HomeMy WebLinkAbout516 DEINES COURT, EXTRA OCCUPANCY RENTAL HOUSE - PDP - PDP120005 - CORRESPONDENCE - (51)Page 2 of 2
From: d.cook@a.com
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 2:05 PM
To: alopez@fcaov.com
Subject: 516 Deines Court
Good Afternoon -
Yesterday, I re -measured this front yard and have attached two versions of driveway expansions, with
the exact front yard measurements.
Could you please informally comment on which version zoning would prefer? I am fine with version
"A", as long as the city is ok with my new driveway being 39.3% of the front yard. Version "B" is one
less percent of the total area.
As soon as I hear from you, I will proceed with the Type 1 Hearing process.
Sincerely -
Deb Cook
2/16/2012
Page 1 of 2
Steve Olt
From:
Gary Lopez
Sent:
Thursday, February 16, 2012 4:38 PM
To:
'd.cook@q.com'
Cc:
Steve Olt
Subject: RE: 516 Deines Court
"B" as shown looked ok to me however what is easiest/safest in backing out would be my chief concern.
40% or less will work. I'll be out of the office tomorrow and of course the City is closed on Monday so if
you have add'I questions before Saturday, send them to Steve Olt. I'll be back Tuesday.
From: d.cook@q.com [mailto:d.cook@q.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 4:34 PM
To: Gary Lopez
Subject: Re: 516 Deines Court
The newly proposed driveway surrounds the original driveway, so my calculations combine the
old space with the new.
If it seems ok with you, the NE corner of the proposed driveway ("B" is slightly angled) could be
angled even more and thus be closer to 35% of the front, vs. 40%.
Thanks for your suggestions!
Deb
From: Gary Lopez
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 4:15 PM
To: mailto:d.cookft.com
Cc: Steve Olt
Subject: RE: 516 Deines Court
Deb, I believe we prefer "B". However, due to possible neighborhood opposition we believe your site plan
needs to be professionally prepared which needs to show the front of the house, property lines, organic
and paved areas, sidewalk, etc. The engineer or surveyor should do all calculations to provide the ratio
so that if your challenged as to the numbers a licensed land engineer's testimony will hold up much better
than your calculations. In addition, this should be done because of the unusually dimensioned lot. You
do understand that the max. 40% vehicle driveways include not just the newly proposed but what's
already there?
From: d.cook@q.com [mailto:d.cook@q.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 2:56 PM
To: Gary Lopez
Subject: Re: 516 Deines Court
oops — sorry — attachments now
2/16/2012