF in size or addition(s) to an existing building that cause the
building to be greater than 50,000 SF. For the purpose of this section, fire walls shall not be used to
define separate buildings.
2. All new basements greater than 10,000 SF where the designed occupant load is greater than 50,
regardless of the occupancy classification.
3. Existing buildings meeting the criteria of Items 1 and 2 of this section undergoing alterations
exceeding 50 percent of the aggregate area of the building.
Public -safety radio amplification systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with criteria
established by Poudre Fire Authority.
PFA Fire Prevention Bureau Administrative Policy 07-01
Initial Date: 04/18/2011 Issue ID: 1 Topic: General Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 04/18/2011: The Site Plan does not show/label the Emergency Access Easement; however, it does
show other easements. For consistency, please include the EAE on the Site Plan. Also, please get
with me to finalize where FIRE LANE - NO PARKING signs should be installed and to get sign
templates.
Page 7 of 15
•
0
coty of
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Light And Power's Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Doug Martine
Initial Date: 01/25/2011 Issue ID: 130 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: [1/25/11] The electric service to the existing Discount Tire store is 120/240 Volt open delta 3 phase. If
this service is relocated as shown on the utility plan, it will be 120/208 Volt wye three phase. The
developer will need to coordinate with Discount Tire to change the voltage, which may involve replacing
equipment in the building. The developer will be responsible for installation of the new electric service
from the transformer to the meter on the building.
Initial Date: 01/25/2011 Issue ID: 131 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: [1/25/11] It appears that there is only 24 Ft. between buildings 2 & 3. The plan shows 2 sewer
services, a water service, a fire water line, and an electric service in this area. Installation as well as
maintentance of these is such close proximity may be challenging or impossible. A utility coordination
meeting is encouraged before plans are finalized.
Initial Date: 01/25/2011 Issue ID: 132 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: [1/25/11] The water main in Choice Center Dr. will need to be moved a minimum of 7 Ft. to the east of
the location shown to provide space for installation of the high voltage electric system. This may result
in the necessity to relocate the sewer main. A utility coordination meeting is encouraged before plans
are finalized.
Page 6 of 15
•
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Forestry's Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Tim Buchanan
Initial Date: 04/22/2011 Issue ID: 1 Topic: Landscape Plans Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 04/22/2011:
Increase the number of mitigation trees listed in the Plant Schedule from 51-56 to correspond with the
required number in mitigation schedule.
Page 5 of 15
r"
L_..r
0
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Environmental Planning's Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Lindsay Ex
Initial Date: 04/18/2011 Issue ID: 81 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 04/18/2011: Will review this detail when it has been finalized.
[2/16/11 ] Asper Dana Leavitt's original comment, thank you for providing the profile of the storm
headwall. However, as Spring Creek is not depicted in this profile, one cannot assess the connection
between the storm outfall and the creek. Please revise this profile to illustrate Spring Creek and provide
a detail, similar to those on Sheet 14, that is a cross-section of this outfall area.
[9/23/081 have not seen utility plans, as soon as I do, I'll provide comment.
[7/29/081 Provide plan and profile of storm draim line adjacent to Spring Creek, between SDMH-OS1and
SDMH-OS2. The creek and the retaining wall are very close together, which may have impacts to the
creek.
Initial Date: 04/18/2011 Issue ID: 82 Topic: Landscape Plans Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 04/20/2011: As per the staff review discussion on 4/20/11 - please confirm that no changes to the
existing planting plan within the buffer area will take place. If changes are to take place, please send me
a copy of the revisions for review.
Page 4 of 15
0
0
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Engineering Development Reviev/s Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Marc Virata
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 199 Topic: General Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: My email of 8/19 and Walker May's response to the email illustrates several outstanding
items not related to the design drawings themselves from a process standpoint. It's critical that these
items are addressed ASAP if Capstone is needing a construction start date of early September.
Page 3 of 15
M
to
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Engineering Development Reviews Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Marc Virata
Initial Date: 02/18/2011 Issue ID: 189 Topic: General Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: The comment noted that this was previously emailed. As our email system purges
messages older than 90 days, I'm not able to find this. Can this be resent?
04/20/2011: 1 didn't come across this info, perhaps an electronic version can be provided that we can
provide a copy to CDOT?
[2/18/11 j CDOT and the City would like to see an updated traffic memo/letter with the consultant's
traffic engineer indicating what changes (if any) to the proposed land use and resulting trip generation
may have taken place between the PDP (pre -hearing) submittal and with the present final plan
submittal, and the impacts (if any) that may result.
Initial Date: 04/20/2011 Issue ID: 191 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: I'd prefer having "For Reference Only" stamped on the CLOMR sheet themselves for clarity
if these sheets need to remain in the set.
04/20/2011: The CLOMR sheets indicated for reference only, if needing to be included in the
construction plan set will require that the sheet numbering be revised to show a total sheet number
more than 29 (and the plat should be included in the total sheet number as well).
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 193 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Please expand the streets cut patching to show that with the underdrain, the street
patching is being done perpendicular to the roadway, we do not allow angled street patching.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 194 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
issue: 08/26/2011: Please use the revised metal sidewalk culvert detail provided at the 8/26 meeting.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 195 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: The construction drawings need to specify what work is intended to be done on the
existing 48" storm drain that is shown as existing but from my understanding is to be repaired/modified.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 196 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Label which storm lines are public vs. private.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 197 Topic: Plat Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: A paper copy of the plat should be provided for review with the proposed changes being
looked at.
Initial Date: 08/26/2011 Issue ID: 198 Topic: Plat Round: 2 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: The plat shows in the abbreviation legend a "PA Public Access Easement". This no longer
appears needed through the consolidation of the various easements and can be removed.
Page 2 of 15
0
C_J
City 4f
Fort Collins
Project: Choice Center Mixed -Use Redevelopment
Date: August 26, 2011
Engineering Development Reviews Unresolved Issues:
Made By: Marc Virata
Initial Date: 02MV2011 Issue ID: 150 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Please provide CDOT detail M-609-1 to the details sheet.
04/20/2011: Additional comments from CDOT are found elsewhere in my comments. Note though that
CDOT standard M-609-1 (both sheets) should be provided as a detail. Comments further herein outline
CDOT wanting to use barrier curb, this should pertain to Curb Type 2 (6" Barrier) with a variable depth as
further prescribed and dowelling to existing similar to Curb Type 4 (6" Barrier).
[2/16/11 ] CDOT M&S Standards should be provided in the construction details pertaining to the
improvements in College Avenue and referenced in the plans. The City is meeting with CDOT at our
monthly coordination meeting this Friday and may have additional comments/concems following the
Wednesday morning meeting. The following three comments are thoughts I had specific to the new
construction/reconstruction along the median in College Avenue and may be further refined pending
input from CDOT.
Initial Date: 02/16/2011 Issue ID: 152 Topic: Construction Drawings Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: The 10" depth of curb below reveal doesn't match the 12" required of CDOT and should be
indicated as 12" minimum as it will need to at least match the depth of existing curb and gutter.
04/20/2011: Feedback from CDOT indicates that they will require barrier curb (without a gutter) to
instead be installed for the new concrete ribbon median as well as the new curb for the median
porkchop. The depth of the barrier curb for the median ribbons will need to match the depth of the
surrounding existing curb and gutter and dowelled per CDOT criteria. The depth of the barrier curb for the
new median porkchop will need to be at a minimum the projected curb and gutter depth of the barrier
curb medians on either side.
[2/16/111 The apparent new concrete "ribbon" median extending the left turn stack into the site should
have additional information on sheet 15. Please indicate a flowline to flowline width of this median. If it's
intended that the existing median along the west side of College is to remain, how will the new median
transition to the existing median? It seems that the existing median no longer has the gutter at existing
finished grade due to successive overlays and the new median gutter would need to then be set below
finished grade in order to tie into existing. Please provide spot elevations along the gutter (or final
pavement grade if gutter is set below) along with cross -sections at several locations in order to
understand how drainage along the extended turn lane is intended to function.
Initial Date: 02/16/2011 ; Issue ID: 169 Topic: General Round: 1 Status: Active
Issue: 08/26/2011: Carried over as unresolved at this time.
04/20/2011: Carried over for reference. It is suggested that the plat be used to create a map type exhibit
of the various easement dedications/vacations (turning off other layers other than property boundaries)
along with an accompanying table indicating each easement along with the identified Grantor and
Grantee for each for dedications and the party consenting for vacations.
[2/16111 ] Is there a reference document already compiled that lists the various dedications and
vacations of easements that are required both onsite and offsite? It is suggested that this document be
provided for review and will then be used as a "check -off' for verification and agreement with all that all
the required approvals are obtained prior to final plan approval.
Page 1 of 15