HomeMy WebLinkAbout516 DEINES COURT, EXTRA OCCUPANCY RENTAL HOUSE - PDP - PDP120005 - CORRESPONDENCE - (31)L64 I T
nGJ.1GtlVt.� s
IaCJI(odr
5'"Lb
I'= to,
or 34,.(G I a cry
�'avl. ',LQYC
r (q n
PuU E
s
.z,
I
�
f
!e-,
' I
'ytn9� PV
(yoxYC4-
�elkbllRli
o �
I
1 /-75
2:5 / _
F-'f;5tj Wl4
Steve Olt
From: Gary Lopez
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:16 AM
To: Steve Olt
Subject: FW: 516 Deines Ct.
Attachments: Scanner. DevRev@FCgov.com_20120214_104655.pdf
Scanner.DevRev@
=Cgov.com-20120..
FYI
-----Original Message -----
From: Gary Lopez
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:22 AM
To: 'd.cook@q.com'
Cc: Peter Barnes; Polly Lauridsen; Sheri Langenberger
Subject: 516 Deines Ct.
Oops..forgot to send the attached in color!
I've looked at your plan and have redrew lines with yellow to show where the concrete
would lie. The first thing you'll note is my suggestion of beginning the width of the
driveway further to the west up to the property line. The 2' or so of grass area from the
existing driveway to the west property isn't being utilized and will place all the organic
area in the front yard to one area. On street parking would be a wash in that the extra
2' eliminated on the west side picks up 2' on the east side.
I've also created dashed line as we would prefer to see the 3rd and 4th veh. spaces
squared off at the front to keep vehicles as far way from the sidewalk as possible.
However, you would have to calculate to make sure that dashed area along with the yellow
area don't exceed more than 40% of the front yard.
I passed this by Polly Lauridsen of Code Compliance which oversees the Muni. Code section
regarding the 40% limit of parking in the front yard. She is ok with it as long as 60% is
retained of organic matter.
I still need to pass this by Engineering. Am I assuming correctly that the curbs are
roll-over curbs and no curb cuts are required?